Edexcel AS Level · PastPaper.sampleTitle

MetadataPastPaper.sampleTitle

Thinka Jun 2022 Pearson Edexcel AS Level-Style Mock — English Language and Literature (8ET0)

100 PastPaper.marks180 PastPaper.minutes2022
An original Thinka practice paper modelled on the structure and difficulty of the Jun 2022 Pearson Edexcel AS Level English Language and Literature (8ET0) paper. Not affiliated with or reproduced from Pearson.

Paper 1 Section A: Language and Context

Read the provided Texts A–C concerning a specific theme. Analyse and compare how contextual factors affect language choices in these texts, referring to relevant language frameworks and levels.
1 PastPaper.question · 25 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · Comparative Analytical Essay
25 PastPaper.marks
### Section A: Language and Context

**Read the following texts (Texts A–C) which all describe encounters with extreme or remote natural environments.**

* **Text A** is an extract from the private journal of Clara Henderson, a pioneer travelling along the Oregon Trail in August 1852.
* **Text B** is a post from the travel blog *The Dusty Boot* by explorer Liam Vance, describing a solo trek through Patagonia, published in 2022.
* **Text C** is a transcribed excerpt from a BBC Radio 4 interview with Antarctic glaciologist Dr. Fiona Vance, broadcast in 2018.

**Analyse and compare how contextual factors affect language choices in these texts, referring to relevant language frameworks and levels.**

---

### Text A: Journal of Clara Henderson (1852)

*August 14th.*—The dust is beyond description, settling upon our clothes and faces until we resemble the very earth we tread. Today we passed the gateway of the great canyon, a formidable wall of dark stone that seems to shut out the merciful hand of Providence. The heat was most oppressive, yet the stock pressed onward with a heavy, melancholy lowing. My dear sister Sarah is quite overcome with the fever, and we can do little but pray for a swift deliverance from this wilderness. The vastness of these plains is terrifying; there is no shelter from the relentless eye of the sun, and one feels singularly small beneath the dome of heaven. We have made but twelve miles today, and the water in our kegs is brackish and warm.


### Text B: The Dusty Boot Blog (2022)

**Chasing the Patagonian Wind: Day 5**

So, day five of the trek and Patagonia is officially trying to blow me off the map. Seriously, the wind here doesn't just blow—it punches you in the gut. I’ve had to pitch my tent behind a semi-collapsed stone wall just to stop it from becoming a kite.

`[Image: A tiny green tent dwarfed by towering, jagged grey peaks under a bruised sky]`

It’s brutal, but honestly? It's absolutely epic. The scale of these peaks (especially Cerro Torre) is mind-bending. You look up and realize there is literally nothing but ice, rock, and wind for hundreds of miles. I’m exhausted, my knees are screaming, and I’m currently eating cold beans out of a tin, but I wouldn't trade this view for a five-star hotel. Let me know in the comments if you’ve ever faced winds like this! **#Patagonia #SoloTrekking #Wanderlust**


### Text C: BBC Radio 4 Interview Transcript (2018)

**Interviewer:** ...and what is the immediate sensation when you step off the plane onto the ice shelf?

**Dr. Fiona Vance:** It’s... (.) it’s the silence. That is the first thing that hits you. It’s a completely dead silence. There are no birds, no leaves rustling, absolutely nothing except the wind, if it’s blowing. And the cold is... it’s not like opening a freezer door (1.0) it’s a physical force. It catches in your throat. You have to wear these massive, heavy-duty parkas and goggles just to breathe comfortably. But once you get over the initial shock, it’s beautiful. It’s like being on another planet. It’s just this endless, blinding white sheet stretching out to the horizon. It’s both incredibly peaceful and... well, terrifyingly hostile if you make a mistake.
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

### Model Comparative Analysis Outline

#### Lexis and Semantics
* **Text A**: Employs elevated, formal, and religious/spiritual lexis reflective of Victorian worldview and values ("Providence", "deliverance", "oppressive", "melancholy"). Metaphors are natural and anthropomorphic ("relentless eye of the sun", "dome of heaven").
* **Text B**: Utilizes highly informal, contemporary, and colloquial lexis ("epic", "mind-bending", "literally", "punches you in the gut"). Employs internet-native elements like hashtags (`#Patagonia`, `#Wanderlust`) to categorise content and build a brand.
* **Text C**: Demonstrates spoken spontaneous language features mixed with vivid descriptive metaphors ("completely dead silence", "physical force", "like being on another planet"). Adjectives are simple but highly sensory ("endless", "blinding white").

#### Grammar and Syntax
* **Text A**: Formed of long, complex, and compound-complex sentences that reflect 19th-century written syntax. Relies on coordinating structures to detail the chronological, arduous journey ("We have made but twelve miles today, and the water...").
* **Text B**: Characterised by structural fragmentation, ellipsis ("So, day five..."), and minor sentences ("Seriously"). Syntactic structures mimic natural inner speech and quick-paced digital messaging designed to hold a modern reader's short attention span.
* **Text C**: Features classic spoken syntax with pauses, reformulations, and hesitations ("It’s... (.) it’s the silence", "peaceful and... well, terrifyingly hostile"). Contains conversational markers and simple coordinating devices ("And the cold is...").

#### Pragmatics and Context
* **Text A**: A private journal written during a historical migration (Oregon Trail). The pragmatic purpose is catharsis and record-keeping, underpinned by immediate survival struggles (fever, heat, brackish water). The audience is self or family.
* **Text B**: A public travel blog intended for global consumption and engagement. Pragmatic purpose is self-promotion, entertainment, and building a community ("Let me know in the comments..."). The challenge is reframed as a chosen, romanticised adventure.
* **Text C**: A broadcast media interview. The speaker is an expert representing scientific work, balancing professional authority with accessible, descriptive language to engage a broad Radio 4 listening public. The environment is both a scientific workspace and an awe-inspiring wild land.

PastPaper.markingScheme

### Marking Scheme (Total: 25 Marks)

This question is assessed against **AO1** (10 marks), **AO2** (10 marks), and **AO3** (5 marks).

#### Level 5 (21–25 Marks) - Critical and Evaluative
* **AO1**: Demonstrates a highly controlled, systematic, and sophisticated application of linguistic frameworks. Terminology is consistently accurate.
* **AO2**: Displays sharp, critical insight into how representation and meaning are constructed across all three texts.
* **AO3**: Offers a perceptive, highly integrated comparison of how contextual parameters (mode, audience, purpose, and time period) influence language choices.

#### Level 4 (16–20 Marks) - Clear and Consistent
* **AO1**: Applies a range of linguistic frameworks accurately and consistently to dissect the texts.
* **AO2**: Explores and analyses how representation of extreme environments is developed through linguistic choices.
* **AO3**: Makes clear and logical connections between contexts and linguistic outcomes, effectively comparing the texts.

#### Level 3 (11–15 Marks) - Explanatory and Broad
* **AO1**: Demonstrates sound understanding of language frameworks with occasional lapses in technical precision.
* **AO2**: Explains how meaning and attitudes are conveyed in the texts with some analysis of language features.
* **AO3**: Shows an understanding of the influence of context on language, making broad comparisons between the texts.

#### Level 2 (6–10 Marks) - Descriptive and Spotty
* **AO1**: Applies frameworks inconsistently; relies on labelling basic word classes rather than structural analysis.
* **AO2**: Describes content and themes rather than analyzing representation or language choices directly.
* **AO3**: Demonstrates limited awareness of contextual influence, pointing out obvious features (e.g., Text A is old, Text B is online) without deep connection to linguistic choices.

#### Level 1 (1–5 Marks) - Fragmentary and Narrative
* **AO1**: Lacks linguistic framework usage. Highly reliant on basic impressionistic comments.
* **AO2**: Offers simple plot or content summaries.
* **AO3**: Fails to establish meaningful contextual links or comparisons.

Paper 1 Section B: Language and Identity

Read the provided Text D. Analyse how the speaker presents themselves in the text, referring to relevant language frameworks and levels.
1 PastPaper.question · 25 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · Single-Text Analytical Essay
25 PastPaper.marks
Read the following Text D, a transcript from an episode of the podcast 'Green Spaces, Urban Places', featuring an interview with Marcus, a 28-year-old community gardener in Hackney, East London.

Analyse how Marcus presents his identity in the text. In your answer, you should refer to:
- relevant language frameworks and levels
- the influence of contextual factors.

**Text D**

**Marcus:** ...when I first started doing this (.) people in Hackney looked at me like I was (1.0) completely mad (laughs) you know? they’d walk past the allotment and see me knee-deep in soil and think ‘what is this young guy doing?’ (.) but for me (.) it’s about connection. my grandparents came over from Jamaica in the sixties and they always grew their own food (.) always. they had this tiny backyard in Tottenham but it was full of callaloo and tomatoes (.) so when I’ve got my hands in the earth (1.5) I feel like I’m literally connecting with them (1.0) with my roots. it’s not just about growing organic veg (.) it’s a form of resistance against this concrete jungle. we’re reclaiming the space (.) making it ours.
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

### Key Areas of Analysis

#### 1. Lexis and Semantics
- **Cultural Heritage and Heritage Lexis:** Marcus uses culturally specific concrete nouns such as 'Jamaica', 'Tottenham', and 'callaloo'. This establishes a direct link between his modern urban identity and his family's Windrush-generation heritage.
- **Metaphorical Oppositions:** The contrast between 'concrete jungle' (a conceptual metaphor representing the oppressive, unnatural urban environment) and organic vocabulary ('earth', 'soil', 'organic veg', 'roots') highlights his identity as an eco-conscious activist and rebel.
- **Colloquial and Informal Lexis:** Phrasing such as 'completely mad', 'this young guy', and the tag question 'you know?' establishes a conversational, relatable, and authentic speaker identity suited to the informal podcast genre.

#### 2. Grammar and Syntax
- **Pronouns and Identity Shift:** Marcus shifts from first-person singular pronouns ('I', 'me', 'my') to represent his individual journey and family heritage, to the collective first-person plural 'we' and 'ours' ('we’re reclaiming the space'). This constructs a shared, community-oriented identity.
- **Syntactic Parallelism and Repetition:** The repetition of 'always' ('they always grew their own food (.) always') and 'with' ('with them (1.0) with my roots') emphasizes the emotional weight of his familial lineage.

#### 3. Phonology and Spoken Discourse Features
- **Pauses and Prosody:** Micro-pauses '(.)' and longer pauses like '(1.0)' and '(1.5)' indicate cognitive processing and emotional reflection when talking about his grandparents and heritage, conveying vulnerability and authenticity.
- **Reported Speech:** He uses reported thought/speech ('think ‘what is this young guy doing?’') to externalise the skepticism of outsiders, contrasting his internal sense of purpose with societal perceptions of a young black man in urban agriculture.

PastPaper.markingScheme

### Marking Scheme (Total 25 marks)

**AO1 (15 Marks) - Apply systematic alternative linguistic frameworks**
- **Level 5 (13-15 marks):** Exceptional, highly systematic, and consistent application of precise linguistic terminology. Evaluates patterns across different levels (grammar, lexis, pragmatics).
- **Level 4 (10-12 marks):** Controlled and consistent analysis using well-chosen linguistic terminology. Explores linguistic features with clear relevance to identity.
- **Level 3 (7-9 marks):** Sound and generally accurate explanation of features. Uses appropriate terminology, though may sometimes read as a list rather than an integrated analysis.
- **Level 2 (4-6 marks):** Basic awareness of linguistic frameworks. Focus is more descriptive than analytical.
- **Level 1 (1-3 marks):** Minimal or no systematic application of frameworks; descriptive or largely generalized response.

**AO3 (10 Marks) - Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts**
- **Level 5 (9-10 marks):** Discriminating and sophisticated understanding of how contextual factors (medium of podcast, geographical setting of East London, cultural heritage, and ecological activism) shape Marcus's language choices.
- **Level 4 (7-8 marks):** Clear and analytical understanding of the influence of contextual factors. Explores the relationship between speaker, audience, and identity.
- **Level 3 (5-6 marks):** Explains contextual factors adequately, showing how they relate to the transcript's themes (e.g., age, race, and urban environment).
- **Level 2 (3-4 marks):** Straightforward or limited recognition of contextual factors.
- **Level 1 (1-2 marks):** Little to no awareness of how context influences identity construction.

Paper 2 Question 1: Child Language (Written)

Using the provided written data, write a script for a talk aimed at first-year A Level English Language students explaining key features of the child's written language. Focus on accuracy, control, and relevant theoretical concepts.
1 PastPaper.question · 20 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · Directed Creative Script
20 PastPaper.marks
### Data

The text below is a short story written by Leo, aged 6 years and 4 months, at home. He has drawn a picture of a rocket ship next to his writing.

**Transcription of Leo's writing:**
> ONCE UPON A tIME thERE WAS A hUGE rocket. IT WENT TO THE mOON. THE mOON WAS bRIgHT AND YELOW. THE rocket CRASHD. BUT THE AStRONOT WAS SAF.

### Task
Using the provided written data, write a script for a talk aimed at first-year A Level English Language students explaining key features of Leo's written language.

In your script, you should:
* Analyze Leo's graphological and orthographic features, including spelling strategies and letter formation.
* Explain his grammatical structure and lexical choices.
* Apply relevant theoretical frameworks of children's written development (such as Gentry's spelling stages or Kroll's stages of development).
* Maintain an appropriate academic tone and register suitable for first-year A Level students.
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

### Model Script Response

**Title:** Decoding Leo’s Journey: An Analysis of a Six-Year-Old’s Writing

**Speaker:** Good morning, everyone! Today, we are going to look at a short piece of writing produced by Leo, who is six years and four months old. This short text is a fantastic window into the cognitive and physical processes behind early literacy development.

First, let's examine Leo's **graphology and orthography**. If you look closely at the transcription, you’ll notice a mix of uppercase and lowercase letters—such as 'tIME' with a lowercase 't' but uppercase 'IME', and lowercase 'g' in 'bRIgHT'. This demonstrates that Leo is still consolidating his graphomotor skills and learning the conventions of capitalization. Now, let’s look at his spelling strategies. We can apply **Richard Gentry’s developmental spelling stages** here. Leo is primarily in the **transitional stage**. His spelling of 'YELOW' (yellow) and 'CRASHD' (crashed) shows that he is applying phonetic strategies, also known as 'invented spelling'. In 'CRASHD', he omits the silent 'e' in the regular past-tense suffix '-ed' because he is spelling phonetically (/t/ or /d/ sound). Similarly, 'AStRONOT' (astronaut) and 'SAF' (safe) rely heavily on sound-symbol correspondence. 'SAF' displays an understanding of the consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) structure but misses the split digraph 'a-e'. This is typical of a child moving towards the conventional spelling stage.

Next, let’s talk about **grammar and discourse structure**. Leo uses a highly recognizable genre formula to open his text: 'ONCE UPON A tIME'. According to **Joan Rothery's genre theory**, this piece is a classic **'narrative'** or **'recount'**, containing an orientation ('there was a huge rocket'), an event/complication ('the rocket crashed'), and a resolution ('the astronaut was safe'). Structurally, Leo relies on simple, declarative sentences. Interestingly, he uses the coordinating conjunction 'BUT' to begin his final sentence: 'BUT THE AStRONOT WAS SAF.' This shows an emerging awareness of narrative tension and contrast.

Applying **Barry Kroll’s writing stages**, Leo is firmly in the **consolidation stage**. His written language closely reflects his spoken language, relying on simple active sentences and colloquial, phonetic spelling, yet he is beginning to master the written medium's narrative conventions.

To wrap up, Leo is making impressive progress. His writing is not simply full of 'errors'; rather, it is a showcase of active, intelligent hypothesis-testing as he transitions from a phonetic speller to a conventional writer. Thank you!

PastPaper.markingScheme

### Marking Scheme

This question is assessed against **AO1** (Apply systematic as well as creative ideas in analysis of language) and **AO2** (Demonstrate critical understanding of various concepts and issues, such as child language acquisition).

**Total Marks: 20**
* **AO1 (10 marks):** Systematic analysis of linguistic features (graphology, orthography, grammar, discourse) and the creation of a clear, coherent script with appropriate register.
* **AO2 (10 marks):** Critical application of child language acquisition theories (e.g., Gentry's spelling stages, Rothery's genres, Kroll's stages).

#### Level Descriptors

* **Level 4 (16–20 marks): High Achievement**
* **AO1:** Sophisticated control of register, highly appropriate for A Level students. Systematic, detailed, and precise identification of graphological, orthographic, lexical, and grammatical features.
* **AO2:** Perceptive and seamless application of relevant theoretical concepts (e.g., Gentry, Kroll, Rothery). Excellent understanding of the developmental reasons behind the child's writing features.

* **Level 3 (11–15 marks): Good Achievement**
* **AO1:** Clear, coherent script structure with an appropriate register. Sound analysis of language features (spelling, capitalization, sentence types) with accurate terminology.
* **AO2:** Consistent application of child language theories. Good understanding of developmental stages and processes of spelling/writing acquisition.

* **Level 2 (6–10 marks): Basic/Some Achievement**
* **AO1:** Some structure to the script but register may drift. Descriptions of the text are largely accurate but may lack precise linguistic terminology.
* **AO2:** Some reference to theories, but application may be superficial or descriptive rather than analytical.

* **Level 1 (1–5 marks): Limited Achievement**
* **AO1:** Form of a script is barely maintained. Focus is mostly on correcting errors rather than analyzing. Highly descriptive with little terminology.
* **AO2:** Very limited or no reference to theoretical concepts.

Paper 2 Question 2: Child Language (Spoken)

Analyze how the children in the spoken transcript use language in their cooperative play, referring to phonology, morphology, lexis, syntax, and discourse.
0 PastPaper.question · 0 PastPaper.marks

PastPaper.sampleCTATitle

PastPaper.sampleCTADescription

PastPaper.sampleStickyMessage

PastPaper.stickyCtaText