IB DP · 考試技巧

Philosophy 考試技巧

Master the art of 'doing philosophy' with official examiner strategies: learn how to anchor Paper 1 Section A directly to your stimulus, divide description from critical evaluation in Paper 2, avoid the fatal name-dropping trap, and build robust, charitable counter-arguments to secure the top-tier 21–25 markband.

閱讀時間 4 分鐘更新於: 2026年6月21日

試卷概覽

卷數
3
總分
125
考試時間
4小時 45分鐘
題型
4
試卷時間分數題數比重題型
Paper 1 (Core & Optional Themes)2小時 30分鐘752Stimulus Inquiry, Thematic Essay
Paper 2 (Prescribed Texts)1小時252Prescribed Text Part A (Explanatory), Prescribed Text Part B (Evaluative)
Paper 31小時 15分鐘25
評級
7654321
計算機規定

A calculator is not normally required for this subject.

  • AO1: Knowledge and understanding of philosophical concepts, texts, and issues
  • AO2: Analysis and evaluation of philosophical arguments and positions
  • AO3: Formulation and support of personal philosophical positions

根據歷屆試題與評分準則整理(2023–2025)。

常見錯誤

  1. 1high涉及分數: 10Being human (Core theme)

    Treating the Paper 1 Section A stimulus as a mere starting decoration and dropping it after the introduction.

    如何避免: Integrate explicit, sustained references to specific conceptual or visual details of the stimulus throughout the entire body of the essay to anchor your thesis.
  2. 2high涉及分數: 6John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Prescribed text)

    Writing a purely descriptive, biographical summary of a philosopher in Paper 2 Part B instead of critical evaluation.

    如何避免: Dedicate Part A strictly to explanation and quarantine all critical evaluation, debate of assumptions, and counterarguments inside Part B.
  3. 3medium涉及分數: 4Ethics (Optional themes)

    Using everyday, colloquial definitions of key terms (like 'autonomy' or 'authenticity') instead of philosophically robust parameters.

    如何避免: Establish precise conceptual boundaries and definitions of all major terms early in your introduction (e.g., distinguishing Mill's self-regarding actions from selfishness).
  4. 4high涉及分數: 5Being human (Core theme)

    Presenting weak, easily dismissed 'strawman' counter-arguments instead of representing opposing perspectives with full intellectual charity.

    如何避免: Construct robust alternative viewpoints and evaluate their genuine strengths and limitations before showing how your core thesis resolves the tension.
  5. 5low涉及分數: 15John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Prescribed text)

    Selecting mismatched sub-parts in Paper 2 (e.g., answering Q7a and Q9b) which results in a rubric violation.

    如何避免: Ensure you answer both parts (a) and (b) of the exact same numbered question for your chosen prescribed text.

將技巧化為佳績

thinka 把你的弱項轉化為針對性練習,即時批改並提供應試回饋。聰明地溫習,事半功倍。

操練真實試題,AI 即時批改,即刻話你知錯喺邊。

免費開始練習