Cambridge IAL · PastPaper.sampleTitle

MetadataPastPaper.sampleTitle

Thinka Jun 2023 (V1) Cambridge International A Level-Style Mock — Accounting (9706)

90 PastPaper.marks105 PastPaper.minutes2023
An original Thinka practice paper modelled on the structure and difficulty of the Jun 2023 (V1) Cambridge International A Level Accounting (9706) paper. Not affiliated with or reproduced from Cambridge.

Section A

Answer all questions. Show your workings and present all accounting statements in good style.
4 PastPaper.question · 90 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · Structured
30 PastPaper.marks
Green and Brown are in partnership, sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 3:2.

Their statement of financial position at 31 December 2023 was as follows:

$$\begin{array}{lrr}
\hline
& \$ & \$ \\
\hline
\textbf{Non-current assets} & & \\
\text{Premises} & & 120,000 \\
\text{Equipment (net book value)} & & 45,000 \\
\hline
& & 165,000 \\
\textbf{Current assets} & & \\
\text{Inventory} & 28,000 & \\
\text{Trade receivables} & 24,500 & \\
\text{Bank} & 6,500 & \\
\hline
& & 59,000 \\
\hline
\textbf{Total assets} & & \mathbf{224,000} \\
\hline
\textbf{Capital Accounts} & & \\
\text{Green} & & 120,000 \\
\text{Brown} & & 86,000 \\
\hline
& & 206,000 \\
\textbf{Current liabilities} & & \\
\text{Trade payables} & & 18,000 \\
\hline
\textbf{Total capital and liabilities} & & \mathbf{224,000} \\
\hline
\end{array}$$

On 1 January 2024, Milford PLC acquired the business of the partnership on the following terms:
1. Premises were valued at $150,000.
2. Equipment was valued at $38,000.
3. Inventory was valued at $25,000.
4. Trade receivables were taken over at book value less a 4\% allowance for doubtful debts.
5. Milford PLC assumed the trade payables at book value.
6. The bank balance was not taken over by Milford PLC.
7. The purchase consideration was agreed at $240,000. This was to be satisfied by the issue of 120,000 ordinary shares of $1.00 each in Milford PLC at a premium of $0.50 per share, with the balance to be paid in cash.
8. Dissolution expenses of $3,500 were paid from the partnership bank account.
9. Ordinary shares in Milford PLC were distributed to Green and Brown in their profit-sharing ratio. The remaining balances on the partners' capital accounts were settled in cash from the partnership's bank account.

\textbf{Required:}

(a) Calculate the purchase consideration paid by Milford PLC and state how it was settled. [4 marks]

(b) Prepare the Realisation Account in the books of the partnership of Green and Brown. [8 marks]

(c) Prepare the Partners' Capital Accounts, showing the final settlement of the partnership. [8 marks]

(d) Prepare the journal entry in Milford PLC's books to record the acquisition of the partnership business (a narrative is not required). [6 marks]

(e) State how purchased Goodwill should be treated in the financial statements of Milford PLC in subsequent years in accordance with IAS 38. [4 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

**(a) Calculation and Settlement of Purchase Consideration**

$$\begin{array}{lr}
\text{Total Purchase Consideration} & \$240,000 \\
\hline
\textbf{Settled by:} & \\
\text{Ordinary Shares in Milford PLC } (120,000 \times \$1.50) & \$180,000 \\
\text{Cash (Balance)} & \$60,000 \\
\hline
\text{Total} & \$240,000 \\
\hline
\end{array}$$

---

**(b) Realisation Account**

$$\begin{array}{lr|lr}
\hline
\textbf{Debit} & \$ & \textbf{Credit} & \$ \\
\hline
\text{Premises} & 120,000 & \text{Trade payables (assumed)} & 18,000 \\
\text{Equipment} & 45,000 & \text{Milford PLC (Purchase consideration)} & 240,000 \\
\text{Inventory} & 28,000 & & \\
\text{Trade receivables} & 24,500 & & \\
\text{Bank (dissolution expenses)} & 3,500 & & \\
\text{Profit on Realisation:} & & & \\
\text{ - Green (3/5)} \quad 22,200 & & & \\
\text{ - Brown (2/5)} \quad 14,800 & 37,000 & & \\
\hline
& \mathbf{258,000} & & \mathbf{258,000} \\
\hline
\end{array}$$

---

**(c) Partners' Capital Accounts**

$$\begin{array}{lrr|lrr}
\hline
\textbf{Debit} & \text{Green (\$)} & \text{Brown (\$)} & \textbf{Credit} & \text{Green (\$)} & \text{Brown (\$)} \\
\hline
\text{Shares in Milford PLC }^1 & 108,000 & 72,000 & \text{Balance b/d} & 120,000 & 86,000 \\
\text{Bank (final settlement)} & 34,200 & 28,800 & \text{Realisation profit} & 22,200 & 14,800 \\
\hline
& \mathbf{142,200} & \mathbf{100,800} & & \mathbf{142,200} & \mathbf{100,800} \\
\hline
\end{array}$$

*Workings:*
$^1$ **Distribution of Shares (Profit Sharing Ratio 3:2):**
- Green: $120,000 \text{ shares} \times 3/5 = 72,000 \text{ shares} \times $1.50 = $108,000$
- Brown: $120,000 \text{ shares} \times 2/5 = 48,000 \text{ shares} \times $1.50 = $72,000$

---

**(d) Journal Entry in Milford PLC's Books**

$$\begin{array}{lrr}
\hline
\textbf{Account Details} & \textbf{Debit (\$)} & \textbf{Credit (\$)} \\
\hline
\text{Premises} & 150,000 & \\
\text{Equipment} & 38,000 & \\
\text{Inventory} & 25,000 & \\
\text{Trade Receivables } (24,500 \times 0.96) & 23,520 & \\
\text{Goodwill }^2 & 21,480 & \\
\quad \text{Trade Payables} & & 18,000 \\
\quad \text{Ordinary Share Capital } (120,000 \times \$1.00) & & 120,000 \\
\quad \text{Share Premium } (120,000 \times \$0.50) & & 60,000 \\
\quad \text{Bank / Cash} & & 60,000 \\
\hline
\mathbf{Total} & \mathbf{258,000} & \mathbf{258,000} \\
\hline
\end{array}$$

*Workings:*
$^2$ **Calculation of Goodwill:**
$$\begin{array}{lr}
\text{Purchase Consideration} & \$240,000 \\
\text{Less: Fair Value of Net Assets Acquired} & \\
\quad \text{Premises} & 150,000 \\
\quad \text{Equipment} & 38,000 \\
\quad \text{Inventory} & 25,000 \\
\quad \text{Trade Receivables} & 23,520 \\
\quad \text{Less: Trade Payables} & (18,000) \\
\quad \text{Net Assets Acquired} & (218,520) \\
\hline
\textbf{Goodwill} & \mathbf{\$21,480} \\
\hline
\end{array}$$

---

**(e) Treatment of Goodwill (IAS 38)**
1. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life.
2. In accordance with IAS 38, goodwill is not amortised.
3. Instead, it must be tested annually for impairment (or more frequently if events/changes indicate it might be impaired).
4. If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognised in profit or loss.

PastPaper.markingScheme

**(a) [Total: 4 marks]**
- State purchase consideration of $240,000 (1)
- Settlement by Ordinary Shares: $180,000 (2) [1 mark for 120,000 shares, 1 mark for the premium valuation of $1.50]
- Settlement by Cash: $60,000 (1)

**(b) [Total: 8 marks]**
- Debit: Premises ($120,000) (1), Equipment ($45,000) (1), Inventory ($28,000) (1), Trade receivables ($24,500) (1)
- Debit: Bank - dissolution expenses ($3,500) (1)
- Credit: Trade payables ($18,000) (1), Milford PLC ($240,000) (1)
- Credit/Transfer: Realisation profit split to Green $22,200 and Brown $14,800 (1 for both correct, or 1/2 mark each)

**(c) [Total: 8 marks]**
- Balances b/d (Green $120,000, Brown $86,000) (1 for both)
- Realisation Profit (Green $22,200, Brown $14,800) (2) [1 mark each]
- Shares in Milford PLC (Green $108,000, Brown $72,000) (2) [1 mark each]
- Bank final settlement (Green $34,200, Brown $28,800) (3) [1 mark each + 1 mark for correct balancing method]

**(d) [Total: 6 marks]**
- Debit: Premises $150,000 (1)
- Debit: Equipment $38,000 (1)
- Debit: Inventory $25,000 (1)
- Debit: Trade Receivables $23,520 (1)
- Debit: Goodwill $21,480 (1) [O/F from calculated net assets]
- Credits: Trade payables $18,000 (0.5), Share capital $120,000 (0.5), Share premium $60,000 (0.5), Bank $60,000 (0.5) (Combined credits: 2 marks total, or 0.5 marks each)

**(e) [Total: 4 marks]**
- Indefinite useful life (1)
- Not amortised (1)
- Tested for impairment annually (or when indicators arise) (1)
- Impairment losses are written off to profit or loss (1)
PastPaper.question 2 · structured
15 PastPaper.marks
Liam operates a wholesaling business. On 30 April 2023, his ledger clerk prepared a Sales Ledger Control Account and a list of customer balances from the sales ledger. The two totals did not agree.

The balances on 30 April 2023 before investigation were:
- Sales Ledger Control Account balance: \( \$42,150 \)
- Total of list of sales ledger balances: \( \$43,400 \)

On investigation, the following errors and omissions were discovered:
1. A credit balance of \( \$380 \) in a customer's account in the sales ledger was omitted from the list of balances.
2. The Sales Day Book had been undercast by \( \$1,200 \).
3. A sales invoice to J. Patel for \( \$450 \) was correctly recorded in the Sales Day Book but entered in Patel's individual sales ledger account as \( \$540 \).
4. A contra of \( \$600 \) with a supplier was correctly entered in the individual ledger accounts (sales ledger and purchase ledger), but had been completely omitted from the control accounts.
5. Cash discount allowed of \( \$180 \) was correctly entered in the cash book but had not been posted to the customer's individual sales ledger account.
6. A debt of \( \$400 \) owed by T. Smith is to be written off as irrecoverable. No entry has yet been made in any of the books of account.

**Required**
(a) Prepare the corrected Sales Ledger Control Account for the month of April 2023. [6]
(b) Prepare a statement reconciling the original total of the sales ledger balances with the corrected balance of the Sales Ledger Control Account. [6]
(c) State three reasons why a business prepares control accounts. [3]
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

(a) **Corrected Sales Ledger Control Account for April 2023**

| Date | Details | Amount ($) | Date | Details | Amount ($) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| 30 Apr | Balance b/d | 42,150 | 30 Apr | Contra / Set-off | 600 |
| 30 Apr | Sales Day Book undercast | 1,200 | 30 Apr | Irrecoverable debt | 400 |
| | | | 30 Apr | Balance c/d | 42,350 |
| | **Total** | **43,350** | | **Total** | **43,350** |
| 1 May | Balance b/d | 42,350 | | | |

(b) **Statement of Reconciliation of Sales Ledger Balances as at 30 April 2023**

| Details | Amount ($) | Amount ($) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Original total of list of balances** | | **43,400** |
| *Less:* | | |
| Credit balance omitted from list | (380) | |
| Overstatement of J. Patel's account \((\$540 - \$450)\) | (90) | |
| Discount allowed not posted | (180) | |
| Irrecoverable debt written off | (400) | **(1,050)** |
| **Adjusted total of list of balances** | | **42,350** |

(c) **Three reasons why a business prepares control accounts:**
1. It helps in locating errors when the Trial Balance does not balance by narrowing down the error to a specific ledger.
2. It acts as an internal check to deter fraud and collusion, as different clerks are usually responsible for the control accounts and individual ledgers.
3. It provides an immediate total of trade receivables and trade payables for management reports and the preparation of financial statements.

PastPaper.markingScheme

**Part (a) [6 marks]**
- **Balance b/d ($42,150):** 1 mark (AO1)
- **Sales Day Book undercast ($1,200) on Debit side:** 1 mark (AO2)
- **Contra entry ($600) on Credit side:** 1 mark (AO2)
- **Irrecoverable debt ($400) on Credit side:** 1 mark (AO2)
- **Balance c/d ($42,350) and bring down to 1 May:** 1 mark (AO1)
- **Overall presentation of T-account (including proper layout, dates, and double lines):** 1 mark (AO1)

**Part (b) [6 marks]**
- **Starting figure ($43,400):** 1 mark (AO1)
- **Less Credit balance ($380):** 1 mark (AO2)
- **Less Patel error correction ($90):** 2 marks (1 mark for calculation of \(\$540 - \$450\), 1 mark for showing as a deduction) (AO2)
- **Less Discount allowed ($180):** 1 mark (AO2)
- **Less Irrecoverable debt ($400):** 1 mark (AO2)
- *Note: The final figure of \(\$42,350\) does not carry an explicit mark but verifies accuracy.*

**Part (c) [3 marks]**
Award 1 mark for each valid reason stated (maximum of 3 marks):
- Helps locate/identify errors in subsidiary ledgers (1)
- Acts as an internal check/helps prevent or detect fraud (1)
- Provides a quick total of trade receivables/payables for draft accounts (1)
- Saves time when preparing the Trial Balance (1)
- Useful for calculating missing values in incomplete records (1)
PastPaper.question 3 · structured
15 PastPaper.marks
Vanguard plc had the following equity balances on 1 January 2023:

* Ordinary shares of $0.50 each: $300,000 (600,000 shares in issue)
* Share premium account: $90,000
* General reserve: $40,000
* Retained earnings: $125,000

During the financial year ended 31 December 2023, the following transactions occurred:

1. **1 March 2023:** The company made a rights issue of 1 ordinary share for every 4 shares held at a price of $0.80 per share. The issue was fully subscribed and paid.
2. **1 July 2023:** A bonus issue of 1 ordinary share for every 10 shares held was made. It is the company's policy to utilise non-distributable reserves first for such issues.
3. **1 October 2023:** An interim dividend of $0.04 per share was paid on all ordinary shares in issue at that date.
4. **31 December 2023:** The profit for the year was calculated at $118,000.
5. **31 December 2023:** The directors resolved to transfer $15,000 from retained earnings to the general reserve.

**Required:**

**(a)** Prepare the Statement of Changes in Equity for Vanguard plc for the year ended 31 December 2023. [11 marks]

**(b)** State two reasons why a company might choose to make a bonus issue of shares rather than pay a cash dividend. [4 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

**(a) Vanguard plc - Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 31 December 2023**

| Details | Ordinary Shares ($0.50) ($) | Share Premium ($) | General Reserve ($) | Retained Earnings ($) | Total ($) |
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: | :---: |
| **Balances at 1 January 2023** | 300,000 | 90,000 | 40,000 | 125,000 | 555,000 |
| Rights issue | 75,000 | 45,000 | - | - | 120,000 |
| Bonus issue | 37,500 | (37,500) | - | - | - |
| Profit for the year | - | - | - | 118,000 | 118,000 |
| Dividends paid | - | - | - | (33,000) | (33,000) |
| Transfer to general reserve | - | - | 15,000 | (15,000) | - |
| **Balances at 31 December 2023** | **412,500** | **97,500** | **55,000** | **195,000** | **760,000** |

**Workings:**
1. **Rights Issue (1 March 2023):**
* Shares in issue before rights = \(600,000\)
* Number of rights shares = \(600,000 \times \frac{1}{4} = 150,000\) shares
* Value to Share Capital = \(150,000 \times \$0.50 = \$75,000\)
* Value to Share Premium = \(150,000 \times (\$0.80 - \$0.50) = \$45,000\)
* Total cash received = \(\$120,000\)

2. **Bonus Issue (1 July 2023):**
* Shares in issue before bonus = \(600,000 + 150,000 = 750,000\) shares
* Number of bonus shares = \(750,000 \times \frac{1}{10} = 75,000\) shares
* Value to Share Capital = \(75,000 \times \$0.50 = \$37,500\)
* Funded fully from Share Premium: \(-\$37,500\)

3. **Dividends Paid (1 October 2023):**
* Shares in issue = \(750,000 + 75,000 = 825,000\) shares
* Dividend paid = \(825,000 \times \$0.04 = \$33,000\)

***

**(b) Reasons for making a bonus issue instead of paying a cash dividend (any two):**

1. **Conserves Cash/Liquidity:** A bonus issue does not require any cash outflow. This allows the company to retain its cash resources for reinvestment in capital projects, operational growth, or debt reduction.
2. **Capitalises Reserves:** It converts reserves (such as share premium) into permanent capital (share capital), which can improve the creditworthiness and financial appearance of the company's balance sheet to lenders.
3. **Satisfies Shareholders:** It offers shareholders a return (in the form of additional shares) when liquid funds are low, keeping them satisfied without draining cash reserves.
4. **Increases Share Marketability:** By increasing the total number of shares in issue, it lowers the individual share price, making the shares more affordable and liquid in the stock market.

PastPaper.markingScheme

**(a) Statement of Changes in Equity [11 Marks]**
* **Opening balances:** [1 mark] for all four opening balances correctly listed.
* **Rights issue:** [2 marks] - [1 mark] for Ordinary Shares ($75,000) and [1 mark] for Share Premium ($45,000).
* **Bonus issue:** [2 marks] - [1 mark] for Ordinary Shares ($37,500) and [1 mark] for Share Premium (\(-\$37,500\)).
* **Profit for the year:** [1 mark] for Retained Earnings ($118,000).
* **Dividends paid:** [2 marks] - [1 mark] for correct calculation of shares in issue (825,000) and [1 mark] for correct Retained Earnings deduction of ($33,000).
* **Transfer to reserve:** [1 mark] for correct movement (+$15,000 General Reserve and -$15,000 Retained Earnings).
* **Closing balances:** [2 marks] - [1 mark] if at least two final column figures are correct, [2 marks] if all final figures (including total column of $760,000) are correct.

**(b) Explanations [4 Marks]**
* [2 marks] for first clear reason stated and explained (e.g., preservation of cash/liquidity).
* [2 marks] for second clear reason stated and explained (e.g., capitalisation of reserves to strengthen permanent equity structure, or reducing share price to increase marketability).
PastPaper.question 4 · structured
30 PastPaper.marks
Vanguard Ltd manufactures two products, Standard (S) and Deluxe (D). The company's budget details for the upcoming period are as follows:

### **Production and Cost Data**
| Feature/Cost | Product Standard (S) | Product Deluxe (D) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Budgeted Production Volume** | 10,000 units | 5,000 units |
| **Direct Materials per unit** | 4 kg @ $3 per kg | 6 kg @ $3 per kg |
| **Direct Labor per unit** | 2 hours @ $15 per hour | 3 hours @ $15 per hour |

Total budgeted manufacturing overheads are $280,000. Currently, the company absorbs overheads using a single traditional plant-wide rate based on direct labor hours.

### **Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Information**
To improve pricing accuracy, the management accountant is considering implementing an Activity-Based Costing (ABC) system. Overhead costs have been analyzed into three major activity cost pools:

| Activity Cost Pool | Budgeted Cost ($) | Cost Driver |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Machine setups** | 120,000 | Number of setups |
| **Quality inspections** | 90,000 | Number of inspections |
| **Material handling** | 70,000 | Number of material orders |
| **Total Overheads** | **280,000** | |

The budgeted cost driver volumes for each product are:

| Cost Driver | Product Standard (S) | Product Deluxe (D) | Total |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Number of setups** | 40 | 80 | 120 |
| **Number of inspections** | 100 | 200 | 300 |
| **Number of material orders** | 150 | 200 | 350 |

### **Required**
**a)** Calculate the budgeted unit cost of Product Standard (S) and Product Deluxe (D) using the current traditional absorption costing method (based on direct labor hours). **(8 marks)**

**b)** Calculate the activity rate for each of the three activity cost pools. **(6 marks)**

**c)** Calculate the budgeted unit cost of Product Standard (S) and Product Deluxe (D) using Activity-Based Costing (ABC). **(10 marks)**

**d)** Discuss **two** advantages and **two** limitations to Vanguard Ltd of switching from traditional absorption costing to Activity-Based Costing (ABC). **(6 marks)**
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

### **Part a) Traditional Absorption Costing**
1. **Calculate total direct labor hours (DLH):**
- Product S: \(10,000\text{ units} \times 2\text{ hours} = 20,000\text{ DLH}\)
- Product D: \(5,000\text{ units} \times 3\text{ hours} = 15,000\text{ DLH}\)
- Total DLH = \(20,000 + 15,000 = 35,000\text{ DLH}\)

2. **Calculate Overhead Absorption Rate (OAR):**
- \(\text{OAR} = \frac{\$280,000}{35,000\text{ hours}} = \$8\text{ per direct labor hour}\)

3. **Calculate Unit Product Costs:**
- **Product S:**
- Direct Materials: \(4\text{ kg} \times \$3 = \$12.00\)
- Direct Labor: \(2\text{ hours} \times \$15 = \$30.00\)
- Overhead: \(2\text{ hours} \times \$8 = \$16.00\)
- **Total unit cost S = $58.00**
- **Product D:**
- Direct Materials: \(6\text{ kg} \times \$3 = \$18.00\)
- Direct Labor: \(3\text{ hours} \times \$15 = \$45.00\)
- Overhead: \(3\text{ hours} \times \$8 = \$24.00\)
- **Total unit cost D = $87.00**

---

### **Part b) ABC Activity Rates**
1. **Machine setups activity rate:**
- \(\frac{\$120,000}{120\text{ setups}} = \$1,000\text{ per setup}\)
2. **Quality inspections activity rate:**
- \(\frac{\$90,000}{300\text{ inspections}} = \$300\text{ per inspection}\)
3. **Material handling activity rate:**
- \(\frac{\$70,000}{350\text{ orders}} = \$200\text{ per order}\)

---

### **Part c) Unit Costs under ABC**
1. **Allocation of Overhead Costs to Product S:**
- Setups: \(40 \times \$1,000 = \$40,000\)
- Inspections: \(100 \times \$300 = \$30,000\)
- Material orders: \(150 \times \$200 = \$30,000\)
- Total Overhead for S = $100,000
- Overhead per unit of S = \(\frac{\$100,000}{10,000\text{ units}} = \$10.00\)

2. **Allocation of Overhead Costs to Product D:**
- Setups: \(80 \times \$1,000 = \$80,000\)
- Inspections: \(200 \times \$300 = \$60,000\)
- Material orders: \(200 \times \$200 = \$40,000\)
- Total Overhead for D = $180,000
- Overhead per unit of D = \(\frac{\$180,000}{5,000\text{ units}} = \$36.00\)

3. **Calculate Total ABC Unit Cost:**
- **Product S:**
- Direct Materials = $12.00
- Direct Labor = $30.00
- ABC Overhead = $10.00
- **Total ABC unit cost S = $52.00**
- **Product D:**
- Direct Materials = $18.00
- Direct Labor = $45.00
- ABC Overhead = $36.00
- **Total ABC unit cost D = $99.00**

---

### **Part d) Advantages and Limitations of ABC**
**Advantages:**
1. **More Accurate Costing:** ABC assigns overheads based on actual consumption of resources rather than volume, revealing that Product D actually consumes more overhead resource than traditionally charged (under-costed previously).
2. **Better Pricing and Decision Making:** Prevents cross-subsidization where the high-volume product S subsidizes the low-volume product D, leading to more appropriate market pricing.

**Limitations:**
1. **High Complexity and Cost:** Implementing ABC is expensive, requiring detailed time-logging, software investment, and continuous monitoring of drivers.
2. **Arbitrary Allocations:** Some overheads (e.g., factory rent, heating) still have to be arbitrarily allocated even under ABC as they don't have a clear activity driver.

PastPaper.markingScheme

### **Part a) [Max 8 marks]**
- Calculating total Labor Hours: 35,000 hours **(1 mark)**
- Calculating OAR: $8/hour **(1 mark)**
- Direct materials cost (S = $12, D = $18) **(1 mark)**
- Direct labor cost (S = $30, D = $45) **(1 mark)**
- Overhead cost per unit Product S: $16 **(1 mark)**
- Overhead cost per unit Product D: $24 **(1 mark)**
- Final unit cost Product S: $58 **(1 mark OF)**
- Final unit cost Product D: $87 **(1 mark OF)**

### **Part b) [Max 6 marks]**
- Machine setups rate: $1,000 per setup **(2 marks)**
- Quality inspections rate: $300 per inspection **(2 marks)**
- Material handling rate: $200 per order **(2 marks)**

### **Part c) [Max 10 marks]**
- Product S overhead allocation total: $100,000 **(2 marks)**
- Product S overhead per unit: $10 **(1 mark OF)**
- Product S total ABC unit cost: $52 **(2 marks OF)**
- Product D overhead allocation total: $180,000 **(2 marks)**
- Product D overhead per unit: $36 **(1 mark OF)**
- Product D total ABC unit cost: $99 **(2 marks OF)**

### **Part d) [Max 6 marks]**
- **Two advantages** clearly explained **(3 marks)** (1.5 marks per advantage: 1 mark for identification, 0.5 marks for application to context)
- **Two limitations** clearly explained **(3 marks)** (1.5 marks per limitation: 1 mark for identification, 0.5 marks for application to context)

PastPaper.sampleCTATitle

PastPaper.sampleCTADescription

PastPaper.sampleStickyMessage

PastPaper.stickyCtaText