Question 1 · Written Product
30 marksYour school recently introduced an AI-powered personalized study assistant for all students. While some classmates find it incredibly helpful for organizing their study schedules and explaining difficult concepts, others worry it encourages laziness and raises concerns about academic integrity. Write a response expressing your views on this development, discussing both its benefits and drawbacks, and suggesting how students can use it responsibly. Write 250 to 400 words. Choose the most appropriate text type from the following three options: Blog post, Letter to the editor, Proposal.
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
Sample Blog Post: Navigating the AI Wave: Friend or Foe in Our Studies? Hey everyone, welcome back to my blog! Recently, our school took a giant leap into the future by introducing 'LearnAI', a personalized study assistant. Since its launch, it has been the ultimate topic of discussion in the hallways. Today, I want to share my thoughts on this tool. On one hand, LearnAI is a brilliant resource. I have used it to break down complex physics formulas and organize my weekly revision schedule. It is like having a tutor available 24/7, ready to explain difficult concepts in different ways until they make sense. For students struggling to grasp tough subjects, this is an absolute game-changer. However, we cannot ignore the risks. Some classmates are relying on it to write entire essays or solve homework problems without trying first. This goes beyond academic dishonesty; it actively stunts our intellectual growth. If we let an AI do our thinking, we will be unprepared for exams and real-world situations where critical thinking is required. To make the most of this technology, we must use it responsibly. First, treat LearnAI as a guide, not a ghostwriter. Use it to clarify concepts only after you have attempted the work yourself. Second, set boundaries: never copy-paste generated content directly into assignments. In conclusion, LearnAI is a powerful tool, but its value depends entirely on us. Let's use it to empower our learning, not replace our minds! What are your thoughts? Leave a comment below!
Marking scheme
The writing is assessed out of 30 marks using the official IB Language B assessment criteria: Criterion A: Language (12 marks) - Assess vocabulary, grammar, and register. High-scoring responses demonstrate a variety of sentence structures and precise vocabulary. Criterion B: Message (12 marks) - Assess how effectively the student explores the prompt's requirements. They must present both benefits and drawbacks of the AI tool, and provide concrete, realistic tips for responsible use. Criterion C: Conceptual understanding (6 marks) - Assess choice of text type and register. For a Blog post: must include a catchy title, direct engagement with the reader (e.g., closing question, greeting), and an informal but reflective tone. For a Letter to the editor: must include formal opening/closing, clear reference to a published topic, and formal register. For a Proposal: must include a clear heading, introduction, structured bullet points or subheadings, and a formal/persuasive tone.