Question 1 · Free-Response
15 marksA nonconducting system is configured in the \(xy\)-plane as follows:
- A point charge \(q_1 = +3.0\text{ nC}\) is fixed on the \(y\)-axis at \((0, d)\), where \(d = 0.20\text{ m}\).
- A thin nonconducting rod of length \(2d\) with uniform positive linear charge density \(+\lambda\) is fixed along the \(x\)-axis from \(x = -d\) to \(x = +d\).
(a) A closed spherical Gaussian surface of radius \(r = 0.50d\) is centered at \((0, d)\), enclosing only the point charge \(q_1\). Calculate the absolute value of the total electric flux \(\Phi_E\) through this Gaussian surface.
(b) In a separate measurement, the electric potential along the positive \(y\)-axis is investigated:
- Point \(J\) at \((0, 2d)\) is on the \(15.0\text{ V}\) equipotential line.
- Point \(K\) at \((0, 3d)\) is on the \(9.0\text{ V}\) equipotential line.
- Point \(M\) at \((2d, 3d)\) is also on the \(9.0\text{ V}\) equipotential line.
A test charge \(q_0 = +2.0\text{ nC}\) is moved slowly by an external force from \(J\) to \(K\), and then from \(K\) to \(M\).
i. Calculate the work \(W_{KM}\) done by the external force in moving the test charge from Point \(K\) to Point \(M\), and the work \(W_{JK}\) done by the external force in moving the test charge from Point \(J\) to Point \(K\).
ii. Calculate the approximate magnitude of the \(y\)-component of the electric field, \(|E_y|\), in the region between Point \(J\) and Point \(K\).
(c) A positive test charge is placed at Point \(J\, (0, 2d)\) and released from rest.
Indicate the direction of the net electric force exerted on the test charge immediately after release:
$$\text{____ } +x \qquad \text{____ } -x \qquad \text{____ } +y \qquad \text{____ } -y$$
Without using equations, justify your choice using physics principles.
(d) The point charge \(q_1\) is removed. The rod now has length \(L\) and lies along the \(x\)-axis from \(x = 0\) to \(x = L\) with uniform linear charge density \(+\lambda\). A point \(P\) is located on the \(x\)-axis at a position \(x_P > L\).
i. Using integral calculus, derive an expression for the electric potential \(V_P\) at Point \(P\) due to the rod. Assume \(V(\infty) = 0\). Express your answer in terms of Coulomb's constant \(k\), \(\lambda\), \(L\), and \(x_P\).
ii. Describe the key characteristics (sign, concavity, and asymptotic behavior) of the graph of the \(x\)-component of the electric field \(E_x\) as a function of \(x\) for \(x > L\).
- A point charge \(q_1 = +3.0\text{ nC}\) is fixed on the \(y\)-axis at \((0, d)\), where \(d = 0.20\text{ m}\).
- A thin nonconducting rod of length \(2d\) with uniform positive linear charge density \(+\lambda\) is fixed along the \(x\)-axis from \(x = -d\) to \(x = +d\).
(a) A closed spherical Gaussian surface of radius \(r = 0.50d\) is centered at \((0, d)\), enclosing only the point charge \(q_1\). Calculate the absolute value of the total electric flux \(\Phi_E\) through this Gaussian surface.
(b) In a separate measurement, the electric potential along the positive \(y\)-axis is investigated:
- Point \(J\) at \((0, 2d)\) is on the \(15.0\text{ V}\) equipotential line.
- Point \(K\) at \((0, 3d)\) is on the \(9.0\text{ V}\) equipotential line.
- Point \(M\) at \((2d, 3d)\) is also on the \(9.0\text{ V}\) equipotential line.
A test charge \(q_0 = +2.0\text{ nC}\) is moved slowly by an external force from \(J\) to \(K\), and then from \(K\) to \(M\).
i. Calculate the work \(W_{KM}\) done by the external force in moving the test charge from Point \(K\) to Point \(M\), and the work \(W_{JK}\) done by the external force in moving the test charge from Point \(J\) to Point \(K\).
ii. Calculate the approximate magnitude of the \(y\)-component of the electric field, \(|E_y|\), in the region between Point \(J\) and Point \(K\).
(c) A positive test charge is placed at Point \(J\, (0, 2d)\) and released from rest.
Indicate the direction of the net electric force exerted on the test charge immediately after release:
$$\text{____ } +x \qquad \text{____ } -x \qquad \text{____ } +y \qquad \text{____ } -y$$
Without using equations, justify your choice using physics principles.
(d) The point charge \(q_1\) is removed. The rod now has length \(L\) and lies along the \(x\)-axis from \(x = 0\) to \(x = L\) with uniform linear charge density \(+\lambda\). A point \(P\) is located on the \(x\)-axis at a position \(x_P > L\).
i. Using integral calculus, derive an expression for the electric potential \(V_P\) at Point \(P\) due to the rod. Assume \(V(\infty) = 0\). Express your answer in terms of Coulomb's constant \(k\), \(\lambda\), \(L\), and \(x_P\).
ii. Describe the key characteristics (sign, concavity, and asymptotic behavior) of the graph of the \(x\)-component of the electric field \(E_x\) as a function of \(x\) for \(x > L\).
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
(a) Using Gauss's Law:
$$\Phi_E = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}$$
$$\Phi_E = \frac{3.0 \times 10^{-9}\text{ C}}{8.85 \times 10^{-12}\text{ C}^2/(\text{N}\cdot\text{m}^2)} \approx 339\text{ N}\cdot\text{m}^2/\text{C}$$
(b)
i. The work done by an external force is \(W_{\text{ext}} = q_0 \Delta V\).
- From \(K\) to \(M\): \(\Delta V = V_M - V_K = 9.0\text{ V} - 9.0\text{ V} = 0\text{ V}\).
$$W_{KM} = q_0(0\text{ V}) = 0\text{ J}$$
- From \(J\) to \(K\): \(\Delta V = V_K - V_J = 9.0\text{ V} - 15.0\text{ V} = -6.0\text{ V}\).
$$W_{JK} = (2.0 \times 10^{-9}\text{ C})(-6.0\text{ V}) = -1.2 \times 10^{-8}\text{ J}$$
ii. The approximate electric field is:
$$|E_y| = \left| -\frac{\Delta V}{\Delta y} \right| = \left| -\frac{V_K - V_J}{y_K - y_J} \right| = \left| -\frac{9.0\text{ V} - 15.0\text{ V}}{3(0.20\text{ m}) - 2(0.20\text{ m})} \right| = \frac{6.0\text{ V}}{0.20\text{ m}} = 30\text{ V/m}$$
(c) Direction: \(+y\)
Justification: The positive point charge at \((0, d)\) repels the positive test charge placed at \((0, 2d)\) along the line connecting them, exerting an electric force in the \(+y\)-direction. Due to the symmetrical placement of the charged rod from \(x = -d\) to \(x = +d\) about the \(y\)-axis, the horizontal (\(x\)) components of the repulsive electric force exerted by symmetric charge elements cancel out completely. The vertical components of the repulsive forces from the rod all point in the \(+y\)-direction (away from the rod since \(y = 2d > 0\)). Thus, the net electric force points strictly in the \(+y\)-direction.
(d)
i. An infinitesimal charge element along the rod is \(dq = \lambda\, dx'\), located at \(x'\) where \(0 \le x' \le L\).
The distance from \(dq\) to Point \(P\) at \(x_P\) is \(r = x_P - x'\).
Using the integral for electric potential with \(V(\infty) = 0\):
$$V_P = \int \frac{k\, dq}{r} = \int_0^L \frac{k \lambda\, dx'}{x_P - x'}$$
Evaluating the integral:
$$V_P = k\lambda \left[ -\ln(x_P - x') \right]_0^L = -k\lambda \left( \ln(x_P - L) - \ln(x_P) \right) = k\lambda \ln\left(\frac{x_P}{x_P - L}\right)$$
ii. The electric field component is \(E_x = -\frac{dV_P}{dx_P} = \frac{k\lambda L}{x_P(x_P - L)}\).
For \(x > L\):
- \(E_x\) is positive (directed in the \(+x\)-direction away from the positive charge distribution).
- \(E_x\) approaches \(+\infty\) asymptotically as \(x \to L^+\).
- \(E_x\) decreases continuously and approaches \(0\) asymptotically as \(x \to \infty\).
- The graph is concave up throughout \(x > L\).
$$\Phi_E = \frac{Q_{\text{enc}}}{\varepsilon_0}$$
$$\Phi_E = \frac{3.0 \times 10^{-9}\text{ C}}{8.85 \times 10^{-12}\text{ C}^2/(\text{N}\cdot\text{m}^2)} \approx 339\text{ N}\cdot\text{m}^2/\text{C}$$
(b)
i. The work done by an external force is \(W_{\text{ext}} = q_0 \Delta V\).
- From \(K\) to \(M\): \(\Delta V = V_M - V_K = 9.0\text{ V} - 9.0\text{ V} = 0\text{ V}\).
$$W_{KM} = q_0(0\text{ V}) = 0\text{ J}$$
- From \(J\) to \(K\): \(\Delta V = V_K - V_J = 9.0\text{ V} - 15.0\text{ V} = -6.0\text{ V}\).
$$W_{JK} = (2.0 \times 10^{-9}\text{ C})(-6.0\text{ V}) = -1.2 \times 10^{-8}\text{ J}$$
ii. The approximate electric field is:
$$|E_y| = \left| -\frac{\Delta V}{\Delta y} \right| = \left| -\frac{V_K - V_J}{y_K - y_J} \right| = \left| -\frac{9.0\text{ V} - 15.0\text{ V}}{3(0.20\text{ m}) - 2(0.20\text{ m})} \right| = \frac{6.0\text{ V}}{0.20\text{ m}} = 30\text{ V/m}$$
(c) Direction: \(+y\)
Justification: The positive point charge at \((0, d)\) repels the positive test charge placed at \((0, 2d)\) along the line connecting them, exerting an electric force in the \(+y\)-direction. Due to the symmetrical placement of the charged rod from \(x = -d\) to \(x = +d\) about the \(y\)-axis, the horizontal (\(x\)) components of the repulsive electric force exerted by symmetric charge elements cancel out completely. The vertical components of the repulsive forces from the rod all point in the \(+y\)-direction (away from the rod since \(y = 2d > 0\)). Thus, the net electric force points strictly in the \(+y\)-direction.
(d)
i. An infinitesimal charge element along the rod is \(dq = \lambda\, dx'\), located at \(x'\) where \(0 \le x' \le L\).
The distance from \(dq\) to Point \(P\) at \(x_P\) is \(r = x_P - x'\).
Using the integral for electric potential with \(V(\infty) = 0\):
$$V_P = \int \frac{k\, dq}{r} = \int_0^L \frac{k \lambda\, dx'}{x_P - x'}$$
Evaluating the integral:
$$V_P = k\lambda \left[ -\ln(x_P - x') \right]_0^L = -k\lambda \left( \ln(x_P - L) - \ln(x_P) \right) = k\lambda \ln\left(\frac{x_P}{x_P - L}\right)$$
ii. The electric field component is \(E_x = -\frac{dV_P}{dx_P} = \frac{k\lambda L}{x_P(x_P - L)}\).
For \(x > L\):
- \(E_x\) is positive (directed in the \(+x\)-direction away from the positive charge distribution).
- \(E_x\) approaches \(+\infty\) asymptotically as \(x \to L^+\).
- \(E_x\) decreases continuously and approaches \(0\) asymptotically as \(x \to \infty\).
- The graph is concave up throughout \(x > L\).
Marking scheme
Part (a): 2 points
- 1 point: For using Gauss's law with the correct enclosed charge (\(\Phi_E = Q_{\text{enc}}/\varepsilon_0\)).
- 1 point: For the correct numerical value with or without units (\(\approx 339\text{ N}\cdot\text{m}^2/\text{C}\) or \(3.4 \times 10^2\text{ V}\cdot\text{m}\)).
Part (b)(i): 2 points
- 1 point: For correctly determining that \(W_{KM} = 0\text{ J}\) because points \(K\) and \(M\) are at the same electric potential.
- 1 point: For correctly calculating \(W_{JK} = -1.2 \times 10^{-8}\text{ J}\) (or stating magnitude \(1.2 \times 10^{-8}\text{ J}\)) using \(W = q\Delta V\).
Part (b)(ii): 2 points
- 1 point: For using a correct relationship between electric field and potential gradient (e.g., \(|E_y| = |\Delta V / \Delta y|\)).
- 1 point: For substituting correct potential values and distance \(\Delta y = 0.20\text{ m}\) to obtain \(30\text{ V/m}\).
Part (c): 3 points
- 1 point: For selecting only \(+y\) with an attempt at a relevant justification.
- 1 point: For explaining that horizontal components of force from the rod cancel by symmetry.
- 1 point: For explaining that repulsive forces from both the point charge and the rod act in the \(+y\)-direction on the positive test charge.
Part (d)(i): 4 points
- 1 point: For writing a correct integral expression for potential \(V = \int \frac{k\, dq}{r}\).
- 1 point: For correctly expressing \(dq = \lambda\, dx'\) and the distance \(r = x_P - x'\).
- 1 point: For setting the correct limits of integration from \(0\) to \(L\).
- 1 point: For integrating correctly to obtain \(V_P = k\lambda \ln\left(\frac{x_P}{x_P - L}\right)\).
Part (d)(ii): 2 points
- 1 point: For indicating a curve that is strictly positive and approaches zero as \(x \to \infty\).
- 1 point: For indicating a concave-up curve that approaches \(+\infty\) as \(x \to L^+\).
- 1 point: For using Gauss's law with the correct enclosed charge (\(\Phi_E = Q_{\text{enc}}/\varepsilon_0\)).
- 1 point: For the correct numerical value with or without units (\(\approx 339\text{ N}\cdot\text{m}^2/\text{C}\) or \(3.4 \times 10^2\text{ V}\cdot\text{m}\)).
Part (b)(i): 2 points
- 1 point: For correctly determining that \(W_{KM} = 0\text{ J}\) because points \(K\) and \(M\) are at the same electric potential.
- 1 point: For correctly calculating \(W_{JK} = -1.2 \times 10^{-8}\text{ J}\) (or stating magnitude \(1.2 \times 10^{-8}\text{ J}\)) using \(W = q\Delta V\).
Part (b)(ii): 2 points
- 1 point: For using a correct relationship between electric field and potential gradient (e.g., \(|E_y| = |\Delta V / \Delta y|\)).
- 1 point: For substituting correct potential values and distance \(\Delta y = 0.20\text{ m}\) to obtain \(30\text{ V/m}\).
Part (c): 3 points
- 1 point: For selecting only \(+y\) with an attempt at a relevant justification.
- 1 point: For explaining that horizontal components of force from the rod cancel by symmetry.
- 1 point: For explaining that repulsive forces from both the point charge and the rod act in the \(+y\)-direction on the positive test charge.
Part (d)(i): 4 points
- 1 point: For writing a correct integral expression for potential \(V = \int \frac{k\, dq}{r}\).
- 1 point: For correctly expressing \(dq = \lambda\, dx'\) and the distance \(r = x_P - x'\).
- 1 point: For setting the correct limits of integration from \(0\) to \(L\).
- 1 point: For integrating correctly to obtain \(V_P = k\lambda \ln\left(\frac{x_P}{x_P - L}\right)\).
Part (d)(ii): 2 points
- 1 point: For indicating a curve that is strictly positive and approaches zero as \(x \to \infty\).
- 1 point: For indicating a concave-up curve that approaches \(+\infty\) as \(x \to L^+\).