- A.First priority: Product X; Contribution per kg: $10
- B.First priority: Product X; Contribution per kg: $20
- C.First priority: Product Y; Contribution per kg: $8
- D.First priority: Product Y; Contribution per kg: $24
Cambridge IAL · PastPaper.sampleTitle
MetadataPastPaper.sampleTitle
Thinka Nov 2024 (V2) Cambridge International A Level-Style Mock — Accounting (9706)
Paper 12 (Multiple Choice)
- A.$17,900
- B.$18,300
- C.$18,500
- D.$18,900
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.$211,000
- B.$218,500
- C.$224,500
- D.$240,500
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.$26,000
- B.$26,800
- C.$27,600
- D.$46,600
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.25 days
- B.30 days
- C.45 days
- D.115 days
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.Price variance: $500 Favourable; Usage variance: $600 Adverse
- B.Price variance: $500 Adverse; Usage variance: $600 Favourable
- C.Price variance: $500 Favourable; Usage variance: $600 Favourable
- D.Price variance: $500 Adverse; Usage variance: $600 Adverse
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.-$5,045
- B.$2,465
- C.$4,955
- D.$12,465
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.Share premium: $0; Retained earnings: $120,000
- B.Share premium: $25,000; Retained earnings: $95,000
- C.Share premium: $50,000; Retained earnings: $70,000
- D.Share premium: $0; Retained earnings: $70,000
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.\( \$41.60 \)
- B.\( \$44.00 \)
- C.\( \$44.60 \)
- D.\( \$47.00 \)
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.\( \$12,500 \)
- B.\( \$26,500 \)
- C.\( \$39,000 \)
- D.\( \$47,500 \)
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.\( \$2,000 \text{ credit} \)
- B.\( \$2,000 \text{ debit} \)
- C.\( \$8,000 \text{ credit} \)
- D.\( \$8,000 \text{ debit} \)
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.X: \( \$80,000 \); Y: \( \$50,000 \)
- B.X: \( \$90,000 \); Y: \( \$50,000 \)
- C.X: \( \$110,000 \); Y: \( \$70,000 \)
- D.X: \( \$100,000 \); Y: \( \$60,000 \)
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.Dividend cover: 1.25 times; Dividend yield: 10.0%
- B.Dividend cover: 2.5 times; Dividend yield: 5.0%
- C.Dividend cover: 2.5 times; Dividend yield: 24.0%
- D.Dividend cover: 5.0 times; Dividend yield: 12.0%
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.Labor rate: \( \$1,650 \) Favourable; Labor efficiency: \( \$1,200 \) Adverse
- B.Labor rate: \( \$1,650 \) Adverse; Labor efficiency: \( \$1,200 \) Favourable
- C.Labor rate: \( \$1,650 \) Adverse; Labor efficiency: \( \$1,200 \) Adverse
- D.Labor rate: \( \$1,600 \) Adverse; Labor efficiency: \( \$1,250 \) Adverse
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.\( \$22,605 \)
- B.\( \$36,265 \)
- C.\( \$42,605 \)
- D.\( \$49,925 \)
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.\( \$30,000 \)
- B.\( \$54,000 \)
- C.\( \$60,000 \)
- D.\( \$110,000 \)
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.$28,000
- B.$30,000
- C.$38,000
- D.$40,000 Gold option (credit only)
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.6,000 units
- B.7,500 units
- C.8,000 units
- D.10,000 units
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.Material price variance $2,500 Favourable; Material usage variance $3,000 Adverse
- B.Material price variance $2,500 Adverse; Material usage variance $3,000 Favourable
- C.Material price variance $2,400 Favourable; Material usage variance $2,900 Adverse
- D.Material price variance $3,000 Favourable; Material usage variance $2,500 Adverse
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.12.5%
- B.25.0%
- C.37.5%
- D.75.0%
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.$225,000
- B.$230,000
- C.$292,000
- D.$294,000
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.6 times
- B.8 times
- C.10 times
- D.12 times
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.Share premium $0; Retained earnings $140,000
- B.Share premium $0; Retained earnings $90,000
- C.Share premium $50,000; Retained earnings $90,000
- D.Share premium $10,000; Retained earnings $140,000
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
- A.$4,000
- B.$4,800
- C.$5,000
- D.$8,000
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
PastPaper.markingScheme
| | Product X | Product Y | Product Z |
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
| Contribution per unit | $15 | $24 | $16 |
| Raw material required per unit | 3 kg | 4 kg | 2 kg |
| Maximum monthly demand | 1,200 units | 1,500 units | 800 units |
The supply of raw material is limited to 7,000 kg per month.
What is the maximum monthly contribution the business can achieve?
- A.$38,400
- B.$41,600
- C.$44,000
- D.$45,200
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
- Product X: \(\$15 / 3 \text{ kg} = \$5 \text{ per kg}\)
- Product Y: \(\$24 / 4 \text{ kg} = \$6 \text{ per kg}\)
- Product Z: \(\$16 / 2 \text{ kg} = \$8 \text{ per kg}\)
Ranking:
1st: Product Z ($8 per kg)
2nd: Product Y ($6 per kg)
3rd: Product X ($5 per kg)
Allocation of limited raw material (7,000 kg):
1. Product Z (1st): Produce maximum demand of 800 units.
Raw material used = \(800 \text{ units} \times 2 \text{ kg} = 1,600 \text{ kg}\).
Contribution = \(800 \text{ units} \times \$16 = \$12,800\).
Remaining material = \(7,000 \text{ kg} - 1,600 \text{ kg} = 5,400 \text{ kg}\).
2. Product Y (2nd): Maximum demand is 1,500 units, which requires \(1,500 \text{ units} \times 4 \text{ kg} = 6,000 \text{ kg}\).
Since only 5,400 kg is remaining, produce as many units of Y as possible:
Units of Y = \(5,400 \text{ kg} / 4 \text{ kg} = 1,350 \text{ units}\).
Contribution = \(1,350 \text{ units} \times \$24 = \$32,400\).
Remaining material = \(5,400 \text{ kg} - 5,400 \text{ kg} = 0 \text{ kg}\).
3. Product X (3rd): 0 units produced.
Total maximum contribution = \(\$12,800 + \$32,400 = \$45,200\).
PastPaper.markingScheme
- If A is chosen: student incorrectly ranked X, Y, then Z.
- If B is chosen: student incorrectly ranked Z, X, then Y.
- If C is chosen: student incorrectly ranked Y, Z, then X.
They admit C into partnership. C brings in $50,000 cash as capital. The new profit sharing ratio is A, B, and C in the ratio of 3:1:1 respectively.
Goodwill is valued at $30,000 but is not to be retained in the books.
What is the balance on B's capital account after C's admission is completed?
- A.$34,000
- B.$40,000
- C.$46,000
- D.$52,000
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
- B's share = \(\$30,000 \times \frac{2}{5} = \$12,000\) (credit)
2. Debit all partners with goodwill in their new profit sharing ratio (3:1:1):
- B's share = \(\$30,000 \times \frac{1}{5} = \$6,000\) (debit)
3. Update B's capital account balance:
- Opening Balance: $40,000
- Add: Share of goodwill credited: +$12,000
- Less: Share of goodwill written off: -$6,000
- Closing Balance = \(\$40,000 + \$12,000 - \$6,000 = \$46,000\).
PastPaper.markingScheme
- If A is chosen: goodwill credited and debited incorrectly.
- If B is chosen: no adjustments made.
- If D is chosen: goodwill credited but not written off.
- Standard labor rate: $12 per hour
- Standard time per unit: 3 hours
During the month, 1,200 units were produced. The actual labor cost was $41,580 for 3,300 hours worked.
What are the direct labor rate and efficiency variances?
- A.Labor rate variance: $1,980 Adverse; Labor efficiency variance: $3,600 Favourable
- B.Labor rate variance: $1,980 Favourable; Labor efficiency variance: $3,600 Adverse
- C.Labor rate variance: $2,160 Adverse; Labor efficiency variance: $3,600 Favourable
- D.Labor rate variance: $1,980 Adverse; Labor efficiency variance: $3,780 Favourable
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
Actual rate per hour = \(\$41,580 / 3,300 \text{ hours} = \$12.60\)
Rate variance = \((\text{Standard Rate} - \text{Actual Rate}) \times \text{Actual Hours}\)
= \((\$12.00 - \$12.60) \times 3,300 = \$1,980\) Adverse (since actual rate is higher than standard rate).
2. Labor efficiency variance:
Standard hours for actual production = \(1,200 \text{ units} \times 3 \text{ hours/unit} = 3,600 \text{ hours}\)
Efficiency variance = \((\text{Standard Hours} - \text{Actual Hours}) \times \text{Standard Rate}\)
= \((3,600 - 3,300) \times \$12 = \$3,600\) Favourable (since actual hours are fewer than standard hours).
PastPaper.markingScheme
- If B is chosen: variances have correct values but incorrect directions.
- If C is chosen: rate variance was incorrectly calculated using standard hours instead of actual hours.
- If D is chosen: efficiency variance was incorrectly calculated using actual rate instead of standard rate.
Discount factors at 10% are:
- Year 1: 0.909
- Year 2: 0.826
- Year 3: 0.751
What is the Net Present Value (NPV) of the project?
- A.-$8,130
- B.$3,135
- C.$6,870
- D.$30,000
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
- Year 1: \(\$45,000 \times 0.909 = \$40,905\)
- Year 2: \(\$45,000 \times 0.826 = \$37,170\)
- Year 3 (Operating): \(\$45,000 \times 0.751 = \$33,795\)
- Year 3 (Scrap): \(\$15,000 \times 0.751 = \$11,265\)
Total PV of cash inflows = \(\$40,905 + \$37,170 + \$33,795 + \$11,265 = \$123,135\).
Net Present Value (NPV) = Total PV of Cash Inflows - Initial Investment
= \(\$123,135 - \$120,000 = \$3,135\).
PastPaper.markingScheme
- If A is chosen: scrap value was ignored.
- If C is chosen: scrap value was added directly without discounting.
- If D is chosen: non-discounted net cash flows were calculated.
What is the immediate effect of this transaction on these two ratios?
- A.Current ratio decreases; Liquid (acid test) ratio decreases
- B.Current ratio decreases; Liquid (acid test) ratio increases
- C.Current ratio increases; Liquid (acid test) ratio decreases
- D.Current ratio increases; Liquid (acid test) ratio increases
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
Current Ratio = \(\$150 / \$100 = 1.5 : 1\).
If Inventory = $70, Liquid Assets (LA) = \(\$150 - \$70 = \$80\).
Liquid Ratio = \(\$80 / \$100 = 0.8 : 1\).
If the business purchases inventory of $20 on credit:
1. Current Assets increase by $20 (due to inventory) to $170.
2. Current Liabilities increase by $20 (due to trade payables) to $120.
3. Liquid Assets remain unchanged at $80 (as inventory is excluded from liquid assets).
New Ratios:
- New Current Ratio = \(\$170 / \$120 = 1.42 : 1\) (Decreases from 1.5 : 1).
- New Liquid Ratio = \(\$80 / \$120 = 0.67 : 1\) (Decreases from 0.8 : 1).
Therefore, both ratios decrease.
PastPaper.markingScheme
- If B, C, or D is chosen: misinterpretation of the mathematical effect on fractions when both numerator and denominator change, or incorrect assumption that liquid assets increase due to inventory purchase.
| | $ |
| :--- | :---: |
| Direct materials cost | 180,000 |
| Direct wages | 120,000 |
| Factory overheads | 90,000 |
| Opening work in progress | 15,000 |
| Closing work in progress | 18,000 |
| Opening finished goods | 40,000 |
| Closing finished goods | 35,000 |
Finished goods are transferred from the factory to the trading account at cost of production plus 20% manufacturing profit.
What is the manufacturing profit for the year?
- A.$77,400
- B.$78,000
- C.$78,400
- D.$96,750
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
- Prime Cost = \(\text{Direct materials} + \text{Direct wages} = \$180,000 + \$120,000 = \$300,000\)
- Factory Cost of Goods Produced = \(\text{Prime Cost} + \text{Factory overheads} + \text{Opening WIP} - \text{Closing WIP}\)
- Cost of Production = \(\$300,000 + \$90,000 + \$15,000 - \$18,000 = \$387,000\)
2. Calculate the Manufacturing Profit:
- Manufacturing Profit = \(20\% \times \text{Cost of Production} = 20\% \times \$387,000 = \$77,400\).
Note: Finished goods opening and closing balances are used in the Trading Account, not in the Manufacturing Account, so they do not affect the Cost of Production or the manufacturing profit.
PastPaper.markingScheme
- If B is chosen: WIP adjustments were ignored in calculating cost of production.
- If C is chosen: finished goods adjustments were incorrectly included in calculating cost of production.
- If D is chosen: calculated markup of 25% (or 20/80 on cost) instead of 20%.
Paper 22 (Fundamentals of Accounting)
**Balances at 1 January 2022**
* Equipment (carrying value): $24,000
* Inventory: $16,500
* Trade receivables: $11,200
* Trade payables: $8,400
* Bank overdraft: $2,100
* Prepaid rent: $1,200
**Balances at 31 December 2022**
* Equipment (at cost/carrying value before depreciation): $24,000
* Inventory: $18,100
* Trade receivables (before writing off bad debts): $13,400
* Trade payables: $9,200
* Accrued electricity: $450
**Summary of Bank Transactions during the year ended 31 December 2022**
* Receipts from credit customers: $84,500
* Cash sales deposited into bank: $15,800
* Payments to trade payables: $51,300
* Rent paid: $7,800
* Electricity paid: $3,200
* General expenses paid: $6,400
* Drawings paid by bank transfer: $9,000
**Additional Information**
1. During the year, Tariq paid helper's wages of $3,600 and took cash drawings of $4,000 directly from cash sales before depositing the remaining balance of $15,800 into the bank.
2. A credit customer who owed $800 has been declared bankrupt and is to be written off as a bad debt. This adjustment has not yet been made to the records.
3. Rent paid during the year includes $1,500 paid for the period up to 31 March 2023.
4. Tariq took goods costing $1,500 for his personal use. No entries have been made for this.
5. Depreciation on equipment is to be provided at 15% per annum on the carrying value at the start of the year.
**Required**
(a) Calculate Tariq's total revenue (sales) for the year ended 31 December 2022. [6 marks]
(b) Calculate Tariq's total purchases for the year ended 31 December 2022. [4 marks]
(c) Prepare the Income Statement for the year ended 31 December 2022. [14 marks]
(d) State three advantages to a sole trader of maintaining a full double-entry system of book-keeping rather than incomplete records. [6 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
* **Credit Sales (using Trade Receivables Control Account):**
* Opening Trade Receivables: $11,200 (Debit)
* Receipts from Credit Customers: $84,500 (Credit)
* Bad debts written off: $800 (Credit)
* Closing Trade Receivables (adjusted): $13,400 - $800 = $12,600
* Credit Sales = $12,600 + $84,500 + $800 - $11,200 = **$86,700**
* **Cash Sales:**
* Cash sales banked: $15,800
* Cash wages paid: $3,600
* Cash drawings: $4,000
* Total Cash Sales = $15,800 + $3,600 + $4,000 = **$23,400**
* **Total Revenue** = $86,700 + $23,400 = **$110,100**
***
**(b) Calculation of Total Purchases**
* **Credit Purchases (using Trade Payables Control Account):**
* Payments to Trade Payables: $51,300
* Closing Trade Payables: $9,200
* Less: Opening Trade Payables: ($8,400)
* Total Purchases = $51,300 + $9,200 - $8,400 = **$52,100**
* *Note: Purchases net of drawings = $52,100 - $1,500 = $50,600.*
***
**(c) Income Statement for the year ended 31 December 2022**
| | $ | $
|---|---|---
| **Revenue** ($86,700 + $23,400) | | 110,100
| **Cost of Sales** | |
| Opening inventory | 16,500 |
| Add: Purchases ($52,100 - $1,500 drawings) | 50,600 |
| | 67,100 |
| Less: Closing inventory | (18,100) |
| **Cost of Sales** | | (49,000)
| **Gross Profit** | | **61,100**
| **Expenses** | |
| Wages | 3,600 |
| Rent ($7,800 + $1,200 - $1,500) | 7,500 |
| Electricity ($3,200 + $450) | 3,650 |
| Bad debts | 800 |
| General expenses | 6,400 |
| Depreciation on equipment (15% \times $24,000) | 3,600 |
| **Total Expenses** | | (25,550)
| **Profit for the year** | | **35,550**
***
**(d) Three advantages of a full double-entry system:**
1. **Arithmetical Accuracy Check:** It enables the preparation of a Trial Balance, which checks the arithmetical accuracy of the postings.
2. **Prevention and Detection of Fraud:** Having cross-referencing ledger entries and performing bank reconciliations makes fraud, theft, and errors much easier to detect and prevent.
3. **Facilitates Financial Analysis and Planning:** Accurate financial statements (Income Statement and Statement of Financial Position) can be easily generated directly from the ledger balances, helping in decision making and applying for external finance.
PastPaper.markingScheme
* Credit Sales calculation: Credit sales of $86,700 [3] (1 mark for including $800 bad debt in receivables reconciliation, 1 mark for correct use of receivables control formula, 1 mark for accuracy of final credit sales figure).
* Cash Sales calculation: Cash sales of $23,400 [2] (1 mark for including cash wages of $3,600 and cash drawings of $4,000, 1 mark for correct total).
* Total Sales = $110,100 [1].
**(b) Total Purchases [4 Marks]**
* Payments to payables $51,300 + Closing payables $9,200 - Opening payables $8,400 = $52,100 [3] (1 mark for payment, 1 mark for correct adjustments of opening/closing payables, 1 mark for accuracy).
* Adjustment for drawings of goods (reducing purchases/cost of sales by $1,500) [1].
**(c) Income Statement [14 Marks]**
* Revenue: $110,100 [1] (OF from part a)
* Opening inventory: $16,500 [1]
* Purchases (net of drawings): $50,600 [2] (1 mark for purchases OF, 1 mark for subtracting $1,500 drawings of goods)
* Closing inventory: $18,100 [1]
* Cost of sales: $49,000 [1]
* Gross Profit: $61,100 [1] (OF)
* Wages: $3,600 [1]
* Rent: $7,500 [2] (1 mark for adjustment $7,800 + $1,200 - $1,500, 1 mark for accuracy)
* Electricity: $3,650 [1]
* Bad debts: $800 [1]
* General expenses: $6,400 [1]
* Depreciation: $3,600 [1]
* Profit for the year: $35,550 [1] (OF)
**(d) Advantages [6 Marks]**
* State advantage + development/explanation (3 imes 2 marks) = [6 marks].
* Max 2 marks per point:
* e.g., Preparing a Trial Balance [1] to check the arithmetical accuracy of the accounts [1].
* e.g., Reduces risk of fraud/theft [1] because accounts are reconciled systematically [1].
* e.g., Easier to secure bank loans/finance [1] as banks require audited/reliable double-entry accounts [1].
$$\begin{array}{|l|r|r|} \hline & \text{Year 1 (\$)} & \text{Year 2 (\$)} \\ \hline \text{Revenue (all on credit)} & 320,000 & 400,000 \\ \hline \text{Cost of sales} & 224,000 & 300,000 \\ \hline \text{Gross profit} & 96,000 & 100,000 \\ \hline \text{Operating expenses} & 48,000 & 68,000 \\ \hline \text{Profit for the year} & 48,000 & 32,000 \\ \hline \text{Average inventory} & 24,000 & 30,000 \\ \hline \text{Trade receivables at year-end} & 36,000 & 48,000 \\ \hline \text{Trade payables at year-end} & 22,000 & 30,000 \\ \hline \text{Credit purchases} & 230,000 & 304,000 \\ \hline \end{array}$$
**Required**:
(a) Calculate the following ratios for both Year 1 and Year 2. (Round your answers to two decimal places.)
(i) Gross profit margin (%)
(ii) Profit margin (%)
(iii) Rate of inventory turnover (times)
(iv) Trade receivables turnover (days)
[8 marks]
(b) State three possible reasons for the change in the gross profit margin from Year 1 to Year 2. [3 marks]
(c) Suggest three actions Zeta Limited could take to improve its working capital cycle. [4 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
**(i) Gross profit margin (%)**
Formula: \(\frac{\text{Gross Profit}}{\text{Revenue}} \times 100\)
- Year 1: \(\frac{\$96,000}{\$320,000} \times 100 = 30.00\%\)
- Year 2: \(\frac{\$100,000}{\$400,000} \times 100 = 25.00\%\)
**(ii) Profit margin (%)**
Formula: \(\frac{\text{Profit for the year}}{\text{Revenue}} \times 100\)
- Year 1: \(\frac{\$48,000}{\$320,000} \times 100 = 15.00\%\)
- Year 2: \(\frac{\$32,000}{\$400,000} \times 100 = 8.00\%\)
**(iii) Rate of inventory turnover (times)**
Formula: \(\frac{\text{Cost of sales}}{\text{Average inventory}}\)
- Year 1: \(\frac{\$224,000}{\$24,000} = 9.33\) times
- Year 2: \(\frac{\$300,000}{\$30,000} = 10.00\) times
**(iv) Trade receivables turnover (days)**
Formula: \(\frac{\text{Trade receivables}}{\text{Credit sales}} \times 365\)
- Year 1: \(\frac{\$36,000}{\$320,000} \times 365 = 41.06\) days
- Year 2: \(\frac{\$48,000}{\$400,000} \times 365 = 43.80\) days
**(b) Possible reasons for the decrease in gross profit margin:**
- Increase in the purchase cost of goods from suppliers that was not passed on to customers.
- Offering trade discounts or promotional price reductions to increase sales volume.
- Increase in direct costs such as carriage inwards.
- A change in the sales mix towards lower-margin goods.
- Inventory theft, damage, or write-downs of obsolete stock.
**(c) Actions to improve the working capital cycle:**
- Offer cash discounts (settlement discounts) to credit customers to encourage prompt payment.
- Implement stricter credit control policies, such as credit checks on new customers and sending regular reminders.
- Negotiate longer payment periods with trade suppliers (without losing goodwill or critical supplier discounts).
- Implement better inventory management systems (e.g., Just-In-Time) to reduce the level of average inventory held and speed up turnover.
- Charge interest on overdue accounts to discourage late payments.
PastPaper.markingScheme
- (i) Gross profit margin: 1 mark for Year 1 (30.00%) and 1 mark for Year 2 (25.00%). [2 marks]
- (ii) Profit margin: 1 mark for Year 1 (15.00%) and 1 mark for Year 2 (8.00%). [2 marks]
- (iii) Rate of inventory turnover: 1 mark for Year 1 (9.33 times) and 1 mark for Year 2 (10.00 times). [2 marks]
- (iv) Trade receivables turnover: 1 mark for Year 1 (41.06 days, accept 41 days or 41.1 days) and 1 mark for Year 2 (43.80 days, accept 44 days or 43.8 days). [2 marks]
**Part (b) [3 marks total]**
- 1 mark for each valid reason stated up to a maximum of 3 marks.
- Acceptable points include: cost of sales increasing faster than selling price, price reductions to boost turnover, changes in sales mix, changes in supplier terms, inventory wastage.
**Part (c) [4 marks total]**
- 1 mark for each valid action suggested with development/explanation (up to a maximum of 4 marks).
- Acceptable points: credit control improvements, customer payment incentives, inventory control systems, negotiation of credit terms with suppliers.
Apex plc
At 1 April 2022, the equity balances of Apex plc were as follows:
- Ordinary shares of $0.50 each: $300,000
- Share premium: $80,000
- General reserve: $40,000
- Retained earnings: $115,000
The following transactions took place during the year ended 31 March 2023:
- 1 June 2022: Paid a final dividend for the year ended 31 March 2022 of $0.05 per share.
- 1 September 2022: Made a rights issue of 1 share for every 4 held at a price of $0.80 per share. The issue was fully subscribed.
- 1 December 2022: Made a bonus issue of 1 share for every 5 held. The directors decided to maintain reserves in their most flexible form.
- 1 February 2023: Paid an interim dividend of $0.02 per share on all shares in issue at that date.
- 31 March 2023: The profit for the year was $95,000.
- 31 March 2023: Transferred $25,000 to the general reserve.
Required:
(a) Prepare the Statement of Changes in Equity for Apex plc for the year ended 31 March 2023. [10 marks]
(b) State three differences between ordinary shares and preference shares. [3 marks]
(c) State two reasons why a company might make a bonus issue rather than pay a cash dividend. [2 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
Part (a)
Statement of Changes in Equity for Apex plc for the year ended 31 March 2023:
DetailsOrdinary Share Capital ($)Share Premium ($)General Reserve ($)Retained Earnings ($)Total ($)Balances at 1 April 2022300,00080,00040,000115,000535,000Final dividend (600,000 shares * $0.05)---(30,000)(30,000)Rights issue (150,000 shares)75,00045,000--120,000Bonus issue (150,000 shares)75,000(75,000)---Interim dividend (900,000 shares * $0.02)---(18,000)(18,000)Profit for the year---95,00095,000Transfer to general reserve--25,000(25,000)-Balances at 31 March 2023450,00050,00065,000137,000702,000Workings:
- Rights issue: \(600,000 / 4 = 150,000\) shares. Share capital = \(150,000 * $0.50 = $75,000\). Share premium = \(150,000 * ($0.80 - $0.50) = $45,000\). Total = \($120,000\).
- Bonus issue: Shares held = \(600,000 + 150,000 = 750,000\) shares. Bonus shares = \(750,000 / 5 = 150,000\) shares. Nominal value = \(150,000 * $0.50 = $75,000\). Fully funded from share premium to keep reserves in the most flexible form.
- Interim dividend: Shares held = \(750,000 + 150,000 = 900,000\) shares. Dividend = \(900,000 * $0.02 = $18,000\).
Part (b)
Differences between ordinary shares and preference shares (any three):
- Ordinary dividends are variable and not guaranteed, whereas preference dividends are usually at a fixed rate.
- Ordinary shareholders usually have voting rights at general meetings, whereas preference shareholders do not.
- In the event of liquidation, preference shareholders have priority over ordinary shareholders for repayment of capital.
- Preference dividends may be cumulative, whereas ordinary dividends are never cumulative.
Part (c)
Reasons for making a bonus issue instead of paying a cash dividend (any two):
- To conserve cash/liquidity within the company for future expansion or working capital.
- To capitalise reserves, converting non-distributable or distributable reserves into permanent share capital.
- To reduce the market price per share, making the shares more affordable and marketable to smaller investors.
- To reassure shareholders of the company's financial strength and growth potential when cash is not currently distributable.
PastPaper.markingScheme
Part (a) [Total: 10 marks]
- Final dividend: $30,000 in Retained Earnings (1 mark)
- Rights issue: $75,000 in Share Capital and $45,000 in Share Premium (1 mark), $120,000 in Total (1 mark)
- Bonus issue: $75,000 in Share Capital and ($75,000) in Share Premium (2 marks)
- Interim dividend: $18,000 in Retained Earnings (1 mark)
- Profit for the year: $95,000 in Retained Earnings (1 mark)
- Transfer to general reserve: $25,000 in General Reserve and ($25,000) in Retained Earnings (1 mark)
- Closing balances: Share capital $450,000, Share premium $50,000, General reserve $65,000, Retained earnings $137,000 (2 marks - 1 mark for any two correct, 2 marks for all four correct)
Part (b) [Total: 3 marks]
- 1 mark for each valid difference between ordinary shares and preference shares, up to a maximum of 3 marks. (e.g., dividend variability, voting rights, priority in winding up, cumulative nature).
Part (c) [Total: 2 marks]
- 1 mark for each valid reason for a bonus issue over a cash dividend, up to a maximum of 2 marks. (e.g., conserving cash, capitalising reserves, lowering market price per share to improve liquidity, signal of strength).
The following budgeted information is available for next month:
| | Alpha | Beta | Gamma |
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
| Selling price per unit | $50 | $65 | $80 |
| Direct materials ($5 per kg) | $15 | $20 | $30 |
| Direct labor ($12 per hour) | $18 | $24 | $24 |
| Variable overheads per unit | $5 | $6 | $8 |
| Maximum monthly demand (units) | 1,500 | 2,000 | 1,200 |
Monthly fixed overheads are budgeted at $31,500.
Due to temporary supply chain disruptions, the availability of direct materials next month is expected to be restricted to 14,000 kg.
**Required**
(a) Calculate the unit contribution for each of the three products: Alpha, Beta, and Gamma. [3]
(b) Explain why direct materials are a limiting factor for the next month, supporting your answer with calculations. [4]
(c) Determine the optimal production mix for next month and calculate the maximum profit that Venture Limited can achieve. [11]
(d) Venture Limited has received an export order for 300 units of Gamma at a special selling price of $70 per unit. Direct materials would have to be purchased from a special overseas supplier at a premium price of $6 per kg (instead of $5) to fulfill this order. No other domestic production would be affected as the supplier will provide these materials specifically for this order. There would be no additional fixed costs.
Advise the directors whether they should accept this export order. Support your answer with calculations. [6]
(e) State three limitations of using marginal costing for decision-making. [6]
[Total: 30 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
* **Alpha:** \( \text{Selling price} - \text{Variable costs} = \$50 - (\$15 + \$18 + \$5) = \$50 - \$38 = \$12 \) per unit
* **Beta:** \( \text{Selling price} - \text{Variable costs} = \$65 - (\$20 + \$24 + \$6) = \$65 - \$50 = \$15 \) per unit
* **Gamma:** \( \text{Selling price} - \text{Variable costs} = \$80 - (\$30 + \$24 + \$8) = \$80 - \$62 = \$18 \) per unit
**(b) Direct materials as a limiting factor:**
First, determine the direct material required in kilograms per unit:
* Alpha: \( \frac{\$15}{\$5} = 3 \text{ kg} \)
* Beta: \( \frac{\$20}{\$5} = 4 \text{ kg} \)
* Gamma: \( \frac{\$30}{\$5} = 6 \text{ kg} \)
Next, calculate total material needed to meet maximum demand:
* Alpha: \( 1,500 \text{ units} \times 3 \text{ kg} = 4,500 \text{ kg} \)
* Beta: \( 2,000 \text{ units} \times 4 \text{ kg} = 8,000 \text{ kg} \)
* Gamma: \( 1,200 \text{ units} \times 6 \text{ kg} = 7,200 \text{ kg} \)
* **Total material required:** \( 4,500 + 8,000 + 7,200 = 19,700 \text{ kg} \)
Since the total direct materials required (19,700 kg) exceeds the maximum availability of direct materials (14,000 kg), direct materials are a limiting factor.
**(c) Optimal production mix and maximum profit:**
Calculate the contribution per kg of the limiting factor (direct materials):
* **Alpha:** \( \frac{\$12 \text{ contribution}}{3 \text{ kg}} = \$4.00 \text{ per kg} \)
* **Beta:** \( \frac{\$15 \text{ contribution}}{4 \text{ kg}} = \$3.75 \text{ per kg} \)
* **Gamma:** \( \frac{\$18 \text{ contribution}}{6 \text{ kg}} = \$3.00 \text{ per kg} \)
**Ranking:**
1. Alpha ($4.00 per kg)
2. Beta ($3.75 per kg)
3. Gamma ($3.00 per kg)
**Allocation of materials (14,000 kg available):**
1. **Alpha (1st):** Meet full demand of 1,500 units.
* Material used: \( 1,500 \times 3 \text{ kg} = 4,500 \text{ kg} \)
* Remaining material: \( 14,000 - 4,500 = 9,500 \text{ kg} \)
2. **Beta (2nd):** Meet full demand of 2,000 units.
* Material used: \( 2,000 \times 4 \text{ kg} = 8,000 \text{ kg} \)
* Remaining material: \( 9,500 - 8,000 = 1,500 \text{ kg} \)
3. **Gamma (3rd):** Use remaining material.
* Units produced: \( \frac{1,500 \text{ kg}}{6 \text{ kg per unit}} = 250 \text{ units} \)
**Optimal Production Mix:**
* Alpha: 1,500 units
* Beta: 2,000 units
* Gamma: 250 units
**Calculation of Maximum Profit:**
| Product | Units | Contribution per Unit | Total Contribution |
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
| Alpha | 1,500 | $12 | $18,000 |
| Beta | 2,000 | $15 | $30,000 |
| Gamma | 250 | $18 | $4,500 |
| **Total Contribution** | | | **$52,500** |
| Less: Fixed Overheads | | | ($31,500) |
| **Maximum Profit** | | | **$21,000** |
**(d) Export order evaluation:**
* **Special Selling Price:** $70 per unit
* **Direct Material Cost:** \( 6 \text{ kg} \times \$6 \text{ per kg} = \$36 \text{ per unit} \)
* **Direct Labor:** $24 per unit
* **Variable Overheads:** $8 per unit
* **Total Variable Cost per unit:** \( \$36 + \$24 + \$8 = \$68 \text{ per unit} \)
* **Contribution per unit:** \( \$70 - \$68 = \$2 \text{ per unit} \)
* **Total Contribution from export order:** \( 300 \text{ units} \times \$2 = \$600 \)
**Advice:**
The directors should accept the export order. It yields a positive contribution of $2 per unit, increasing the company's total contribution and overall net profit by $600. Since this order uses specialized external supply, it does not cannibalize or restrict existing profitable domestic production.
**Other considerations:**
* Will this lead to long-term profitable export relationships?
* Is there sufficient labor capacity to produce these extra 300 units?
* Will domestic buyers discover the lower price ($70 vs $80) and demand discounts?
**(e) Three limitations of marginal costing:**
1. **Fixed Costs Assumptions:** It assumes fixed costs remain completely unchanged across all levels of activity. In reality, fixed costs often increase in steps as capacity thresholds are reached.
2. **Linear Variable Costs:** It assumes variable costs per unit are constant. This ignores potential discounts for bulk material purchases or premium overtime rates for labor.
3. **Constant Selling Price:** It assumes selling price remains constant regardless of volume. In practice, a firm may need to lower prices to sell higher volumes (price elasticity).
4. **Short-term Focus:** It focuses primarily on contribution and short-term decisions, which can lead to underpricing in the long term if products fail to recover total fixed overheads.
PastPaper.markingScheme
* Alpha contribution = $12 (1)
* Beta contribution = $15 (1)
* Gamma contribution = $18 (1)
**(b)** [Total: 4 marks]
* Calculate kg/unit for all products (Alpha = 3 kg, Beta = 4 kg, Gamma = 6 kg) (1)
* Calculate total material required: Alpha (4,500 kg) and Beta (8,000 kg) (1)
* Calculate Gamma required (7,200 kg) (1)
* State that total requirement (19,700 kg) exceeds availability (14,000 kg), hence it is a limiting factor (1)
**(c)** [Total: 11 marks]
* Calculate contribution per kg: Alpha = $4.00, Beta = $3.75, Gamma = $3.00 (3 marks - 1 mark for each)
* Establish ranking: 1st Alpha, 2nd Beta, 3rd Gamma (1)
* Allocate materials to Alpha: 1,500 units / 4,500 kg (1)
* Allocate materials to Beta: 2,000 units / 8,000 kg (1)
* Allocate remaining materials to Gamma: 250 units / 1,500 kg (1)
* Calculate Alpha contribution ($18,000) (1)
* Calculate Beta contribution ($30,000) (1)
* Calculate Gamma contribution ($4,500) (1)
* Calculate Net Profit ($21,000) (1)
**(d)** [Total: 6 marks]
* Calculate revised material cost: 6 kg * $6 = $36 (1)
* Calculate total variable cost: $68 (1)
* Calculate unit contribution: $2 (1)
* Calculate total contribution: $600 (1)
* Provide clear recommendation based on positive contribution (1)
* Provide at least one non-financial factor / qualitative consideration (1)
**(e)** [Total: 6 marks]
* Award 2 marks for each well-explained limitation (up to a maximum of 3 limitations):
* Fixed costs are not always constant / step costs exist (2)
* Variable costs per unit can change due to economies of scale (2)
* Selling prices may fluctuate with volume (2)
* Over-reliance on short-term analysis may lead to long-term failure to cover fixed costs (2)
* (Accept other valid limitations of marginal costing)
The following budgeted information is available for next month:
| | Alpha | Beta | Gamma |
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
| Selling price per unit | $50 | $65 | $80 |
| Direct materials ($5 per kg) | $15 | $20 | $30 |
| Direct labor ($12 per hour) | $18 | $24 | $24 |
| Variable overheads per unit | $5 | $6 | $8 |
| Maximum monthly demand (units) | 1,500 | 2,000 | 1,200 |
Monthly fixed overheads are budgeted at $31,500.
Due to temporary supply chain disruptions, the availability of direct materials next month is expected to be restricted to 14,000 kg.
**Required**
(a) Calculate the unit contribution for each of the three products: Alpha, Beta, and Gamma. [3]
(b) Explain why direct materials are a limiting factor for the next month, supporting your answer with calculations. [4]
(c) Determine the optimal production mix for next month and calculate the maximum profit that Venture Limited can achieve. [11]
(d) Venture Limited has received an export order for 300 units of Gamma at a special selling price of $70 per unit. Direct materials would have to be purchased from a special overseas supplier at a premium price of $6 per kg (instead of $5) to fulfill this order. No other domestic production would be affected as the supplier will provide these materials specifically for this order. There would be no additional fixed costs.
Advise the directors whether they should accept this export order. Support your answer with calculations. [6]
(e) State three limitations of using marginal costing for decision-making. [6]
[Total: 30 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
* **Alpha:** \( \text{Selling price} - \text{Variable costs} = \$50 - (\$15 + \$18 + \$5) = \$50 - \$38 = \$12 \) per unit
* **Beta:** \( \text{Selling price} - \text{Variable costs} = \$65 - (\$20 + \$24 + \$6) = \$65 - \$50 = \$15 \) per unit
* **Gamma:** \( \text{Selling price} - \text{Variable costs} = \$80 - (\$30 + \$24 + \$8) = \$80 - \$62 = \$18 \) per unit
**(b) Direct materials as a limiting factor:**
First, determine the direct material required in kilograms per unit:
* Alpha: \( \frac{\$15}{\$5} = 3 \text{ kg} \)
* Beta: \( \frac{\$20}{\$5} = 4 \text{ kg} \)
* Gamma: \( \frac{\$30}{\$5} = 6 \text{ kg} \)
Next, calculate total material needed to meet maximum demand:
* Alpha: \( 1,500 \text{ units} \times 3 \text{ kg} = 4,500 \text{ kg} \)
* Beta: \( 2,000 \text{ units} \times 4 \text{ kg} = 8,000 \text{ kg} \)
* Gamma: \( 1,200 \text{ units} \times 6 \text{ kg} = 7,200 \text{ kg} \)
* **Total material required:** \( 4,500 + 8,000 + 7,200 = 19,700 \text{ kg} \)
Since the total direct materials required (19,700 kg) exceeds the maximum availability of direct materials (14,000 kg), direct materials are a limiting factor.
**(c) Optimal production mix and maximum profit:**
Calculate the contribution per kg of the limiting factor (direct materials):
* **Alpha:** \( \frac{\$12 \text{ contribution}}{3 \text{ kg}} = \$4.00 \text{ per kg} \)
* **Beta:** \( \frac{\$15 \text{ contribution}}{4 \text{ kg}} = \$3.75 \text{ per kg} \)
* **Gamma:** \( \frac{\$18 \text{ contribution}}{6 \text{ kg}} = \$3.00 \text{ per kg} \)
**Ranking:**
1. Alpha ($4.00 per kg)
2. Beta ($3.75 per kg)
3. Gamma ($3.00 per kg)
**Allocation of materials (14,000 kg available):**
1. **Alpha (1st):** Meet full demand of 1,500 units.
* Material used: \( 1,500 \times 3 \text{ kg} = 4,500 \text{ kg} \)
* Remaining material: \( 14,000 - 4,500 = 9,500 \text{ kg} \)
2. **Beta (2nd):** Meet full demand of 2,000 units.
* Material used: \( 2,000 \times 4 \text{ kg} = 8,000 \text{ kg} \)
* Remaining material: \( 9,500 - 8,000 = 1,500 \text{ kg} \)
3. **Gamma (3rd):** Use remaining material.
* Units produced: \( \frac{1,500 \text{ kg}}{6 \text{ kg per unit}} = 250 \text{ units} \)
**Optimal Production Mix:**
* Alpha: 1,500 units
* Beta: 2,000 units
* Gamma: 250 units
**Calculation of Maximum Profit:**
| Product | Units | Contribution per Unit | Total Contribution |
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
| Alpha | 1,500 | $12 | $18,000 |
| Beta | 2,000 | $15 | $30,000 |
| Gamma | 250 | $18 | $4,500 |
| **Total Contribution** | | | **$52,500** |
| Less: Fixed Overheads | | | ($31,500) |
| **Maximum Profit** | | | **$21,000** |
**(d) Export order evaluation:**
* **Special Selling Price:** $70 per unit
* **Direct Material Cost:** \( 6 \text{ kg} \times \$6 \text{ per kg} = \$36 \text{ per unit} \)
* **Direct Labor:** $24 per unit
* **Variable Overheads:** $8 per unit
* **Total Variable Cost per unit:** \( \$36 + \$24 + \$8 = \$68 \text{ per unit} \)
* **Contribution per unit:** \( \$70 - \$68 = \$2 \text{ per unit} \)
* **Total Contribution from export order:** \( 300 \text{ units} \times \$2 = \$600 \)
**Advice:**
The directors should accept the export order. It yields a positive contribution of $2 per unit, increasing the company's total contribution and overall net profit by $600. Since this order uses specialized external supply, it does not cannibalize or restrict existing profitable domestic production.
**Other considerations:**
* Will this lead to long-term profitable export relationships?
* Is there sufficient labor capacity to produce these extra 300 units?
* Will domestic buyers discover the lower price ($70 vs $80) and demand discounts?
**(e) Three limitations of marginal costing:**
1. **Fixed Costs Assumptions:** It assumes fixed costs remain completely unchanged across all levels of activity. In reality, fixed costs often increase in steps as capacity thresholds are reached.
2. **Linear Variable Costs:** It assumes variable costs per unit are constant. This ignores potential discounts for bulk material purchases or premium overtime rates for labor.
3. **Constant Selling Price:** It assumes selling price remains constant regardless of volume. In practice, a firm may need to lower prices to sell higher volumes (price elasticity).
4. **Short-term Focus:** It focuses primarily on contribution and short-term decisions, which can lead to underpricing in the long term if products fail to recover total fixed overheads.
PastPaper.markingScheme
* Alpha contribution = $12 (1)
* Beta contribution = $15 (1)
* Gamma contribution = $18 (1)
**(b)** [Total: 4 marks]
* Calculate kg/unit for all products (Alpha = 3 kg, Beta = 4 kg, Gamma = 6 kg) (1)
* Calculate total material required: Alpha (4,500 kg) and Beta (8,000 kg) (1)
* Calculate Gamma required (7,200 kg) (1)
* State that total requirement (19,700 kg) exceeds availability (14,000 kg), hence it is a limiting factor (1)
**(c)** [Total: 11 marks]
* Calculate contribution per kg: Alpha = $4.00, Beta = $3.75, Gamma = $3.00 (3 marks - 1 mark for each)
* Establish ranking: 1st Alpha, 2nd Beta, 3rd Gamma (1)
* Allocate materials to Alpha: 1,500 units / 4,500 kg (1)
* Allocate materials to Beta: 2,000 units / 8,000 kg (1)
* Allocate remaining materials to Gamma: 250 units / 1,500 kg (1)
* Calculate Alpha contribution ($18,000) (1)
* Calculate Beta contribution ($30,000) (1)
* Calculate Gamma contribution ($4,500) (1)
* Calculate Net Profit ($21,000) (1)
**(d)** [Total: 6 marks]
* Calculate revised material cost: 6 kg * $6 = $36 (1)
* Calculate total variable cost: $68 (1)
* Calculate unit contribution: $2 (1)
* Calculate total contribution: $600 (1)
* Provide clear recommendation based on positive contribution (1)
* Provide at least one non-financial factor / qualitative consideration (1)
**(e)** [Total: 6 marks]
* Award 2 marks for each well-explained limitation (up to a maximum of 3 limitations):
* Fixed costs are not always constant / step costs exist (2)
* Variable costs per unit can change due to economies of scale (2)
* Selling prices may fluctuate with volume (2)
* Over-reliance on short-term analysis may lead to long-term failure to cover fixed costs (2)
* (Accept other valid limitations of marginal costing)
Paper 32 (Financial Accounting)
Vandermeer Ltd
Vandermeer Ltd is a manufacturing business. The following trial balance information is available at 30 April 2023:
Account TitleDebit ($)Credit ($)Inventory at 1 May 2022:- Raw materials45000- Work in progress28000- Finished goods (at transfer price)78000Purchases of raw materials245000Carriage inwards on raw materials8500Direct factory wages184000Indirect factory wages62000Factory supervision salaries35000Factory power and heating54000Administrative expenses112000Distribution costs86000Revenue920000Factory machinery at cost240000Provision for depreciation on factory machinery (1 May 2022)72000The following additional information is available at 30 April 2023:
- Inventories at 30 April 2023 were valued as follows: Raw materials $48,500; Work in progress $31,200.
- Finished goods are transferred from the factory to the warehouse at a transfer price including a mark-up of 30% on factory cost. Finished goods inventory on 30 April 2023 was valued at transfer price of $91,000.
- Direct factory wages of $6,000 were accrued at 30 April 2023.
- Factory power and heating includes a prepaid expense of $4,000.
- Depreciation is to be provided on factory machinery at 15% per annum on cost.
Required:
(a) Prepare the Manufacturing Account for Vandermeer Ltd for the year ended 30 April 2023, showing clearly the prime cost, cost of production, and transfer price of finished goods. [14 marks]
(b) Prepare the Statement of Profit or Loss (up to Gross Profit) for Vandermeer Ltd for the year ended 30 April 2023, showing clearly the manufacturing profit and any adjustment for unrealised profit. [7 marks]
(c) State four reasons why a manufacturing business transfers finished goods to the warehouse at a transfer price including a mark-up. [4 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
(a) Manufacturing Account of Vandermeer Ltd for the year ended 30 April 2023
Opening inventory of raw materials$45,000Purchases of raw materials$245,000Carriage inwards$8,500$253,500Less: Closing inventory of raw materials($48,500)Cost of raw materials consumed$250,000Direct factory wages ($184,000 + $6,000 accrued)$190,000PRIME COST$440,000Factory Overheads:Indirect factory wages$62,000Factory supervision salaries$35,000Factory power and heating ($54,000 - $4,000 prepaid)$50,000Depreciation on factory machinery (15% * $240,000)$36,000$183,000$623,000Add: Opening work in progress$28,000Less: Closing work in progress($31,200)COST OF PRODUCTION$619,800Manufacturing profit (30% mark-up)$185,940TRANSFER PRICE OF FINISHED GOODS$805,740(b) Statement of Profit or Loss (up to Gross Profit) for the year ended 30 April 2023
Revenue$920,000Cost of Sales:Opening inventory of finished goods$78,000Transfer price of finished goods$805,740$883,740Less: Closing inventory of finished goods($91,000)($792,740)Gross Profit on Trading$127,260Add: Manufacturing profit$185,940Less: Increase in Provision for Unrealised Profit (W1)($3,000)Adjusted Gross Profit$310,200Working 1 (W1): Provision for Unrealised Profit (PUP)
Opening PUP = $78,000 * (30 / 130) = $18,000
Closing PUP = $91,000 * (30 / 130) = $21,000
Increase in PUP = $21,000 - $18,000 = $3,000
(c) Reasons for transferring finished goods at a mark-up:
- Allows the manufacturing department to be treated as a profit centre, enabling its performance and efficiency to be evaluated.
- Allows the business to compare the internal cost of manufacturing with the cost of purchasing finished goods from external suppliers (make-or-buy decisions).
- Ensures that finished goods inventory in the Statement of Financial Position is valued closer to its realistic market value (before adjustment for unrealised profit).
- Maintains confidentiality of actual manufacturing costs and profit margins from sales department personnel or external competitors.
PastPaper.markingScheme
Part (a): Manufacturing Account [Total: 14 marks]
- Raw materials consumed calculation: [1] mark for adding opening, purchases and carriage, [1] mark for subtracting closing raw materials.
- Direct wages adjustment ($184,000 + $6,000): [1] mark.
- Prime Cost correctly labeled and calculated ($440,000): [1] mark (Own Figure - OF).
- Indirect wages and supervision salaries ($62,000 & $35,000): [1] mark.
- Factory power & heating adjustment ($54,000 - $4,000): [1] mark.
- Depreciation calculation ($240,000 * 15% = $36,000): [1] mark.
- Total factory overheads correct total ($183,000): [1] mark (OF).
- Work in progress adjustments (both opening and closing correctly applied): [2] marks (1 mark for opening WIP, 1 mark for closing WIP).
- Cost of production correctly labeled and calculated ($619,800): [1] mark (OF).
- Manufacturing profit calculation (30% * Cost of Production): [2] marks (1 mark for rate, 1 mark for application to Cost of Production).
- Transfer price total ($805,740): [1] mark (OF).
Part (b): Statement of Profit or Loss [Total: 7 marks]
- Revenue ($920,000): [1] mark.
- Opening & Closing finished goods inventory: [1] mark.
- Transfer price of finished goods (from part a): [1] mark (OF).
- Cost of sales correctly calculated ($792,740) and subtracted to get Gross Profit on Trading ($127,260): [1] mark.
- Manufacturing profit added ($185,940): [1] mark (OF).
- Calculation of increase in Provision for Unrealised Profit ($3,000) and deducted: [1] mark.
- Adjusted Gross Profit correct total ($310,200): [1] mark (OF).
Part (c): Reasons for Transfer Mark-up [Total: 4 marks]
- [1] mark for each valid reason stated, up to a maximum of 4 marks.
- Reject vague answers like 'to make more profit'.
The statement of financial position of the partnership at 31 December 2023 was as follows:
**Non-current assets**
- Premises: $120,000
- Equipment (carrying value): $45,000
Total Non-current assets = $165,000
**Current assets**
- Inventory: $24,000
- Trade receivables: $18,500
- Bank: $3,500
Total Current assets = $46,000
**Total assets** = $211,000
**Capital and Liabilities**
**Capital accounts**
- Ahmed: $100,000
- Bashir: $60,000
**Current accounts**
- Ahmed: $8,500
- Bashir: ($4,200)
**Non-current liabilities**
- Loan from Ahmed: $30,000
**Current liabilities**
- Trade payables: $16,700
**Total capital and liabilities** = $211,000
**Additional information:**
1. AB Limited took over all of the assets (excluding bank) and assumed all the liabilities (except the loan from Ahmed).
2. The purchase consideration was agreed at $200,000.
3. The purchase consideration was settled by:
- The issue of 120,000 ordinary shares of $1.00 each in AB Limited at a premium of $0.25 per share, distributed to the partners in their profit-sharing ratio.
- The balance paid in cash.
4. Dissolution expenses amounted to $2,400 and were paid from the partnership bank account.
5. The loan from Ahmed was repaid in full along with outstanding interest of $600.
6. Any remaining bank balance was settled between the partners to close their accounts.
**Required:**
(a) Prepare the Realization Account of the partnership. (8 marks)
(b) Prepare the Partners' Capital Accounts (in columnar format) to show the final closure of the partnership. (10 marks)
(c) State three reasons why partners might decide to convert their partnership into a limited company. (3 marks)
(d) Explain the accounting treatment of a partner's loan and any outstanding loan interest upon the dissolution of a partnership. (4 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
| Details | $ | Details | $ |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Premises | 120,000 | Trade payables | 16,700 |
| Equipment | 45,000 | AB Limited (Purchase Consideration) | 200,000 |
| Inventory | 24,000 | | |
| Trade receivables | 18,500 | | |
| Dissolution expenses | 2,400 | | |
| Loan interest (Ahmed) | 600 | | |
| **Profit on Realization:** | | | |
| - Ahmed (3/5) | 3,720 | | |
| - Bashir (2/5) | 2,480 | | |
| | **216,700** | | **216,700** |
*Calculations:*
- Total Debits (before profit) = \(120,000 + 45,000 + 24,000 + 18,500 + 2,400 + 600 = 210,500\)
- Total Credits = \(16,700 + 200,000 = 216,700\)
- Net Profit = \(216,700 - 210,500 = 6,200\)
- Ahmed's Share: \(6,200 \times 0.60 = 3,720\)
- Bashir's Share: \(6,200 \times 0.40 = 2,480\)
***
**(b) Partners' Capital Accounts**
| Debit | Ahmed ($) | Bashir ($) | Credit | Ahmed ($) | Bashir ($) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Current Account | - | 4,200 | Balance b/d | 100,000 | 60,000 |
| Shares in AB Ltd | 90,000 | 60,000 | Current Account | 8,500 | - |
| Bank (final cash) | 22,220 | - | Realization profit | 3,720 | 2,480 |
| | | | Bank (cash received) | - | 1,720 |
| **Total** | **112,220** | **64,200** | **Total** | **112,220** | **64,200** |
*Calculations:*
- Total value of shares = \(120,000 \times $1.25 = $150,000\)
- Ahmed's share of shares: \(150,000 \times 3/5 = $90,000\)
- Bashir's share of shares: \(150,000 \times 2/5 = $60,000\)
- Ahmed final bank cash: \(100,000 + 8,500 + 3,720 - 90,000 = $22,220\) (Cash paid to Ahmed)
- Bashir final bank cash: \(60,000 + 2,480 - 4,200 - 60,000 = -$1,720\) (Cash received from Bashir to clear deficit)
***
**(c) Reasons to convert to a limited company:**
1. Owners gain limited liability status, protecting their personal assets.
2. Access to a wider source of capital by issuing shares to the public or private investors.
3. The company has perpetual succession, continuing to exist even if shareholders or directors change.
***
**(d) Accounting treatment of loan and interest:**
- A partner's loan is a liability but is treated internally. It is not transferred to the Realization Account but is settled by a direct payment from the Bank Account after paying outside creditors and before capital accounts are closed.
- Outstanding loan interest is a partnership expense. It is debited to the Realization Account (or Income Statement) and credited to the partner's loan account (or current account) before being repaid from the bank account.
PastPaper.markingScheme
- Transfer of Assets (Premises, Equipment, Inventory, Trade Receivables) to debit side: [2] marks (0.5 marks each)
- Trade Payables transferred to credit side: [1] mark
- Dissolution Expenses ($2,400) debited: [1] mark
- Loan Interest ($600) debited: [1] mark
- AB Limited Purchase Consideration ($200,000) credited: [1] mark
- Distribution of profit (Ahmed: $3,720, Bashir: $2,480): [2] marks (1 mark each)
**(b) Partners' Capital Accounts (10 marks)**
- Correct opening balances: [1] mark
- Transfer of Current Accounts (Ahmed Cr, Bashir Dr): [2] marks (1 mark each)
- Realization profit correctly credited (O/F from (a)): [1] mark
- Ordinary shares in AB Ltd distributed ($90,000 to Ahmed, $60,000 to Bashir): [2] marks (1 mark each)
- Cash paid to Ahmed ($22,220) correctly calculated and debited: [2] marks
- Cash received from Bashir ($1,720) correctly calculated and credited: [2] marks
**(c) Reasons for conversion (3 marks)**
- 1 mark for each valid reason (e.g., limited liability, easier expansion, perpetual succession) up to a maximum of 3 marks.
**(d) Accounting treatment of loan and interest (4 marks)**
- Partner's loan not transferred to realization / repaid directly from bank: [1] mark
- Repaid after external liabilities but before capital: [1] mark
- Outstanding interest is a partnership expense / debited to Realization: [1] mark
- Interest paid alongside the loan principal from the bank account: [1] mark
**Income Statement Summaries:**
| | Year ended 31 December 2022 ($) | Year ended 31 December 2023 ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 950,000 | 1,200,000 |
| Profit from operations | 185,000 | 230,000 |
| Finance costs | (25,000) | (20,000) |
| Profit before tax | 160,000 | 210,000 |
| Taxation | (40,000) | (50,000) |
| Profit for the year | 120,000 | 160,000 |
**Extract from Statement of Financial Position at 31 December:**
| | 2022 ($) | 2023 ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary shares ($0.50 each) | 400,000 | 500,000 |
| Retained earnings | 195,000 | 283,000 |
**Additional information:**
1. On 1 January 2023, the company made an issue of 200,000 ordinary shares. There were no other changes to the share capital during the two years.
2. The total ordinary dividend paid and proposed was:
- Year ended 31 December 2022: $48,000
- Year ended 31 December 2023: $72,000
3. The market price of one ordinary share was:
- At 31 December 2022: $1.80
- At 31 December 2023: $2.40
**Required:**
(a) Calculate the following investment ratios for Vanguard plc for both 2022 and 2023. Show your workings and state your answers to two decimal places.
(i) Earnings per share (EPS)
(ii) Price-earnings (P/E) ratio
(iii) Dividend yield
(iv) Dividend cover
[16 marks]
(b) An existing shareholder is considering buying more shares in Vanguard plc.
Evaluate the performance and investment potential of the company based on the ratios calculated in part (a) and other information. Recommend whether or not the shareholder should buy more shares.
[6 marks]
(c) Explain three limitations of using accounting ratios to assess a company's investment potential.
[3 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
**(i) Earnings per share (EPS)**
$$\text{Formula: } \frac{\text{Profit for the year}}{\text{Number of ordinary shares in issue}}$$
- **2022**
- Number of shares = $\frac{$400,000}{$0.50} = 800,000$ shares
- $\text{EPS} = \frac{$120,000}{800,000\text{ shares}} = $0.15\text{ or } 15.00\text{ cents}$ (2 marks)
- **2023**
- Number of shares = $\frac{$500,000}{$0.50} = 1,000,000$ shares
- $\text{EPS} = \frac{$160,000}{1,000,000\text{ shares}} = $0.16\text{ or } 16.00\text{ cents}$ (2 marks)
**(ii) Price-earnings (P/E) ratio**
$$\text{Formula: } \frac{\text{Market price per share}}{\text{Earnings per share (EPS)}}$$
- **2022**
- $\text{P/E ratio} = \frac{$1.80}{$0.15} = 12.00\text{ times}$ (2 marks)
- **2023**
- $\text{P/E ratio} = \frac{$2.40}{$0.16} = 15.00\text{ times}$ (2 marks)
**(iii) Dividend yield**
$$\text{Formula: } \frac{\text{Dividend per share (DPS)}}{\text{Market price per share}} \times 100\%$$
- **2022**
- $\text{DPS} = \frac{$48,000}{800,000\text{ shares}} = $0.06\text{ per share}$
- $\text{Dividend yield} = \frac{$0.06}{$1.80} \times 100\% = 3.33\%$ (2 marks)
- **2023**
- $\text{DPS} = \frac{$72,000}{1,000,000\text{ shares}} = $0.072\text{ per share}$
- $\text{Dividend yield} = \frac{$0.072}{$2.40} \times 100\% = 3.00\%$ (2 marks)
**(iv) Dividend cover**
$$\text{Formula: } \frac{\text{Earnings per share (EPS)}}{\text{Dividend per share (DPS)}} \quad \text{or} \quad \frac{\text{Profit for the year}}{\text{Total ordinary dividend}}$$
- **2022**
- $\text{Dividend cover} = \frac{$120,000}{$48,000} = 2.50\text{ times}$ (2 marks)
- **2023**
- $\text{Dividend cover} = \frac{$160,000}{$72,000} = 2.22\text{ times}$ (2 marks)
---
**(b) Evaluation and Recommendation**
- **Earnings per share (EPS)** increased from 15.00 cents to 16.00 cents (an increase of 6.67%). This is a positive sign for shareholders because despite a 25% increase in the number of shares (from 800,000 to 1,000,000), profits grew even faster, indicating strong profitability.
- **P/E ratio** increased from 12.00 times to 15.00 times. This reflects increased investor confidence in the future earnings potential and growth prospects of Vanguard plc. Investors are now willing to pay 15 times earnings to acquire a share.
- **Dividend yield** has fallen slightly from 3.33% to 3.00% despite the fact that Dividend per share rose from 6.00 cents to 7.20 cents (a 20% increase). This drop is due to the rapid rise in market share price (+33.33%, from $1.80 to $2.40) which outstripped the dividend increase.
- **Dividend cover** fell from 2.50 times to 2.22 times, showing that the company is distributing a higher proportion of its earnings as dividends. While this is positive for immediate cash payouts, it means fewer funds are retained in the business, which might reduce future growth and make the dividend slightly more vulnerable in down years.
- **Overall Recommendation**: The shareholder should buy more shares if they seek long-term capital appreciation and are encouraged by the positive market sentiment and rising earnings. However, if they are primarily looking for immediate high-income yields with maximum dividend safety, they may want to exercise caution, given the falling dividend yield and cover. (Max 6 marks)
---
**(c) Limitations of accounting ratios**
- **Historical focus**: Ratios are based on historical accounting records, which reflect past performance and may not accurately indicate future potential or prospects.
- **Non-financial factors ignored**: Ratio analysis does not capture qualitative factors such as quality of management, employee morale, brand reputation, or changes in customer preferences.
- **Inflation effects**: Financial statements are prepared on a historical cost basis; inflation can distort asset values and profitability figures, reducing comparability over time.
- **Accounting policy differences**: Companies can employ different accounting policies (e.g., depreciation methods or inventory valuation), which makes comparison with external competitors difficult.
(1 mark for each of three explained limitations, Max 3 marks)
PastPaper.markingScheme
- (i) EPS 2022: 1 mark for correct working, 1 mark for correct answer (15.00c or $0.15)
- (i) EPS 2023: 1 mark for correct working, 1 mark for correct answer (16.00c or $0.16)
- (ii) P/E ratio 2022: 1 mark for correct working/formula, 1 mark for correct answer (12.00 times)
- (ii) P/E ratio 2023: 1 mark for correct working, 1 mark for correct answer (15.00 times)
- (iii) Dividend yield 2022: 1 mark for correct DPS calculation, 1 mark for correct yield (3.33%)
- (iii) Dividend yield 2023: 1 mark for correct DPS calculation, 1 mark for correct yield (3.00%)
- (iv) Dividend cover 2022: 1 mark for correct working/formula, 1 mark for correct answer (2.50 times)
- (iv) Dividend cover 2023: 1 mark for correct working, 1 mark for correct answer (2.22 times)
*(Note: Accept rounded figures to 2 decimal places. Own Figure (OF) rules apply throughout.)*
**Part (b) [6 marks total]**
- 1 mark for analyzing EPS increase (positive earnings growth despite dilution).
- 1 mark for analyzing P/E ratio increase (increased investor confidence/market optimism).
- 1 mark for analyzing Dividend yield decrease (due to rapid increase in share price outstripping dividend increase).
- 1 mark for analyzing Dividend cover decrease (higher dividend payout, lower reserve retention).
- 1 mark for analyzing capital growth/share price appreciation (+33.33%).
- 1 mark for a clear, reasoned recommendation matching the analysis.
*(Accept alternate reasonable interpretations if well-argued.)*
**Part (c) [3 marks total]**
- 1 mark for each clearly explained limitation of using accounting ratios for investment appraisal (Max 3 marks).
- Accepted points: historical nature of financial statements, impact of inflation, variation in accounting policies across companies, lack of qualitative/non-financial details, or seasonal distortions (window dressing).
Paper 42 (Cost and Management Accounting)
- Direct materials: 4 kg @ $6.00 per kg = $24.00
- Direct labor: 2 hours @ $12.00 per hour = $24.00
Fixed overheads are budgeted at $40,000 per month and are absorbed on the basis of direct labor hours. The budgeted monthly production is 5,000 units.
During Month 1, the actual results recorded were as follows:
- Production: 4,800 units
- Direct materials purchased and used: 19,500 kg costing $115,050
- Direct labor: 9,400 hours worked costing $115,620
- Actual fixed overheads incurred: $39,000
Required:
(a) Calculate the following variances for Month 1, indicating whether each variance is Favourable (F) or Adverse (A):
(i) Material price variance (3 marks)
(ii) Material usage variance (3 marks)
(iii) Labor rate variance (3 marks)
(iv) Labor efficiency variance (3 marks)
(v) Fixed overhead expenditure variance (2 marks)
(vi) Fixed overhead volume variance (2 marks)
(b) Prepare a statement reconciling the standard cost of actual production with the actual cost of production for Month 1. (5 marks)
(c) Advise the directors of Vanguard Plastics Ltd on the possible interrelationships between the material and labor variances calculated in part (a). (4 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
**(i) Material price variance**
\( \text{Actual Price (AP)} = \frac{\$115,050}{19,500 \text{ kg}} = \$5.90 \text{ per kg} \)
\( \text{Material Price Variance} = (\text{Standard Price} - \text{Actual Price}) \times \text{Actual Quantity} \)
\( (\$6.00 - \$5.90) \times 19,500 \text{ kg} = \$1,950 \text{ Favourable (F)} \)
**(ii) Material usage variance**
\( \text{Standard Quantity (SQ) for actual production} = 4,800 \text{ units} \times 4 \text{ kg} = 19,200 \text{ kg} \)
\( \text{Material Usage Variance} = (\text{Standard Quantity} - \text{Actual Quantity}) \times \text{Standard Price} \)
\( (19,200 \text{ kg} - 19,500 \text{ kg}) \times \$6.00 = \$1,800 \text{ Adverse (A)} \)
**(iii) Labor rate variance**
\( \text{Actual Rate (AR)} = \frac{\$115,620}{9,400 \text{ hours}} = \$12.30 \text{ per hour} \)
\( \text{Labor Rate Variance} = (\text{Standard Rate} - \text{Actual Rate}) \times \text{Actual Hours} \)
\( (\$12.00 - \$12.30) \times 9,400 \text{ hours} = \$2,820 \text{ Adverse (A)} \)
**(iv) Labor efficiency variance**
\( \text{Standard Hours (SH) for actual production} = 4,800 \text{ units} \times 2 \text{ hours} = 9,600 \text{ hours} \)
\( \text{Labor Efficiency Variance} = (\text{Standard Hours} - \text{Actual Hours}) \times \text{Standard Rate} \)
\( (9,600 - 9,400) \times \$12.00 = \$2,400 \text{ Favourable (F)} \)
**(v) Fixed overhead expenditure variance**
\( \text{Fixed Overhead Expenditure Variance} = \text{Budgeted Fixed Overheads} - \text{Actual Fixed Overheads} \)
\( \$40,000 - \$39,000 = \$1,000 \text{ Favourable (F)} \)
**(vi) Fixed overhead volume variance**
\( \text{Standard FOAR per unit} = \frac{\$40,000}{5,000 \text{ units}} = \$8.00 \text{ per unit} \)
\( \text{Fixed Overhead Volume Variance} = (\text{Actual Production} - \text{Budgeted Production}) \times \text{Standard FOAR per unit} \)
\( (4,800 - 5,000) \times \$8.00 = \$1,600 \text{ Adverse (A)} \)
---
### Part (b) Reconciliation Statement
| Reconciliation of Standard to Actual Cost | $ | $
| :--- | :---: | :---: |
| **Standard Cost of Actual Production (4,800 units @ $56*)** | | **268,800** |
| *Note: $24 (Mat) + $24 (Lab) + $8 (FOH) = $56 per unit* | | |
| **Adverse Variances:** | | |
| - Material usage variance | 1,800 | |
| - Labor rate variance | 2,820 | |
| - Fixed overhead volume variance | 1,600 | **6,220** |
| | | **275,020** |
| **Favourable Variances:** | | |
| - Material price variance | (1,950) | |
| - Labor efficiency variance | (2,400) | |
| - Fixed overhead expenditure variance | (1,000) | **(5,350)** |
| **Actual Cost of Production** | | **269,670** |
*Verification:*
\( \text{Actual Materials} \, (\$115,050) + \text{Actual Labor} \, (\$115,620) + \text{Actual Fixed Overheads} \, (\$39,000) = \$269,670 \).
---
### Part (c) Advice on Variance Interrelationships
- **Material Price and Material Usage Interrelationship:** The company achieved a Favourable material price variance ($1,950 F) but suffered an Adverse material usage variance ($1,800 A). This strongly suggests that purchasing bought lower-grade/cheaper materials (saving $0.10/kg), which likely resulted in higher wastage, defects, or scrap during the manufacturing process, requiring more material than the standard (using 300 kg extra).
- **Labor Rate and Labor Efficiency Interrelationship:** The company suffered an Adverse labor rate variance ($2,820 A) but gained a Favourable labor efficiency variance ($2,400 F). This suggests that the production department utilized more highly skilled or experienced workers who command a higher hourly rate (paying $12.30 instead of $12.00), but their superior skills enabled them to work faster than standard, saving 200 hours.
- **Combined Interrelationship:** Alternatively, the lower-quality materials purchased might have required more experienced operators to process them without high levels of reject, which links the usage of higher-paid labor to the cheap material purchases.
PastPaper.markingScheme
- **(i) Material price variance:** Formula/working (1 mark), Correct calculation of $1,950 (1 mark), Correct direction 'Favourable' or 'F' (1 mark). [3 marks]
- **(ii) Material usage variance:** Standard quantity calculation of 19,200 kg (1 mark), Correct calculation of $1,800 (1 mark), Correct direction 'Adverse' or 'A' (1 mark). [3 marks]
- **(iii) Labor rate variance:** Formula/working (1 mark), Correct calculation of $2,820 (1 mark), Correct direction 'Adverse' or 'A' (1 mark). [3 marks]
- **(iv) Labor efficiency variance:** Standard hours calculation of 9,600 hours (1 mark), Correct calculation of $2,400 (1 mark), Correct direction 'Favourable' or 'F' (1 mark). [3 marks]
- **(v) Fixed overhead expenditure variance:** Correct calculation of $1,000 (1 mark), Correct direction 'Favourable' or 'F' (1 mark). [2 marks]
- **(vi) Fixed overhead volume variance:** Correct calculation of $1,600 (1 mark), Correct direction 'Adverse' or 'A' (1 mark). [2 marks]
### Part (b) [Total: 5 marks]
- Correctly stating the Standard Cost of Actual Production of $268,800 (1 mark).
- Correct listing and addition of adverse variances (1 mark).
- Correct listing and deduction of favourable variances (1 mark).
- Arriving at the correct Actual Cost of Production of $269,670 (1 mark).
- Presentation and clear layout of the statement (1 mark).
### Part (c) [Total: 4 marks]
- Identifies the link between Favourable Material Price and Adverse Material Usage (1 mark) and explains the trade-off (cheaper materials lead to higher wastage/lower quality) (1 mark).
- Identifies the link between Adverse Labor Rate and Favourable Labor Efficiency (1 mark) and explains the trade-off (more expensive/skilled staff work faster/more efficiently) (1 mark).
- Maximum of 4 marks for a well-reasoned discussion linking these aspects together.
* Initial cost of machine: $300,000
* Estimated useful life: 4 years
* Residual value at the end of Year 4: $30,000
The budgeted operating cash flows are as follows:
| Year | Operating cash inflows ($) | Operating cash outflows ($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 140,000 | 40,000 |
| 2 | 150,000 | 40,000 |
| 3 | 130,000 | 40,000 |
| 4 | 110,000 | 40,000 |
The company's cost of capital is 10%.
Discount factors:
| Year | 10% discount factor | 15% discount factor |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.909 | 0.870 |
| 2 | 0.826 | 0.756 |
| 3 | 0.751 | 0.658 |
| 4 | 0.683 | 0.572 |
**Required:**
(a) Calculate the Net Present Value (NPV) of the proposed project at the cost of capital of 10%. [7 marks]
(b) Calculate the Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) for the project based on average investment. [6 marks]
(c) Calculate the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the project using the 10% and 15% discount rates. [6 marks]
(d) Advise the directors of Vandervelde Ltd whether they should proceed with the purchase of the packing machine. Support your answer with reference to both financial and non-financial factors. [6 marks]
PastPaper.showAnswersPastPaper.hideAnswers
PastPaper.workedSolution
| Year | Cash Flow Description | Cash Flow ($) | Discount Factor (10%) | Present Value ($) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Initial Outlay | (300,000) | 1.000 | (300,000) |
| 1 | Operating Net Cash Flow | 100,000 | 0.909 | 90,900 |
| 2 | Operating Net Cash Flow | 110,000 | 0.826 | 90,860 |
| 3 | Operating Net Cash Flow | 90,000 | 0.751 | 67,590 |
| 4 | Operating Net Cash Flow + Disposal | 100,000 | 0.683 | 68,300 |
| **NPV** | | | | **$17,650** |
*Workings for Year 4 Net Cash Flow:*
\( \text{Inflow } \$110,000 - \text{Outflow } \$40,000 + \text{Residual value } \$30,000 = \$100,000 \)
***
**(b) Calculation of Accounting Rate of Return (ARR):**
1. **Total Net Cash Flows over 4 years (excluding residual value recovery in accounting profit calculation):**
\( \text{Total operating cash flows} = \$100,000 + \$110,000 + \$90,000 + \$70,000 = \$370,000 \)
2. **Total Depreciation:**
\( \text{Cost } \$300,000 - \text{Residual Value } \$30,000 = \$270,000 \)
3. **Total Accounting Profit:**
\( \text{Total Cash Flow } \$370,000 - \text{Depreciation } \$270,000 = \$100,000 \)
4. **Average Annual Profit:**
\( \$100,000 / 4 \text{ years} = \$25,000 \)
5. **Average Investment:**
\( (\text{Initial Outlay } \$300,000 + \text{Residual Value } \$30,000) / 2 = \$165,000 \)
6. **ARR:**
\( (\$25,000 / \$165,000) \times 100 = 15.15\% \text{ (or } 15.2\%\text{)} \)
***
**(c) Calculation of Internal Rate of Return (IRR):**
1. **Calculate NPV at 15%:**
| Year | Cash Flow ($) | Discount Factor (15%) | Present Value ($) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | (300,000) | 1.000 | (300,000) |
| 1 | 100,000 | 0.870 | 87,000 |
| 2 | 110,000 | 0.756 | 83,160 |
| 3 | 90,000 | 0.658 | 59,220 |
| 4 | 100,000 | 0.572 | 57,200 |
| **NPV** | | | **$(13,420)** |
2. **IRR Formula:**
\( \text{IRR} = L + \left( \frac{NPV_L}{NPV_L - NPV_H} \right) \times (H - L) \)
Where:
* \( L = 10\% \)
* \( H = 15\% \)
* \( NPV_L = \$17,650 \)
* \( NPV_H = -\$13,420 \)
\( \text{IRR} = 10\% + \left( \frac{17,650}{17,650 - (-13,420)} \right) \times (15\% - 10\%) \)
\( \text{IRR} = 10\% + \left( \frac{17,650}{31,070} \right) \times 5\% \)
\( \text{IRR} = 10\% + 0.5681 \times 5\% = 12.84\% \text{ (or } 12.8\%\text{)} \)
***
**(d) Recommendation Advice:**
* **Financial Factors:**
* The NPV is positive at \( \$17,650 \), indicating the project increases shareholder wealth.
* The IRR of \( 12.84\% \) is above the firm's required cost of capital of \( 10\% \).
* The ARR is \( 15.15\% \), which may exceed the company's internal target rate of return.
* **Non-Financial / Qualitative Factors:**
* Automation might lead to improved consistency and packing quality, leading to higher customer satisfaction.
* Potential staff redundancies or retraining costs for workers operating the new machine.
* Risk of machine obsolescence or technical breakdowns.
* **Conclusion/Recommendation:**
* The directors should proceed with the project because it is financially viable and aligns with modernization efforts, provided that staff transition and training are well-managed.
PastPaper.markingScheme
* Correct cash flows for years 1-3 ($100k, $110k, $90k) [1 mark for all three]
* Correct cash flow for year 4 ($100k including residual) [1 mark]
* Correct discount factors applied [1 mark]
* Correct present values calculated for each year [2 marks (minus 1 for each error)]
* Net Present Value of $17,650 calculated [2 marks (1 method mark + 1 accuracy mark)]
*(Max 7 marks)*
**(b) Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)**
* Total operating cash flow of $370,000 [1 mark]
* Calculation of total depreciation of $270,000 [1 mark]
* Average annual profit of $25,000 [1 mark]
* Average investment of $165,000 [1 mark]
* Final ARR calculation of 15.15% (or 15.2%) [2 marks (1 method mark + 1 accuracy mark)]
*(Max 6 marks)*
**(c) Internal Rate of Return (IRR)**
* Discount factors correctly applied at 15% [1 mark]
* Correct Year 4 cash flow PV at 15% ($57,200) [1 mark]
* Correct NPV at 15% of -$13,420 [1 mark]
* Correct application of IRR interpolation formula [1 mark]
* Final calculated IRR of 12.84% (or 12.8%) [2 marks (1 method mark + 1 accuracy mark)]
*(Max 6 marks)*
**(d) Advice/Recommendation**
* Financial discussion (referencing NPV, IRR, and/or ARR results) [2 marks]
* Non-financial discussion (redundancies, quality, reliability, obsolescence) [2 marks]
* Clear recommendation with justification [2 marks]
*(Max 6 marks)*
PastPaper.sampleStickyMessage
PastPaper.stickyCtaText