Question 1 · Structured
20 marks### Instructions: Answer either Question 1 or Question 2. (This is Question 1)
Read the following sources and answer the questions.
**Source A**
"Since ancient times, the Three Dukes discussed the Dao, and the Six Ministers divided duties. Since the First Emperor of Qin established the Prime Minister, the dynasty perished in a few generations. Han, Tang, and Song followed this system; though there were virtuous prime ministers, there were also many who monopolized power and disrupted the administration. Now, I abolish the Prime Minister and set up the Five Military Commissions, the Six Ministries, the Censorate, the Office of Transmission, and the Court of Judicial Review to manage world affairs. They counterbalance each other and dare not dominate one another, with all matters ultimately decided by the Court. In the future, when my descendants become emperors, they are absolutely not allowed to establish a Prime Minister. If any minister dares to propose establishing one, the civil and military officials shall immediately impeach them and subject them to severe punishment."
— Adapted from *Ming Taizu Shilu* (Veritable Records of Emperor Taizu of Ming)
**Source B**
"The abolition of the Prime Minister system in the Ming Dynasty was originally intended to strengthen imperial autocracy, concentrating all power in the hands of the Emperor. However, the affairs of the realm were vast and numerous, and the Emperor's energy was limited; he could not manage them alone. During the reign of Emperor Chengzu, the Grand Secretariat was first established, where Hanlin officials were ordered to assist with confidential state affairs, marking the origin of the cabinet system. After the reign of Emperor Xuanzong, the power of the cabinet gradually grew. While the power of drafting proposals (*Piaoni*) fell to the Grand Secretaries, the power of red-ink approval (*Pihong*) was held by the eunuchs of the Directorate of Ceremonial. If the monarch neglected state affairs, the eunuchs seized the opportunity to usurp power, creating an anomalous political situation where there was 'no title of prime minister, but the reality of one,' even leading to the disaster of eunuch dictation."
— Adapted from a modern scholar's discussion on the evolution of Ming political systems
**Questions**
(a) Based on Source A, state the historical reason why Ming Taizu abolished the Prime Minister, and identify the measure he implemented to prevent any future attempt to reinstate the office. (4 marks)
(b) According to Source B, what practical problem did the Emperor face after abolishing the Prime Minister? How did the early Ming emperors attempt to resolve this problem? (4 marks)
(c) Explain the interaction and division of labor between the Grand Secretariat (*內閣*) and the Palace Eunuchs (*宦官*) in mid-to-late Ming dynasty administration as described in Source B. How did this lead to the rise of eunuch power? (6 marks)
(d) "The abolition of the Prime Minister by Ming Taizu ultimately weakened rather than strengthened the effective governance of the empire." To what extent do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer with reference to the sources and your own historical knowledge. (6 marks)
Read the following sources and answer the questions.
**Source A**
"Since ancient times, the Three Dukes discussed the Dao, and the Six Ministers divided duties. Since the First Emperor of Qin established the Prime Minister, the dynasty perished in a few generations. Han, Tang, and Song followed this system; though there were virtuous prime ministers, there were also many who monopolized power and disrupted the administration. Now, I abolish the Prime Minister and set up the Five Military Commissions, the Six Ministries, the Censorate, the Office of Transmission, and the Court of Judicial Review to manage world affairs. They counterbalance each other and dare not dominate one another, with all matters ultimately decided by the Court. In the future, when my descendants become emperors, they are absolutely not allowed to establish a Prime Minister. If any minister dares to propose establishing one, the civil and military officials shall immediately impeach them and subject them to severe punishment."
— Adapted from *Ming Taizu Shilu* (Veritable Records of Emperor Taizu of Ming)
**Source B**
"The abolition of the Prime Minister system in the Ming Dynasty was originally intended to strengthen imperial autocracy, concentrating all power in the hands of the Emperor. However, the affairs of the realm were vast and numerous, and the Emperor's energy was limited; he could not manage them alone. During the reign of Emperor Chengzu, the Grand Secretariat was first established, where Hanlin officials were ordered to assist with confidential state affairs, marking the origin of the cabinet system. After the reign of Emperor Xuanzong, the power of the cabinet gradually grew. While the power of drafting proposals (*Piaoni*) fell to the Grand Secretaries, the power of red-ink approval (*Pihong*) was held by the eunuchs of the Directorate of Ceremonial. If the monarch neglected state affairs, the eunuchs seized the opportunity to usurp power, creating an anomalous political situation where there was 'no title of prime minister, but the reality of one,' even leading to the disaster of eunuch dictation."
— Adapted from a modern scholar's discussion on the evolution of Ming political systems
**Questions**
(a) Based on Source A, state the historical reason why Ming Taizu abolished the Prime Minister, and identify the measure he implemented to prevent any future attempt to reinstate the office. (4 marks)
(b) According to Source B, what practical problem did the Emperor face after abolishing the Prime Minister? How did the early Ming emperors attempt to resolve this problem? (4 marks)
(c) Explain the interaction and division of labor between the Grand Secretariat (*內閣*) and the Palace Eunuchs (*宦官*) in mid-to-late Ming dynasty administration as described in Source B. How did this lead to the rise of eunuch power? (6 marks)
(d) "The abolition of the Prime Minister by Ming Taizu ultimately weakened rather than strengthened the effective governance of the empire." To what extent do you agree with this statement? Explain your answer with reference to the sources and your own historical knowledge. (6 marks)