Question 1 · Comparative Poetry Essay
24 marksCompare the ways in which poets explore the experiences of grief and memory in 'Effects' by Alan Jenkins and in one other poem of your choice from the Poems of the Decade: An Anthology of the Forward Books of Poetry 2002–2011.
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Successful responses will compare 'Effects' by Alan Jenkins with a suitable partner poem (e.g., 'Material' by Ros Barber or 'On Her Blindness' by Adam Thorpe) focusing on the manifestations of grief, regret, and the persistence of memory.
**Key Comparison Points (using 'Material' as the second poem):**
1. **Structure and Form:**
- **'Effects':** Written in a single, dense, continuous stanza block. The overwhelming, torrential syntax (featuring long clauses, parenthetical insertions, and frequent enjambment) reflects the unstoppable flood of memories and the suffocating weight of grief.
- **'Material':** Structured in formal, mostly regular eight-line stanzas (octaves). This controlled, traditional structure mirrors the nostalgic order of the past and the 'material' stability the speaker associates with her mother's generation, though the break in rhyme scheme in the final stanzas reflects the transition to her own imperfect maternal reality.
2. **The Significance of Physical Objects as Mnemonics:**
- **'Effects':** The mother's hands, her physical 'effects' (such as her rings, 'the cheap watch', and 'the knuckles red, swollen'), act as painful reminders of her manual domestic labor and her decline. The removal of the rings signifies the finality of her death.
- **'Material':** The 'handkerchief' (the 'hanky') is a central, tactile motif that symbolizes her mother's era, maternal duty, and a physical link to a bygone past. It contrasts with the modern 'paper tissues' that lack durability and history.
3. **Guilt and the Complexities of Relationships:**
- **'Effects':** The speaker expresses deep-seated regret for neglecting his mother during her decline, noting his own distance ('I saddled with the milk-round of her needs') and her final, unreciprocated gesture of reaching out.
- **'Material':** The speaker reflects on her own perceived shortcomings as a mother compared to her own mother's standards, expressing a modern guilt while recognizing that she must ultimately let the past go ('this is your material / to do with what you will').
4. **Tone and Language:**
- **'Effects':** Features a melancholic, conversational, yet highly crafted tone. The syntax winds down to a quiet, devastating final focus on the mother's last night.
- **'Material':** Uses highly rhythmic, colloquial language ('scrubbed', 'spittle', 'tuck') that carries a nostalgic, warm tone, which shifts to a poignant, reflective realization of loss and change in the final stanzas.
**Key Comparison Points (using 'Material' as the second poem):**
1. **Structure and Form:**
- **'Effects':** Written in a single, dense, continuous stanza block. The overwhelming, torrential syntax (featuring long clauses, parenthetical insertions, and frequent enjambment) reflects the unstoppable flood of memories and the suffocating weight of grief.
- **'Material':** Structured in formal, mostly regular eight-line stanzas (octaves). This controlled, traditional structure mirrors the nostalgic order of the past and the 'material' stability the speaker associates with her mother's generation, though the break in rhyme scheme in the final stanzas reflects the transition to her own imperfect maternal reality.
2. **The Significance of Physical Objects as Mnemonics:**
- **'Effects':** The mother's hands, her physical 'effects' (such as her rings, 'the cheap watch', and 'the knuckles red, swollen'), act as painful reminders of her manual domestic labor and her decline. The removal of the rings signifies the finality of her death.
- **'Material':** The 'handkerchief' (the 'hanky') is a central, tactile motif that symbolizes her mother's era, maternal duty, and a physical link to a bygone past. It contrasts with the modern 'paper tissues' that lack durability and history.
3. **Guilt and the Complexities of Relationships:**
- **'Effects':** The speaker expresses deep-seated regret for neglecting his mother during her decline, noting his own distance ('I saddled with the milk-round of her needs') and her final, unreciprocated gesture of reaching out.
- **'Material':** The speaker reflects on her own perceived shortcomings as a mother compared to her own mother's standards, expressing a modern guilt while recognizing that she must ultimately let the past go ('this is your material / to do with what you will').
4. **Tone and Language:**
- **'Effects':** Features a melancholic, conversational, yet highly crafted tone. The syntax winds down to a quiet, devastating final focus on the mother's last night.
- **'Material':** Uses highly rhythmic, colloquial language ('scrubbed', 'spittle', 'tuck') that carries a nostalgic, warm tone, which shifts to a poignant, reflective realization of loss and change in the final stanzas.
Marking scheme
Marks are awarded across three Assessment Objectives: AO1 (8 marks), AO2 (8 marks), and AO4 (8 marks).
**Level 5 (20–24 marks): Critical and Sophisticated**
- **AO1:** Demonstrates an authoritative, highly coherent, and personal response to the prompt. Uses precise, sophisticated literary terminology with fluent written expression.
- **AO2:** Offers a perceptive and detailed analysis of how language, form, and structure shape meanings, using highly relevant textual evidence.
- **AO4:** Explores complex and illuminating connections between the two poems, maintaining a fully integrated comparative approach throughout.
**Level 4 (15–19 marks): Consistent and Detailed**
- **AO1:** Presents a clear, well-structured, and consistent argument. Literary terminology is used accurately and effectively.
- **AO2:** Demonstrates a sound and analytical understanding of how the poets use poetic devices (structure, rhythm, imagery) to explore grief and memory.
- **AO4:** Makes clear, relevant connections and comparisons between the chosen poems, with a balanced focus on both texts.
**Level 3 (10–14 marks): Clear and Explanatory**
- **AO1:** Provides a structured response with a clear line of argument. Relevant terminology is used appropriately.
- **AO2:** Explains how poetic devices and language choices shape meaning, though analysis may be more straightforward or uneven.
- **AO4:** Identifies and explains logical points of comparison and contrast between the two poems.
**Level 2 (5–9 marks): Descriptive and Identificational**
- **AO1:** Response is largely descriptive or narrative. Terminology is limited or occasionally inaccurate.
- **AO2:** Identifies basic poetic features (e.g., rhyme, stanzas) but with limited explanation of how they create meaning.
- **AO4:** Points of connection are superficial or listed rather than integrated into a comparative discussion.
**Level 1 (1–4 marks): Minimal and Fragmentary**
- **AO1:** Fragmentary or very brief response. Struggle to maintain a relevant focus.
- **AO2:** Minimal reference to poetic techniques.
- **AO4:** Minimal or no connections made between the texts.
**Level 5 (20–24 marks): Critical and Sophisticated**
- **AO1:** Demonstrates an authoritative, highly coherent, and personal response to the prompt. Uses precise, sophisticated literary terminology with fluent written expression.
- **AO2:** Offers a perceptive and detailed analysis of how language, form, and structure shape meanings, using highly relevant textual evidence.
- **AO4:** Explores complex and illuminating connections between the two poems, maintaining a fully integrated comparative approach throughout.
**Level 4 (15–19 marks): Consistent and Detailed**
- **AO1:** Presents a clear, well-structured, and consistent argument. Literary terminology is used accurately and effectively.
- **AO2:** Demonstrates a sound and analytical understanding of how the poets use poetic devices (structure, rhythm, imagery) to explore grief and memory.
- **AO4:** Makes clear, relevant connections and comparisons between the chosen poems, with a balanced focus on both texts.
**Level 3 (10–14 marks): Clear and Explanatory**
- **AO1:** Provides a structured response with a clear line of argument. Relevant terminology is used appropriately.
- **AO2:** Explains how poetic devices and language choices shape meaning, though analysis may be more straightforward or uneven.
- **AO4:** Identifies and explains logical points of comparison and contrast between the two poems.
**Level 2 (5–9 marks): Descriptive and Identificational**
- **AO1:** Response is largely descriptive or narrative. Terminology is limited or occasionally inaccurate.
- **AO2:** Identifies basic poetic features (e.g., rhyme, stanzas) but with limited explanation of how they create meaning.
- **AO4:** Points of connection are superficial or listed rather than integrated into a comparative discussion.
**Level 1 (1–4 marks): Minimal and Fragmentary**
- **AO1:** Fragmentary or very brief response. Struggle to maintain a relevant focus.
- **AO2:** Minimal reference to poetic techniques.
- **AO4:** Minimal or no connections made between the texts.