Worked solution
Personal strategies play an important role in tackling bullying. Young people are encouraged to tell a trusted adult (a parent, teacher or other adult) about bullying, which can lead to it being addressed by the school or family before it escalates; for cyberbullying specifically, blocking the person responsible, refusing to retaliate, and reporting abusive content to the social media platform can quickly reduce a victim's exposure to further abuse. These strategies can be effective because they are immediate and within the young person's control, but they rely on the young person feeling confident enough to speak up, and some victims may feel too ashamed or afraid to do so, limiting their effectiveness.
Schools and the government also have responsibilities. Schools are required to have anti-bullying policies, which set out how incidents will be reported, investigated and dealt with, and can include restorative approaches or sanctions for those responsible; this creates a consistent, structured response. Government campaigns can raise awareness of the signs and impact of bullying (including cyberbullying and homophobic bullying) among students, parents and teachers, encouraging early identification. However, these approaches have limitations: policies are only effective if they are properly enforced and if pupils trust the system enough to report bullying, and cyberbullying is especially hard for schools to monitor and control because much of it happens outside school hours on personal devices.
On balance, a combination of approaches is more effective than either individual or institutional action alone: personal strategies help a young person respond in the moment, while school policies and government awareness campaigns provide the wider structures needed to prevent bullying and support victims consistently. However, given how much cyberbullying now takes place through personal devices and social media outside school supervision, government and school strategies are only partially effective unless paired with strong personal awareness and confidence to report — so the most effective response depends on individuals, schools and government working together, rather than relying on any single strategy.
Final answer: no single strategy is fully effective on its own; personal strategies (telling a trusted adult, blocking/reporting online abuse) and government/school strategies (anti-bullying policies, awareness campaigns) are both necessary and are most effective when used together, since cyberbullying in particular falls outside what schools alone can monitor.
Marking scheme
Level of response marking (10 marks). Level 1 (1–4 marks): basic evaluation; identifies one or two strategies with limited development; conclusion missing or inadequate/unsupported. Level 2 (5–7 marks): competent evaluation covering more than one strategy (personal and/or institutional) with some balanced discussion of strengths and limitations; a relevant conclusion is reached. Level 3 (8–10 marks): detailed evaluation covering multiple viewpoints (personal strategies, school policies, government action), clearly weighing strengths against limitations (e.g. reliance on victims reporting, difficulty monitoring cyberbullying outside school), with a detailed and well-justified conclusion. Quality of written communication (structure, specialist vocabulary, continuous prose) is embedded in the level awarded. Indicative content: telling a trusted adult; blocking/reporting on social media; school anti-bullying policies; restorative approaches/sanctions; government awareness campaigns; limitations around victims' confidence to report and difficulty monitoring cyberbullying outside school. All other valid, well-justified evaluations will be credited.