Welcome to Relevant Cash Flows!
Hello there! Welcome to one of the most important chapters in your P2 Advanced Management Accounting journey. Before we start calculating complex Net Present Values (NPV), we need to make sure we are looking at the right numbers. That is exactly what Relevant Cash Flows is all about.
Think of it like this: If you are deciding whether to buy a new car, the price of the car matters. But the money you spent on a bus pass last month? That’s gone, and it shouldn't affect your decision now. In this chapter, we will learn how to filter out the "noise" and focus only on the costs and benefits that actually change because of a decision.
Don't worry if this seems a bit abstract at first. We will break it down step-by-step with clear rules and examples. Let's dive in!
1. What Makes a Cash Flow "Relevant"?
For a cash flow to be considered relevant for a capital investment decision, it must meet three specific criteria. You can remember these using the acronym FIC:
1. Future: It must happen in the future. We cannot change the past, so past costs are irrelevant.
2. Incremental: It must be an "extra" cash flow. If the cash flow stays the same whether we accept the project or not, it’s not relevant.
3. Cash: It must be an actual movement of money. Accounting entries like depreciation are not cash flows.
Quick Review: The Relevant Flow Checklist
Ask yourself these three questions: 1. Does this happen in the future? 2. Is it a direct result of this specific decision? 3. Is it a real cash payment or receipt? If the answer to all three is YES, it’s a relevant cash flow!
2. Identifying Irrelevant Costs (The Traps to Avoid)
In your exam, you will often be given "distractor" information. Here are the most common irrelevant items you should ignore:
Sunk Costs: These are costs already incurred or money already committed (e.g., market research already paid for). Even if the project is cancelled, this money is gone. Example: Spending \$10,000 on a feasibility study last month.
\n\nCommitted Costs: These are future costs that must be paid regardless of whether the project goes ahead. Example: A legally binding lease agreement already signed for the next 5 years.
\n\nNon-Cash Items: Items like depreciation or amortization. These are accounting adjustments, not physical cash leaving the bank account.
\n\nAbsorbed Overheads: General head office costs or fixed overheads that are "allocated" to departments are usually irrelevant. Only incremental fixed overheads (extra costs specifically for the project) are relevant.
\n\nKey Takeaway: If a cost has already happened, or if it will happen no matter what you decide, leave it out of your calculations!
\n\n3. Relevant Costs of Materials
\nWhen a project requires materials, how much should we "charge" the project? It depends on whether we already have the materials in stock. Follow this logical path:
\n\nScenario A: Materials are not in stock
\nIf we don't have them, we must buy them. The relevant cost is the current purchase price (Replacement Cost).
\n\nScenario B: Materials are in stock but NOT used regularly
\nIf we have them but don't usually use them, the relevant cost is the higher of:\n1. The Net Realizable Value (NRV) (the cash we’d get if we sold them today).\n2. The Value in use (the cash they could save us elsewhere in the business).
\n\nScenario C: Materials are in stock and ARE used regularly
\nIf we use them for other jobs, taking them for this project means we have to go out and buy more to replace them. Therefore, the relevant cost is the current purchase price (Replacement Cost).
\n\nCommon Mistake: Students often want to use the "Original Purchase Price" (the price we paid 6 months ago). Never use the original price! It is a sunk cost.
\n\n4. Relevant Costs of Labor
\nLabor is often tricky because staff are usually already being paid. Use this guide to decide the relevant cost:
\n\n1. If there is spare capacity: If staff are sitting idle but still being paid, the relevant cost of using them on a new project is Zero (NIL).
\n\n2. If extra staff must be hired: The relevant cost is the actual wages paid to those new employees.
\n\n3. If staff are fully occupied (No spare capacity): If you move a worker from an existing job to the new project, you lose the profit they were generating. The relevant cost is:\n\( \text{Direct Labor Cost} + \text{Contribution Forgone (Opportunity Cost)} \)
\n\nAnalogy: Imagine you have a friend who helps you bake cakes. If they are bored and have nothing to do, asking them to help with a new order costs you nothing extra. But if they were busy making a cake for someone else that would have earned you \$20 profit, then the "cost" of moving them to your new project is their wage PLUS that \$20 you just lost.
5. Opportunity Cost: The Hidden Cost
Opportunity cost is the benefit sacrificed when one course of action is chosen over the next best alternative. It is one of the most important concepts in P2.
Did you know? Even if a project uses a building you already own, it isn't "free." The relevant cost is the rent you could have received if you had leased it to someone else instead of using it for this project.
Key Rule: Always include the "benefit given up" as a cash outflow for your project.
6. Summary Table for Quick Reference
Here is a quick cheat sheet for your final review:
Item: Depreciation
Treatment: ALWAYS IRRELEVANT (Non-cash)
Item: Market Research (Past)
Treatment: ALWAYS IRRELEVANT (Sunk cost)
Item: Interest Payments
Treatment: IRRELEVANT (Financing costs are handled by the discount rate in NPV, not the cash flows)
Item: Incremental Fixed Costs
Treatment: RELEVANT (Only the extra amount caused by the project)
Item: Opportunity Costs
Treatment: RELEVANT (The benefit forgone)
Final Encouragement
Mastering relevant cash flows is like learning the "rules of the game" for investment appraisal. Once you can confidently spot what is relevant and what isn't, the rest of the capital investment section becomes much easier. Keep practicing with different scenarios, and always ask yourself: "If I don't do this project, will this cash flow still happen?"
If the answer is "Yes," ignore it. If the answer is "No," it's relevant! You've got this!