Cambridge IGCSE · PastPaper.sampleTitle

MetadataPastPaper.sampleTitle

Thinka Jun 2023 (V1) Cambridge International A Level-Style Mock — Literature in English (0475)

50 PastPaper.marks90 PastPaper.minutes2023
An original Thinka practice paper modelled on the structure and difficulty of the Jun 2023 (V1) Cambridge International A Level Literature in English (0475) paper. Not affiliated with or reproduced from Cambridge.

Section A: Poetry

Answer one question from this section. Remember to support your ideas with details from the writing.
1 PastPaper.question · 25 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · essay
25 PastPaper.marks
Read this poem, and then answer the question that follows:

Hunting Snake

Sun-warmed in the late season’s grace,
under the autumn’s gentlest sky
we walked, and froze half-through a pace.
The great black snake went reeling by.

Head-down, tongue flickering on the trail,
he quested lost intent; of food
and cold-blooded prey he took no heed:
his lick of fire was cool and clean.

He passed on, handsome, python-like,
and we, with breath held, watched him go;
cold, dark and splendid he was gone
into the grass that hid his prey.

We took a deeper breath of day,
looked at each other, and went on.


Explore how Wright vividly conveys the shock of this sudden encounter and the awe-inspiring power of nature in 'Hunting Snake'.
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

A high-quality response should cover the following key areas of literary analysis:

1. Contrast and Tension: The opening establishes a peaceful, idyllic autumn scene ('Sun-warmed', 'gentlest sky') which is instantly shattered by the physical paralysis of the walkers ('froze half-through a pace'). This abrupt shift highlights the unpredictable and commanding presence of nature.

2. The Portrayal of the Snake: Wright presents the snake not merely as a dangerous predator, but as a magnificent force. Use of terms like 'great black snake', 'handsome, python-like', and 'cold, dark and splendid' creates a sense of majestic beauty alongside instinctual danger. The phrase 'lick of fire was cool and clean' highlights the paradox of its deadly yet pure natural essence.

3. The Human Reaction: The physical vulnerability of the observers is captured through breath motifs. They are frozen ('breath held') in absolute awe and respect, showing how human activity is completely suspended in the presence of raw nature. Only after the snake vanishes ('into the grass') can they regain their breath and resume their journey ('We took a deeper breath of day / ... and went on').

4. Form and Structure: The poem uses a regular, controlled structure (four-line stanzas with an alternate rhyme scheme that moves into a final couplet). This controlled pacing contrasts with the sudden internal panic of the observers, mimicking the tense, fluid, and purposeful movement of the snake itself.

PastPaper.markingScheme

Marks are awarded out of 25 according to the following bands:

- Band 8 (23-25 marks): Show a highly perceptive, sensitive, and assured understanding of the poem. Direct, sophisticated analysis of how Wright uses language, structure, and imagery to create tension. Seamlessly integrates textual evidence to support arguments.
- Band 7 (20-22 marks): Demonstrate a clear, critical, and sustained understanding of the poem's themes and techniques. Well-focused analysis of the contrast between the peaceful atmosphere and the sudden shock, supported by appropriate textual references.
- Band 6 (17-19 marks): Show a good understanding of the poem, focusing on the key effects of Wright's word choices (e.g., 'reeling', 'splendid', 'froze'). Arguments are clear and structured.
- Band 5 (14-16 marks): Provide a relevant response showing a sound understanding of the plot and themes of the poem, with some appreciation of the sensory language used.
- Bands 1-4 (1-13 marks): Progressive levels of understanding, moving from basic narrative summary with minimal support to emerging recognition of literary effects.

Section B: Prose

Answer one question from this section. Remember to support your ideas with details from the writing.
1 PastPaper.question · 25 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · essay
25 PastPaper.marks
In what ways does Austen vividly present the contrasting attitudes of Elizabeth Bennet and Charlotte Lucas towards marriage?
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

A high-quality response will explore: 1. Charlotte's Pragmatism vs. Elizabeth's Idealism: Charlotte views marriage as a 'preservative from want' and believes happiness in marriage is 'entirely a matter of chance'. In contrast, Elizabeth believes that marrying without affection is a recipe for misery and cannot comprehend Charlotte sacrificing her feelings for security. 2. The Impact of the Mr. Collins Marriage Proposal: The immediate aftermath of Charlotte's engagement to Mr. Collins dramatizes this conflict. Elizabeth is 'astonished' and feels Charlotte has humiliated herself, while Charlotte defends her choice as highly reasonable given her age (twenty-seven) and lack of fortune. 3. The Visit to Hunsford: Elizabeth's visit to Hunsford Parsonage allows her to see Charlotte's married life firsthand. She notices Charlotte skillfully managing Mr. Collins's tedious nature (e.g., encouraging him to garden or sit in a separate room). This demonstrates that Charlotte has achieved her goal of comfortable independence, even if it lacks romantic fulfillment, prompting Elizabeth to respect her friend's resilience while still rejecting such a compromise for herself. 4. Social Context and Authorial Commentary: Austen uses this contrast to comment on the limited choices available to middle-class women in nineteenth-century England. Charlotte represents the realistic compromise many women had to make, while Elizabeth represents a heroic refusal to submit to economic pressure, which ultimately rewards her with a marriage that combines both love and status.

PastPaper.markingScheme

Candidates will be graded according to the standard Cambridge Assessment International Education (CAIE) IGCSE Literature in English (0475) mark scheme levels: Band 8 (0-4 marks): Insufficient/very limited response, showing little understanding of the text. Band 7 (5-9 marks): Shows some limited familiarity with the characters and plots, but with little focus on the question. Band 6 (10-13 marks): Makes basic relevant points about Elizabeth and Charlotte, with simple supporting reference to the novel. Band 5 (14-17 marks): Shows a clear understanding of the contrasting attitudes toward marriage, with relevant textual support. Band 4 (18-20 marks): Demonstrates a detailed knowledge of the text and makes a well-developed argument exploring how Austen presents Charlotte's pragmatism and Elizabeth's romantic expectations. Band 3 (21-23 marks): Shows a deeper, critical appreciation of Austen's techniques, the characters' motivations, and the social context of marriage. Excellent use of integrated quotations. Band 2/1 (24-25 marks): Offers a highly persuasive, sophisticated, and sensitive analysis of the contrasting perspectives. Displays a mature understanding of how Austen employs narrative voice, irony, and dialogue to present these attitudes.

PastPaper.sampleCTATitle

PastPaper.sampleCTADescription

PastPaper.sampleStickyMessage

PastPaper.stickyCtaText