MetadataPastPaper.sampleTitle

First, calculate the cash inflow from the share issue: \(100,000 \times (\$0.50 + \$0.20) = \$70,000\). Second, identify the cash outflows: redemption of debentures of $40,000 and interest paid of $3,000. Total outflow is \(\$43,000\). Net cash flow from financing activities is \(\$70,000 - \$43,000 = \$27,000\) inflow.

1 mark for the correct answer A. Deduct marks if share premium or interest is omitted or incorrectly classified.

Calculate the overhead rates for each driver: Setup rate = \(\$120,000 / (30 + 50) = \$1,500\) per setup. Inspection rate = \(\$60,000 / (40 + 80) = \$500\) per inspection. Allocate overheads to Product X: Machine setups = \(30 \times \$1,500 = \$45,000\). Quality inspections = \(40 \times \$500 = \$20,000\). Total overheads for X = \(\$45,000 + \$20,000 = \$65,000\). Overhead per unit of X = \(\$65,000 / 1,000 = \$65.00\).

1 mark for the correct calculation of $65.00.

Calculate the present value (PV) of cash flows: Year 0: \(-\$200,000 - \$30,000 = -\$230,000\). Year 1: \(\$80,000 \times 0.909 = \$72,720\). Year 2: \(\$100,000 \times 0.826 = \$82,600\). Year 3: \((\$90,000 + \$30,000) \times 0.751 = \$120,000 \times 0.751 = \$90,120\). Total PV of cash inflows = \(\$72,720 + \$82,600 + \$90,120 = \$245,440\). NPV = \(\$245,440 - \$230,000 = \$15,440\).

1 mark for the correct option B. Common errors include omitting the working capital outflow or its recovery.

Using a Subscriptions Account: Debit side: Balance b/f (Arrears) \(\$1,800\), Income & Expenditure account (balancing figure) \(X\), Balance c/f (Advance) \(\$1,500\). Credit side: Balance b/f (Advance) \(\$900\), Cash received \(\$42,000\), Irrecoverable subscriptions \(\$400\), Balance c/f (Arrears) \(\$2,100\). Therefore, \(1,800 + X + 1,500 = 900 + 42,000 + 400 + 2,100\) which gives \(3,300 + X = 45,400\), so \(X = \$42,100\).

1 mark for correct calculation of subscriptions income of $42,100.

Current contribution per unit = \(\$30 - \$18 = \$12\). Current break-even point = \(\$90,000 / \$12 = 7,500\) units. Proposed contribution per unit = \(\$30 - \$15 = \$15\). Proposed fixed costs = \(\$90,000 + \$30,000 = \$120,000\). Proposed break-even point = \(\$120,000 / \$15 = 8,000\) units. Change in break-even point = \(8,000 - 7,500 = 500\) units increase.

1 mark for the correct answer of 500 units increase.

First, update the cash book balance: \(\$4,500\) (Debit) \(- \$150\) (Bank charges) \(- \$900\) (Dishonoured cheque) = \(\$3,450\) (Corrected Debit balance). Second, reconcile with bank statement: let Bank Statement balance be \(X\). \(X + \$1,800\) (Deposits in transit) \(- \$1,200\) (Unpresented cheques) = \(\$3,450\) (Corrected cash book). \(X + \$600 = \$3,450\) which gives \(X = \$2,850\) (Credit).

1 mark for the correct option A. Verify step 1 (updating cash book) and step 2 (reconciling items).

Let current assets be \(200\) and current liabilities be \(100\) (Current Ratio = 2.0). Let liquid assets be \(80\) and inventory be \(120\) (Liquid Ratio = 0.8). If inventory of \(20\) is purchased on credit, new current assets become \(220\) and new current liabilities become \(120\). New current ratio = \(220 / 120 = 1.83:1\) (Decrease). New liquid assets remain \(80\) while current liabilities become \(120\). New liquid ratio = \(80 / 120 = 0.67:1\) (Decrease).

1 mark for the correct conceptual deduction that both ratios decrease.

According to the IESBA Code of Ethics, a financial interest in the outcome of financial statements or receiving a bonus tied directly to performance indicators (such as profit) creates a self-interest threat, as the accountant has a financial incentive to manipulate the figures.

1 mark for identifying the self-interest threat.

The present value (PV) of cash inflows is calculated as: Year 1: \(\$50,000 \times 0.909 = \$45,450\); Year 2: \(\$60,000 \times 0.826 = \$49,560\); Year 3: \(\$40,000 \times 0.751 = \$30,040\). Total PV of inflows = \(\$45,450 + \$49,560 + \$30,040 = \$125,050\). NPV = Total PV of Inflows - Initial Investment = \(\$125,050 - \$120,000 = \$5,050\).

1 mark for the correct option A. Method: Award 1 mark for correct calculation of NPV of \(\$5,050\). Reject other choices due to incorrect discounting or omitting initial outlay.

First, find the total setups = \(30 + 50 = 80\). The cost per setup = \(\$24,000 / 80 = \$300\). Total setup cost allocated to Product X = \(30 \times \$300 = \$9,000\). Setup cost per unit of Product X = \(\$9,000 / 2,000\text{ units} = \$4.50\).

1 mark for the correct option B. Method: Calculate cost per setup ($300) and allocate to Product X ($9,000), then divide by units of X ($4.50). Reject options based on incorrect driver or unit bases.

Subscription Income = Receipts + Opening Advance - Closing Advance - Opening Arrears + Closing Arrears = \(\$18,500 + \$800 - \$1,100 - \$1,200 + \$900 = \$17,900\).

1 mark for the correct option A. Method: Correctly apply adjustment formula for accruals and prepayments to find $17,900. Reject other options due to reverse adjustments of opening/closing figures.

Retained earnings balance = Opening retained earnings ($150,000) + Profit for the year ($85,000) - Interim dividend paid ($15,000) - Transfer to general reserve ($20,000) = $200,000. Note: Revaluation gain goes to the revaluation reserve, and the proposed final dividend is not recognized as a liability or deducted until approved by shareholders.

1 mark for the correct option B. Method: Identify relevant items affecting retained earnings under IAS 1 and IAS 10. Reject inclusion of revaluation gain and proposed dividend.

Existing shares = \(\$400,000 / \$0.50 = 800,000\) shares. Rights issue shares = \(800,000 / 4 = 200,000\) shares. Nominal value of rights shares = \(200,000 \times \$0.50 = \$100,000\). New Share Capital = \(\$400,000 + \$100,000 = \$500,000\). Premium per share = \(\$0.80 - \$0.50 = \$0.30\). Total share premium added = \(200,000 \times \$0.30 = \$60,000\). New Share Premium = \(\$120,000 + \$60,000 = \$180,000\).

1 mark for the correct option C. Method: Calculate rights shares count, increase nominal share capital by $100,000, and increase share premium by $60,000. Reject other options which fail to separate nominal value and premium correctly.

Since both ratios are greater than 1.0:1, an equal decrease in both the numerator (current assets/liquid assets) and the denominator (current liabilities) will cause both ratios to increase. For example, if current assets were $20,000 and current liabilities were $10,000 (ratio 2:1), paying $5,000 cash reduces current assets to $15,000 and current liabilities to $5,000, raising the new current ratio to 3:1. Liquid ratio similarly increases.

1 mark for the correct option A. Method: Deduce effect of equal reductions in numerator and denominator when starting ratio is above 1.0. Reject options showing decreases or no change.

A close family relationship with an officer of the client company creates a familiarity threat, as the accountant may be too sympathetic to the client's interests or too accepting of their work due to the relationship.

1 mark for the correct option B. Method: Identify familiarity threat as the primary threat resulting from close personal/family relationships. Reject other threat classifications.

Adjusted/updated cash book balance = Bank statement balance (overdraft) + Uncredited deposits - Outstanding cheques = \(-\$2,500 + \$1,800 - \$1,200 = -\$1,900\) (overdrawn). Cash book balance before entering the bank charge = Updated cash book balance + Bank charge (since the charge decreased the balance) = \(-\$1,900 + \$50 = -\$1,850\) (or an overdraft of \(\$1,850\)).

1 mark for the correct option A. Method: Reconcile bank balance to the adjusted cash book balance ($1,900 overdraft) and reverse the bank charge ($50) to find unadjusted balance ($1,850 overdraft). Reject other combinations of signs.

1. Calculate the activity rates:
- Machine setup rate: $$60,000 / 60 \text{ setups} = $1,000$ per setup.
- Quality inspection rate: $$40,000 / 40 \text{ inspections} = $1,000$ per inspection.

2. Calculate the overhead allocated to Product A:
- Machine setup cost: $20 \text{ setups} \times $1,000 = $20,000$
- Quality inspection cost: $30 \text{ inspections} \times $1,000 = $30,000$
- Total overhead for Product A = $$20,000 + $30,000 = $50,000$

3. Calculate the overhead cost per unit of Product A:
- $$50,000 / 4,000 \text{ units} = $12.50$ per unit.

1 mark for the correct answer of A ($12.50).
0 marks for any other option.

1. Identify the cash flows for each year:
- Year 0 (Investment): $($120,000)$
- Year 1: $$50,000$
- Year 2: $$60,000$
- Year 3: $$40,000$ (operating) + $$15,000$ (scrap value) = $$55,000$

2. Calculate the Present Value (PV) of each cash flow:
- Year 1 PV: $$50,000 \times 0.909 = $45,450$
- Year 2 PV: $$60,000 \times 0.826 = $49,560$
- Year 3 PV: $$55,000 \times 0.751 = $41,305$
- Total Present Value of inflows = $$45,450 + $49,560 + $41,305 = $136,315$

3. Calculate Net Present Value (NPV):
- $\text{NPV} = \text{Total PV of inflows} - \text{Initial Investment}$
- $\text{NPV} = $136,315 - $120,000 = $16,315$

1 mark for the correct answer of A ($16,315).
0 marks for any other option.

1. Determine the bonus issue details:
- Number of shares in issue on 1 April 2023: $500,000$.
- Bonus shares to issue: $500,000 / 5 = 100,000$ shares of $$1$ each = $$100,000$.
- Since the share premium account balance is $$150,000$, the entire bonus issue of $$100,000$ can be funded from the share premium account. No retained earnings are used.

2. Determine the interim dividend paid on 30 June 2023:
- Total shares in issue on 30 June 2023: $500,000 \text{ (opening)} + 100,000 \text{ (bonus)} = 600,000$ shares.
- Dividend paid: $600,000 \text{ shares} \times $0.05 = $30,000$.

3. Calculate the closing retained earnings balance:
- Opening retained earnings: $$280,000$
- Add: Profit for the year: $$120,000$
- Less: Transfer to general reserve: $($30,000)$
- Less: Interim dividend: $($30,000)$
- Closing balance: $$280,000 + $120,000 - $30,000 - $30,000 = $340,000$.

1 mark for the correct answer of A ($340,000).
0 marks for any other option.

We can reconstruct the Subscriptions Account to find the balancing cash figure (Bank):

$$\begin{array}{lr|lr}
\textbf{Dr} & \textbf{Subscriptions Account} & & \textbf{Cr} \\
\hline
\text{Bal b/f (Arrears)} & 1,200 & \text{Bal b/f (Advance)} & 800 \\
\text{Income & Expenditure} & 18,400 & \text{Irrecoverable (written off)} & 300 \\
\text{Bal c/f (Advance)} & 600 & \text{Bank (Cash received - balance)} & 17,600 \\
& & \text{Bal c/f (Arrears)} & 1,500 \\
\hline
\textbf{Total} & \mathbf{20,200} & \textbf{Total} & \mathbf{20,200} \\
\hline
\end{array}$$

Therefore, the cash received during the year was $$17,600$.

1 mark for the correct answer of A ($17,600).
0 marks for any other option.

1. Calculate variable cost per unit:
- $\text{Variable Cost} = $12 + $10 + $3 = $25$ per unit.

2. Calculate contribution per unit:
- $\text{Contribution} = \text{Selling Price} - \text{Variable Cost} = $40 - $25 = $15$.

3. Calculate the Contribution to Sales (C/S) ratio:
- $\text{C/S Ratio} = $15 / $40 = 0.375$ (or $37.5\%$).

4. Calculate the required contribution:
- $\text{Required Contribution} = \text{Fixed Costs} + \text{Target Profit} = $180,000 + $60,000 = $240,000$.

5. Calculate required sales revenue:
- $\text{Required Sales Revenue} = \text{Required Contribution} / \text{C/S Ratio} = $240,000 / 0.375 = $640,000$.

1 mark for the correct answer of A ($640,000).
0 marks for any other option.

1. Correct the cash book balance first:
- $\text{Draft cash book balance (Dr)} = $8,450$
- Less: Bank charges = $($150)$
- Less: Dishonoured cheque = $($400)$
- $\text{Corrected cash book balance (Dr)} = $7,900$

2. Perform the bank reconciliation to find the bank statement balance:
- $\text{Corrected cash book balance} = $7,900$
- Add: Unpresented cheques = $$1,200$
- Less: Outstanding deposit = $($950)$
- $\text{Bank statement balance (Cr)} = $8,150$

1 mark for the correct answer of A ($8,150).
0 marks for any other option.

Let's assume initial figures that match the starting ratios:
- $\text{Current Assets (CA)} = $250,000$
- $\text{Current Liabilities (CL)} = $100,000$ (Current Ratio = 2.5 : 1)
- $\text{Liquid Assets (LA)} = $80,000$ (Acid Test Ratio = 0.8 : 1)

Now, apply the transaction (pay trade payables of $$20,000$ via bank):
- Both Cash (in CA and LA) and Trade Payables (in CL) decrease by $$20,000$.

Calculate new ratios:
- $\text{New CA} = $250,000 - $20,000 = $230,000$
- $\text{New CL} = $100,000 - $20,000 = $80,000$
- $\text{New Current Ratio} = 230,000 / 80,000 = 2.875 : 1$ (Increase)

- $\text{New LA} = $80,000 - $20,000 = $60,000$
- $\text{New CL} = $80,000$
- $\text{New Acid Test Ratio} = 60,000 / 80,000 = 0.75 : 1$ (Decrease)

Therefore, the current ratio increases and the acid test ratio decreases.

1 mark for the correct answer of A (Current ratio increases, Acid test ratio decreases).
0 marks for any other option.

1. Calculate the predetermined overhead absorption rate (OAR):
- $\text{OAR} = \text{Budgeted Overheads} / \text{Budgeted Hours} = $240,000 / 60,000 \text{ hours} = $4.00$ per direct labour hour.

2. Calculate the overhead absorbed:
- $\text{Overheads Absorbed} = \text{Actual Hours Worked} \times \text{OAR} = 62,500 \text{ hours} \times $4.00 = $250,000$.

3. Determine the over or under-absorption:
- $\text{Overheads Absorbed} - \text{Actual Overheads Incurred} = $250,000 - $255,000 = -$5,000$ (under-absorbed by $$5,000$).

1 mark for the correct answer of A ($5,000 under-absorbed).
0 marks for any other option.

The transfer to the Capital Redemption Reserve (CRR) is calculated as: Nominal value of preference shares redeemed - Nominal value of fresh issue of shares = $200,000 - $100,000 = $100,000. The premium on redemption and the premium on the new issue of ordinary shares do not affect the nominal capital requirement of the CRR.

1 mark for the correct option B. Method: Determine nominal value of redeemed shares ($200,000) and subtract nominal value of fresh issue ($100,000).

Year 0 cash flow: -$150,000 (machinery) - $20,000 (working capital) = -$170,000. Years 1 and 2 cash flow: $80,000 - $30,000 = +$50,000. Year 3 cash flow: $50,000 + $20,000 (recovery) = +$70,000. PV calculations: Year 0 PV = -$170,000 * 1.000 = -$170,000; Year 1 PV = $50,000 * 0.909 = $45,450; Year 2 PV = $50,000 * 0.826 = $41,300; Year 3 PV = $70,000 * 0.751 = $52,570. NPV = -$170,000 + $45,450 + $41,300 + $52,570 = -$30,680.

1 mark for the correct option B. Method: Calculate net cash flows for each year, apply discount factors, and sum the present values.

Traditional OAR: Total labour hours = (2,000 * 2) + (4,000 * 1.5) = 10,000 hours. OAR = $180,000 / 10,000 = $18 per hour. Traditional overhead per unit of X = 2 hours * $18 = $36.00. ABC allocation for X: Setup costs = 30/80 * $120,000 = $45,000. Inspection costs = 100/300 * $60,000 = $20,000. Total ABC overhead for X = $45,000 + $20,000 = $65,000. ABC overhead per unit of X = $65,000 / 2,000 units = $32.50. Change = $36.00 - $32.50 = $3.50 decrease.

1 mark for the correct option A. Method: Compare the traditional overhead cost per unit ($36.00) with the ABC overhead cost per unit ($32.50).

Total fund balance before transfer = $36,000 (opening) + (10 * $1,200) = $36,000 + $12,000 = $48,000. Transfer to Income and Expenditure Account = 10% of $48,000 = $4,800. Closing balance of Life Membership Fund = $48,000 - $4,800 = $43,200.

1 mark for the correct option B. Method: Add new fees to the opening balance, calculate the 10% transfer, and subtract the transfer to get the closing balance.

The director's pressure creates an intimidation threat which compromises the accountant's objectivity. Capitalising research costs in breach of IAS 38 would result in misleading financial statements, which compromises the accountant's integrity and professional behaviour. Confidentiality is not threatened here.

1 mark for the correct option A. Method: Identify that integrity, objectivity, and professional behaviour are threatened, whereas confidentiality is not.

The purchase of inventory on credit increases current assets (inventory) and current liabilities (trade payables) by the same amount. Since the current ratio is greater than 1, adding an equal amount to both the numerator and denominator decreases the ratio. The liquid ratio numerator (liquid assets, which excludes inventory) remains unchanged, while the denominator (current liabilities) increases. Therefore, the liquid ratio also decreases.

1 mark for the correct option A. Method: Analyse the mathematical effect on both ratios of adding an equal amount to current assets/liabilities (current ratio) and increasing current liabilities only (liquid ratio).

**Part (a) Workings and Calculations:**

1. **Inventory Valuation at 31 December 2023:**
- Cost: $110,000
- Damaged goods write-down: Cost is $8,000. Net Realisable Value (NRV) = Selling Price ($5,000) - Repair Costs ($1,500) = $3,500.
- Write-down amount = $8,000 - $3,500 = $4,500.
- Adjusted Closing Inventory = $110,000 - $4,500 = $105,500.

2. **Depreciation:**
- Buildings: $300,000 (Buildings Cost = $500,000 - $200,000 Land) \times 2% = $6,000 (Admin Expense).
- Equipment: ($280,000 - $98,000) \times 20% = $36,400 total.
- Cost of Sales share (60%): $36,400 \times 60% = $21,840.
- Distribution Costs share (40%): $36,400 \times 40% = $14,560.

3. **Trade Receivables and Allowance:**
- Bad debt write-off: $4,000.
- Remaining receivables: $112,000 - $4,000 = $108,000.
- Required Allowance (3%): $108,000 \times 3% = $3,240.
- Increase in Allowance: $3,240 - $3,200 = $40.
- Total Admin Expense adjustment = Bad debt written off ($4,000) + Increase in allowance ($40) = $4,040.

4. **Bonus Issue & Dividend Correction:**
- Number of original shares = $300,000 / $0.50 = 600,000 shares.
- Bonus issue (1-for-10) = 60,000 shares \times $0.50 = $30,000. Debited to Share Premium, credited to Share Capital.
- New total shares = 660,000 shares.
- Dividend paid = 660,000 shares \times $0.02 = $13,200. This must be removed from Administrative Expenses and debited directly to Retained Earnings.

5. **Expense Summaries:**
- **Cost of Sales:** Opening Inventory ($94,000) + Purchases ($820,000) - Closing Inventory ($105,500) + Equipment Depreciation ($21,840) = $830,340.
- **Administrative Expenses:** Draft ($180,000) - Incorrect Dividend ($13,200) + Buildings Depreciation ($6,000) + Bad Debt & Allowance Increase ($4,040) = $176,840.
- **Distribution Costs:** Draft ($115,000) + Equipment Depreciation ($14,560) = $129,560.
- **Finance Costs:** 6% \times $100,000 = $6,000 (accrued).

6. **Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income for Vanguard PLC for the year ended 31 December 2023:**

| Details | $ |
| :--- | :--- |
| Revenue | 1,450,000 |
| Cost of Sales | (830,340) |
| **Gross Profit** | **619,660** |
| Administrative Expenses | (176,840) |
| Distribution Costs | (129,560) |
| **Operating Profit** | **313,260** |
| Finance Costs (Debenture Interest) | (6,000) |
| **Profit Before Tax** | **307,260** |
| Income Tax Expense | (24,000) |
| **Profit for the Year** | **283,260** |
| **Other Comprehensive Income:** | |
| Gain on Revaluation of Land ($320,000 - $200,000) | 120,000 |
| **Total Comprehensive Income for the Year** | **403,260** |

***

**Part (b) Statement of Changes in Equity for Vanguard PLC for the year ended 31 December 2023:**

| Details | Share Capital ($) | Share Premium ($) | Revaluation Reserve ($) | General Reserve ($) | Retained Earnings ($) | Total Equity ($) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Balance at 1 Jan 2023** | 300,000 | 60,000 | 0 | 40,000 | 113,600 | 513,600 |
| Profit for the Year | - | - | - | - | 283,260 | 283,260 |
| Revaluation Gain | - | - | 120,000 | - | - | 120,000 |
| Bonus Share Issue | 30,000 | (30,000) | - | - | - | 0 |
| Dividend Paid | - | - | - | - | (13,200) | (13,200) |
| **Balance at 31 Dec 2023** | **330,000** | **30,000** | **120,000** | **40,000** | **383,660** | **903,660** |

***

**Part (c) Statement of Financial Position for Vanguard PLC as at 31 December 2023:**

| Non-current Assets | Cost ($) | Accum. Depr ($) | Net Book Value ($) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Land | 320,000 | - | 320,000 |
| Buildings | 300,000 | (66,000) | 234,000 |
| Equipment | 280,000 | (134,400) | 145,600 |
| **Total Non-current Assets** | **900,000** | **(200,400)** | **699,600** |

| Current Assets | $ |
| :--- | :--- |
| Inventory | 105,500 |
| Trade Receivables ($112,000 - $4,000 - $3,240) | 104,760 |
| Bank | 212,800 |
| **Total Current Assets** | **423,060** |
| **Total Assets** | **1,122,660** |

| Equity and Liabilities | $ |
| :--- | :--- |
| **Equity** | |
| Ordinary Share Capital ($0.50 shares) | 330,000 |
| Share Premium | 30,000 |
| Revaluation Reserve | 120,000 |
| General Reserve | 40,000 |
| Retained Earnings | 383,660 |
| **Total Equity** | **903,660** |
| **Non-current Liabilities** | |
| 6% Debentures | 100,000 |
| **Current Liabilities** | |
| Trade Payables | 89,000 |
| Accrued Debenture Interest | 6,000 |
| Current Tax Liability | 24,000 |
| **Total Current Liabilities** | **119,000** |
| **Total Equity and Liabilities** | **1,122,660** |

***

**Part (d) Discussion:**
* **Advantages:**
- Conserves cash resources: No physical cash outflow is required, allowing the company to retain funds for capital investment and working capital.
- Capitalisation of reserves: Converts undistributed profits into permanent share capital, strengthening the balance sheet structure.
* **Disadvantages:**
- Earnings per share (EPS) dilution: Increases the number of shares in issue, which will dilute future earnings per share if overall profits do not grow.
- No cash return to investors: Shareholders seeking liquid income/dividends may be dissatisfied as they receive paper shares rather than cash payments.

**Part (a) Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income [Total: 14 marks]**
* Revenue: $1,450,000 (no mark, given)
* Cost of Sales: $830,340 [3 marks]
* 1 mark for correct adjusted Closing Inventory of $105,500.
* 1 mark for calculating correct equipment depreciation of $36,400, split to cost of sales as $21,840.
* 1 mark for correct final cost of sales summation.
* Gross Profit: $619,660 [1 mark, OF]
* Administrative Expenses: $176,840 [3 marks]
* 1 mark for subtracting the $13,200 dividend correction.
* 1 mark for adding buildings depreciation ($6,000).
* 1 mark for net bad debt/allowance adjustment ($4,000 + $40 = $4,040).
* Distribution Costs: $129,560 [1 mark]
* 1 mark for correct addition of equipment depreciation ($14,560).
* Finance Costs: $6,000 [1 mark] for debenture interest accrual calculation.
* Profit Before Tax: $307,260 [1 mark, OF]
* Income Tax Expense: $24,000 (no mark, given)
* Profit for the Year: $283,260 [1 mark, OF]
* Other Comprehensive Income: $120,000 [2 marks]
* 2 marks for revaluation of land calculation ($320,000 - $200,000).
* Total Comprehensive Income: $403,260 [1 mark, OF]

**Part (b) Statement of Changes in Equity [Total: 6 marks]**
* Correct opening balances row: [1 mark]
* Profit for the year correctly inserted under Retained Earnings: [1 mark, OF]
* Revaluation gain correctly inserted under Revaluation Reserve: [1 mark]
* Bonus share issue entries (Debit Share Premium $30,000; Credit Share Capital $30,000): [2 marks]
* Dividend paid (Debit Retained Earnings $13,200): [1 mark]
*(Note: 1 mark of the total is reserved for calculating correct closing balances column totals, no overall mark penalties for rounding errors)*

**Part (c) Statement of Financial Position [Total: 7 marks]**
* Land ($320,000) and Buildings Net ($234,000): [1 mark]
* Equipment Net ($145,600): [1 mark]
* Inventory ($105,500) and Bank ($212,800): [1 mark]
* Trade Receivables Net ($104,760): [1 mark]
* Total Equity ($903,660) (must match Part (b) closing totals): [1 mark, OF]
* Non-current Liabilities (Debentures $100,000): [1 mark]
* Current Liabilities (Trade payables $89,000 + Accrued interest $6,000 + Tax $24,000 = $119,000): [1 mark]

**Part (d) Discussion [Total: 3 marks]**
* Max 2 marks for advantages (1 mark per valid point, e.g., cash conservation, reserves capitalisation).
* Max 2 marks for disadvantages (1 mark per valid point, e.g., dilution of EPS, shareholder dissatisfaction with non-cash return).
* Maximum of 3 marks overall for a balanced answer.

(a) Corrected Sales Ledger Control Account:

$$\begin{array}{lr|lr} \hline \textbf{Details} & \textbf{\$} & \textbf{Details} & \textbf{\$} \\ \hline \text{Balance b/d} & 24,560 & \text{Sales returns (Jamal - understatement)} & 90 \\ \text{Sales journal undercast} & 850 & \text{Contra entry (PLCA)} & 450 \\ & & \text{Bad debts written off} & 180 \\ & & \text{Balance c/d} & 24,690 \\ \hline & 25,410 & & 25,410 \\ \hline \text{Balance b/d} & 24,690 & & \end{array}$$

(b) Statement of Reconciliation of the List of Trade Receivables:

$$\begin{array}{lrr} \hline \textbf{Details} & & \textbf{\$} \\ \hline \text{Draft list total} & & 25,140 \\ \text{Add: Understatement of invoice (Lim)} & & 180 \\ \hline & & 25,320 \\ \text{Less: Contra entry} & (450) & \\ \text{Less: Bad debt written off} & (180) & (630) \\ \hline \textbf{Adjusted list total} & & \mathbf{24,690} \\ \hline \end{array}$$

Note: Cash misposted between S. Tan and J. Tan (Error 6) has no effect on the total list of trade receivables balances.

(c) Two reasons for a credit balance in a trade receivable's personal account:
1. The customer paid in advance for goods before they were invoiced.
2. The customer overpaid their invoice by mistake.
3. The customer returned goods after having already paid their account balance in full, resulting in a credit note being issued.
4. Cash discount was claimed and credited after the full balance was already paid.

(d) One advantage of maintaining control accounts:
- Helps to detect/locate errors in the ledgers.
- Acts as an internal check to deter fraud and collusion.
- Provides the total trade receivables and trade payables balance quickly for compiling draft financial statements without needing to list individual personal accounts.

Part (a) [5 marks total]:
- Dr Correction of sales journal undercast ($850): 1 mark
- Cr Sales returns correction ($90): 1 mark
- Cr Contra entry ($450): 1 mark
- Cr Bad debts written off ($180): 1 mark
- Correct adjusted Balance c/d ($24,690) with correct balance b/d brought down: 1 mark

Part (b) [5 marks total]:
- Understatement of invoice to Lim (Add $180): 1 mark
- Contra entry (Less $450): 1 mark
- Bad debt written off (Less $180): 1 mark
- Error 6 stated as having 'No effect' or omitted with correct explanation: 1 mark
- Final matching adjusted total ($24,690): 1 mark (Only if it matches the adjusted SLCA in part a)

Part (c) [4 marks total]:
- Any two valid reasons described: 2 marks for each reason. (1 mark for brief mention, 2 marks for full explanation)

Part (d) [1 mark total]:
- Any one valid advantage stated: 1 mark.

**Part (a) Calculations**

**(1) Gross margin percentage:**
* Formula: \( \frac{\text{Gross Profit}}{\text{Revenue}} \times 100 \)
* Year 1: \( \frac{146,000}{365,000} \times 100 = 40.00\% \) [1 mark for both workings or 1 correct calculation, 1 mark for both correct answers]
* Year 2: \( \frac{153,300}{438,000} \times 100 = 35.00\% \)

**(2) Profit margin percentage:**
* Formula: \( \frac{\text{Profit for the Year}}{\text{Revenue}} \times 100 \)
* Year 1: \( \frac{73,000}{365,000} \times 100 = 20.00\% \) [1 mark for both workings or 1 correct calculation, 1 mark for both correct answers]
* Year 2: \( \frac{43,800}{438,000} \times 100 = 10.00\% \)

**(3) Liquid (acid test) ratio:**
* Formula: \( \frac{\text{Current Assets} - \text{Inventory}}{\text{Current Liabilities}} \)
* Year 1: \( \frac{73,000 - 36,500}{36,500} = 1.00 : 1 \) [1 mark for both workings, 1 mark for both correct answers]
* Year 2: \( \frac{106,000 - 52,000}{80,000} = \frac{54,000}{80,000} = 0.68 : 1 \) (Accept 0.675:1 if not rounded to 2 d.p.)

**(4) Trade receivables turnover in days:**
* Formula: \( \frac{\text{Trade Receivables}}{\text{Revenue}} \times 365 \)
* Year 1: \( \frac{30,000}{365,000} \times 365 = 30 \text{ days} \) [1 mark for both workings, 1 mark for both correct answers]
* Year 2: \( \frac{54,000}{438,000} \times 365 = 45 \text{ days} \)

---

**Part (b) Analysis (Max 7 marks)**

**Profitability (Max 3 marks):**
* **Gross margin decreased** from 40.00% to 35.00%. This suggests rising supplier purchase prices that were not passed on to customers, or price reductions/discounts offered to boost sales volume [1 mark].
* **Profit margin halved** from 20.00% to 10.00%. Because this drop (10% decline) is greater than the drop in gross margin (5% decline), it shows that operating expenses increased disproportionately to revenue (expenses rose from 20% to 25% of sales) [1 mark].
* Although revenue increased by 20%, absolute net profit fell from $73,000 to $43,800, indicating poor overall cost control [1 mark].

**Liquidity (Max 4 marks):**
* The **liquid ratio deteriorated** from 1.00:1 to 0.68:1. This is below the traditional ideal target of 1:1, meaning the business may struggle to meet short-term debts as they fall due without selling inventory [1 mark].
* **Trade receivables collection period lengthened** from 30 days to 45 days. Customers are taking 15 days longer to pay, which has locked up liquid cash in receivables (receivables increased from $30,000 to $54,000) [1 mark].
* **Inventory levels increased** substantially (from $36,500 to $52,000), suggesting slow-moving inventory or overstocking, which further drains liquidity [1 mark].
* Consequently, cash reserves have been depleted, forcing the business to rely on a **bank overdraft of $20,000** and delay payables to suppliers (trade payables increased from $36,500 to $60,000) [1 mark].

**Part (a) Marking Scheme (Total 8 marks):**
- (1) 1 mark for correct workings, 1 mark for both correct answers (40.00% and 35.00%).
- (2) 1 mark for correct workings, 1 mark for both correct answers (20.00% and 10.00%).
- (3) 1 mark for correct workings, 1 mark for both correct answers (1.00:1 and 0.68:1/0.675:1).
- (4) 1 mark for correct workings, 1 mark for both correct answers (30 days and 45 days).
*Note: Accept alternative formulas if clearly specified, but standard year-end formulas must be consistently applied.*

**Part (b) Marking Scheme (Total 7 marks):**
- Max 3 marks for Profitability analysis: identifying key trends (declining margins), explaining cost-of-sales impact (1 mark), explaining disproportionate operating expenses increase (1 mark).
- Max 4 marks for Liquidity analysis: identifying decline in liquid ratio below benchmark (1 mark), linking to receivables collection delay (1 mark), linking to high inventory tie-up (1 mark), noting the emergence of bank overdraft / high trade payables (1 mark).

**(a) Predetermined overhead absorption rate per unit**
\(\text{Predetermined OAR} = \frac{\text{Budgeted Fixed Manufacturing Overhead}}{\text{Budgeted Production Volume}} = \frac{\$120,000}{20,000\text{ units}} = \$6\text{ per unit}\)

***

**(b)(i) Income Statement using Marginal Costing**

\begin{array}{lrr} \hline & \textbf{$} & \textbf{$} \\ \hline \text{Sales } (18,000 \text{ units} \times $50) & & 900,000 \\ \text{Less: Variable Cost of Sales} & & \\ \quad \text{Opening inventory} & 0 & \\ \quad \text{Variable cost of production } (22,000 \text{ units} \times $24^*) & 528,000 & \\ \quad \text{Less: Closing inventory } (4,000 \text{ units} \times $24) & (96,000) & (432,000) \\ \hline \text{Variable manufacturing profit} & & 468,000 \\ \text{Less: Variable selling overheads } (18,000 \text{ units} \times $2) & & (36,000) \\ \hline \text{Total Contribution} & & 432,000 \\ \text{Less: Fixed Costs} & & \\ \quad \text{Fixed manufacturing overheads} & 120,000 & \\ \quad \text{Fixed selling and admin overheads} & 45,000 & (165,000) \\ \hline \textbf{Net Profit (Marginal Costing)} & & \textbf{267,000} \\ \hline \end{array}

*Note on unit marginal cost: \(\$12 \text{ (materials)} + \$8 \text{ (labour)} + \$4 \text{ (variable overhead)} = \$24\).

***

**(b)(ii) Income Statement using Absorption Costing**

\begin{array}{lrr} \hline & \textbf{$} & \textbf{$} \\ \hline \text{Sales } (18,000 \text{ units} \times $50) & & 900,000 \\ \text{Less: Cost of Sales} & & \\ \quad \text{Opening inventory} & 0 & \\ \quad \text{Cost of production } (22,000 \text{ units} \times $30^{**}) & 660,000 & \\ \quad \text{Less: Closing inventory } (4,000 \text{ units} \times $30) & (120,000) & \\ \hline \text{Cost of Sales at standard} & 540,000 & \\ \text{Less: Over-absorbed overheads (W1)} & (12,000) & (528,000) \\ \hline \textbf{Gross Profit} & & 372,000 \\ \text{Less: Operating Expenses} & & \\ \quad \text{Variable selling overheads } (18,000 \times $2) & 36,000 & \\ \quad \text{Fixed selling and admin overheads} & 45,000 & (81,000) \\ \hline \textbf{Net Profit (Absorption Costing)} & & \textbf{291,000} \\ \hline \end{array}

**W1: Over/Under Absorption Calculation:**
\(\text{Fixed overhead absorbed } (22,000 \text{ units actual production} \times \$6 \text{ OAR}) = \$132,000\)
\(\text{Actual fixed overhead incurred} = \$120,000\)
\(\text{Over-absorbed overhead} = \$132,000 - \$120,000 = \$12,000\) (since actual is less than absorbed).

\(^{**}\)\text{Note on unit absorption cost: } \(\$24 \text{ (variable cost)} + \$6 \text{ (fixed overhead OAR)} = \$30\).

***

**(c) Reconciliation of Profits**

\begin{array}{lr} \hline & \textbf{$} \\ \hline \text{Profit as per Absorption Costing} & 291,000 \\ \text{Less: Fixed overhead in closing inventory } (4,000 \text{ units} \times $6) & (24,000) \\ \hline \textbf{Profit as per Marginal Costing} & \textbf{267,000} \\ \hline \end{array}

*(Alternatively, start with Marginal Costing Profit of $267,000 and add $24,000 to get Absorption Costing Profit of $291,000)*

***

**(d) Evaluation of Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing**

* **Arguments for Marginal Costing (Advantages):**
* Contribution is clearly visible, which assists in short-term decision making, such as make-or-buy decisions, accepting special orders, or drop-product scenarios.
* Profits are not influenced by changes in inventory levels. Profit only increases when sales increase, preventing "profit manipulation" by overproducing to defer fixed overhead costs to the next period.
* It avoids the arbitrary allocation and apportionment of joint fixed costs.
* **Arguments for Absorption Costing (Disadvantages of Marginal Costing):**
* It ignores fixed overheads in product costing, which can lead to under-pricing in the long term; in the long run, all fixed costs must be recovered to generate profit.
* It does not comply with IAS 2 (Inventory Valuation), which requires inventory valuation to include systematic allocations of fixed and variable production overheads. Therefore, adjustments are required for external financial reporting.

**(a) Total [2 marks]**
* $6 per unit **(2)** (1 mark for showing formula/working: \(120,000 / 20,000\) **(1)**)

**(b)(i) Marginal Costing Income Statement [8 marks]**
* Revenue: $900,000 **(1)**
* Variable Cost of Production: $528,000 **(1)**
* Closing Inventory: \(\$96,000\) **(1)**
* Variable selling overhead: $36,000 **(1)**
* Total Contribution: $432,000 **(1 OF)**
* Fixed Manufacturing Overhead: $120,000 **(1)**
* Fixed selling and admin: $45,000 **(1)**
* Net Profit: $267,000 **(1 OF)**

**(b)(ii) Absorption Costing Income Statement [10 marks]**
* Cost of production: $660,000 (at $30 per unit) **(1)**
* Closing Inventory: \(\$120,000\) **(1)**
* Over-absorption calculation showing $12,000 **(2)** (1 mark for absorbed amount $132,000, 1 mark for correct deduction)
* Gross profit correctly adjusted: $372,000 **(2 OF)**
* Operating expenses: variable selling ($36,000) and fixed admin ($45,000) correctly listed **(2)** (1 mark for each)
* Net Profit: $291,000 **(2 OF)**

**(c) Reconciliation Statement [4 marks]**
* Setting up reconciliation format starting with one profit figure and finishing with the other **(1)**
* Identifying difference amount as $24,000 **(1)**
* Explaining difference by reference to change in inventory volume (4,000 units) **(1)** multiplied by OAR of $6 **(1)**

**(d) Discussion/Evaluation [6 marks]**
* Up to 3 marks for advantages of Marginal Costing (e.g., contribution relevance **(1)**, no profit distortion by overproduction **(1)**, useful for pricing/special orders **(1)**).
* Up to 3 marks for limitations/benefits of Absorption Costing (e.g., necessary for external reporting under IAS 2 **(1)**, ensures full recovery of total costs **(1)**, prevents underpricing in the long-term **(1)**).

**(a) Difference between 'Value in Use' and 'Fair Value Less Costs of Disposal'**
* **Value in use** represents the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from an asset or cash-generating unit through its continued use and ultimate disposal at the end of its useful life. It is an entity-specific measure.
* **Fair value less costs of disposal** is the amount obtainable from the sale of an asset or cash-generating unit in an arm's length transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties, less the direct incremental costs of such disposal. It is a market-based measure.

**(b) (i) Calculations for Asset A**
* **Value in Use Calculation:**
* Year 1: \(\$50,000 \times 0.909 = \$45,450\)
* Year 2: \(\$60,000 \times 0.826 = \$49,560\)
* Year 3: \(\$55,000 \times 0.751 = \$41,305\)
* **Total Value in Use = $136,315**
* **Fair Value Less Costs of Disposal:**
* \(\$140,000 - \$8,000 = \$132,000\)
* **Recoverable Amount:**
* Higher of Value in Use ($136,315) and Fair Value Less Costs of Disposal ($132,000) = **$136,315**
* **Impairment Loss:**
* \(\text{Carrying Amount} - \text{Recoverable Amount}\)
* \(\$180,000 - \$136,315 = \$43,685\)

**(b) (ii) Calculations and Allocation for Asset B (CGU)**
* **Total Impairment Loss of CGU:**
* \(\text{Total Carrying Amount before Impairment} - \text{Recoverable Amount of CGU}\)
* \(\$300,000 - \$220,000 = \$80,000\)
* **Order of Allocation under IAS 36:**
1. First, write down Goodwill in full to zero. Goodwill impairment loss = **$40,000**.
2. Allocate the remaining impairment loss (\(\$80,000 - \$40,000 = \$40,000\)) to the other non-current assets pro-rata based on their carrying amounts.
3. Net current assets are stated at net realisable value and are subject to other standards (IAS 2 / IFRS 9). No impairment is allocated to them under IAS 36.
* **Pro-rata Allocation of the remaining $40,000 to Property and Plant & Machinery:**
* Total carrying amount of eligible assets = \(\$120,000\text{ (Property)} + \$80,000\text{ (Plant \& Machinery)} = \$200,000\)
* Allocation to Property: \(\$40,000 \times \frac{\$120,000}{\$200,000} = \$24,000\)
* Allocation to Plant and Machinery: \(\$40,000 \times \frac{\$80,000}{\$200,000} = \$16,000\)
* **Final Summary Table:**

| Asset Component | Carrying Amount Before Impairment ($) | Allocated Impairment Loss ($) | Final Carrying Amount ($) |
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
| Goodwill | 40,000 | (40,000) | Nil |
| Property | 120,000 | (24,000) | 96,000 |
| Plant and Machinery | 80,000 | (16,000) | 64,000 |
| Net Current Assets | 60,000 | Nil | 60,000 |
| **Total** | **300,000** | **(80,000)** | **220,000** |

**(c) Impairment of Previously Revalued Assets**
* When an asset has been previously revalued upwards, there is a credit balance in the revaluation surplus (equity) for that individual asset.
* Under IAS 36, any impairment loss on a revalued asset must first be recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and debited to the revaluation surplus to the extent that the impairment does not exceed the amount in the revaluation surplus for that same asset.
* Any excess impairment loss beyond the balance on the revaluation surplus for that asset must be recognized immediately in the Profit or Loss statement as an expense.

**Part (a) [Total: 4 marks]**
* 1 mark for defining 'Value in use' as the present value of future cash flows.
* 1 mark for explaining it is based on continuing use and eventual disposal (entity-specific).
* 1 mark for defining 'Fair value less costs of disposal' as the sale price in an arm's length transaction between willing parties.
* 1 mark for mentioning it is net of direct incremental disposal costs (market-specific).

**Part (b)(i) [Total: 6 marks]**
* **Value in use calculation:**
* $45,450 + $49,560 + $41,305 = $136,315 [2 marks] (1 mark for working, 1 mark for final figure)
* **Fair value less disposal costs:**
* $132,000 [1 mark]
* **Recoverable amount determination:**
* Identify as higher of the two ($136,315) [1 mark]
* **Impairment loss calculation:**
* Carrying Amount $180,000 - Recoverable Amount $136,315 = $43,685 [2 marks] (1 mark for correct formula application, 1 mark for correct final value)

**Part (b)(ii) [Total: 10 marks]**
* **Determine overall impairment loss:** $80,000 [1 mark]
* **Write-down of Goodwill:**
* Full $40,000 allocated to Goodwill [1 mark]
* Goodwill carrying amount reduced to Nil [1 mark]
* **Treatment of current assets:**
* No impairment allocated to Net Current Assets [1 mark]
* **Allocation of remaining $40,000 impairment:**
* Correct proportion calculation (Property: 60%, Plant: 40%) [1 mark]
* Property impairment allocation of $24,000 [1 mark]
* Plant & Machinery impairment allocation of $16,000 [1 mark]
* **Post-impairment Carrying Amounts:**
* Property carrying amount = $96,000 [1 mark]
* Plant & Machinery carrying amount = $64,000 [1 mark]
* Net Current Assets carrying amount = $60,000 [1 mark]

**Part (c) [Total: 5 marks]**
* 1 mark for stating that revaluation surplus is reduced first.
* 1 mark for stating that this portion is recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI).
* 1 mark for noting this only applies up to the balance existing in the revaluation surplus for that specific asset.
* 1 mark for stating any excess impairment is recognized in the Statement of Profit or Loss.
* 1 mark for referencing the interaction between IAS 16 (Property, Plant and Equipment) and IAS 36.

### Part (a) Statement of Shop Profit or Loss for the year ended 31 December 2023

$$
\begin{array}{lrr}
& \$ & \$
\\ \text{Shop Sales} & & 18,600
\\ \text{Less: Cost of Sales} & &
\\ \quad \text{Opening inventory} & 3,100 &
\\ \quad \text{Add: Purchases (W1)} & 10,950 &
\\ \hline
& 14,050 &
\\ \quad \text{Less: Closing inventory} & (2,800) &
\\ \hline
\text{Cost of Sales} & & (11,250)
\\ \hline
\text{Gross Profit} & & 7,350
\\ \text{Less: Expenses}
\\ \quad \text{Shop assistant's wages} & 3,500 &
\\ \quad \text{Rent (W2)} & 1,800 &
\\ \quad \text{Depreciation - Equipment (W3)} & 900 &
\\ \hline
\text{Total Expenses} & & (6,200)
\\ \hline
\text{Shop Profit} & & \mathbf{1,150}
\\ \hline
\end{array}
$$

**Working 1: Purchases**
$$\text{Payments to suppliers} + \text{Closing payables} - \text{Opening payables} = \$11,200 + \$1,150 - \$1,400 = \$10,950$$

**Working 2: Shop Rent**
$$\text{Total Rent Expense} = \$8,000 - \$800\text{ (Prepaid)} = \$7,200$$
$$\text{Shop share } (25\%) = \$7,200 \times 25\% = \$1,800$$

**Working 3: Shop Depreciation on Equipment**
$$\text{Total carrying value} = \text{Opening NBV } \$24,000 + \text{Additions } \$6,000 = \$30,000$$
$$\text{Total depreciation } (15\% \times \$30,000) = \$4,500$$
$$\text{Shop share } (20\%) = \$4,500 \times 20\% = \$900$$

---

### Part (b) Subscriptions Calculation

#### 1. Ordinary Subscriptions
$$
\begin{array}{lr}
& \$
\\ \text{Total subscriptions received} & 28,400
\\ \text{Less: Received for 2022 arrears} & (500)
\\ \text{Less: Received for 2024 advance} & (900)
\\ \text{Less: Received for Life membership fees} & (3,000)
\\ \hline
\text{Subscriptions received for 2023} & 24,000
\\ \text{Add: Received in 2022 for 2023 (Opening advance)} & 600
\\ \text{Add: Arrears for 2023 outstanding at year-end} & 1,100
\\ \hline
\text{Ordinary Subscriptions Income} & \mathbf{25,700}
\end{array}
$$

#### 2. Life Membership Transfer
$$
\begin{array}{lr}
& \$
\\ \text{Opening balance (1 January 2023)} & 18,000
\\ \text{Add: Receipts during the year (2 } \times \$1,500) & 3,000
\\ \hline
\text{Fund balance before transfer} & 21,000
\\ \text{Transfer to Income & Expenditure (10\%)} & \mathbf{2,100}
\\ \hline
\text{Closing balance (31 December 2023)} & 18,900
\end{array}
$$

#### 3. Total Subscriptions to be credited to I&E
$$\text{Total Subscriptions} = \text{Ordinary } \$25,700 + \text{Life membership transfer } \$2,100 = \mathbf{27,800}$$

*Note on write-off:*
$$\text{Total 2022 arrears outstanding on 1 January 2023} = \$800$$
$$\text{Less: Arrears received in 2023} = (\$500)$$
$$\text{Amount written off as irrecoverable (Expenditure)} = \mathbf{\$300}$$

---

### Part (c) Income and Expenditure Account for the year ended 31 December 2023

$$
\begin{array}{lrr}
& \$ & \$
\\ \textbf{Income} & &
\\ \quad \text{Subscription income (Ordinary + Life) (Part b)} & & 27,800
\\ \quad \text{Shop profit (Part a)} & & 1,150
\\ \hline
\text{Total Income} & & 28,950
\\ \textbf{Expenditure} & &
\\ \quad \text{Rent } (75\% \times \$7,200) & 5,400 &
\\ \quad \text{Other club expenses} & 9,400 &
\\ \quad \text{Subscriptions written off } (\$800 - \$500) & 300 &
\\ \quad \text{Depreciation - Premises } (2\% \times \$120,000) & 2,400 &
\\ \quad \text{Depreciation - Equipment } (80\% \times \$4,500) & 3,600 &
\\ \hline
\text{Total Expenditure} & & (21,100)
\\ \hline
\textbf{Surplus of Income over Expenditure} & & \mathbf{7,850}
\\ \hline
\end{array}
$$

---

### Part (d) Evaluation and Recommendation

* **Financial Factors:**
* **Annual Cost:** The bank loan of $30,000 at 6% per annum will incur an annual interest expense of $1,800. This is a recurring charge that will reduce the annual surplus from $7,850 to $6,050, assuming no change in other operations.
* **Liquidity and Cash Flow:**
* Opening Bank Balance: $6,200
* Total Receipts: $47,000 ($28,400 + $18,600)
* Total Payments: $38,100 ($11,200 + $8,000 + $6,000 + $9,400 + $3,500)
* Closing Bank Balance: $15,100 ($6,200 + $8,900)
* Spending $10,000 from cash reserves is possible but leaves only $5,100 in the bank, exposing the club to liquidity risks if unexpected costs arise.
* **Loan Repayment:** Apart from interest, the principal loan of $30,000 must eventually be repaid, placing an additional medium-to-long-term cash flow strain on the club.

* **Non-Financial / Strategic Factors:**
* **Year-Round Usage:** An indoor court will allow playing during adverse weather, potentially increasing active usage, attracting new members, and increasing future subscription income.
* **Competitive Advantage:** It will upgrade club facilities, making it more competitive relative to other local venues.

* **Conclusion/Recommendation:**
* *Option A (Proceed):* The club should proceed because the current surplus of $7,850 can cover the interest expense of $1,800, and the new court will likely generate new membership revenue.
* *Option B (Reject/Postpone):* The club should not proceed now because spending $10,000 will severely deplete cash reserves to $5,100, and the extra interest and principal repayments could lead to deficit cash flow in future years if new membership does not materialize.

### **Part (a) [6 Marks]**
* **Purchases:** $10,950 [1 mark]
* **Cost of Sales:** $11,250 [1 mark]
* **Gross Profit:** $7,350 [1 mark] (award if GP matches Sales - Cost of Sales)
* **Rent:** $1,800 [1 mark]
* **Depreciation on Equipment:** $900 [1 mark]
* **Shop Profit:** $1,150 [1 mark] (of / final accuracy)

### **Part (b) [6 Marks]**
* **Ordinary subscription received for 2023:** $24,000 [1 mark]
* **Total ordinary subscription income:** $25,700 [2 marks] (Award 1 mark for adjustment of either opening advance or closing arrears)
* **Life membership fund transfer:** $2,100 [2 marks] (Award 1 mark for correct additions to fund, i.e., $21,000 total)
* **Irrecoverable written off:** $300 [1 mark]

### **Part (c) [8 Marks]**
* **Subscriptions:** $27,800 [1 mark] (accept split as $25,700 and $2,100)
* **Shop Profit:** $1,150 [1 mark] (of)
* **Rent:** $5,400 [1 mark]
* **Other club expenses:** $9,400 [1 mark]
* **Subscriptions written off:** $300 [1 mark] (of)
* **Depreciation - Premises:** $2,400 [1 mark]
* **Depreciation - Equipment:** $3,600 [1 mark]
* **Surplus:** $7,850 [1 mark] (of / final accuracy)

### **Part (d) [5 Marks]**
* **Loan interest calculation:** Identifies $1,800 annual cost [1 mark]
* **Cash analysis:** Calculates closing cash balance of $15,100 and recognizes that a $10,000 contribution leaves $5,100 [1 mark]
* **Strategic benefit:** Discusses potential for increased members/all-weather play [1 mark]
* **Risk:** Discusses risks (repayments, liquidity, or impact on surplus) [1 mark]
* **Recommendation:** Gives a clear recommendation backed by balanced reasons [1 mark]

**(a) Statement of Cash Flows for Talon plc for the year ended 30 September 2023**

| **Cash flows from operating activities** | $ | $ |
|---|---|---|
| Profit from operations | | 130,000 |
| *Adjustments for:* | | |
| Depreciation | | 115,000 |
| Loss on disposal of machinery \((\$45,000 - \$38,000)\) | | 7,000 |
| *Changes in working capital:* | | |
| Increase in inventory \((\$115,000 - \$132,000)\) | | (17,000) |
| Decrease in trade receivables \((\$94,000 - \$81,000)\) | | 13,000 |
| Increase in trade payables \((\$112,000 - \$85,000)\) | | 27,000 |
| **Cash generated from operations** | | **275,000** |
| Interest paid (W1) | | (20,000) |
| Tax paid (W2) | | (26,000) |
| **Net cash from operating activities** | | **229,000** |
| | | |
| **Cash flows from investing activities** | | |
| Purchase of property, plant and equipment (W3) | (290,000) | |
| Proceeds from sale of machinery | 38,000 | |
| **Net cash used in investing activities** | | **(252,000)** |
| | | |
| **Cash flows from financing activities** | | |
| Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares \((\$100,000 + \$30,000)\) | 130,000 | |
| Repayment of debentures \((\$250,000 - \$150,000)\) | (100,000) | |
| Dividends paid (W4) | (41,000) | |
| **Net cash used in financing activities** | | **(11,000)** |
| | | |
| **Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents** | | **(34,000)** |
| Cash and cash equivalents at start of the year | | 46,000 |
| **Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year** | | **12,000** |

**Workings:**
* **W1: Interest Paid**
\(\text{Opening Interest Payable} + \text{Finance Cost Charge} - \text{Closing Interest Payable} = \text{Interest Paid}\)
\(\$5,000 + \$18,000 - \$3,000 = \$20,000\)

* **W2: Tax Paid**
\(\text{Opening Tax Payable} + \text{Tax Charge} - \text{Closing Tax Payable} = \text{Tax Paid}\)
\(\$23,000 + \$28,000 - \$25,000 = \$26,000\)

* **W3: Purchase of PPE**
\(\text{Opening PPE Carrying Amount} - \text{Disposal Carrying Amount} - \text{Depreciation} + \text{Additions} = \text{Closing PPE Carrying Amount}\)
\(\$850,000 - \$45,000 - \$115,000 + \text{Additions} = \$980,000\)
\(\text{Additions} = \$980,000 - \$690,000 = \$290,000\)

* **W4: Dividends Paid**
\(\text{Profit for the year} = \text{Operating Profit } \$130,000 - \text{Finance Costs } \$18,000 - \text{Tax } \$28,000 = \$84,000\)
\(\text{Opening Retained Earnings } \$162,000 + \text{Profit } \$84,000 - \text{Dividends Paid} = \text{Closing Retained Earnings } \$205,000\)
\(\text{Dividends Paid} = \$246,000 - \$205,000 = \$41,000\)

***

**(b) Distinction between a Statement of Cash Flows and a Cash Budget**
* **Statement of Cash Flows:**
* It is a historical financial statement reporting on actual cash flows that occurred during a past accounting period (backward-looking).
* It is prepared in accordance with statutory requirements and accounting standards (such as IAS 7) for external stakeholders (shareholders, banks, tax authorities).
* **Cash Budget:**
* It is a planning tool forecasting expected cash receipts and cash payments over a future period (forward-looking).
* It is prepared primarily for internal management decision-making and planning, and has no set statutory format.

***

**(c) Ethical considerations**

**(i) Fundamental Ethical Principles Breached:**
* **Integrity:** Being straightforward and honest. Delaying the transaction recording is dishonest and constitutes falsification of financial records.
* **Objectivity:** Not allowing bias, conflict of interest, or undue influence to override professional judgment. Following the Director's instruction means compromising professional objectivity for corporate self-interest.
* **Professional Behaviour:** Complying with relevant laws and regulations and avoiding actions that discredit the profession. Intentionally misleading the bank about a loan covenant is fraudulent and damages the reputation of the accounting profession.

**(ii) Response of the Management Accountant:**
* The accountant must **refuse** to carry out the instruction to delay recording the transaction.
* The accountant should explain the implications to the Finance Director (i.e., that it is fraudulent, breaches accounting standards, and misleads external stakeholders).
* If the Finance Director insists, the accountant should escalate the matter internally to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) or the Audit Committee.
* The accountant should document all discussions, instructions, and actions taken.
* The accountant can seek advice from their professional accounting body (e.g., CIMA/ACCA) or seek independent legal advice.
* If no action is taken by the company and the pressure continues, the accountant may have to resign.

**Part (a) [14 marks]**
* **Profit from operations, Depreciation, and Loss on disposal** [2 marks] (all three correct = 2 marks; any two correct = 1 mark; otherwise 0)
* **Working capital adjustments (Inventory, Receivables, Payables)** [2 marks] (all three correct = 2 marks; any two correct = 1 mark)
* **Interest paid calculation & presentation** [1 mark] (for showing \(\$20,000\) outflow)
* **Tax paid calculation & presentation** [1 mark] (for showing \(\$26,000\) outflow)
* **Purchase of PPE** [2 marks] (1 mark for correct working of additions \(\$290,000\), 1 mark for presentation as outflow)
* **Proceeds from sale of machinery** [1 mark] (for \(\$38,000\) inflow)
* **Proceeds from share issue** [1 mark] (for \(\$130,000\) inflow)
* **Repayment of debentures** [1 mark] (for \(\$100,000\) outflow)
* **Dividends paid** [2 marks] (1 mark for profit calculation \(\$84,000\) or retained earnings analysis, 1 mark for final dividend of \(\$41,000\) outflow)
* **Net decrease in cash & cash equivalents and reconciliation to opening/closing balances** [1 mark]

**Part (b) [4 marks]**
* 1 mark for Statement of Cash Flows is historical/backward-looking.
* 1 mark for Statement of Cash Flows is for external reporting/IAS 7 compliance.
* 1 mark for Cash Budget is future-oriented/forward-looking forecast.
* 1 mark for Cash Budget is for internal management decision-making/no fixed format.

**Part (c)(i) [3 marks]**
* 1 mark for identifying **Integrity** (with brief explanation of why it applies).
* 1 mark for identifying **Objectivity** (with brief explanation of why it applies).
* 1 mark for identifying **Professional Behaviour** (with brief explanation of why it applies).

**Part (c)(ii) [4 marks]**
* Award 1 mark per valid point discussed up to a maximum of 4 marks:
* Refuse the request directly (1)
* Explain the legal/professional consequences of falsifying records (1)
* Escalate to higher authority (CEO/Board/Audit Committee) (1)
* Consult professional body or seek legal advice (1)
* Document the event and consider resignation if unresolved (1)

**(a) Calculation of Net Present Value (NPV) at 10% Cost of Capital**

* **Year 0:**
* Plant acquisition: $(250,000)
* Working capital: $(30,000)
* Net Cash Flow: $(280,000)
* Discount Factor: 1.000
* Present Value: $(280,000)

* **Year 1:**
* Operating cash receipt: $120,000
* Operating cash payment: $(40,000)
* Net Cash Flow: $80,000
* Discount Factor: 0.909
* Present Value: $72,720

* **Year 2:**
* Operating cash receipt: $140,000
* Operating cash payment: $(45,000)
* Net Cash Flow: $95,000
* Discount Factor: 0.826
* Present Value: $78,470

* **Year 3:**
* Operating cash receipt: $150,000
* Operating cash payment: $(50,000)
* Net Cash Flow: $100,000
* Discount Factor: 0.751
* Present Value: $75,100

* **Year 4:**
* Operating cash receipt: $110,000
* Operating cash payment: $(35,000)
* Scrap value of plant: $25,000
* Working capital recovered: $30,000
* Net Cash Flow: $130,000
* Discount Factor: 0.683
* Present Value: $88,790

* **Net Present Value (NPV):**
* \(NPV = -280,000 + 72,720 + 78,470 + 75,100 + 88,790 = \$35,080\)

---

**(b) Calculation of Accounting Rate of Return (ARR)**

* **Average Investment:**
* \(\text{Average Investment} = \frac{\text{Initial Capital Outlay of Plant} + \text{Scrap Value}}{2}\)
* \(\text{Average Investment} = \frac{\$250,000 + \$25,000}{2} = \$137,500\)

* **Average Annual Accounting Profit:**
* Total Net Operating Cash Flows (excluding Working Capital and Scrap) = \(\$80,000 + \$95,000 + \$100,000 + \$75,000 = \$350,000\)
* Total Depreciation over 4 years = \(\$250,000 - \$25,000 = \$225,000\)
* Total Accounting Profit = \(\$350,000 - \$225,000 = \$125,000\)
* Average Annual Profit = \(\frac{\$125,000}{4} = \$31,250\)

* **ARR:**
* \(ARR = \left(\frac{\$31,250}{\$137,500}\right) \times 100 = 22.73\%\)
* *(Note: If calculated as Average Profit / Initial Investment, then \(ARR = \frac{\$31,250}{\$250,000} \times 100 = 12.5\%\). Both methods are acceptable with clear working, but the average investment method is preferred.)*

---

**(c) Calculation of Internal Rate of Return (IRR)**

* **NPV at 15% Discount Rate:**
* Year 0: \(-\$280,000 \times 1.000 = -\$280,000\)
* Year 1: \(\$80,000 \times 0.870 = \$69,600\)
* Year 2: \(\$95,000 \times 0.756 = \$71,820\)
* Year 3: \(\$100,000 \times 0.658 = \$65,800\)
* Year 4: \(\$130,000 \times 0.572 = \$74,360\)
* NPV at 15% = \(-\$280,000 + \$69,600 + \$71,820 + \$65,800 + \$74,360 = \$1,580\)

* **IRR Interpolation:**
* \(IRR = L + \left[ \frac{NPV_L}{NPV_L - NPV_H} \right] \times (H - L)\)
* \(IRR = 10\% + \left[ \frac{\$35,080}{\$35,080 - \$1,580} \right] \times (15\% - 10\%)\)
* \(IRR = 10\% + \left[ \frac{35,080}{33,500} \right] \times 5\% = 10\% + 5.24\% = 15.24\%\)

---

**(d) Discussion and Recommendation**

* **Financial Factors:**
* The project yields a positive NPV of $35,080, meaning it adds value to the business and increases shareholder wealth.
* The IRR is 15.24%, which is higher than the company's cost of capital (10%), indicating an acceptable rate of return.
* The ARR is 22.73%, representing strong accounting profitability relative to the capital invested.

* **Non-Financial / Qualitative Factors:**
* The cash flows are estimates and subject to uncertainty (e.g., changes in operating receipts or payments due to market competition or inflation).
* Working capital of $30,000 is tied up for 4 years, which could impact short-term liquidity.
* The scrap value of $25,000 in Year 4 is an estimate and might not be fully realized.
* Potential impact on employee morale or training requirements for operating the new plant.

* **Recommendation:**
* The company should proceed with the investment as it is financially viable under all quantitative metrics (positive NPV, IRR > cost of capital, and healthy ARR).

**(a) Net Present Value (NPV) - 10 marks**
* Calculation of net operating cash flows for Years 1-4 (80,000, 95,000, 100,000, 75,000) (2 marks)
* Correct treatment of Year 0 outflow ($280,000) (1 mark)
* Correct treatment of Year 4 working capital recovery ($30,000) and scrap value ($25,000) (2 marks)
* Correct application of 10% discount factors (2 marks)
* Calculation of present values (2 marks)
* Final NPV ($35,080) with correct sign (1 mark)

**(b) Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) - 5 marks**
* Calculation of average investment ($137,500) (2 marks)
* Calculation of total and average annual accounting profit ($31,250) (2 marks)
* Calculation of ARR (22.73%) (1 mark) [Accept 12.5% if based on initial investment of $250,000 with clear working]

**(c) Internal Rate of Return (IRR) - 4 marks**
* Calculation of NPV at 15% ($1,580) (2 marks)
* Application of the interpolation formula (1 mark)
* Final IRR (15.24%) (1 mark)

**(d) Discussion and Recommendation - 6 marks**
* Up to 3 marks for discussing financial factors (NPV, IRR, ARR comparison with targets).
* Up to 2 marks for discussing non-financial/qualitative factors (estimates accuracy, liquidity impact of working capital, external environment).
* 1 mark for a clear, reasoned recommendation.

**(a) Traditional Absorption Costing Unit Cost Calculation**

1. Calculate Total Direct Labour Hours (DLH):
- Alpha: \(5,000 \text{ units} \times 2.0 \text{ hours} = 10,000 \text{ DLH}\)
- Beta: \(10,000 \text{ units} \times 1.5 \text{ hours} = 15,000 \text{ DLH}\)
- Total DLH = \(25,000 \text{ DLH}\)

2. Calculate Overhead Absorption Rate (OAR):
- Total Overheads = \(\$120,000 + \$100,000 + \$80,000 = \$300,000\)
- OAR = \(\frac{\$300,000}{25,000 \text{ DLH}} = \$12 \text{ per DLH}\)

3. Calculate Total Unit Costs:
- **Alpha:**
- Direct Materials: $15.00
- Direct Labour (\(2.0 \times \$12\)): $24.00
- Overhead (\(2.0 \times \$12\)): $24.00
- **Total Cost per Unit (Alpha) = $63.00**
- **Beta:**
- Direct Materials: $20.00
- Direct Labour (\(1.5 \times \$12\)): $18.00
- Overhead (\(1.5 \times \$12\)): $18.00
- **Total Cost per Unit (Beta) = $56.00**

---

**(b) Cost Driver Rates under ABC**

1. **Machine Setup:**
- Total setups = \(40 + 80 = 120\)
- Rate = \(\frac{\$120,000}{120} = \$1,000 \text{ per setup}\)

2. **Quality Inspections:**
- Total inspections = \(150 + 100 = 250\)
- Rate = \(\frac{\$100,000}{250} = \$400 \text{ per inspection}\)

3. **Order Processing:**
- Total orders = \(300 + 500 = 800\)
- Rate = \(\frac{\$80,000}{800} = \$100 \text{ per order}\)

---

**(c) Activity Based Costing (ABC) Unit Cost Calculation**

1. **Overhead Allocation to Alpha:**
- Machine Setups: \(40 \times \$1,000 = \$40,000\)
- Quality Inspections: \(150 \times \$400 = \$60,000\)
- Order Processing: \(300 \times \$100 = \$30,000\)
- Total ABC Overhead = \(\$130,000\)
- Overhead per unit (Alpha) = \(\frac{\$130,000}{5,000 \text{ units}} = \$26.00\)

2. **Overhead Allocation to Beta:**
- Machine Setups: \(80 \times \$1,000 = \$80,000\)
- Quality Inspections: \(100 \times \$400 = \$40,000\)
- Order Processing: \(500 \times \$100 = \$50,000\)
- Total ABC Overhead = \(\$170,000\)
- Overhead per unit (Beta) = \(\frac{\$170,000}{10,000 \text{ units}} = \$17.00\)

3. **Total ABC Cost per Unit:**
- **Alpha:**
- Direct Materials: $15.00
- Direct Labour: $24.00
- ABC Overhead: $26.00
- **Total Cost per Unit (Alpha) = $65.00**
- **Beta:**
- Direct Materials: $20.00
- Direct Labour: $18.00
- ABC Overhead: $17.00
- **Total Cost per Unit (Beta) = $55.00**

---

**(d) Evaluation and Recommendation**

- **Cost Distortion / Product Cross-Subsidisation:** Traditional costing under-costs Alpha by $2.00 ($63.00 vs $65.00) and over-costs Beta by $1.00 ($56.00 vs $55.00). This occurs because Alpha is a lower-volume product but consumes a disproportionately higher share of setups and inspections relative to its production volume.
- **Pricing and Competitiveness:** With ABC, Zenith Ltd can set more accurate prices. Over-costing Beta could lead to overpricing and loss of market share to competitors, while under-costing Alpha means selling it too cheaply, hurting profitability.
- **Cost Control:** ABC identifies specific cost drivers. Management can look into reducing setups or inspections to control overheads directly.
- **Drawbacks:** Implementing ABC will be expensive, time-consuming, and complex. It requires robust information systems to log driver usage.
- **Recommendation:** Zenith Ltd should implement ABC because the product characteristics are diverse, and inaccurate product costing could lead to flawed pricing decisions for their core electronic components.

**Part (a) [Total: 5 marks]**
- (1 mark) calculation of total direct labour hours (25,000 DLH).
- (1 mark) calculation of OAR ($12 per DLH).
- (1 mark) calculation of total cost per unit for Alpha ($63.00).
- (1 mark) calculation of total cost per unit for Beta ($56.00).
- (1 mark) showing both direct materials and direct labour correctly in both calculations.

**Part (b) [Total: 6 marks]**
- (2 marks) Machine Setup rate = $1,000 per setup (1 mark for working, 1 mark for answer).
- (2 marks) Quality Inspection rate = $400 per inspection (1 mark for working, 1 mark for answer).
- (2 marks) Order Processing rate = $100 per order (1 mark for working, 1 mark for answer).

**Part (c) [Total: 8 marks]**
- (2 marks) ABC overhead allocation to Alpha ($130,000 total or breakdown detail).
- (2 marks) ABC overhead allocation to Beta ($170,000 total or breakdown detail).
- (1 mark) ABC overhead cost per unit for Alpha ($26.00).
- (1 mark) ABC overhead cost per unit for Beta ($17.00).
- (1 mark) Total ABC cost per unit for Alpha ($65.00).
- (1 mark) Total ABC cost per unit for Beta ($55.00).

**Part (d) [Total: 6 marks]**
- (4 marks) Up to 4 points of evaluation (e.g., identifies under-costing/over-costing, benefits of better pricing, cost control opportunities, high cost/complexity of ABC).
- (1 mark) Clear recommendation based on analysis.
- (1 mark) Analytical quality/use of contextual calculations (mentioning specific unit cost differences of Alpha/Beta).