Edexcel IAS-Level · PastPaper.sampleTitle

MetadataPastPaper.sampleTitle

Thinka Jan 2026 Cambridge International A Level-Style Mock — Accounting (XAC11)

400 PastPaper.marks360 PastPaper.minutes2026
PastPaper.analysisPastPaper.samplePaper
An original Thinka practice paper modelled on the structure and difficulty of the Jan 2026 Cambridge International A Level Accounting (XAC11) paper. Not affiliated with or reproduced from Cambridge.

Unit 1 Section A

Answer both questions in this section.
2 PastPaper.question · 110 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · scenario
55 PastPaper.marks
Sarah owns Bayside Retailers, which operates two departments: Clothing and Footwear. The following trial balance extract was available at 31 December 2023: Revenue: Clothing £350,000, Footwear £250,000; Purchases: Clothing £180,000, Footwear £130,000; Opening inventory (1 January 2023): Clothing £32,000, Footwear £24,000; Carriage inwards (Clothing only): £6,000; Carriage outwards: £12,000; Wages and salaries: £72,000; Rent and rates: £48,000; Advertising: £24,000; General administrative expenses: £36,000; Fixtures and fittings (at cost): Clothing £80,000, Footwear £40,000. Additional information at 31 December 2023: (1) During the year, goods costing £15,000 were transferred from the Clothing department to the Footwear department. This has not been recorded in the books. (2) Wages and salaries accrued were £3,000. These are to be allocated based on the number of staff: Clothing (6 staff) and Footwear (3 staff). (3) Rent and rates prepaid were £4,000. These are to be allocated based on floor space: Clothing (3,000 sq m) and Footwear (1,000 sq m). (4) Carriage outwards and Advertising are to be allocated in proportion to departmental revenue. (5) General administrative expenses are to be allocated equally between the departments. (6) Depreciation is to be charged on fixtures and fittings at 10% per annum using the straight-line method based on cost. (7) Closing inventory was: Clothing £28,000, Footwear £18,000. Required: (a) Prepare the Departmental Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31 December 2023, showing columns for Clothing, Footwear, and Total. (24 marks) (b) Calculate for each department: (i) Gross profit margin, (ii) Profit for the year as a percentage of revenue, (iii) Rate of inventory turnover (times per year). (12 marks) (c) Explain two reasons why Sarah should keep departmental accounts rather than just a single set of accounts for the whole business. (4 marks) (d) Evaluate the performance of the two departments and suggest actions the management of Bayside Retailers could take to improve overall profitability. (15 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

(a) Departmental Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31 December 2023: Revenue: Clothing £350,000, Footwear £250,000, Total £600,000. Opening Inventory: Clothing £32,000, Footwear £24,000, Total £56,000. Purchases (adjusted): Clothing £165,000 (180,000 - 15,000), Footwear £145,000 (130,000 + 15,000), Total £310,000. Carriage Inwards: Clothing £6,000, Footwear £0, Total £6,000. Less: Closing Inventory: Clothing (£28,000), Footwear (£18,000), Total (£46,000). Cost of Sales: Clothing £175,000, Footwear £151,000, Total £326,000. Gross Profit: Clothing £175,000, Footwear £99,000, Total £274,000. Expenses: Wages and salaries: Clothing £50,000 (75,000 * 6/9), Footwear £25,000 (75,000 * 3/9), Total £75,000. Rent and rates: Clothing £33,000 (44,000 * 3/4), Footwear £11,000 (44,000 * 1/4), Total £44,000. Carriage outwards: Clothing £7,000 (12,000 * 35/60), Footwear £5,000 (12,000 * 25/60), Total £12,000. Advertising: Clothing £14,000 (24,000 * 35/60), Footwear £10,000 (24,000 * 25/60), Total £24,000. General administrative expenses: Clothing £18,000 (36,000 / 2), Footwear £18,000, Total £36,000. Depreciation: Clothing £8,000 (80,000 * 10%), Footwear £4,000 (40,000 * 10%), Total £12,000. Total Expenses: Clothing £130,000, Footwear £73,000, Total £203,000. Profit for the year: Clothing £45,000, Footwear £26,000, Total £71,000. (b) Ratio Calculations: (i) Gross Profit Margin: Clothing = (175,000 / 350,000) * 100 = 50.00%, Footwear = (99,000 / 250,000) * 100 = 39.60%. (ii) Profit for the Year Margin: Clothing = (45,000 / 350,000) * 100 = 12.86%, Footwear = (26,000 / 250,000) * 100 = 10.40%. (iii) Rate of Inventory Turnover: Average Inventory: Clothing = (32,000 + 28,000) / 2 = £30,000; Footwear = (24,000 + 18,000) / 2 = £21,000. Rate of Inventory Turnover: Clothing = 175,000 / 30,000 = 5.83 times, Footwear = 151,000 / 21,000 = 7.19 times. (c) Reasons for keeping departmental accounts: (1) Allows the business to evaluate the performance and profitability of individual departments separately so targeted action can be taken. (2) Helps management make strategic decisions, such as expansion, resource reallocation, pricing, or closure of unprofitable segments. (d) Evaluation: Clothing has a very strong Gross Profit Margin (50%) and Net Profit Margin (12.86%), contributing the majority of the profit (£45,000). However, its inventory turnover of 5.83 times is slower, which may indicate holding slow-moving lines. Footwear has a lower Gross Profit Margin (39.6%) and Net Profit Margin (10.4%), but a faster inventory turnover of 7.19 times, indicating high efficiency in selling stock. Footwear is burdened by equal general administrative costs (£18,000) despite its smaller size. Both departments are profitable and should be retained. Recommendations: Footwear should review costs and negotiate better purchase prices. Clothing should look at inventory management to improve its turnover rate.

PastPaper.markingScheme

(a) [Total: 24 marks] Revenue (1 for both), Opening Inventory (1 for both), Purchases adjusted (1 for Clothing: 165k; 1 for Footwear: 145k), Carriage inwards (1), Transfer adjustment entry (1 for Clothing transfer out; 1 for Footwear transfer in), Closing Inventory (1 for both), Gross Profit calculations (1 for Clothing, 1 for Footwear, 1 for Total), Wages and salaries adjusted & allocated (1 for adj 75k, 1 for Clothing 50k, 1 for Footwear 25k), Rent and rates adjusted & allocated (1 for adj 44k, 1 for Clothing 33k, 1 for Footwear 11k), Carriage outwards (1 for Clothing 7k, 1 for Footwear 5k), Advertising (1 for Clothing 14k, 1 for Footwear 10k), General admin (1), Depreciation (1 for Clothing 8k, 1 for Footwear 4k), Profit for the year (1 for Clothing 45k, 1 for Footwear 26k). (b) [Total: 12 marks] (i) Gross Profit Margin: 2 marks for Clothing (50%), 2 marks for Footwear (39.6%). (ii) Net Profit Margin: 2 marks for Clothing (12.86%), 2 marks for Footwear (10.4%). (iii) Rate of Inventory Turnover: 2 marks for Clothing (5.83 times) (showing average inventory of 30k), 2 marks for Footwear (7.19 times) (showing average inventory of 21k). (c) [Total: 4 marks] 2 marks for each well-explained reason (1 mark for identification, 1 mark for development). (d) [Total: 15 marks] Band 1 (1-4 marks): Simple statements or calculations copied from results without evaluation. Band 2 (5-8 marks): Good evaluation of one department, or superficial evaluation of both without comparing key drivers (margins vs turnover). Band 3 (9-12 marks): Detailed evaluation of both departments, noting Clothing's strong margins but slower turnover, and Footwear's faster turnover but lower GP margin and admin cost burden. Band 4 (13-15 marks): Balanced and thorough evaluation of both departments, critical discussion on expense allocation (e.g. general admin split equally), clear and realistic recommendations with a final justified conclusion.
PastPaper.question 2 · practical
55 PastPaper.marks
Alister is a sole trader who operates a wholesale electronics business. On 31 December 2023, his draft trial balance failed to agree, and the debits exceeded the credits. A suspense account was opened for the difference.

The draft profit for the year ended 31 December 2023 was £48,500.

Subsequent investigations revealed the following errors and omissions:
1. A payment of £850 to a trade creditor, V. Patel, was correctly entered in the bank account but posted to Patel's account as £580.
2. Motor vehicle repairs and expenses of £1,400 had been debited to the Motor Vehicles asset account. Depreciation of 20% per annum on the straight-line method is charged on motor vehicles. Depreciation was charged on the year-end balance of the Motor Vehicles account which included this incorrect entry.
3. No entry had been made in the books for bank charges of £120 shown on the December bank statement.
4. A credit sale of goods to J. Wright for £620 was recorded in the Sales Journal as £260 (both debtor and sales accounts were posted with £260).
5. Goods taken by Alister for personal use, cost price £400, selling price £550, had not been recorded.
6. Cash received from a trade debtor, H. Smith, of £300 had been credited to the Sales Account.
7. Rent received of £900 had been debited to the Rent Payable account.

Alister's Statement of Financial Position drafted before the discovery of these errors showed:
- Motor Vehicles (carrying value): £24,000
- Inventory (at cost): £56,530
- Trade Receivables: £15,200
- Bank: £4,100 (debit balance)
- Trade Payables: £11,800
- Capital (opening): £50,000
- Drawings: £12,000

**Required**
(a) Prepare the journal entries to correct errors (1) to (7). (Narratives are not required). (18 marks)
(b) Prepare the Suspense Account to show how the balance is cleared. (6 marks)
(c) Prepare a Statement of Corrected Profit for the year ended 31 December 2023, starting with the draft profit of £48,500. (14 marks)
(d) Prepare the Statement of Financial Position of Alister as at 31 December 2023. (11 marks)
(e) Evaluate the use of Control Accounts as an internal control procedure for a business. (6 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

### **(a) General Journal Entries**

| Error | Account Debit | Account Credit | Debit (£) | Credit (£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **1** | V. Patel (Trade Payables) | | 270 | |
| | Suspense | | | 270 |
| | *(Correction of underpost to creditor: \(850 - 580 = 270\))* | | | |
| **2** | Motor Expenses | | 1,400 | |
| | Motor Vehicles | | | 1,400 |
| | *(Transfer of revenue expense from asset account)* | | | |
| | Provision for Depreciation (Motor Vehicles) | | 280 | |
| | Depreciation Expense (or Profit & Loss) | | | 280 |
| | *(Reversal of 20% depreciation incorrectly charged on expenses: \(1,400 \times 20\% = 280\))* | | | |
| **3** | Bank Charges | | 120 | |
| | Bank | | | 120 |
| | *(Recording unrecorded bank charges)* | | | |
| **4** | J. Wright (Trade Receivables) | | 360 | |
| | Sales | | | 360 |
| | *(Correction of under-recorded sales invoice: \(620 - 260 = 360\))* | | | |
| **5** | Drawings | | 400 | |
| | Purchases | | | 400 |
| | *(Recording goods taken for personal use at cost)* | | | |
| **6** | Sales | | 300 | |
| | H. Smith (Trade Receivables) | | | 300 |
| | *(Correction of cash receipt from debtor incorrectly credited to sales)* | | | |
| **7** | Suspense | | 1,800 | |
| | Rent Payable | | | 900 |
| | Rent Received (Income) | | | 900 |
| | *(Correction of rent received debited to Rent Payable)* | | | |

---

### **(b) Suspense Account**

| Date | Details | Amount (£) | Date | Details | Amount (£) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Dec | Rent correction (7) | 1,800 | 31 Dec | Balance b/d (balancing figure) | 1,530 |
| | | | 31 Dec | V. Patel correction (1) | 270 |
| | **Total** | **1,800** | | **Total** | **1,800** |

*(Note: The trial balance debits exceeded credits by £1,530, meaning the starting balance of the suspense account was a credit of £1,530 to balance the trial balance.)*

---

### **(c) Statement of Corrected Profit for the year ended 31 December 2023**

| Details | Adjustments (£) | Profit (£) |
|---|---|---|
| **Draft Profit** | | **48,500** |
| *Error 1* | No effect | - |
| *Error 2* | Motor Expenses | (1,400) |
| | Reversal of Depreciation | 280 |
| *Error 3* | Bank Charges | (120) |
| *Error 4* | Additional Sales (J. Wright) | 360 |
| *Error 5* | Decrease in Purchases (Drawings of stock) | 400 |
| *Error 6* | Overstated Sales reversed | (300) |
| *Error 7* | Rent Payable expense reduction | 900 |
| | Rent Received income addition | 900 |
| **Corrected Profit** | | **49,520** |

---

### **(d) Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2023**

| Assets | Details | Subtotal (£) | Total (£) |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Non-current Assets** | | | |
| Motor Vehicles (carrying value) | \(24,000 - 1,400 + 280\) | | 22,880 |
| **Current Assets** | | | |
| Inventory | | 56,530 | |
| Trade Receivables | \(15,200 + 360 - 300\) | 15,260 | |
| Bank | \(4,100 - 120\) | 3,980 | |
| **Total Current Assets** | | | 75,770 |
| **Total Assets** | | | **98,650** |
| | | | |
| **Capital & Liabilities** | | | |
| **Capital** | | | |
| Opening Capital | | 50,000 | |
| Add: Corrected Profit | | 49,520 | |
| | | 99,520 | |
| Less: Drawings | \(12,000 + 400\) | (12,400) | |
| **Closing Capital** | | | 87,120 |
| **Current Liabilities** | | | |
| Trade Payables | \(11,800 - 270\) | | 11,530 |
| **Total Capital and Liabilities** | | | **98,650** |

---

### **(e) Evaluation of Control Accounts**

**Arguments for keeping Control Accounts:**
- **Arithmetical Accuracy:** They check the arithmetical accuracy of the subsidiary ledgers (Sales Ledger and Purchases Ledger).
- **Fraud Prevention & Detection:** They act as an internal check because they are typically maintained by a different person than the ledger clerks, reducing the likelihood of collusion and fraud.
- **Saves Time & Fast Information:** They provide the total trade receivables and trade payables balance immediately for the preparation of financial statements without needing to list individual customer and supplier balances.
- **Error Location:** If the control accounts do not reconcile, it localizes errors to a specific subsidiary ledger.

**Arguments against / Limitations of Control Accounts:**
- **Incomplete Protection:** Control accounts will not detect errors of omission, commission, principle, original entry, or compensating errors within individual customer or supplier accounts.
- **Additional Cost & Admin:** It requires extra labor, time, and accounting systems to compile daybooks and post to control accounts, which might not be cost-effective for smaller businesses.

**Conclusion:**
Control accounts are highly beneficial as they provide an independent check on ledger accuracy and aid in the rapid preparation of financial accounts. However, they must be combined with regular bank reconciliations and proper separation of duties to provide a truly effective internal control framework.

PastPaper.markingScheme

### **(a) Journal Entries [18 Marks total]**
- **Error 1:** Debit V. Patel £270, Credit Suspense £270 **(2 marks)**
- **Error 2:** Debit Motor expenses £1,400, Credit Motor vehicles £1,400 **(2 marks)**; Debit Provision for depreciation £280, Credit Depreciation (or Profit & Loss) £280 **(2 marks)**
- **Error 3:** Debit Bank charges £120, Credit Bank £120 **(2 marks)**
- **Error 4:** Debit J. Wright £360, Credit Sales £360 **(2 marks)**
- **Error 5:** Debit Drawings £400, Credit Purchases £400 **(2 marks)**
- **Error 6:** Debit Sales £300, Credit H. Smith £300 **(2 marks)**
- **Error 7:** Debit Suspense £1,800 **(1 mark)**, Credit Rent Payable £900 **(2 marks)**, Credit Rent Received £900 **(1 mark)**

### **(b) Suspense Account [6 Marks total]**
- Opening Balance b/d (Credit) £1,530 **(2 marks)** *(accept credit entry of £1,530 calculated as a balancing figure)*
- Credit entry: V. Patel £270 **(2 marks)**
- Debit entry: Rent correction £1,800 **(2 marks)**

### **(c) Statement of Corrected Profit [14 Marks total]**
- Draft profit: £48,500 **(1 mark)**
- Motor expenses: Less £1,400 **(2 marks)**
- Depreciation reversed: Add £280 **(2 marks)**
- Bank charges: Less £120 **(2 marks)**
- J. Wright sales: Add £360 **(2 marks)**
- Drawings of stock: Add £400 **(2 marks)**
- Sales (Smith) reversed: Less £300 **(1 mark)**
- Rent Payable correction: Add £900 **(1 mark)**
- Rent Received addition: Add £900 **(1 mark)**

### **(d) Statement of Financial Position [11 Marks total]**
- Motor Vehicles Net Book Value: £22,880 **(2 marks)** *(1 mark for working, 1 mark for value)*
- Inventory: £56,530 **(1 mark)**
- Trade Receivables: £15,260 **(2 marks)** *(1 mark for working, 1 mark for value)*
- Bank: £3,980 **(2 marks)** *(1 mark for working, 1 mark for value)*
- Capital section (Closing Capital of £87,120): **(2 marks)** *(1 mark for corrected profit addition, 1 mark for drawings of £12,400)*
- Trade Payables: £11,530 **(1 mark)**
- Correct presentation/balancing totals (£98,650): **(1 mark)**

### **(e) Evaluation [6 Marks total]**
- **Level 1 (1-2 marks):** Basic points identified (e.g. lists benefits like 'saves time' or 'finds errors') without development.
- **Level 2 (3-4 marks):** Detailed explanation of benefits (e.g., arithmetical accuracy, internal check) and limitations (e.g., cannot find errors of principle/omission).
- **Level 3 (5-6 marks):** Balanced discussion showing both benefits and limits, concluding with an overall judgement on whether they are worthwhile for Alister's business.

Unit 1 Section B

Answer three questions from this section.
4 PastPaper.question · 120 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · Control Accounts & Irrecoverable Debts
30 PastPaper.marks
Alastair operates a wholesale business. He maintains a trade receivables ledger control account in the general ledger. At 30 April 2024, the balance on Alastair's trade receivables ledger control account was £42,650 (debit). On the same date, the total of the list of individual balances extracted from the trade receivables ledger was £43,220.

The following errors and omissions were subsequently discovered:
1. The sales day book had been undercast by £1,200.
2. A credit sale of goods to J. Wright for £850 had been completely omitted from the books.
3. No entry had been made in the control account for a contra debt of £420 offset against a balance in the trade payables ledger. The entry had been correctly recorded in the individual personal ledgers.
4. A credit note for £340 sent to M. Taylor had been entered on the credit side of Taylor's personal account as £430. The entry in the sales returns day book was correct.
5. Bad debts written off of £560 had been entered in the customer's personal account, but no entry had been made in the trade receivables ledger control account.
6. A cash refund of £150 to a credit customer, S. Green, for overpayment was correctly entered in the cash book but had been debited to the individual personal ledger as £510.
7. Interest of £80 charged on an overdue account of H. Benson had been recorded in the individual personal account, but no entry had been made in the control account.
8. A customer, D. Miller, who owed £600, has gone into liquidation. A payment of £0.25 in the £1 was received. The balance of the debt is to be written off as irrecoverable. Only the cash receipt has been recorded in both the control account and the individual ledger. The write-off of the remaining balance has not been recorded anywhere.

**Required**

(a) Prepare the Trade Receivables Ledger Control Account for the month ended 30 April 2024, showing the necessary corrections. (12 marks)

(b) Prepare a Reconciliation Statement starting with the original total of the list of individual balances (£43,220) to show that it agrees with the corrected control account balance. (8 marks)

(c) Alastair also maintains an Allowance for Doubtful Debts. On 1 May 2023, the balance on this account was £1,800. At 30 April 2024, Alastair wishes to maintain an allowance for doubtful debts of 4% of the adjusted trade receivables.

(i) Calculate the value of the Allowance for Doubtful Debts at 30 April 2024. (2 marks)

(ii) Prepare the Allowance for Doubtful Debts Account for the year ended 30 April 2024. (4 marks)

(d) Evaluate the usefulness of maintaining control accounts to Alastair's business. (4 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

**(a) Trade Receivables Ledger Control Account**

$$\begin{array}{lr|lr}
\text{Dr} & & & \text{Cr} \\
\hline
\text{Details} & \text{\pounds} & \text{Details} & \text{\pounds} \\
\text{Balance b/d} & 42,650 & \text{Contra entry} & 420 \\
\text{Sales (undercast)} & 1,200 & \text{Irrecoverable debts (omitted)} & 560 \\
\text{Sales (Wright)} & 850 & \text{Irrecoverable debts (Miller)} & 450 \\
\text{Interest receivable} & 80 & \text{Balance c/d} & 43,350 \\
\hline
& \mathbf{44,780} & & \mathbf{44,780} \\
\hline
\text{Balance b/d} & 43,350 & &
\end{array}$$

**(b) Reconciliation of List of Balances to Control Account Balance**

$$\begin{array}{lrr}
\text{Original total of list of balances} & & 43,220 \\
\text{Add:} & & \\
\text{- Credit sale omitted (J. Wright)} & 850 & \\
\text{- Correcting credit note error (M. Taylor) (\pounds430 - \pounds340)} & 90 & 940 \\
\hline
& & 44,160 \\
\text{Less:} & & \\
\text{- Correcting cash refund error (S. Green) (\pounds510 - \dots)} & (360) & \\
\text{- Irrecoverable debt write-off (D. Miller) (\pounds600 \times 0.75)} & (450) & (810) \\
\hline
\text{Adjusted total of list of balances} & & \mathbf{43,350} \\
\hline
\end{array}$$

**(c) (i) Calculation of Allowance for Doubtful Debts**

$$\text{Allowance for Doubtful Debts} = \text{Adjusted Trade Receivables} \times 4\%$$
$$\text{Allowance} = \text{\pounds}43,350 \times 0.04 = \text{\pounds}1,734$$

**(c) (ii) Allowance for Doubtful Debts Account**

$$\begin{array}{lr|lr}
\text{Dr} & & & \text{Cr} \\
\hline
\text{Details} & \text{\pounds} & \text{Details} & \text{\pounds} \\
\text{Income Statement (reduction)} & 66 & \text{Balance b/d} & 1,800 \\
\text{Balance c/d} & 1,734 & & \\
\hline
& \mathbf{1,800} & & \mathbf{1,800} \\
\hline
& & \text{Balance b/d} & 1,734
\end{array}$$

**(d) Evaluation of maintaining control accounts**

*Arguments for:*
- It helps to identify errors of arithmetic and transposition in the subsidiary sales ledger by comparing with the control account balance.
- It helps to prevent fraud and collusion because of the division of labor (different personnel manage the sales day book and the sales ledger).
- It provides a total trade receivables figure quickly for preparation of final statements.

*Arguments against:*
- It does not detect certain errors (omission, commission, compensating errors) if they are duplicated in both the journals and the ledger accounts.
- Additional administrative time and cost are required to maintain a separate general ledger control system.

*Conclusion:*
Control accounts are a highly effective internal control mechanism for Alastair's business, despite the extra administrative effort, as they ensure the integrity of financial balances.

PastPaper.markingScheme

**(a) Trade Receivables Ledger Control Account (12 Marks)**
- Balance b/d (\pounds42,650): (No Mark / prerequisite)
- Sales Day Book undercast debited (\pounds1,200): (1) Method + (1) Accuracy
- Sales omitted debited (\pounds850): (1) Method + (1) Accuracy
- Interest charged debited (\pounds80): (1) Accuracy
- Contra entry credited (\pounds420): (1) Method + (1) Accuracy
- Omitted bad debt credited (\pounds560): (1) Method + (1) Accuracy
- D. Miller bad debt write-off credited (\pounds450): (1) Accuracy
- Correct balance c/d and b/d (\pounds43,350): (1) Accuracy

**(b) Reconciliation of List of Balances (8 Marks)**
- Omitted J. Wright sale (+\pounds850): (2) Accuracy (1 for amount, 1 for correct treatment)
- M. Taylor credit note error correction (+\pounds90): (2) Accuracy
- S. Green cash refund error correction (-\pounds360): (2) Accuracy
- D. Miller bad debt write-off (-\pounds450): (2) Accuracy

**(c) (i) Allowance calculation (2 Marks)**
- Correct application of 4% to \pounds43,350 (\pounds1,734): (1) Method + (1) Accuracy

**(c) (ii) Allowance for Doubtful Debts Account (4 Marks)**
- Balance b/d on credit side (\pounds1,800): (1) Accuracy
- Debit to Income Statement (\pounds66): (1) Method + (1) Accuracy
- Balance c/d and b/d (\pounds1,734): (1) Accuracy

**(d) Evaluation (4 Marks)**
- 1 Mark for defining/explaining a clear benefit (e.g., error checking / internal check).
- 1 Mark for explaining another benefit (e.g., quick total for trial balance).
- 1 Mark for identifying a limitation (e.g., cannot detect errors of omission or commission).
- 1 Mark for a reasoned, supported conclusion.
PastPaper.question 2 · Accounting Ratios & Liquidity
30 PastPaper.marks
Hargreaves Trading is a retail business owned by Sarah Hargreaves. The following summarised financial information is available for the years ended 31 December 2022 and 31 December 2023:

### Summarised Statement of Profit or Loss
| | Year ended 31 December 2022 (£) | Year ended 31 December 2023 (£) |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 360 000 | 480 000 |
| Cost of sales | (216 000) | (312 000) |
| **Gross Profit** | **144 000** | **168 000** |
| Expenses | (108 000) | (139 200) |
| **Profit for the year** | **36 000** | **28 800** |

### Summarised Statement of Financial Position (Extracts)
| | As at 31 December 2022 (£) | As at 31 December 2023 (£) |
|---|---|---|
| Non-current assets | 120 000 | 140 000 |
| Inventory | 32 000 | 48 000 |
| Trade Receivables | 30 000 | 60 000 |
| Bank / Cash | 18 000 | 2 000 |
| Trade Payables | 25 000 | 40 000 |
| Bank Overdraft | - | 15 000 |

**Additional information:**
1. All sales are credit sales.
2. Credit purchases for the year ended 31 December 2022 were £200 000, and for the year ended 31 December 2023 were £300 000.

**Required:**

(a) Calculate the following ratios for both 2022 and 2023. Show your workings and round your answers to **two decimal places**:
1. Gross profit margin (%)
2. Profit for the year margin (%)
3. Current ratio
4. Liquid (acid test) ratio
5. Trade receivables collection period (days)
6. Trade payables payment period (days)
*(12 marks)*

(b) Explain **two** limitations of using accounting ratios to analyse business performance.
*(4 marks)*

(c) Analyse the changes in liquidity and working capital management of Hargreaves Trading between 2022 and 2023.
*(8 marks)*

(d) Evaluate Sarah's proposal to offer a 2% cash discount to credit customers to improve the business's liquid position.
*(6 marks)*
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

### **Part (a) Ratio Calculations**

**1. Gross profit margin (%)**
*Formula:* \(\frac{\text{Gross Profit}}{\text{Revenue}} \times 100\)
* **2022:** \(\frac{144\,000}{360\,000} \times 100 = 40.00\%\)
* **2023:** \(\frac{168\,000}{480\,000} \times 100 = 35.00\%\)

**2. Profit for the year margin (%)**
*Formula:* \(\frac{\text{Profit for the year}}{\text{Revenue}} \times 100\)
* **2022:** \(\frac{36\,000}{360\,000} \times 100 = 10.00\%\)
* **2023:** \(\frac{28\,800}{480\,000} \times 100 = 6.00\%\)

**3. Current ratio**
*Formula:* \(\frac{\text{Current Assets}}{\text{Current Liabilities}}\)
* **2022:** \(\frac{32\,000 + 30\,000 + 18\,000}{25\,000} = \frac{80\,000}{25\,000} = 3.20 : 1\)
* **2023:** \(\frac{48\,000 + 60\,000 + 2\,000}{40\,000 + 15\,000} = \frac{110\,000}{55\,000} = 2.00 : 1\)

**4. Liquid (acid test) ratio**
*Formula:* \(\frac{\text{Current Assets} - \text{Inventory}}{\text{Current Liabilities}}\)
* **2022:** \(\frac{80\,000 - 32\,000}{25\,000} = \frac{48\,000}{25\,000} = 1.92 : 1\)
* **2023:** \(\frac{110\,000 - 48\,000}{55\,000} = \frac{62\,000}{55\,000} = 1.13 : 1\)

**5. Trade receivables collection period (days)**
*Formula:* \(\frac{\text{Trade Receivables}}{\text{Credit Sales}} \times 365\)
* **2022:** \(\frac{30\,000}{360\,000} \times 365 = 30.42\text{ days} \) (accept 30 days)
* **2023:** \(\frac{60\,000}{480\,000} \times 365 = 45.63\text{ days} \) (accept 46 days)

**6. Trade payables payment period (days)**
*Formula:* \(\frac{\text{Trade Payables}}{\text{Credit Purchases}} \times 365\)
* **2022:** \(\frac{25\,000}{200\,000} \times 365 = 45.63\text{ days} \) (accept 46 days)
* **2023:** \(\frac{40\,000}{300\,000} \times 365 = 48.67\text{ days} \) (accept 49 days)

---

### **Part (b) Limitations of Ratio Analysis**
* **Historical data:** Financial ratios are based on historical cost statements which represent past transactions. They may not reflect current or future performance.
* **Inflation:** Changes in price levels over time are not factored into the ratios, which can distort year-on-year comparison.
* **Different accounting policies:** Differences in accounting choices (e.g., straight-line vs reducing balance depreciation or FIFO vs inventory valuation) limit cross-firm comparison.
* **Window dressing:** Businesses can manipulate balance sheet figures near year-end (e.g., paying off a creditor early) to show a temporarily improved liquid position.

---

### **Part (c) Analysis of Liquidity and Working Capital Management**
* **Overall Liquidity Deterioration:** Both current and acid test ratios have fallen significantly. The current ratio dropped from an excessive \(3.20:1\) to \(2.00:1\) (which is generally considered optimal), but the acid test ratio dropped from \(1.92:1\) to \(1.13:1\). This demonstrates a tightening liquid position.
* **Cash Crisis:** Although revenue has grown by 33.3%, the cash book has deteriorated. The positive bank balance of £18 000 in 2022 was drained to £2 000, and a bank overdraft of £15 000 was introduced by the end of 2023.
* **Inventory Management:** Inventory levels increased by 50% (from £32 000 to £48 000), which represents cash tied up in slow-moving stock.
* **Credit Control Weakness:** The trade receivables collection period increased by approximately 15 days (from 30.42 days to 45.63 days). Sarah is giving customers longer to pay, which has doubled trade receivables outstanding to £60 000 and worsened the cash flow.
* **Supplier Relationship Pressure:** The trade payables payment period increased slightly from 45.63 days to 48.67 days. Sarah is delaying payments to suppliers to preserve cash, which may lead to loss of cash discounts or strained supplier relations.
* **Conclusion:** This scenario represents **overtrading**. Sales have expanded rapidly, but working capital has been poorly controlled, culminating in a cash deficit.

---

### **Part (d) Evaluation of Cash Discount Proposal**
* **Arguments for offering a 2% discount:**
* It incentivises trade receivables to pay faster, which will shorten the collection period below 45.63 days.
* It will generate immediate cash inflows to clear the bank overdraft of £15 000 and avoid paying overdraft interest.
* It reduces the risk of bad debts/irrecoverable debts by clearing accounts quicker.

* **Arguments against offering a 2% discount:**
* A 2% discount directly reduces sales revenue, which will further depress the gross profit margin (already fallen from 40% to 35%) and profit for the year margin (fallen from 10% to 6%).
* Customers might have taken advantage of this anyway, meaning the business loses 2% on sales that would have been paid on time.
* It does not fix the root cause of the credit control failure (poor vetting or lack of chasing overdue accounts).

* **Conclusion:** Sarah should implement structured credit control policies (e.g. sending regular reminders, charging interest on late accounts) rather than relying solely on cash discounts, as a cash discount permanently reduces profitability. However, a temporary short-term discount could be used to resolve the immediate overdraft crisis.

PastPaper.markingScheme

### **Marking Scheme**

#### **Part (a): Calculations (12 Marks)**
* **1. Gross profit margin (%):** 1 mark for 2022 (40.00%) and 1 mark for 2023 (35.00%). *(2 marks)*
* **2. Profit for the year margin (%):** 1 mark for 2022 (10.00%) and 1 mark for 2023 (6.00%). *(2 marks)*
* **3. Current ratio:** 1 mark for 2022 (3.20:1) and 1 mark for 2023 (2.00:1). *(2 marks)*
* **4. Liquid (acid test) ratio:** 1 mark for 2022 (1.92:1) and 1 mark for 2023 (1.13:1). *(2 marks)*
* **5. Trade receivables collection period:** 1 mark for 2022 (30.42 or 30 days) and 1 mark for 2023 (45.63 or 46 days). *(2 marks)*
* **6. Trade payables payment period:** 1 mark for 2022 (45.63 or 46 days) and 1 mark for 2023 (48.67 or 49 days). *(2 marks)*
*(Note: deduct max 1 mark total if ratio formats/units are missing (e.g., missing ':1' or '%')).*

#### **Part (b): Limitations (4 Marks)**
* Award 1 mark for identifying a limitation and 1 mark for explanation, up to a maximum of 2 limitations. *(2 x 2 marks = 4 marks)*
* *Historical records (1) - only tells us about the past, not current or future performance (1).*
* *Inflation (1) - historical cost figures are not adjusted for changing price levels, distorting comparisons (1).*

#### **Part (c): Analysis of Liquidity (8 Marks)**
* **7-8 marks:** Excellent analysis that references the calculations from (a), notes the deterioration of liquidity, details inventory levels, identifies credit collection failures, and correctly diagnoses "overtrading".
* **4-6 marks:** Reasonable analysis that mentions changing ratios but may lack depth in explaining working capital components (receivables, payables, stock) or fails to link the bank overdraft to the cash crisis.
* **1-3 marks:** Supericial comments on ratios without meaningful analysis of the cash/working capital cycle.

#### **Part (d): Evaluation (6 Marks)**
* **5-6 marks:** Balanced arguments for and against the discount, including cash flow benefits vs. impact on profit margins, followed by a clear, justified recommendation.
* **3-4 marks:** Arguments for and against are made, but lacks depth, or lacks a clear, logical conclusion.
* **1-2 marks:** One-sided view or basic points with no evaluation.
PastPaper.question 3 · practical
30 PastPaper.marks
Sovereign Shields Ltd manufactures bespoke security doors. The business uses the First In First Out (FIFO) method of inventory valuation for its primary raw material, 'Steel plates'.

The following details are available for the month of April 2023:

1. Inventory of raw materials at 1 April 2023:
- 200 sheets of steel plates valued at \(£45\) per sheet.

2. Receipts (Purchases) during April 2023:
- 4 April: 350 sheets @ \(£48\) per sheet
- 15 April: 300 sheets @ \(£50\) per sheet
- 28 April: 150 sheets @ \(£52\) per sheet

3. Issues to production during April 2023:
- 10 April: 400 sheets
- 22 April: 250 sheets

4. Additional information for April 2023:
- Direct factory labour: 1,200 hours worked at \(£15\) per hour.
- Factory supervisor salary: \(£4,500\).
- Factory rent and rates: \(£6,000\). This is to be apportioned 80% to the factory and 20% to administration.
- Depreciation of factory machinery: \(£3,200\).
- Indirect materials consumed: \(£1,800\).
- Work in progress (WIP) on 1 April 2023 was valued at \(£5,400\).
- Work in progress (WIP) on 30 April 2023 was valued at \(£4,100\).

**Required:**

(a) Calculate the value of the closing inventory of raw materials (Steel plates) at 30 April 2023 using the FIFO method. (6 marks)

(b) Calculate the total cost of raw materials issued to production during April 2023. (6 marks)

(c) Prepare the Manufacturing Account for Sovereign Shields Ltd for the month ended 30 April 2023, clearly showing the Prime Cost and Cost of Production. (12 marks)

(d) Evaluate the use of the FIFO method compared to the Weighted Average Cost (AVCO) method for valuing raw materials in times of rising prices. (6 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

**(a) Calculation of closing inventory of raw materials at 30 April 2023:**

Total sheets purchased/available:
- Opening inventory: 200 sheets
- Purchases: 350 (4 April) + 300 (15 April) + 150 (28 April) = 800 sheets
- Total available: 1,000 sheets
- Total issued: 400 (10 April) + 250 (22 April) = 650 sheets
- Remaining closing inventory = \(1,000 - 650 = 350\) sheets.

Under FIFO, these 350 sheets are assumed to be from the most recent purchases:
- 150 sheets from 28 April purchase @ \(£52\) = \(£7,800\)
- 200 sheets from 15 April purchase @ \(£50\) = \(£10,000\)
- Total value of closing inventory = \(£10,000 + £7,800 = £17,800\)

**(b) Cost of raw materials issued to production:**

Issue on 10 April (400 sheets):
- 200 sheets from opening inventory @ \(£45 = £9,000\)
- 200 sheets from 4 April purchase @ \(£48 = £9,600\)
- Total cost of 10 April issue = \(£18,600\)

Issue on 22 April (250 sheets):
- 150 sheets (remaining) from 4 April purchase @ \(£48 = £7,200\)
- 100 sheets from 15 April purchase @ \(£50 = £5,000\)
- Total cost of 22 April issue = \(£12,200\)

Total cost of issues = \(£18,600 + £12,200 = £30,800\)
*(Alternative validation: Opening Inventory £9,000 + Total Purchases £39,600 - Closing Inventory £17,800 = £30,800)*

**(c) Manufacturing Account of Sovereign Shields Ltd for the month ended 30 April 2023:**

| | £ | £ |
|---|---|---|
| **Opening inventory of raw materials** | | 9,000 |
| Add: Purchases of raw materials | | 39,600 |
| Less: Closing inventory of raw materials | | (17,800) |
| **Cost of raw materials consumed** | | **30,800** |
| Direct factory labour (1,200 hours × £15) | | 18,000 |
| **PRIME COST** | | **48,800** |
| **Factory Overheads:** | | |
| Factory supervisor salary | 4,500 | |
| Factory rent and rates (80% of £6,000) | 4,800 | |
| Depreciation of factory machinery | 3,200 | |
| Indirect materials consumed | 1,800 | 14,300 |
| | | **63,100** |
| Add: Opening work in progress | | 5,400 |
| Less: Closing work in progress | | (4,100) |
| **COST OF PRODUCTION** | | **64,400** |

**(d) Evaluation of FIFO vs AVCO in times of rising prices:**
- **FIFO:** Assumes older, cheaper items are issued first. Therefore, the Cost of Production is lower, leading to higher reported gross profits during inflationary periods. Closing inventory on the Statement of Financial Position is valued at current, higher prices, reflecting more realistic current values.
- **AVCO:** Smoothes out price changes. Issued materials and closing inventory are valued at average prices. Cost of Production is higher than FIFO (reducing reported profit), but closing inventory is valued lower than FIFO.
- **Conclusion:** While FIFO reflects more realistic asset values on the statement of financial position, it can cause 'paper profits' and lead to higher tax liabilities because profits are higher. AVCO is more conservative during inflation. Whichever is chosen must be applied consistently to comply with the consistency concept.

PastPaper.markingScheme

**(a) Valuation of Closing Inventory (Max 6 marks)**
- Identifying closing inventory quantity is 350 sheets: **(1 mark)**
- Valuation of 150 sheets @ £52 = £7,800: **(2 marks)**
- Valuation of 200 sheets @ £50 = £10,000: **(2 marks)**
- Total valuation of £17,800: **(1 mark)**

**(b) Cost of Raw Materials Issued (Max 6 marks)**
- 10 April issue calculation split (200 @ £45 and 200 @ £48): **(2 marks)**
- 22 April issue calculation split (150 @ £48 and 100 @ £50): **(2 marks)**
- Correct individual totals (£18,600 and £12,200): **(1 mark)**
- Total cost of issues of £30,800 (or correct alternate check calculation): **(1 mark)**

**(c) Manufacturing Account (Max 12 marks)**
- Opening inventory (£9,000) + Purchases (£39,600): **(1 mark)**
- Less Closing inventory (£17,800) to find consumed of £30,800: **(1 mark)**
- Direct labor calculation: 1,200 hours × £15 = £18,000: **(1 mark)**
- Correct Prime Cost of £48,800 (OF - own figure): **(1 mark)**
- Factory supervisor salary £4,500: **(1 mark)**
- Apportionment of rent: 80% × £6,000 = £4,800: **(1 mark)**
- Depreciation of machinery £3,200: **(1 mark)**
- Indirect materials £1,800: **(1 mark)**
- Total Overheads of £14,300 (OF): **(1 mark)**
- Work in progress adjustments (+£5,400 / -£4,100): **(1 mark)**
- Correct final Cost of Production of £64,400 (OF): **(2 marks)**

**(d) Evaluation (Max 6 marks)**
- 1 mark for mentioning FIFO results in a higher closing inventory value closer to replacement cost.
- 1 mark for explaining FIFO leads to lower material costs in manufacturing and higher gross profit.
- 1 mark for explaining AVCO results in higher material costs (lower profit) and lower inventory valuations in inflationary times.
- 1 mark for highlighting AVCO's smoothing effect on cost fluctuations.
- 1 mark for linking choice to consistency concept (IAS 2).
- 1 mark for a justified conclusion or recommendation.
PastPaper.question 4 · essay
30 PastPaper.marks

Scenario:

Zenith Logistics operates a fleet of delivery vehicles. The company's financial year ends on 31 December. The policy of the company is to charge depreciation on a monthly basis (pro-rata) for the period of ownership of non-current assets.

The following transactions occurred during the years 2021, 2022, and 2023:

  • 1 January 2021: Purchased Delivery Van A for £40,000. It is depreciated using the reducing balance method at 30% per annum.
  • 1 July 2022: Purchased Delivery Van B for £30,000. It is depreciated using the straight-line method at 20% per annum.
  • 30 September 2023: Sold Delivery Van A for £15,000 cash.

Required:

(a) Calculate the depreciation charge for each of the years ended 31 December 2021, 31 December 2022, and 31 December 2023 for both Delivery Van A and Delivery Van B. (10 marks)

(b) Prepare the following ledger accounts for the years ended 31 December 2022 and 31 December 2023, showing clearly the balances brought down on 1 January 2024:

(i) Delivery Vehicles - Cost Account (4 marks)

(ii) Provision for Depreciation - Delivery Vehicles Account (6 marks)

(iii) Disposal of Delivery Vehicles Account (4 marks)

(c) Evaluate Zenith Logistics' decision to use different depreciation methods (reducing balance and straight-line) for different non-current assets, referring to accounting concepts. (6 marks)

PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

Part (a) Calculations of Depreciation Charges

Delivery Van A (Reducing Balance Method at 30% p.a.):

  • Year 2021: \(£40,000 \times 30\% = £12,000\)
  • Year 2022: \((£40,000 - £12,000) \times 30\% = £28,000 \times 30\% = £8,400\)
  • Year 2023 (9 months of ownership): \((£28,000 - £8,400) \times 30\% \times \frac{9}{12} = £19,600 \times 30\% \times 0.75 = £4,410\)

Delivery Van B (Straight-Line Method at 20% p.a.):

  • Year 2021: No charge (not yet owned) = \(£0\)
  • Year 2022 (6 months of ownership): \(£30,000 \times 20\% \times \frac{6}{12} = £3,000\)
  • Year 2023: \(£30,000 \times 20\% = £6,000\)

Part (b) Ledger Accounts

Delivery Vehicles - Cost Account (£)DateDetailsRefAmountDateDetailsRefAmount1 Jan 2022Balance b/d40,00031 Dec 2022Balance c/d70,0001 Jul 2022Bank30,000Total70,000Total70,0001 Jan 2023Balance b/d70,00030 Sep 2023Disposal Account40,00031 Dec 2023Balance c/d30,000Total70,000Total70,0001 Jan 2024Balance b/d30,000
Provision for Depreciation - Delivery Vehicles Account (£)DateDetailsRefAmountDateDetailsRefAmount31 Dec 2022Balance c/d23,4001 Jan 2022Balance b/d12,00031 Dec 2022Income Statement11,400Total23,400Total23,40030 Sep 2023Disposal Account24,8101 Jan 2023Balance b/d23,40031 Dec 2023Balance c/d9,00031 Dec 2023Income Statement10,410Total33,810Total33,8101 Jan 2024Balance b/d9,000
Disposal of Delivery Vehicles Account (£)DateDetailsRefAmountDateDetailsRefAmount30 Sep 2023Delivery Vehicles Cost40,00030 Sep 2023Provision for Depr.24,81030 Sep 2023Bank (cash proceeds)15,00031 Dec 2023Income Statement (Loss)190Total40,000Total40,000

Part (c) Evaluation

Accounting Concepts & Analysis:

  • Consistency Concept: This concept dictates that accounting policies and methods (such as depreciation methods) should be applied consistently from one financial period to another. This allows users of financial statements to perform meaningful trend analysis and compare performance.
  • Application across asset classes: The consistency concept does not require the exact same depreciation method to be used across all different classes of non-current assets. It requires that the method chosen for a specific class (or asset type) is applied consistently over time.
  • Matching/Accrual Concept: Depreciation should reflect the pattern in which the asset's economic benefits are consumed. Van A (delivery vehicle with high usage/wear in early years) is appropriately depreciated using the reducing balance method. Van B (which might be expected to provide more even utility over its useful life) may be depreciated using the straight-line method to match costs with revenues evenly.

Conclusion: Zenith Logistics is justified in using different depreciation methods for different assets, provided that this represents the truest consumption pattern of the assets and the policy is consistently maintained year-over-year. However, using different methods for two items of the same general class (Delivery Vehicles) may make internal comparison of vehicle efficiencies more complex, and they should ensure this split treatment is clearly disclosed and justified.

PastPaper.markingScheme

Part (a) [10 Marks]

  • Van A: 1 mark for 2021 calculation (\(£12,000\)); 1 mark for 2021 working. 1 mark for 2022 calculation (\(£8,400\)); 1 mark for 2022 working. 2 marks for 2023 calculation (\(£4,410\) incorporating the \(9/12\) fraction).
  • Van B: 1 mark for recognizing 2021 has no charge (\(£0\)). 1 mark for 2022 calculation (\(£3,000\)); 1 mark for 2022 working (incorporating \(6/12\) fraction). 1 mark for 2023 calculation (\(£6,000\)).

Part (b) [14 Marks]

  • (i) Cost Account [4 Marks]: 1 mark for correct opening balance b/d on 1 Jan 2022 and purchase of Van B on 1 Jul 2022. 1 mark for correct disposal transfer on 30 Sep 2023. 1 mark for correct balances (c/d on 31 Dec 2023 and b/d on 1 Jan 2024 of \(£30,000\)). 1 mark for correct dates and narratives.
  • (ii) Provision Account [6 Marks]: 1 mark for correct opening balance of \(£12,000\). 1 mark for 2022 Income Statement transfer (\(£11,400\)). 1 mark for 2023 Income Statement transfer (\(£10,410\)). 1 mark for correct disposal transfer of accumulated depreciation (\(£24,810\)). 1 mark for correct balance c/d and b/d on 1 Jan 2024 (\(£9,000\)). 1 mark for correct dates and narratives.
  • (iii) Disposal Account [4 Marks]: 1 mark for transfer of cost (\(£40,000\)) on debit side. 1 mark for transfer of accumulated depreciation (\(£24,810\)) on credit side. 1 mark for cash/bank proceeds (\(£15,000\)) on credit side. 1 mark for correct transfer of loss on disposal (\(£190\)) to the Income Statement.

Part (c) [6 Marks]

  • Up to 2 marks: Discussion of the consistency concept and its purpose (comparability across periods).
  • Up to 2 marks: Linking to the Matching/Accruals concept (matching depreciation pattern with economic benefit consumption).
  • Up to 2 marks: Evaluation and conclusion (it is acceptable to use different methods for different assets, but inconsistencies within the same asset class like delivery vehicles require robust justification and disclosure).

Unit 2 Section A

Answer both questions in this section.
2 PastPaper.question · 110 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · essay
55 PastPaper.marks
Zander PLC is a retail distributor. The following trial balance was extracted from the books on 30 September 2023:

$$\begin{array}{l|r|r}
\text{Account Title} & \text{Debit (\pounds)} & \text{Credit (\pounds)} \\
\hline
\text{Revenue} & & 2,450,000 \\
\text{Purchases} & 1,320,000 & \\
\text{Inventory (1 October 2022)} & 185,000 & \\
\text{Distribution costs} & 240,000 & \\
\text{Administrative expenses} & 385,000 & \\
\text{8\% Debentures (repayable 2030)} & & 200,000 \\
\text{Debenture interest paid} & 8,000 & \\
\text{Land and Buildings (Cost)} & 900,000 & \\
\text{Equipment (Cost)} & 350,000 & \\
\text{Accumulated depreciation (1 October 2022):} & & \\
\quad\text{- Land and Buildings} & & 90,000 \\
\quad\text{- Equipment} & & 140,000 \\
\text{Trade receivables} & 165,000 & \\
\text{Allowance for doubtful debts (1 October 2022)} & & 6,500 \\
\text{Trade payables} & & 112,000 \\
\text{Cash and cash equivalents} & 228,500 & \\
\text{Ordinary shares (\pounds0.50 each)} & & 600,000 \\
\text{Share premium} & & 100,000 \\
\text{Retained earnings (1 October 2022)} & & 118,000 \\
\text{General reserve} & & 80,000 \\
\text{Interim dividend paid} & 15,000 & \\
\hline
\textbf{Total} & \mathbf{3,796,500} & \mathbf{3,796,500} \\
\end{array}$$

**Additional information at 30 September 2023:**
1. Inventory at 30 September 2023 was valued at a cost of \pounds195,000. This includes some damaged items that originally cost \pounds12,000 but can now only be sold for \pounds8,000 after incurring \pounds1,000 of repair and distribution costs.
2. Administrative expenses of \pounds12,000 were prepaid, and distribution costs of \pounds18,500 were accrued.
3. Depreciation is to be charged for the year as follows:
* Buildings: 2\% per annum on cost. (Land included in Land and Buildings is valued at \pounds400,000 and is not subject to depreciation. The remaining value represents Buildings.) Depreciation on buildings is classified as administrative expenses.
* Equipment: 20\% per annum using the reducing balance method, to be charged to distribution costs.
4. The allowance for doubtful debts is to be adjusted to 4\% of trade receivables.
5. Half of the annual debenture interest remained unpaid at the end of the financial year.
6. The directors estimate the income tax expense for the year to be \pounds45,000.
7. On 15 September 2023, the directors proposed a final ordinary dividend of \pounds0.02 per share. This was not yet approved by shareholders at the year-end.
8. The directors resolved to transfer \pounds25,000 to the general reserve.

**Required:**

(a) Prepare the Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income for the year ended 30 September 2023, in a form suitable for publication according to IAS 1. (20 marks)

(b) Prepare the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 September 2023. (10 marks)

(c) Prepare the Statement of Financial Position as at 30 September 2023, in a form suitable for publication according to IAS 1. (19 marks)

(d) Zander PLC needs to raise \pounds500,000 for expansion. Evaluate whether the company should raise this finance by issuing 8\% Debentures or by issuing 500,000 Ordinary Shares of \pounds1 each at par. (6 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

### **Workings**

**1. Closing Inventory valuation (IAS 2)**
* Cost of undamaged items = \pounds195,000 - \pounds12,000 = \pounds183,000
* Net Realisable Value (NRV) of damaged items = Expected selling price (\pounds8,000) - Repair costs (\pounds1,000) = \pounds7,000
* Damaged items must be valued at the lower of cost (\pounds12,000) and NRV (\pounds7,000) = \pounds7,000
* Total adjusted closing inventory value = \pounds183,000 + \pounds7,000 = **\pounds190,000**

**2. Cost of Sales**
* Opening Inventory: \pounds185,000
* Purchases: \pounds1,320,000
* Less: Closing Inventory: (\pounds190,000)
* Cost of Sales = **\pounds1,315,000**

**3. Distribution costs**
* Per trial balance: \pounds240,000
* Add: Accrual: \pounds18,500
* Add: Depreciation on Equipment (20\% on reducing balance):
* NBV = \pounds350,000 - \pounds140,000 = \pounds210,000
* Depreciation = 20\% \times \pounds210,000 = \pounds42,000
* Total Distribution Costs = \pounds240,000 + \pounds18,500 + \pounds42,000 = **\pounds300,500**

**4. Administrative expenses**
* Per trial balance: \pounds385,000
* Less: Prepaid expenses: (\pounds12,000)
* Add: Depreciation on Buildings:
* Cost of Buildings = Cost of Land & Buildings (\pounds900,000) - Land (\pounds400,000) = \pounds500,000
* Depreciation = 2\% \times \pounds500,000 = \pounds10,000
* Add: Increase in Allowance for Doubtful Debts:
* Required allowance = 4\% \times \pounds165,000 = \pounds6,600
* Existing allowance = \pounds6,500
* Increase = \pounds6,600 - \pounds6,500 = \pounds100
* Total Administrative Expenses = \pounds385,000 - \pounds12,000 + \pounds10,000 + \pounds100 = **\pounds383,100**

**5. Finance costs**
* 8\% of \pounds200,000 Debentures = \pounds16,000 annual interest
* Paid: \pounds8,000; Accrued: \pounds8,000
* Total Finance Costs = **\pounds16,000**

**6. Dividends (IAS 10 treatment)**
* Number of ordinary shares = \pounds600,000 / \pounds0.50 = 1,200,000 shares
* Proposed final dividend = 1,200,000 \times \pounds0.02 = \pounds24,000. Under IAS 10, because this is proposed after the reporting period and not approved, it is NOT recognised as a liability in the SOFP or recorded in the SOCE. It is only disclosed in the notes.
* Interim dividend paid = \pounds15,000 (included in the SOCE).

---

### **(a) Zander PLC - Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income for the year ended 30 September 2023**

$$\begin{array}{lrr}
& \mathbf{\pounds} \\
\text{Revenue} & 2,450,000 \\
\text{Cost of sales} & (1,315,000) \\
\hline
\textbf{Gross profit} & \mathbf{1,135,000} \\
\text{Distribution costs} & (300,500) \\
\text{Administrative expenses} & (383,100) \\
\hline
\textbf{Operating profit} & \mathbf{451,400} \\
\text{Finance costs} & (16,000) \\
\hline
\textbf{Profit before tax} & \mathbf{435,400} \\
\text{Income tax expense} & (45,000) \\
\hline
\textbf{Profit for the year} & \mathbf{390,400} \\
\textbf{Other comprehensive income} & - \\
\hline
\textbf{Total comprehensive income for the year} & \mathbf{390,400} \\
\end{array}$$

---

### **(b) Zander PLC - Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 30 September 2023**

$$\begin{array}{lccccc}
& \textbf{Ordinary} & \textbf{Share} & \textbf{General} & \textbf{Retained} & \\
& \textbf{Shares (\pounds)} & \textbf{Premium (\pounds)} & \textbf{Reserve (\pounds)} & \textbf{Earnings (\pounds)} & \textbf{Total (\pounds)} \\
\hline
\textbf{Balance at 1 October 2022} & 600,000 & 100,000 & 80,000 & 118,000 & 898,000 \\
\text{Profit for the year} & - & - & - & 390,400 & 390,400 \\
\text{Interim dividend paid} & - & - & - & (15,000) & (15,000) \\
\text{Transfer to General Reserve} & - & - & 25,000 & (25,000) & - \\
\hline
\textbf{Balance at 30 September 2023} & \mathbf{600,000} & \mathbf{100,000} & \mathbf{105,000} & \mathbf{468,400} & \mathbf{1,273,400} \\
\end{array}$$

---

### **(c) Zander PLC - Statement of Financial Position as at 30 September 2023**

$$\begin{array}{lrr}
& \mathbf{\pounds} & \mathbf{\pounds} \\
\textbf{Non-current assets} & & \\
\text{Property, plant and equipment:} & & \\
\quad\text{Land and buildings (NBV) (\pounds900,000 - \pounds100,000)} & 800,000 & \\
\quad\text{Equipment (NBV) (\pounds350,000 - \pounds182,000)} & 168,000 & 968,000 \\
\hline
\textbf{Current assets} & & \\
\text{Inventories} & 190,000 & \\
\text{Trade receivables (\pounds165,000 - \pounds6,600)} & 158,400 & \\
\text{Prepayments} & 12,000 & \\
\text{Cash and cash equivalents} & 228,500 & 588,900 \\
\hline
\textbf{Total assets} & & \mathbf{1,556,900} \\
\hline
\hline
\textbf{Equity and liabilities} & & \\
\textbf{Equity} & & \\
\text{Ordinary shares} & 600,000 & \\
\text{Share premium} & 100,000 & \\
\text{General reserve} & 105,000 & \\
\text{Retained earnings} & 468,400 & 1,273,400 \\
\hline
\textbf{Non-current liabilities} & & \\
\text{8\% Debentures (repayable 2030)} & & 200,000 \\
\hline
\textbf{Current liabilities} & & \\
\text{Trade payables} & 112,000 & \\
\text{Accruals (\pounds18,500 + \pounds8,000)} & 26,500 & \\
\text{Taxation} & 45,000 & 183,500 \\
\hline
\textbf{Total equity and liabilities} & & \mathbf{1,556,900} \\
\end{array}$$

---

### **(d) Evaluation of Finance Options**

* **Option 1: 8% Debentures**
* **Advantages:** No loss of control or voting rights for existing shareholders. Interest is tax-deductible, which lowers the overall cost of capital.
* **Disadvantages:** Increases the company's financial gearing and financial risk. The company must make mandatory annual interest payments of \pounds40,000 (8\% of \pounds500,000), even if profit margins drop in the future. The debt must eventually be repaid in full.
* **Option 2: Ordinary Shares**
* **Advantages:** It is permanent capital; no obligation to repay the funds. Equity dividend payments are discretionary and depend on profits, reducing operational risk.
* **Disadvantages:** Dilutes the control and voting power of existing shareholders. Dividends are paid out of post-tax profits and are not tax-deductible. Flotation costs may also be higher than issuing debt.

* **Conclusion/Recommendation:** Zander PLC already has low gearing (Debentures represent only a minor portion of long-term funding). Its profit levels are strong (Operating profit of \pounds451,400). Therefore, the company can likely handle additional debt. To avoid diluting shareholdings, issuing **Debentures** would be a suitable choice, provided cash flows are stable. However, if market uncertainty exists, **Ordinary Shares** would be safer.

PastPaper.markingScheme

### **Marking Scheme Breakdown (Total: 55 Marks)**

#### **(a) Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income (20 marks)**
* **Revenue**: \pounds2,450,000 [1 mark]
* **Cost of Sales**:
* Correct Opening Inventory and Purchases [1 mark]
* Adjusted Closing Inventory (\pounds190,000) showing IAS 2 rule [1 mark]
* Correct Cost of Sales (\pounds1,315,000) [1 mark]
* **Gross Profit**: \pounds1,135,000 [1 mark (consequential on Revenue - Cost of Sales)]
* **Distribution costs**:
* Accrued distribution cost calculation (\pounds240,000 + \pounds18,500) [1 mark]
* Equipment depreciation calculation (\pounds42,000) [1 mark]
* Total (\pounds300,500) [1 mark]
* **Administrative expenses**:
* Prepayment adjustment (\pounds385,000 - \pounds12,000) [1 mark]
* Buildings depreciation (\pounds10,000) [1 mark]
* Allowance for doubtful debts increase (\pounds100) [1 mark]
* Total (\pounds383,100) [1 mark]
* **Operating Profit**: \pounds451,400 [1 mark]
* **Finance costs**:
* Debenture interest outstanding accrued (\pounds8,000) [1 mark]
* Total Finance Costs (\pounds16,000) [1 mark]
* **Profit before tax**: \pounds435,400 [1 mark]
* **Income tax expense**: \pounds45,000 [1 mark]
* **Profit for the year**: \pounds390,400 [1 mark]
* **IAS 1 Presentation & Terminology**: Use of exact titles (Revenue, Gross profit, etc.) [2 marks]

#### **(b) Statement of Changes in Equity (10 marks)**
* **Format and Headings**: Columns for Shares, Premium, Reserves, Retained Earnings, Total [1 mark]
* **Opening Balances**: Entered correctly [1 mark]
* **Profit for the Year**: Correctly added to Retained Earnings column and Total column [1 mark]
* **Interim Dividend Paid**: Correctly deducted from Retained Earnings column and Total column (\pounds15,000) [1 mark]
* **Proposed Final Dividend**: Correctly excluded (IAS 10 treatment) [2 marks]
* **Transfer to General Reserve**: Correct addition to General Reserve (\pounds25,000) and deduction from Retained Earnings (\pounds25,000) [2 marks]
* **Closing Balances**: Correctly computed for all columns [2 marks]

#### **(c) Statement of Financial Position (19 marks)**
* **Property, Plant and Equipment (Non-current assets)**:
* Land and buildings carrying value (\pounds800,000) [2 marks]
* Equipment carrying value (\pounds168,000) [2 marks]
* **Current Assets**:
* Inventory (\pounds190,000) [1 mark]
* Net trade receivables (\pounds158,400) [2 marks]
* Prepayments (\pounds12,000) [1 mark]
* Cash and cash equivalents (\pounds228,500) [1 mark]
* **Equity Section**: Figures match closing balances in SOCE [1 mark]
* **Non-current Liabilities**: 8\% Debentures (\pounds200,000) [1 mark]
* **Current Liabilities**:
* Trade payables (\pounds112,000) [1 mark]
* Accruals (\pounds26,500) [2 marks: 1 for distribution accrual, 1 for debenture interest accrual]
* Taxation liability (\pounds45,000) [1 mark]
* **Structure and Balance**: SOFP presentation format (IAS 1) and exact balance of \pounds1,556,900 [3 marks]

#### **(d) Evaluation (6 marks)**
* **Arguments for Debentures/Against Shares**: Up to 2 marks.
* **Arguments for Shares/Against Debentures**: Up to 2 marks.
* **Clear reasoned recommendation**: 2 marks.
PastPaper.question 2 · Budgetary Control & Cash Budgets
55 PastPaper.marks

Sovereign Furnishings Ltd

Sovereign Furnishings Ltd manufactures a premium item, the 'Royal Chair'. The company is preparing its operating and cash budgets for September and October 2024.

The following information is available:

  1. Sales volumes (units):
    • August (actual): 400 units
    • September (budgeted): 500 units
    • October (budgeted): 600 units
    • November (budgeted): 500 units
    • December (budgeted): 400 units
    The selling price of the 'Royal Chair' is £150 per unit.
  2. Sales terms: 40% of sales are cash sales. 60% are credit sales. Credit sales are collected: 50% in the month of sale (subject to a 2% cash discount), 48% in the month following sale, and 2% are written off as bad debts.
  3. Finished Goods Inventory Policy: Closing inventory of finished goods at the end of each month must be 20% of the following month's budgeted sales. On 31 August 2024, finished goods inventory was 100 units.
  4. Raw Materials: Each 'Royal Chair' requires 4 kg of raw material, costing £12 per kg. Closing inventory of raw materials at the end of each month must be 10% of the next month's production requirements. On 31 August 2024, raw material inventory was 220 kg. Raw material purchases are paid: 50% in the month of purchase and 50% in the month following purchase. Trade payables on 31 August 2024 were £11,000, to be paid in September.
  5. Direct Labour: Paid at £15 per hour. Each 'Royal Chair' requires 2 hours of direct labour. Paid in the month incurred.
  6. Overheads: Monthly manufacturing overheads are £12,000 (including £2,500 non-cash depreciation), paid in the month incurred. Monthly administration overheads are £6,000, paid in the month following incurrence. Administration overheads for August 2024 were £5,800.
  7. Capital Transactions: A new manufacturing machine will be purchased in September 2024 for £15,000. A cash deposit of £3,000 is paid in September 2024, and the remaining balance is paid in two equal monthly instalments of £6,000 starting in October 2024. An old delivery vehicle will be sold in October 2024 for £4,000 cash.
  8. Cash Balance: Budgeted bank and cash balance on 1 September 2024 is £8,500.

Required:

(a) Prepare the Production Budget (in units) of 'Royal Chair' for September and October 2024. (6 marks)

(b) Prepare the Raw Material Purchases Budget (in kg and £) for September and October 2024. (10 marks)

(c) Prepare the Cash Budget for Sovereign Furnishings Ltd for September and October 2024. (25 marks)

(d) Explain the difference between cash flow forecasting and cash budgeting, and evaluate how a cash budget can assist Sovereign Furnishings Ltd in managing its liquidity. (14 marks)

PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

Solution

Part (a) Production Budget (units)

DescriptionSeptemberOctoberBudgeted Sales (units)500600Add: Closing Inventory (20% of next month)120100Total Requirements620700Less: Opening Inventory(100)(120)Budgeted Production (units)520580

Note: November production is 480 units (500 sales + 80 closing - 100 opening) to find October closing inventory of raw materials.

Part (b) Raw Material Purchases Budget

DescriptionSeptemberOctoberProduction (units)520580Material per unit (kg)44Production Requirement (kg)2,0802,320Add: Closing Inventory (10% of next month production requirement)232192Total Requirement (kg)2,3122,512Less: Opening Inventory (kg)(220)(232)Budgeted Purchases (kg)2,0922,280Price per kg (£)£12£12Budgeted Purchases Cost (£)£25,104£27,360

*October Closing Inventory calculation: November Production = 500 (sales) + 80 (closing inventory: 20% of Dec sales 400) - 100 (opening inventory) = 480 units. November Material Requirement = 480 * 4 kg = 1,920 kg. October Closing RM Inventory = 10% * 1,920 kg = 192 kg.

Part (c) Cash Budget for September and October 2024

DescriptionSeptember (£)October (£)Receipts:Cash Sales30,00036,000Collections from credit customers:- Previous month credit sales17,28021,600- Current month credit sales (net of 2% discount)22,05026,460Sale of vehicle-4,000Total Receipts (A)69,33088,060Payments:Suppliers of raw materials23,55226,232Direct Labour15,60017,400Manufacturing overheads (excluding depreciation)9,5009,500Administration overheads5,8006,000Machinery purchase3,0006,000Total Payments (B)57,45265,132Net Cash Flow (A - B)11,87822,928Opening Balance8,50020,378Closing Balance20,37843,306

Part (d) Cash Flow Forecasting vs. Cash Budgeting & Liquidity Evaluation

Difference: A cash flow forecast is an estimation of future cash flows based on historical trends, whereas a cash budget is a formal tactical plan with committed targets used for control and variance analysis.

Evaluation: The cash budget reveals strong liquidity, with the balance rising to £43,306. This indicates the firm can easily afford the £15,000 machinery purchase. However, the budget relies on estimates; hence, actual performance should be monitored to guard against changes in sales demand or customer collection patterns.

PastPaper.markingScheme

Marking Scheme

Part (a) Production Budget (6 Marks):

  • 1 mark for September closing finished goods inventory calculation (120 units).
  • 1 mark for September budgeted production (520 units).
  • 1 mark for October closing finished goods inventory calculation (100 units).
  • 1 mark for October budgeted production (580 units).
  • 2 marks (1 mark per month) for correct application of opening finished goods inventory.

Part (b) Raw Material Purchases Budget (10 Marks):

  • 1 mark for September production requirement (2,080 kg).
  • 1 mark for October production requirement (2,320 kg).
  • 2 marks for calculating November production (480 units) and its material requirement (1,920 kg).
  • 1 mark for September closing raw material inventory (232 kg).
  • 1 mark for October closing raw material inventory (192 kg).
  • 1 mark for September purchases in kg (2,092 kg) and 1 mark for value (£25,104).
  • 1 mark for October purchases in kg (2,280 kg) and 1 mark for value (£27,360).

Part (c) Cash Budget (25 Marks):

  • 2 marks (1 mark per month) for Cash Sales.
  • 2 marks for September collections from August credit sales (£17,280).
  • 3 marks for September collections from September credit sales net of discount (£22,050).
  • 2 marks for October collections from September credit sales (£21,600).
  • 3 marks for October collections from October credit sales net of discount (£26,460).
  • 1 mark for Sale of delivery vehicle in October (£4,000).
  • 2 marks for September material payments (£23,552).
  • 2 marks for October material payments (£26,232).
  • 2 marks (1 mark per month) for Direct Labour payments.
  • 2 marks (1 mark per month) for Manufacturing overhead payments (excluding £2,500 depreciation).
  • 2 marks (1 mark per month) for Administration overhead payments.
  • 2 marks (1 mark per month) for Machinery payments.
  • 2 marks (1 mark per month) for accurate calculation of closing bank/cash balances.

Part (d) Discussion & Evaluation (14 Marks):

  • AO1 (4 Marks): Accurate definitions and differences between cash flow forecasting and cash budgeting.
  • AO2 (4 Marks): Relevant application to Sovereign Furnishings Ltd's figures and transactions (such as the machinery purchase, the 2% discount, and rising cash balances).
  • AO3 (3 Marks): Coherent analysis of how cash budgets enable management to schedule capital expenditure and evaluate credit policies.
  • AO4 (3 Marks): Critical evaluation of the limitations of budgets as estimates, and a balanced conclusion on the importance of combining cash budgets with real-time performance reviews.

Unit 2 Section B

Answer three questions from this section.
4 PastPaper.question · 120 PastPaper.marks
PastPaper.question 1 · essay
30 PastPaper.marks
Zenith Plc is planning to expand its manufacturing operations. The current capital structure of the company is as follows:

Equity and Liabilities:
- Ordinary shares of £1 each: £5,000,000
- Share premium: £1,000,000
- Retained earnings: £2,000,000
- 10% Debentures (repayable 2035): £2,000,000

Additional Information:
- The current Profit Before Interest and Taxation (EBIT) is £1,500,000.
- The planned expansion requires a capital investment of £3,000,000, which is projected to generate an additional £600,000 of Profit Before Interest and Taxation (EBIT) annually.
- To fund the £3,000,000 expansion, Zenith Plc is considering two alternative financing options:
* Option A: Issue £3,000,000 of 6% Debentures.
* Option B: Issue 2,000,000 Ordinary Shares of £1 each at a premium of £0.50 per share.

Required:
(a) Calculate the gearing ratio for Zenith Plc under the following scenarios:
(i) Current capital structure (4 marks)
(ii) If Option A is selected (4 marks)
(iii) If Option B is selected (4 marks)
(Note: You may use either the debt/capital employed formula or the debt/equity formula, but must state the formula used.)

(b) Calculate the projected Profit before Taxation (after interest charges) under:
(i) Option A (3 marks)
(ii) Option B (3 marks)

(c) Evaluate whether Zenith Plc should choose Option A or Option B to fund the expansion. (12 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

(a) Calculation of Gearing Ratios

Using Formula: (Non-current Liabilities / Capital Employed) * 100
Where Capital Employed = Total Equity + Non-current Liabilities

(i) Current Position:
- Total Equity = £5,000,000 (Ordinary shares) + £1,000,000 (Share premium) + £2,000,000 (Retained earnings) = £8,000,000
- Non-current Liabilities = £2,000,000
- Capital Employed = £8,000,000 + £2,000,000 = £10,000,000
- Gearing Ratio = (£2,000,000 / £10,000,000) * 100 = 20.00%

(ii) Option A (Debt Financing):
- Total Equity = £8,000,000 (unchanged)
- Non-current Liabilities = £2,000,000 (old) + £3,000,000 (new) = £5,000,000
- Capital Employed = £8,000,000 + £5,000,000 = £13,000,000
- Gearing Ratio = (£5,000,000 / £13,000,000) * 100 = 38.46%

(iii) Option B (Equity Financing):
- Total Equity = £8,000,000 + £3,000,000 (New shares: 2,000,000 * £1.50) = £11,000,000
- Non-current Liabilities = £2,000,000 (unchanged)
- Capital Employed = £11,000,000 + £2,000,000 = £13,000,000
- Gearing Ratio = (£2,000,000 / £13,000,000) * 100 = 15.38%

Alternative Formula: (Non-current Liabilities / Total Equity) * 100
(i) Current: (£2,000,000 / £8,000,000) * 100 = 25.00%
(ii) Option A: (£5,000,000 / £8,000,000) * 100 = 62.50%
(iii) Option B: (£2,000,000 / £11,000,000) * 100 = 18.18%

(b) Calculation of Projected Profit before Taxation
Projected EBIT = £1,500,000 (current) + £600,000 (expansion) = £2,100,000

(i) Option A:
- Old interest = £2,000,000 * 10% = £200,000
- New interest = £3,000,000 * 6% = £180,000
- Total interest = £380,000
- Profit before Tax = £2,100,000 - £380,000 = £1,720,000

(ii) Option B:
- Old interest = £2,000,000 * 10% = £200,000
- New interest = £0
- Total interest = £200,000
- Profit before Tax = £2,100,000 - £200,000 = £1,900,000

PastPaper.markingScheme

Part (a) [Total: 12 Marks]
- (i) 1 mark for finding Total Equity (£8,000,000); 1 mark for finding Capital Employed (£10,000,000); 1 mark for formula application; 1 mark for correct gearing ratio 20.00% (or 25.00% for debt-to-equity).
- (ii) 1 mark for new Debt (£5,000,000); 1 mark for new Capital Employed (£13,000,000); 1 mark for calculations; 1 mark for correct ratio 38.46% (or 62.50%).
- (iii) 1 mark for new Equity (£11,000,000); 1 mark for Capital Employed (£13,000,000); 1 mark for calculations; 1 mark for correct ratio 15.38% (or 18.18%).

Part (b) [Total: 6 Marks]
- (i) 1 mark for projected EBIT of £2,100,000; 1 mark for total interest of £380,000; 1 mark for correct final profit of £1,720,000.
- (ii) 1 mark for showing interest remains at £200,000; 1 mark for correct final profit of £1,900,000 (1 mark carried over/own-figure for EBIT of £2,100,000).

Part (c) [Total: 12 Marks] - Evaluation Rubric:
- Level 1 (1-3 Marks): Simple points identification. Mentions gearing change or profit levels without deep integration of percentages and totals.
- Level 2 (4-6 Marks): Some application and structured discussion. Discusses issues like diluted control (Option B) and increased risk from interest commitments (Option A).
- Level 3 (7-9 Marks): Analysis of both options. Compares the financial impact on risk (gearing moves from 20% to 38.46% vs 15.38%) and profitability. Identifies that Option B has a higher overall profit (£1,900,000 vs £1,720,000) but dilutes shares.
- Level 4 (10-12 Marks): Thoroughly balanced evaluation. Brings in advanced points such as Earnings Per Share (EPS) dilution: under Option A, EPS is based on 5,000,000 shares (£1,720,000 / 5,000,000 = £0.344), whereas under Option B, EPS is diluted because of 7,000,000 shares (£1,900,000 / 7,000,000 = £0.271). Offers a definitive, well-argued recommendation.
PastPaper.question 2 · structured
30 PastPaper.marks
Zenith Apparel Ltd manufactures high-quality jackets. The standard cost card for one jacket is as follows:

- Direct material: 2.5 kg at £6.00 per kg = £15.00
- Direct labour: 1.5 hours at £12.00 per hour = £18.00

The budgeted production for October 2023 was 4,000 jackets.

The actual results for October 2023 were as follows:
- Jackets produced: 3,800 jackets
- Direct materials purchased and used: 9,120 kg costing £56,544
- Direct labour hours worked: 5,890 hours costing £68,324

Required:

(a) State two advantages to Zenith Apparel Ltd of using a standard costing system. (4 marks)

(b) Calculate the following variances for October 2023, showing all workings and stating whether each variance is Favourable (F) or Adverse (A):
    (i) Direct material price variance (3 marks)
    (ii) Direct material usage variance (3 marks)
    (iii) Direct labour rate variance (3 marks)
    (iv) Direct labour efficiency variance (3 marks)

(c) Prepare a statement reconciling the total standard cost of actual production with the total actual cost of production for October 2023. (8 marks)

(d) Evaluate the performance of Zenith Apparel Ltd for October 2023 using your calculated variances, and discuss whether standard costing remains an effective management tool when raw material prices are highly volatile. (6 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

(a) Advantages of using a standard costing system (4 marks)
- Cost Control and Variance Analysis: It allows management to compare actual costs with predetermined standard costs, enabling them to identify inefficiencies and take corrective action (2 marks).
- Budget Preparation and Planning: Standard costs provide a reliable basis for creating budgets and forecasting future cash flows and profit margins (2 marks).
- Pricing Decisions: Standard costs make it easier to determine selling prices for products based on expected costs (2 marks).
- Simplifies Inventory Valuation: Closing inventory and cost of goods sold can be valued quickly at standard costs (2 marks).
*(Accept any two well-explained advantages for a maximum of 4 marks)*

(b) Variance Calculations (12 marks)

(i) Direct material price variance:
- Actual Price per kg (ΑP) = \( \frac{£56,544}{9,120\text{ kg}} = £6.20 \) per kg (1 mark)
- Formula: \( (\text{Standard Price} - \text{Actual Price}) \times \text{Actual Quantity} \)
- Calculation: \( (£6.00 - £6.20) \times 9,120\text{ kg} = £1,824 \text{ Adverse (A)} \) (2 marks)

(ii) Direct material usage variance:
- Standard Quantity for actual production (SQ) = \( 3,800 \times 2.5\text{ kg} = 9,500\text{ kg} \) (1 mark)
- Formula: \( (\text{Standard Quantity} - \text{Actual Quantity}) \times \text{Standard Price} \)
- Calculation: \( (9,500\text{ kg} - 9,120\text{ kg}) \times £6.00 = 380\text{ kg} \times £6.00 = £2,280 \text{ Favourable (F)} \) (2 marks)

(iii) Direct labour rate variance:
- Actual Rate per hour (AR) = \( \frac{£68,324}{5,890\text{ hours}} = £11.60 \) per hour (1 mark)
- Formula: \( (\text{Standard Rate} - \text{Actual Rate}) \times \text{Actual Hours} \)
- Calculation: \( (£12.00 - £11.60) \times 5,890\text{ hours} = £0.40 \times 5,890 = £2,356 \text{ Favourable (F)} \) (2 marks)

(iv) Direct labour efficiency variance:
- Standard Hours for actual production (SH) = \( 3,800 \times 1.5\text{ hours} = 5,700\text{ hours} \) (1 mark)
- Formula: \( (\text{Standard Hours} - \text{Actual Hours}) \times \text{Standard Rate} \)
- Calculation: \( (5,700\text{ hours} - 5,890\text{ hours}) \times £12.00 = -190 \times £12.00 = £2,280 \text{ Adverse (A)} \) (2 marks)

(c) Reconciliation Statement (8 marks)
DescriptionAmount (£)Amount (£)Standard Cost of Actual Production: (3,800 jackets % 33.00)125,400 (2)Add Adverse Variances:Direct material price variance1,824 (1)Direct labour efficiency variance2,280 (1)4,104Less Favourable Variances:Direct material usage variance(2,280) (1)Direct labour rate variance(2,356) (1)(4,636)Net Variance (Favourable)(532) (1)Actual Cost of Production:124,868 (1)
*(Workings for actual cost of production: £56,544 + £68,324 = £124,868)*

(d) Evaluation (6 marks)
- Variance Interrelationships: The company paid more than standard for raw materials (Adverse price variance of £1,824), but this may have been due to purchasing higher-grade material. This higher-quality material likely reduced waste, resulting in a Favourable usage variance of £2,280. Similarly, hiring cheaper labor (Favourable rate variance of £2,356) may have led to employing lower-skilled staff, who took longer to complete the work (Adverse efficiency variance of £2,280). Overall, the actual cost was slightly below standard, showing a net favorable variance of £532 (3 marks).
- Standard Costing under Price Volatility: If raw material prices are highly volatile, standard costing becomes less effective for measuring material price variance because standard prices quickly become outdated. This makes the price variance an external market indicator rather than a measure of buyer performance. However, standard costing remains valuable for controlling internal quantity usage (usage variance) and labor efficiency, which are independent of market price fluctuations. To maintain effectiveness, the business can update standard prices more frequently (using current or rolling standards), though this increases administrative costs (3 marks).

PastPaper.markingScheme

(a) State two advantages
- Max 4 marks: 2 marks for each well-explained point (AO1 Knowledge and Understanding).

(b) Calculate variances
- Max 12 marks (3 marks per variance):
  - 1 mark for correct intermediate calculation (e.g. actual rate, standard hours) (AO2 Application).
  - 1 mark for correct variance value (AO2 Application).
  - 1 mark for correct direction (F/A) (AO2 Application).

(c) Reconciliation Statement
- Max 8 marks:
  - 2 marks for standard cost of actual production.
  - 1 mark for each of the 4 individual variances correctly placed.
  - 1 mark for net variance calculation.
  - 1 mark for actual cost of production total (AO2 Application).

(d) Evaluation
- Max 6 marks:
  - Up to 3 marks for analyzing the interrelationships of variances (AO3 Analysis).
  - Up to 3 marks for evaluating standard costing utility under volatility and providing a clear balanced conclusion (AO4 Evaluation).
PastPaper.question 3 · essay
30 PastPaper.marks
Vandyke plc is a manufacturing company. The following information has been extracted from the company's financial records for the year ended 31 December 2023.

**Extracts from the Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December:**

| | 2022 (£) | 2023 (£) |
| :--- | :---: | :---: |
| Property, plant and equipment (at carrying value) | 410,000 | 485,000 |
| Inventories | 54,000 | 48,500 |
| Trade receivables | 38,000 | 42,100 |
| Trade payables | 29,000 | 33,400 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 12,000 | (15,000) |
| Share Capital (Ordinary shares of £1 each) | 300,000 | 350,000 |
| Share Premium | 50,000 | 70,000 |
| Retained Earnings | 85,000 | 86,200 |
| 8% Non-current Debentures | 50,000 | 20,000 |

*Note: The cash and cash equivalents of £12,000 in 2022 represents cash at bank (debit), and the £(15,000) in 2023 represents a bank overdraft.*

**Additional information:**
1. Profit for the year ended 31 December 2023 was £26,200 after charging interest of £3,200, taxation of £15,000, and depreciation on property, plant and equipment of £65,000.
2. During the year, a machine with an original cost of £48,000 and accumulated depreciation of £28,000 was sold for cash of £16,500.
3. Other items of property, plant and equipment were purchased during the year.
4. Dividends paid during the year were £25,000. No dividends were outstanding at the end of either year.
5. Taxation paid during the year was £14,000. Interest paid during the year was £3,200.

**Required:**

(a) Prepare the Statement of Cash Flows for Vandyke plc for the year ended 31 December 2023, in accordance with IAS 7 (using the indirect method). (16 marks)

(b) Prepare the following ledger accounts for the year ended 31 December 2023:
(i) Property, Plant and Equipment (at carrying value) Account. (4 marks)
(ii) Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment Account. (4 marks)

(c) Evaluate Vandyke plc's financial performance and cash position, focusing on its reliance on a bank overdraft despite making a profit of £26,200 and generating positive operating cash flows. Suggest actions the management could take to improve cash management. (6 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

### **(a) Statement of Cash Flows for Vandyke plc for the year ended 31 December 2023**

| **Cash flows from operating activities** | **£** | **£** |
| :--- | :---: | :---: |
| Profit for the year | 26,200 | |
| *Adjustments for:* | | |
| Interest expense | 3,200 | |
| Taxation expense | 15,000 | |
| **Operating profit (Profit before interest and tax)** | **44,400** | |
| Depreciation charge | 65,000 | |
| Loss on disposal of PPE \((\text{CV } \pounds20,000 - \text{Proceeds } \pounds16,500)\) | 3,500 | |
| **Operating cash flows before working capital changes** | **112,900** | |
| Decrease in inventories \((\pounds54,000 - \pounds48,500)\) | 5,500 | |
| Increase in trade receivables \((\pounds38,000 - \pounds42,100)\) | (4,100) | |
| Increase in trade payables \((\pounds29,000 - \pounds33,400)\) | 4,400 | |
| **Cash generated from operations** | **118,700** | |
| Interest paid | (3,200) | |
| Taxation paid | (14,000) | |
| **Net cash from operating activities** | | **101,500** |
| | | |
| **Cash flows from investing activities** | | |
| Proceeds from sale of PPE | 16,500 | |
| Purchase of PPE *(see working)* | (160,000) | |
| **Net cash used in investing activities** | | **(143,500)** |
| | | |
| **Cash flows from financing activities** | | |
| Proceeds from issue of shares \((\pounds50,000 \text{ capital} + \pounds20,000 \text{ premium})\) | 70,000 | |
| Redemption of 8% Debentures \((\pounds50,000 - \pounds20,000)\) | (30,000) | |
| Dividends paid | (25,000) | |
| **Net cash from financing activities** | | **15,000** |
| | | |
| **Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents** | | **(27,000)** |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | | 12,000 |
| **Cash and cash equivalents at end of year (Overdraft)** | | **(15,000)** |

*Working for Purchase of PPE:*
\(\text{Opening Carrying Value} - \text{Disposal Carrying Value} - \text{Depreciation} + \text{Purchases} = \text{Closing Carrying Value}\)
\(\pounds410,000 - \pounds20,000 - \pounds65,000 + \text{Purchases} = \pounds485,000\)
\(\pounds325,000 + \text{Purchases} = \pounds485,000\)
\(\text{Purchases} = \pounds160,000\)

---

### **(b) Ledger Accounts**

#### **(i) Property, Plant and Equipment (at carrying value) Account**

| Date | Details | £ | Date | Details | £ |
| :--- | :--- | :---: | :--- | :--- | :---: |
| 2023 | | | 2023 | | |
| Jan 1 | Balance b/d | 410,000 | Dec 31 | Disposal (carrying value) | 20,000 |
| Dec 31 | Cash/Bank (Purchases) | 160,000 | Dec 31 | Depreciation charge | 65,000 |
| | | | Dec 31 | Balance c/d | 485,000 |
| | | **570,000** | | | **570,000** |
| 2024 | | | | | |
| Jan 1 | Balance b/d | 485,000 | | | |

#### **(ii) Disposal of Property, Plant and Equipment Account**

| Date | Details | £ | Date | Details | £ |
| :--- | :--- | :---: | :--- | :--- | :---: |
| 2023 | | | 2023 | | |
| Dec 31 | PPE (carrying value of disposal) | 20,000 | Dec 31 | Cash/Bank (Proceeds) | 16,500 |
| | | | Dec 31 | Profit or Loss (Loss on disposal) | 3,500 |
| | | **20,000** | | | **20,000** |

---

### **(c) Evaluation of Vandyke plc's Performance and Cash Position**

- **Financial Performance vs. Cash Flow:** Vandyke plc is profitable, generating £26,200 of profit for the year. More importantly, its operating activities are very strong, generating £101,500 of net cash inflow. This indicates a high quality of earnings since cash generated from operations is significantly higher than net profit. Working capital management was successful as inventories fell by £5,500 and trade payables increased by £4,400, helping to offset the £4,100 increase in trade receivables.
- **Causes of Cash Deficit (Overdraft):** Despite the strong cash inflows from operations, the bank balance deteriorated from a positive £12,000 to an overdraft of £15,000. This is due to heavy outflows in investing and financing activities. The company invested £160,000 in purchasing new PPE and spent £30,000 on redeeming long-term debentures, alongside paying £25,000 in dividends. These outflows vastly exceeded the cash generated from operations and the £70,000 raised from issuing new shares.
- **Evaluation of Management Decisions:**
- The heavy investment in PPE (£160,000) might be a necessary capital upgrade to generate future capacity and profit.
- Redeeming debentures (£30,000) reduces the long-term debt burden and interest costs, but using short-term funds (bank overdraft) to pay off long-term liabilities is poor treasury management.
- Paying £25,000 of dividends when the company was short of cash is highly questionable and worsened the overdraft situation.
- **Recommendations:**
- *Alternative financing:* Management should have funded the long-term PPE purchases through long-term loans or leasing options instead of short-term bank overdrafts which carry higher, variable interest rates.
- *Dividend Policy:* Consider suspending or reducing dividends in years of high capital expenditure.
- *Working Capital and Credit Management:* Continue monitoring credit terms with trade receivables and trade payables to maximize operating cash flow.

PastPaper.markingScheme

### **Marking Scheme Breakdown**

#### **Part (a): Statement of Cash Flows (16 Marks)**
- **Operating profit / Profit before tax** calculation: £41,200 or starting with £26,200 and adjusting. (1 Mark)
- **Adjustments for non-cash and non-operating items:** Depreciation (£65,000), Interest (£3,200), Loss on disposal (£3,500). (2 Marks if all three correct; 1 Mark if one or two correct)
- **Working capital changes:** Decrease in inventories (+£5,500), Increase in receivables (-£4,100), Increase in payables (+£4,400). (2 Marks if all three correct; 1 Mark if two correct)
- **Operating Cash Outflows:** Interest paid (-£3,200) and Tax paid (-£14,000). (1 Mark for both)
- **Net cash from operating activities:** Correctly calculated £101,500. (1 Mark)
- **Investing Activities:**
- Disposal proceeds: £16,500. (1 Mark)
- Purchase of PPE: (£160,000). (2 Marks for correct working and figure; 1 Mark for calculation attempt with error)
- Net cash used in investing activities: (£143,500). (1 Mark)
- **Financing Activities:**
- Share proceeds (Share Capital + Share Premium): £70,000. (1 Mark)
- Debentures redeemed: (£30,000). (1 Mark)
- Dividends paid: (£25,000). (1 Mark)
- Net cash from financing activities: £15,000. (1 Mark)
- **Reconciliation:** Net decrease (£27,000), opening cash (£12,000), and closing overdraft (£15,000) correctly presented. (1 Mark)

#### **Part (b): Ledger Accounts (8 Marks)**
- **(i) Property, Plant and Equipment Account (4 Marks):**
- Opening balance b/d £410,000 on Debit. (1 Mark)
- Purchases £160,000 on Debit (or of from (a)). (1 Mark)
- Disposal transfer of carrying value £20,000 on Credit. (1 Mark)
- Depreciation charge £65,000 on Credit. (1 Mark)
- **(ii) Disposal Account (4 Marks):**
- PPE carrying value transfer £20,000 on Debit. (1 Mark)
- Cash/Bank proceeds £16,500 on Credit. (1 Mark)
- Loss on disposal transfer to Profit or Loss £3,500 on Credit. (2 Marks for correct entry and amount; 1 Mark if amount is incorrect but debit/credit is correct)

#### **Part (c): Evaluation (6 Marks)**
- **Level 1 (1-2 Marks):** Basic comments identifying that the company has a bank overdraft despite making profits. Limited use of financial figures.
- **Level 2 (3-4 Marks):** Explains that cash flow from operating activities is positive and strong, but massive outflows for PPE acquisition and debentures caused the overdraft. Identifies the issue of using short-term finance (overdraft) for long-term investments. Offers basic solutions.
- **Level 3 (5-6 Marks):** Full evaluation showing a deep understanding of the distinction between profit and cash flow. Recognises the high quality of operating cash flow. Critically appraises the dividend policy and funding mismatch (long-term assets funded by overdraft). Recommends sound restructuring strategies (e.g., term loans, leasing, or dividend reduction) with clear justifications.
PastPaper.question 4 · Break-even & Marginal Costing
30 PastPaper.marks
Hesperis Ltd manufactures and sells high-quality eco-friendly composters. The following budgeted information is available for the upcoming financial year:

- Selling price per unit: £45.00
- Budgeted sales volume: 12,000 units

Variable costs per unit:
- Direct materials: £15.00
- Direct labour: £8.00
- Variable production overheads: £4.00

Fixed costs for the year are budgeted at £144,000.

Required:

(a) Calculate the:
(i) break-even point in units and in sales value (£) (4 marks)
(ii) margin of safety as a percentage of budgeted sales (3 marks)
(iii) budgeted profit for the year under the current structure. (3 marks)

(b) The directors of Hesperis Ltd are considering an alternative marketing proposal to boost sales. Under this proposal:
- The selling price would be reduced by 10%.
- Improved materials would be used, increasing the direct material cost by £1.00 per unit.
- Annual advertising expenditure (fixed cost) would increase by £18,000.
- These changes are expected to increase sales volume by 40%.

Calculate the new break-even point in units and the projected profit for the year under this proposal. (8 marks)

(c) Discuss three limitations of break-even analysis for a manufacturing business. (6 marks)

(d) Evaluate whether Hesperis Ltd should implement the proposed changes, using calculations from parts (a) and (b) to support your answer. (6 marks)
PastPaper.showAnswers

PastPaper.workedSolution

Part (a)
(i)
Contribution per unit = \( \text{Selling Price} - \text{Variable Costs} \)
Contribution per unit = \( £45.00 - (£15.00 + £8.00 + £4.00) = £45.00 - £27.00 = £18.00 \) per unit.
Break-even point (units) = \( \frac{\text{Fixed Costs}}{\text{Contribution per unit}} = \frac{£144,000}{£18.00} = 8,000 \) units.
Break-even sales value = \( 8,000 \text{ units} \times £45.00 = £360,000 \).

(ii)
Margin of Safety (%) = \( \frac{\text{Budgeted Sales} - \text{Break-even Sales}}{\text{Budgeted Sales}} \times 100 \)
Margin of Safety (%) = \( \frac{12,000 - 8,000}{12,000} \times 100 = 33.33\% \).

(iii)
Budgeted Profit = \( (12,000 \text{ units} \times £18.00 \text{ contribution}) - £144,000 \text{ fixed costs} = £216,000 - £144,000 = £72,000 \).

Part (b)
New Selling Price = \( £45.00 \times 0.90 = £40.50 \).
New Variable Cost per unit = \( £27.00 + £1.00 = £28.00 \).
New Contribution per unit = \( £40.50 - £28.00 = £12.50 \).
New Fixed Costs = \( £144,000 + £18,000 = £162,000 \).
New Break-even point (units) = \( \frac{£162,000}{£12.50} = 12,960 \) units.
New Budgeted Sales Volume = \( 12,000 \text{ units} \times 1.40 = 16,800 \) units.
New Projected Profit = \( (16,800 \text{ units} \times £12.50 \text{ contribution}) - £162,000 \text{ fixed costs} = £210,000 - £162,000 = £48,000 \).

Part (c)
Limitations of Break-even Analysis:
1. Assumes selling price is constant: It does not account for discounts given for bulk purchases, which might be necessary to sell higher volumes.
2. Assumes variable costs change in direct proportion: It ignores economies of scale that might reduce material prices per unit at higher volumes.
3. Assumes fixed costs are completely static: Fixed costs often behave as step-costs when production increases significantly.
4. Assumes all production is sold: It ignores the inventory levels where production does not equal sales volume.

Part (d)
Evaluation:
- Under the current structure, profit is higher at £72,000 compared to the proposed profit of £48,000, representing a significant drop of £24,000 (33.3%).
- The break-even point increases from 8,000 units to 12,960 units. This is a 62% increase in the risk profile, and the new break-even point actually exceeds the original sales volume (12,000 units).
- The margin of safety decreases from 33.33% to 22.86% (\( \frac{16,800 - 12,960}{16,800} \)), meaning there is less room for sales fluctuations before losses occur.
- On the positive side, sales volume increases to 16,800 units, which might increase market share and build brand loyalty due to higher quality materials.
- Recommendation: The directors should reject the proposal in its current form because it reduces profits, increases risk, and raises the break-even point to a level higher than current sales levels.

PastPaper.markingScheme

Part (a) [10 marks]
(i)
- Contribution per unit = £18 (1 mark)
- Break-even units = 8,000 units (1 mark)
- Break-even value = £360,000 (2 marks: 1 method, 1 accuracy)
(ii)
- Margin of Safety calculation = (12,000 - 8,000)/12,000 (1 method mark)
- Margin of Safety = 33.33% or 1/3 (2 accuracy marks)
(iii)
- Profit calculation: (12,000 * 18) - 144,000 (1 method mark)
- Profit = £72,000 (2 accuracy marks)

Part (b) [8 marks]
- New Selling Price (£40.50) and New Variable Cost (£28.00) (1 mark)
- New Contribution per unit = £12.50 (1 mark)
- New Fixed Costs = £162,000 (1 mark)
- New Break-even point = 12,960 units (2 marks: 1 method, 1 accuracy)
- New Sales Volume = 16,800 units (1 mark)
- New Projected Profit calculation = (16,800 * £12.50) - £162,000 (1 method mark)
- New Profit = £48,000 (1 accuracy mark)

Part (c) [6 marks]
- Award up to 2 marks per limitation explained (1 mark for identification, 1 mark for explanation/application) up to a maximum of 3 limitations.

Part (d) [6 marks]
- Award 2 marks for analytical points criticizing the proposal (e.g., lower profit by £24,000, higher risk with break-even rising to 12,960, reduced margin of safety).
- Award 2 marks for analytical points supporting the proposal (e.g., market share increase, higher quality, larger sales volume of 16,800 units).
- Award 2 marks for a clear, reasoned recommendation consistent with the calculations.

PastPaper.sampleCTATitle

PastPaper.sampleCTADescription

PastPaper.ctaPrimaryPastPaper.ctaSecondary

PastPaper.sampleStickyMessage

PastPaper.stickyCtaText