IB DP · Thinka-original Practice Paper
2025 IB DP Geography Practice Paper with Answers
Thinka May 2025 SL (TZ1) IB Diploma Programme-Style Mock — Geography
Section A
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
1. Identify a primary cluster or spatial concentration: High ecological footprints (\(> 6.0\) gha/person) are concentrated in high-income regions, predominantly in the Northern Hemisphere, specifically North America (USA, Canada) and Western Europe.
2. Identify another cluster or highlight a contrasting region of absence: There is another significant cluster in the Middle East (Gulf States), while there is a near-total absence of such countries in Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Southern Asia.
Marking scheme
- Award 1 mark for identifying a major regional concentration or cluster (e.g., North America, Western Europe, or the Middle East/Gulf States).
- Award 1 mark for identifying a region where they are absent or sparse (e.g., Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia) OR for identifying that the distribution is highly uneven and predominantly aligns with high-income/industrialized nations.
*Note: Do not award marks for a simple list of countries without geographic context or pattern description.*
Section B
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Suggest one visual or geographical inaccuracy that arises from representing migration flows in this way.
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
- **Inaccuracy/Limitation (1 mark):** e.g., Identifies that straight arrows imply direct movement, simplifies origins/destinations to a single central point, or obscures transit countries.
- **Explanation (1 mark):** e.g., Explains that actual migration is step-wise or transit-based, or that regional variation within large countries (such as rural-to-urban origins) is completely masked.
*Do not accept generic criticisms of data collection methods (e.g., 'unregistered migrants are not counted') unless directly tied to how the data is visually represented.*
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Marking scheme
Section C
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Introduction
Define 'circular economy' as an economic system aimed at eliminating waste and the continual use of resources, contrasting it with the traditional linear economy ('take, make, dispose'). Define 'resource insecurity' in terms of water, food, and energy. State a clear thesis on the extent to which circular models can resolve these challenges.
Arguments supporting the circular economy as a realistic solution:
1. Resource Conservation and Waste Reduction: By keeping materials in use, it reduces the demand for raw materials (e.g., urban mining for electronic waste in Japan or Europe, reducing the need for destructive resource extraction).
2. Water and Food Security (The Nexus): Circular water systems (e.g., NEWater in Singapore) treat and reuse wastewater, directly combating water scarcity. In agriculture, organic waste can be converted to compost or biogas, returning nutrients to the soil and producing renewable energy, illustrating a closed-loop nexus solution.
3. Economic and Environmental Sustainability: Reduces greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation, which are major drivers of future resource scarcity (e.g., climate change impacts on agriculture).
Limitations and challenges of the circular economy:
1. Technological and Thermodynamic Constraints: Not all materials can be recycled indefinitely without degradation (e.g., plastics and paper). Some energy inputs are always required, meaning absolute circularity is thermodynamically impossible.
2. High Transition and Infrastructure Costs: Developing circular supply chains requires immense capital. Low-income countries (LICs) often lack the infrastructure, technology, and funding to implement large-scale circular systems, meaning resource insecurity may persist where it is most acute.
3. Consumer Behavior and Corporate Resistance: Linear business models remain highly profitable. Globalized supply chains make tracking and reclaiming products extremely difficult. Consumer preference for cheap, disposable goods is a major cultural barrier.
Conclusion:
Summarize that while the circular economy offers an essential framework for mitigating resource insecurity—particularly in high-consumption, high-income nations—it is not a standalone panacea. Its success is highly dependent on global cooperation, technology transfer to LICs, and systemic changes in consumer behavior and regulatory policies.
Marking scheme
Marking Scheme (Total: 10 Marks)
- 9–10 marks: The response shows an excellent understanding of the circular economy and resource insecurity. Explains both benefits and limitations thoroughly. Evaluates the term 'to what extent' with a nuanced, balanced argument. Integrates well-chosen, detailed case studies (e.g., Singapore, Japan, or specific city initiatives). Structure is highly logical with a clear, justified conclusion.
- 7–8 marks: Shows a good understanding of circular economy concepts and resource challenges. Discusses both strengths and weaknesses, though one side may be slightly more developed. Includes relevant examples. Offers a clear evaluation and structured conclusion.
- 5–6 marks: Describes the circular economy and resource insecurity but may lack depth in linking them. Arguments are mostly descriptive rather than evaluative. Examples are generic or lack detail. The conclusion is brief or repetitive.
- 3–4 marks: Shows basic, superficial knowledge of recycling or resource waste. Lacks a clear understanding of the 'circular economy' concept beyond simple recycling. No evaluation or specific case studies are present.
- 1–2 marks: Fragmented or irrelevant response. Shows little or no understanding of the question.
Wondering how well you actually know this?
Thinka is an AI practice app for DSE students — unlimited questions, instant auto-marking, and detailed step-by-step solutions. 100,000+ students use it to confirm they actually know it, not just think they do.
Want more questions like this? Practice unlimited on Thinka — instant answers included.
Start Practising Free