IB DP · 考試技巧
History 考試技巧
Evidence-based exam tips and strategies for IB Diploma Programme History Paper 1 and Paper 2, focusing on precise time management, command word interpretation, structural outlines, and avoiding regional traps.
試卷概覽
| 試卷 | 時間 | 分數 | 題數 | 比重 | 題型 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 1: Source-based (Prescribed Subjects) | 1小時 | 24 | — | — | — |
| Paper 2: World History Topics | 1小時 30分鐘 | 30 | — | — | — |
| Paper 3: HL Depth Studies (one regional option) | 2小時 30分鐘 | 45 | — | — | — |
A calculator is not normally required for this subject.
- AO1: AO1: Knowledge and understanding
- AO2: AO2: Application and analysis
- AO3: AO3: Synthesis and evaluation
- AO4: AO4: Use and application of historical skills
根據歷屆試題與評分準則整理(2023–2025)。
常見錯誤
- 1high涉及分數: 4Paper 1 source comparison techniques
Treating Paper 1 Question 3 (Compare and Contrast) as two separate, sequential source summaries rather than an integrated comparative analysis.
如何避免: Structure the response thematically using direct comparative linking words (such as 'similarly', 'conversely', 'whereas') to run point-by-point comparative paragraphs. - 2high涉及分數: 15World History Topics selection
Choosing two case study countries from the same geographical region in Paper 2 essays when the prompt explicitly mandates selecting different regions.
如何避免: Carefully check the geographical regions of your planned case studies (Americas, Europe, Asia/Oceania, Africa/Middle East) and ensure they are distinct before selecting your prompt. - 3high涉及分數: 8Essay structure and argument
Writing purely narrative or chronological 'storytelling' accounts in Paper 2 essays instead of maintaining an analytical, conceptually-driven thematic argument.
如何避免: Structure your body paragraphs around thematic arguments (social, political, economic, or ideological) rather than a chronological timeline of events, and explicitly link each paragraph back to the central prompt. - 4medium涉及分數: 2Source Evaluation (OPCVL)
Failing to address both value and limitations explicitly with reference to origin, purpose, and content in Paper 1 Question 2 (OPCVL), or applying formulaic generalizations.
如何避免: Explicitly reference all three elements (origin, purpose, and content) to construct contextual values and limitations tied directly to the specified historical investigation. - 5high涉及分數: 5Paper 1 synthesis essay
Failing to integrate both source-based evidence and candidate's own historical knowledge in the final 9-mark Paper 1 synthesis question (Question 4).
如何避免: Plan body paragraphs around thematic points, supporting each point explicitly with both a citation/quote from the provided sources and detailed, named external facts from memory.
操練真實試題,AI 即時批改,即刻話你知錯喺邊。
免費開始練習