Table 1: Settlement Hierarchy in Kettle Valley
- City: 1 settlement | Average Population: 150,000 | Services: University, Specialist Hospital, Department Store
- Town: 4 settlements | Average Population: 22,000 | Services: Secondary School, Supermarket, Bank
- Village: 18 settlements | Average Population: 1,200 | Services: Primary School, Post Office, General Store
- Hamlet: 55 settlements | Average Population: 80 | Services: Post box, Bus shelter
(a)(i) Identify the relationship between the size of a settlement type and the number of settlements of that type shown in Table 1. [1 mark]
(a)(ii) Define the term 'sphere of influence'. [2 marks]
(a)(iii) Using evidence from Table 1, explain the relationship between the average population of a settlement and the services it provides. [3 marks]
(b)(i) Describe the difference between 'threshold population' and 'range' of a service. [2 marks]
(b)(ii) Explain how urban growth or decline can change the services available in a settlement over time. [3 marks]
(c) For a named country or region you have studied, describe and explain the settlement hierarchy and service provision. [7 marks]
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
(a)(ii) The sphere of influence is the geographical area served by a settlement, from which it attracts people/customers to use its services and facilities.
(a)(iii) Settlements with larger average populations (such as cities with 150,000 people) provide high-order, specialist services (such as universities and specialist hospitals) because they have a large enough population to meet the high threshold needed to make these services viable. Settlements with smaller populations (such as hamlets with 80 people) can only support low-order, basic services (such as post boxes or bus shelters) which require a low threshold population but are used frequently by local residents.
(b)(i) Threshold population is the minimum number of people/customers required to support a service and make it profitable, whereas range is the maximum distance people are willing to travel to obtain or use that service.
(b)(ii) Services change because:
1. Population growth can increase the local population beyond the threshold level required for new high-order services, leading to the introduction of supermarkets or banks.
2. Economic or urban decline can cause depopulation, meaning existing services (e.g., local primary schools or post offices) lose their threshold population and are forced to close.
3. Technological changes, such as the rise of online banking and e-commerce, decrease the physical range of traditional retail services, leading to closures of physical bank branches and shops.
(c) Example Case Study: East Anglia, UK.
The settlement hierarchy in East Anglia consists of a major regional city (Norwich), surrounded by medium-sized market towns (e.g., Diss, Thetford), villages (e.g., Banham), and small hamlets. Norwich has a population of over 140,000, allowing it to support high-order services like the University of East Anglia, large department stores (e.g., John Lewis), and a major specialist hospital (Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital). This gives Norwich a vast sphere of influence spanning the entire county of Norfolk. Market towns like Diss (population approx. 7,500) provide middle-order services like secondary schools, banks, and supermarkets, serving local rural hinterlands. Small villages like Banham have low-order services (primary school, small convenience shop) with small spheres of influence, while nearby hamlets have no services at all, meaning residents must travel to Diss or Norwich for most needs.
Marking scheme
1 mark for stating that there is an inverse relationship / as population size increases, number of settlements decreases (or vice-versa).
(a)(ii) [2 marks]
- 1 mark for the concept of 'area served/influenced by a settlement'.
- 1 mark for referencing 'from which people/customers travel to use services'.
(a)(iii) [3 marks]
- 1 mark for explaining that larger settlements/populations can support high-order/specialist services (or vice-versa for small settlements).
- 1 mark for referencing specific service examples from Table 1 (e.g., university/specialist hospital for City OR post box/bus shelter for Hamlet).
- 1 mark for explaining the concept of threshold population/frequency of use (e.g., high-order services need a large customer base to survive, while low-order services have a low threshold and are used daily).
(b)(i) [2 marks]
- 1 mark for defining threshold population (minimum number of people needed to support a service / make it viable).
- 1 mark for defining range (maximum distance people are willing to travel to use a service).
(b)(ii) [3 marks]
3 marks for 3 separate developed points:
- Urban growth increases population, meeting threshold limits for new high-order services (1 mark).
- Urban decline/depopulation means services lose their threshold customer base and close down (1 mark).
- Improvements in transport/increased car ownership allow people to travel further, bypassing local services and causing rural/village shop closures (1 mark).
- Shift to online services reduces the demand for physical high-street shops/banks (1 mark).
(c) [7 marks]
Level 1 (1-3 marks): Simple statements describing the hierarchy or services of a region, with little explanation of the relationships (e.g., 'There are big cities with large hospitals, and villages have local shops.'). Max 3 marks if no named region is used.
Level 2 (4-6 marks): Explains the settlement hierarchy and service provision with reference to a named region/area. Clear distinction is made between high-order and low-order services with some geographic terminology (threshold, range, sphere of influence) used. Max 5 marks if no named examples of settlements within the region are given.
Level 3 (7 marks): Detailed, comprehensive case study of a named region, explaining the hierarchy with specific population data and named settlements at different levels (city, town, village). Concepts of range, threshold, and sphere of influence are accurately applied to explain the spatial pattern of service provision.