Cambridge International AS Level · Psychology (9990)

Piliavin 等(地鐵撒瑪利亞人):練習題

5 條多項選擇題即時批改,另有 5 條文字題附完整解題步驟,全部圍繞「Piliavin 等(地鐵撒瑪利亞人)」。

10 條題目29 免費,無需登記
第 1 題
1

In the Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans) study, what was the primary difference in the operationalisation of the 'ill' victim versus the 'drunk' victim?

第 2 題
1

In the study by Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans), which of the following describes the role of the two female observers?

第 3 題
1

Piliavin et al. found that helping behavior did not decrease as the number of bystanders increased. Which of the following best explains why the diffusion of responsibility effect was not observed in this field experiment?

第 4 題
1

In the study by Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans), which of the following is a correct description of the victims used in the experiment?

第 5 題
1

Regarding the results of the Piliavin et al. study, what was the observed relationship between the number of bystanders and the speed of helping?

第 6 題
3

Identify two quantitative measures of the dependent variable that were recorded by the observers while the victim was collapsed on the floor.

先自己寫一次答案,再對照解題步驟。

第 7 題
5

Explain why the use of qualitative data, such as the recorded comments of female passengers, was necessary to supplement the quantitative findings in this study.

先自己寫一次答案,再對照解題步驟。

第 8 題
4

Explain one reason why the study by Piliavin et al. is categorized as a field experiment rather than a naturalistic observation.

先自己寫一次答案,再對照解題步驟。

第 9 題
5

Piliavin et al. conducted a field experiment to investigate bystander behavior on a New York subway.

(a) Describe the standardized behavior of the 'victim' during the trials. [2]

(b) Explain one way in which the study attempted to control for the variable of 'diffusion of responsibility'. [2]

(c) Identify one qualitative finding recorded by the observers during the study. [1]

先自己寫一次答案,再對照解題步驟。

第 10 題
7

The study by Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans) utilized a field experiment to observe bystander intervention.

(a) Identify two of the four independent variables manipulated in this study. [2]

(b) Explain one strength and one weakness of using a field experiment to investigate bystander apathy in this study. [2]

(c) Based on the findings regarding the 'ill' and 'drunk' conditions, describe how the cost-reward model explains the differences in the speed of helping. Refer to specific results in your answer. [3]

先自己寫一次答案,再對照解題步驟。

* thinka提供的內容由AI生成,可能並非總是準確或最新。請將其用作輔助資源,並與官方材料進行核實。

你已看過標準答案,接下來輪到批改你的答案。

這一頁可以告訴你好答案的樣子,卻無法指出你的答案欠缺什麼。thinka 按真實評分準則批改你的文字答案,約 15 秒完成。

想多做幾條同類題目?立即開始練習呢個課題,即做即批改。

立即練習