Welcome to "Managing People"!
In this chapter, we are going to explore Approaches to Staffing. Essentially, we are looking at how a business views its employees and how it chooses to organize them. Is a worker just a number on a spreadsheet, or are they the heartbeat of the company? How a business answers that question changes everything about how they operate!
Don't worry if some of these terms seem new—we’ll break them down using simple examples and analogies you see every day.
1. Staff: An Asset or a Cost?
Every business looks at its staff in one of two ways. Think of this as the "Mindset" of the boss.
Staff as an Asset (The "Soft" Approach)
When a business treats staff as an asset, they see employees as valuable resources that help the business grow over time.
Example: A tech company like Google provides free meals and training because they want their "assets" to be happy and stay for years.
- Focus: Long-term value, training, and motivation.
- Communication: Two-way (managers listen to staff).
- Pay: Usually higher, with good benefits to keep people loyal.
Staff as a Cost (The "Hard" Approach)
When a business treats staff as a cost, they see employees as an expense that needs to be kept as low as possible to maximize profit.
Example: A fast-food chain might use zero-hour contracts and provide only the bare minimum training required by law.
- Focus: Minimizing wages and maximizing output.
- Communication: Top-down (managers tell, staff do).
- Pay: Often minimum wage, with little job security.
Quick Review: Treating staff as an asset is like owning a house (you maintain it so it gains value). Treating staff as a cost is like using a disposable battery (you use it up and replace it when it's empty).
Key Takeaway: Businesses that see staff as assets focus on motivation; those that see them as costs focus on efficiency.
2. The Flexible Workforce
Modern businesses need to be "agile." This means they need to change the size or skills of their workforce quickly. Here are the four ways they do it:
a) Multi-skilling
This means training staff to do more than one job.
Analogy: A "Swiss Army Knife" employee. If the person on the till is sick, a shelf-stacker who is multi-skilled can step in and help immediately.
b) Part-time and Temporary
Part-time staff work fewer hours than full-time. Temporary staff are on short-term contracts.
Real-world example: Supermarkets hire "seasonal" (temporary) staff in December because they are much busier at Christmas than in June.
c) Flexible Hours and Home Working
This gives staff more control over where and when they work. This is very popular now due to high-speed internet.
Benefit: It saves the business money on office space and makes employees happier (better work-life balance).
d) Outsourcing
This is when a business pays another firm to do a specific task instead of hiring their own staff to do it.
Example: A school might outsource its cleaning or catering to a specialist company like Compass Group.
Quick Tip: Remember the "Gig Economy" (like Uber or Deliveroo). These businesses rely almost entirely on a flexible workforce to keep costs low.
Key Takeaway: Flexibility helps a business manage costs and respond to changes in demand.
3. Dismissal vs. Redundancy
These two terms are often confused, but they are very different in the eyes of the law! This is a classic "trap" in exams, so pay close attention.
Dismissal (The "You're Fired" version)
Dismissal happens because of the employee's actions. Maybe they were always late, didn't do their work, or broke a major rule.
Key point: The job still exists, but the person is being replaced.
Redundancy (The "Job is Gone" version)
Redundancy happens because the business no longer needs that role.
Example: If a bank closes a physical branch because everyone is using an app, the cashiers become redundant. It’s not their fault; the job simply doesn't exist anymore.
Memory Aid:
Dismissal = Disciplinary (It's about the person).
Redundancy = Restructure (It's about the business).
Key Takeaway: Dismissal is about performance; redundancy is about business needs.
4. Employer/Employee Relationships
How do bosses and workers talk to each other and settle arguments about pay or rules? There are two main ways:
Individual Approach
Each worker negotiates their own contract and pay with the boss.
Pros: Good for high-performing stars who want to ask for a big raise.
Cons: The boss has much more power than one single worker.
Collective Bargaining
Workers join together (usually in a Trade Union) to negotiate as one big group.
Analogy: Imagine one student asking for a shorter school day (the Principal says no). Now imagine every student in the school asking at once. That's collective bargaining.
Pros: More "power in numbers" for the workers.
Cons: It can lead to strikes if the two sides can't agree.
Did you know?
Trade Union membership has been falling in the UK for many years as more businesses move toward the individual approach.
Key Takeaway: The individual approach favors the business; collective bargaining gives more power to the workers.
Final Quick Check!
Before you move on, make sure you can answer these:
1. What is the difference between seeing staff as an asset vs. a cost?
2. Can you name two benefits of a flexible workforce?
3. If a shop closes down and the staff lose their jobs, is that dismissal or redundancy?
4. Why might a worker prefer collective bargaining over an individual approach?
Great job! You've just covered the essentials of 1.4.1 Approaches to Staffing.