Cambridge IGCSE · Thinka-original Practice Paper
2024 Cambridge IGCSE Enterprise (0454) Practice Paper with Answers
Thinka Nov 2024 (V3) Cambridge International A Level-Style Mock — Enterprise (0454)
Section A
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
* Selling price: $15 per t-shirt
* Variable cost: $7 per t-shirt
* Fixed costs: $120 for hiring the printing machine
During the fair, Jasmine sold 45 t-shirts.
Calculate the total profit made by Jasmine's enterprise. Show your working.
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
1. **Total Revenue**: \(45 \text{ t-shirts} \times 15 = 675\) (Total Revenue = $675)
2. **Total Variable Costs**: \(45 \text{ t-shirts} \times 7 = 315\) (Total Variable Cost = $315)
3. **Total Costs**: \(\text{Fixed Costs} + \text{Total Variable Costs} = 120 + 315 = 435\) (Total Cost = $435)
4. **Total Profit**: \(\text{Total Revenue} - \text{Total Costs} = 675 - 435 = 240\) (Total Profit = $240)
**Alternative Method (Contribution per unit)**:
1. **Contribution per unit**: \(15 - 7 = 8\) (Contribution = $8 per t-shirt)
2. **Total Contribution**: \(45 \text{ t-shirts} \times 8 = 360\) (Total Contribution = $360)
3. **Total Profit**: \(\text{Total Contribution} - \text{Fixed Costs} = 360 - 120 = 240\) (Total Profit = $240)
Marking scheme
* **1 mark** for calculating Total Revenue correctly: $675 (or showing correct working: \(45 \times 15\)).
* **1 mark** for calculating Total Variable Costs correctly: $315 (or showing correct working: \(45 \times 7\)).
* **1 mark** for showing a correct profit formula/method (e.g., \(\text{Total Revenue} - \text{Total Costs}\) or \(\text{Total Contribution} - \text{Fixed Costs}\)).
* **1 mark** for the correct final answer: $240.
Note: Award full 4 marks for a correct final answer of $240 (or 240) even if no working is shown.
* Selling price: $15 per t-shirt
* Variable cost: $7 per t-shirt
* Fixed costs: $120 for hiring the printing machine
During the fair, Jasmine sold 45 t-shirts.
Calculate the total profit made by Jasmine's enterprise. Show your working.
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
1. **Total Revenue**: \(45 \text{ t-shirts} \times 15 = 675\) (Total Revenue = $675)
2. **Total Variable Costs**: \(45 \text{ t-shirts} \times 7 = 315\) (Total Variable Cost = $315)
3. **Total Costs**: \(\text{Fixed Costs} + \text{Total Variable Costs} = 120 + 315 = 435\) (Total Cost = $435)
4. **Total Profit**: \(\text{Total Revenue} - \text{Total Costs} = 675 - 435 = 240\) (Total Profit = $240)
**Alternative Method (Contribution per unit)**:
1. **Contribution per unit**: \(15 - 7 = 8\) (Contribution = $8 per t-shirt)
2. **Total Contribution**: \(45 \text{ t-shirts} \times 8 = 360\) (Total Contribution = $360)
3. **Total Profit**: \(\text{Total Contribution} - \text{Fixed Costs} = 360 - 120 = 240\) (Total Profit = $240)
Marking scheme
* **1 mark** for calculating Total Revenue correctly: $675 (or showing correct working: \(45 \times 15\)).
* **1 mark** for calculating Total Variable Costs correctly: $315 (or showing correct working: \(45 \times 7\)).
* **1 mark** for showing a correct profit formula/method (e.g., \(\text{Total Revenue} - \text{Total Costs}\) or \(\text{Total Contribution} - \text{Fixed Costs}\)).
* **1 mark** for the correct final answer: $240.
Note: Award full 4 marks for a correct final answer of $240 (or 240) even if no working is shown.
| Scenario | Category of Risk |
| --- | --- |
| A fire breaks out in the warehouse, halting production. | (i) .................................. |
| A sudden increase in interest rates raises borrowing costs. | (ii) .................................. |
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
(ii) Financial risk - as it relates to the cost of borrowing and impacts the financial position of the enterprise.
Marking scheme
- (i) Operational (accept: Health and Safety)
- (ii) Financial
| Feature | Sole Trader | Limited Company (Ltd) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Liability | Unlimited | (i) .................................. |
| Ownership | (ii) .................................. | Shareholders |
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
(ii) Sole trader / proprietor / individual owner - the business is owned and run by one person.
Marking scheme
- (i) Limited / Limited liability
- (ii) Sole trader / sole proprietor / one person / individual owner (do not accept 'entrepreneur' as this can apply to any business type)
Section B
Evaluate the suitability of two sources of finance that you used, or could have used, in your enterprise project. You should consider the advantages and disadvantages of each source in your evaluation.
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
'In our school enterprise project, which involved producing and selling eco-friendly reusable tote bags, we required an initial capital of $150 to purchase plain canvas bags and fabric paints. We evaluated two possible sources of finance: personal savings (owner's equity) and a short-term loan from our school's enterprise fund.
Firstly, using personal savings was highly suitable because it did not involve any interest charges or administrative delays. Each of the three group members contributed $50. This meant we retained 100% control of our enterprise and did not face the pressure of repayment deadlines, reducing our financial risk. However, the disadvantage was that our personal savings were highly limited. If we had faced unexpected setup costs (such as a sewing machine breakdown), we would not have had any reserve funds to cover it.
Secondly, we considered a loan from the school's enterprise fund. The advantage of this loan was that it offered a larger pool of capital (up to $300), which would have allowed us to buy materials in bulk and benefit from economies of scale, reducing our unit cost. However, the disadvantage was that the loan had to be repaid in full within six weeks, regardless of whether we made a profit. This repayment obligation would have created cash flow pressure early in our cycle, potentially forcing us to price our bags higher than our target market of students could afford.
In conclusion, personal savings was the more suitable source of finance for our enterprise. Given the small scale of our operation and the high level of uncertainty regarding student demand, avoiding debt and interest repayment obligations was crucial to ensuring our project's financial viability. Had we attempted a larger-scale manufacturing model, the school loan would have been necessary, but for our low-risk startup, personal savings minimized our exposure to financial failure.'
Marking scheme
Candidate offers a balanced evaluation of two sources of finance, explicitly and consistently applied to their own enterprise project. There is a clear, justified judgment/conclusion regarding which source of finance is more suitable for their enterprise.
Level 3 (6-8 marks):
Candidate analyzes both sources of finance in detail, explaining their advantages and disadvantages. There is clear application to the candidate's own enterprise project. Some attempt at a conclusion, though it may lack deep justification.
Level 2 (3-5 marks):
Candidate describes two sources of finance and attempts to apply them to their own enterprise project. The response may focus heavily on description of what they did rather than analyzing the suitability (advantages/disadvantages).
Level 1 (1-2 marks):
Candidate demonstrates basic knowledge of sources of finance (e.g., listing sources such as bank loans, grants, or crowd-funding) with little or no application to their own project.
Level 0 (0 marks):
No creditable response.
Evaluate the importance of both preparation and choosing an appropriate negotiation style to the success of Nora's negotiation. You must refer to Nora's situation and your own enterprise project experience in your answer.
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
'In Nora's enterprise, preparing thoroughly before meeting the supplier is vital. Preparation involves researching the market prices of beads and metals, determining her Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA), and setting her limit (the maximum price she can pay while keeping her handmade jewellery profitable). For example, if Nora knows another supplier sells the same beads for $0.10 each, she has leverage. If she does not prepare, she risks accepting a price that destroys her profit margins. Choosing the right negotiation style is equally important. A win-win (collaborative) style is best because Nora wants a long-term relationship with this local supplier to ensure consistent quality and reliable delivery. A win-lose (competitive) style might get her a cheap price once but could damage the relationship, leading to late deliveries or poor quality later.
In my own enterprise project, which involved sourcing organic ingredients for a baking stall, preparation was the single most important factor. Before negotiating with the local grocery manager, we prepared by calculating exactly how much we could pay per kilogram of flour to maintain a 50% gross profit margin. This preparation gave us the confidence to reject their initial high offer. We also adopted a collaborative negotiation style, offering to place a sign on our stall promoting their store in exchange for a discount. This win-win approach secured us a 20% discount on ingredients.
In conclusion, while choosing the right negotiation style (collaborative) creates goodwill and opens up creative options, preparation is ultimately more critical to the success of Nora's negotiation. Without preparation, Nora would not know what a "good" price is or when to walk away, making even the most cooperative style ineffective. Preparation provides the factual foundation and confidence needed to guide the style used during the live discussion.'
Marking scheme
Candidate provides a balanced, analytical evaluation of both preparation and negotiation styles. The response is explicitly applied to both Nora's situation and the candidate's own enterprise project. A clear, well-justified conclusion is provided on which aspect is more critical to negotiation success.
Level 3 (6-8 marks):
Candidate analyzes the role of preparation and/or negotiation styles with clear application to Nora's scenario and/or their own project. The analysis explains how these factors affect the outcome of the negotiation.
Level 2 (3-5 marks):
Candidate describes preparation steps or negotiation styles with some application to Nora or their own project. The response tends to be descriptive rather than analytical.
Level 1 (1-2 marks):
Candidate demonstrates basic knowledge of negotiation concepts (e.g., listing stages of negotiation or naming styles like competitive or collaborative) with little or no application.
Level 0 (0 marks):
No creditable response.
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Benefits of updating the business plan:
- Attracting Finance: Banks will require a formal, updated business plan showing cash flow forecasts and break-even analysis before granting a loan for expansion. This reduces the lender's perceived risk.
- Securing Retail Partners: Local retail shops will want to see that Nora's Glow is a reliable brand with consistent production capacity, marketing strategies, and target market research.
- Clear Direction: It helps Nora clarify her new objectives, operational needs (e.g., purchasing raw materials in bulk), and financial targets for the expansion.
Limitations of the business plan:
- Time and Cost: Preparing a high-quality plan takes significant time away from running the daily operations of the candle business.
- Inaccuracy of Forecasts: Financial forecasts are based on estimates and market research, which may not materialise, especially in a changing retail environment.
- Lack of Flexibility: Nora might focus too rigidly on following the plan rather than adapting to immediate opportunities or challenges in the market.
Conclusion/Evaluation:
Ultimately, updating the business plan is highly critical. While it cannot guarantee success due to external market risks, it is a prerequisite for obtaining external finance and convincing retail retailers to stock her products. The benefits of planning and risk mitigation far outweigh the opportunity cost of the time spent writing it.
Marking scheme
Level 3 (6-10 marks): Candidate provides detailed analysis of the benefits and/or limitations of an updated business plan, linking plan contents (such as cash flow forecasts or marketing sections) to securing retail partners or bank loans.
Level 2 (3-5 marks): Candidate applies business plan concepts directly to Nora's candle business or expansion context (e.g., mentioning wax suppliers, candle retail sales).
Level 1 (1-2 marks): Candidate demonstrates basic knowledge of business plans, such as listing their contents (executive summary, financial plan, marketing plan) without application or analysis.
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Example of a strong response:
In our enterprise project selling custom eco-friendly tote bags, we used two main marketing communication methods: social media advertising (Instagram) and printed posters around the school campus.
Evaluation of methods used:
- Instagram: This was highly effective because our target market was students aged 14-18 who spend significant time online. It allowed us to post high-quality photos of the bags at zero financial cost, resulting in 40 direct inquiries and 15 sales within the first week. However, it was less effective at reaching teachers, who also showed interest but did not follow our page.
- Printed Posters: These were placed in high-traffic corridors. While they raised general awareness, they were expensive to print relative to our small budget and many posters were ignored or torn down, resulting in low direct conversion to sales.
Alternative Method Suggestion:
An alternative method that would have been more effective is personal selling / direct demonstrations at a school assembly or during lunch breaks. By physically showing the durability and design of the tote bags to students and teachers simultaneously, we could have addressed concerns about quality immediately. This would have overcome the limitations of passive posters and reached the teacher demographic that social media missed, likely resulting in a higher sales volume from our limited stock.
Marking scheme
Level 3 (6-10 marks): Candidate analyzes the effectiveness of the marketing communication methods used in their project, explaining how they impacted sales or awareness. Some attempt at recommending an alternative is made.
Level 2 (3-5 marks): Candidate applies marketing communication concepts to their own enterprise project, describing what methods they used and how they implemented them.
Level 1 (1-2 marks): Candidate lists general marketing communication methods (e.g., posters, flyers, radio) with little or no connection to their own enterprise project.
Wondering how well you actually know this?
Thinka is an AI practice app for DSE students — unlimited questions, instant auto-marking, and detailed step-by-step solutions. 100,000+ students use it to confirm they actually know it, not just think they do.
Want more questions like this? Practice unlimited on Thinka — instant answers included.
Start Practising Free