Topic 10: Language, Thought, and Communication – How do you communicate with others?

Welcome! In this chapter, we are going to explore the fascinating world of communication. It’s not just about the words we say; it’s about how we think, how our language shapes our world, and all the "hidden" messages we send with our bodies. This topic is part of your Paper 2 exam, so let's dive in!

Quick Tip: Think of this chapter as three parts: Thinking and Talking, Humans vs. Animals, and Body Language.


10.1.1 The Relationship Between Language and Thought

Does the way you think control what you say, or does the language you speak control how you think? Two famous psychologists had different ideas about this.

Piaget’s Theory: Thought comes first

Jean Piaget believed that representational thinking precedes language. This means children must understand a concept (a schema) before they can find the words to describe it.
Example: A child needs to understand what "big" is by seeing large objects before they can actually use the word "big."

Strengths: It explains why children’s language development follows a specific order.
Weaknesses: Some children can use words for things they don't fully understand yet (like parrots!).

Vygotsky’s Theory: Language and Thought are separate

Lev Vygotsky believed language and thought start off separately and eventually merge. He talked about:

  • Pre-linguistic thought: Thinking without words (like a baby knowing they want a toy).
  • Pre-intellectual language: Making sounds without thinking (like a baby babbling "ba-ba-ba").
Eventually, these two meet, and we use "inner speech" to help us solve problems.

Strengths: It recognizes how important social interaction is for learning.
Weaknesses: It is very difficult to prove "inner speech" is actually happening in someone's head!

Quick Review: Piaget = Thinking leads to talking. Vygotsky = Thinking and talking start separately and then join up.


10.1.2 How Language Affects Our View of the World

This is known as the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. It suggests that the language we speak influences how we see the world around us.

Linguistic Determinism (The Strong Version)

This idea says that if your language doesn't have a word for something, you cannot think about it.
Example: If a language has no word for "blue," speakers of that language literally wouldn't see blue as a separate color from green.

Linguistic Relativism (The Weak Version)

This idea says that language just influences how we think; it doesn't control it completely. It makes it easier to think about things we have words for.
Example: If you have ten different words for "snow," you might notice different types of snow more easily than someone who just has one word.

Key Takeaway: Determinism is "language locks your brain," while Relativism is "language nudges your brain."


10.1.3 Human vs. Animal Communication

We communicate, and so do dogs, bees, and monkeys. But is it the same? Psychologist Jean Aitchison came up with criteria to show the difference.

Aitchison’s Criteria (Key Features):

  1. Displacement: Humans can talk about things that aren't there (like the past, the future, or a dragon). Most animals only communicate about the "here and now."
  2. Productivity: Humans can create an infinite number of new sentences. Animals usually have a set number of signals.
  3. Cultural Transmission: We learn language from our environment. While some animals learn songs or calls, much of their communication is innate (born with it).

Did you know? Bees do a "waggle dance" to tell other bees where food is. This has displacement because the food isn't right in front of them, but they can't use the dance to tell a story about a scary bird they saw yesterday!


10.1.4 Non-Verbal Communication (NVC)

NVC is basically "talking" without words. It’s what we do with our bodies.

  • Facial Expressions: Smiling, frowning, or raising eyebrows. These are often universal!
  • Eye Contact: This regulates the flow of conversation, shows attraction, or signals dominance.
  • Body Language:
    • Postures: Standing tall (confident) vs. slouching (sad or bored). Open posture (arms uncrossed) shows you are approachable.
    • Gestures: Hand movements like waving or pointing.
  • Personal Space (Proxemics): The "bubble" we keep around us. This changes based on:
    • Culture: Some cultures like to stand very close; others prefer more distance.
    • Status: People with higher status often take up more space.

Quick Review: Most of our communication is actually non-verbal! If your words say "I'm happy" but your face is frowning, people will believe your face, not your words.


10.1.5 Explanations of Non-Verbal Communication

Why do we use body language? Charles Darwin argued it is evolutionary.

He believed that NVC is innate (born with us) and helped our ancestors survive.
Example: Baring your teeth when angry is a warning to others to stay away so you don't have to fight and get hurt. Opening eyes wide when scared helps you see more of the danger around you.


10.2 Core Studies you MUST know

10.2.1 Yuki et al. (2007) – Cultural Differences in NVC

Aim: To see if people from different cultures (Japan and USA) look at different parts of the face to judge emotions.

Procedure: Participants were shown computer-generated "emoticons" where the eyes and mouths were mismatched (e.g., happy eyes with a sad mouth).

Findings:

  • Japanese participants focused more on the eyes to judge emotion.
  • American participants focused more on the mouth.
Conclusion: Culture plays a big role in how we interpret facial expressions.

Memory Aid: Think of how emoticons are typed!
Western: : ) (Focus on the mouth)
Japanese: (^_^) (Focus on the eyes)


10.2.2 Boroditsky (2001) – Does Language Shape Thought?

Aim: To see if Mandarin speakers and English speakers think about time differently because of their language.

Background: English speakers usually talk about time horizontally ("The weekend is ahead of us"). Mandarin speakers often talk about time vertically (using words like shàng meaning "up" for earlier events).

Findings: Mandarin speakers were faster at confirming time-related facts if they had just seen a vertical arrangement of objects. English speakers were faster if they had seen a horizontal arrangement.

Conclusion: This supports the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis – the language we use influences how we perceive concepts like time.


Final Key Takeaway: Communication is a mix of biology (Darwin), culture (Yuki), and the language we use (Boroditsky). Don't worry if the names seem hard to remember – just focus on what they found and why it matters!