Difficulty Verdict
The examination papers present a moderate level of difficulty. They offer highly accessible introductory questions while reserving high-tariff marks for complex, multi-perspective theoretical arguments. Paper 1 successfully balances the core themes of socialisation and research methodology, while Paper 2 tests the foundational functionalist perspective against modern realities of diversity and changing parenthood roles.
Where the Marks are Found
The highest concentration of marks lies in Section B (26-mark essays). Success in these essays depends on a balanced distribution of assessment objectives: Knowledge and Understanding (AO1), Interpretation and Application (AO2), and Analysis and Evaluation (AO3). High-scoring candidates must avoid purely descriptive accounts and instead build explicit, sustained debates. This is achieved by juxtaposing structuralist views with interactionist or postmodernist critiques.
Examiner Pitfalls
- Commonplace Assertions: Relying on general personal observations or everyday assumptions rather than citing specific sociological studies, concepts, and named theorists (such as Oakley, Parsons, Rapoport, or Giddens).
- One-Sided Arguments: Writing descriptive essays that fail to offer a clear, explicit, and sustained counter-argument, particularly in the 26-mark evaluation questions.
- Concept Confusion: Conflating methodological concepts, such as confusing validity with reliability, or misunderstanding the nuanced difference between Weber's views on values and pure positivism.
Strategy for Success
To maximize marks, candidates should master the 4-mark 'Describe' and 8-mark 'Explain' formats early. These questions require precise, highly structured paragraphs with explicit links to sociological concepts. When addressing essay prompts, candidates must outline their evaluative framework in the introduction, ensuring that every paragraph features a clear 'point, evidence, explain, and evaluate' (PEEE) structure.
Future Predictions
With unstructured interviews and laboratory experiments thoroughly tested, future series are highly likely to pivot toward quantitative research methods (e.g., questionnaires and official statistics). In the family module, upcoming examinations are predicted to emphasize Marxist and Feminist critiques of the family, moving away from the functionalist and cultural diversity focus seen in this series.