OCR AS Level · Analysis & Prediction

2023 OCR AS Level English Language and Literature (EMC) - H074 Past Paper Analysis

An in-depth analysis of the 2023 OCR AS Level English Language (H070) examinations, covering Papers 01 (Exploring language) and 02 (Exploring contexts). This suite evaluates linguistic precision, comparative synthesis, topical journalism, and critical analysis of power and gender dynamics in contemporary media.

Updated: 14 Jun 2026

Analysis Sample paper

Difficulty 3.5/5

Total marks

120

Duration

180 mins

Most tested

Comparative and Contextual Linguistic Analysis

Paper breakdown

H070/01 Exploring language: 60 marks · 90 minsH070/02 Exploring contexts: 60 marks · 90 mins

Top chapters

Comparing and Contrasting Texts (H070/01 Sec B) · 36 marksLanguage in Context: Power / Gender (H070/02 Sec B) · 36 marksLanguage Features in Context (H070/01 Sec A) · 24 marksTopical Language Writing (H070/02 Sec A) · 24 marks

Overall Difficulty Verdict

The 2023 OCR AS Level English Language (H070) series presents a balanced yet demanding suite of assessments, rating a 3.5 out of 5 stars in difficulty. While the source materials are modern, highly engaging, and relatable—ranging from online consumer guides about Airbnb scams to TV transcripts and interviews—the papers require high structural precision and sophisticated theoretical application to secure top marks.

Where the Marks Are Won

In Paper 1 (H070/01), success is heavily dictated by your ability to bridge fine-grained linguistic levels (AO1) with broader contextual and social factors (AO3). High-scoring scripts identified how asymmetrical power is established through subtle structures like non-inclusive personal pronouns (e.g., 'we' vs 'you') and frequent unmitigated imperatives ('Avoid', 'Don't click') in consumer advice. The comparison task (Section B, 36 marks) is the ultimate differentiator: candidates must systematically contrast spoken non-fluency features (overlapping speech, latch-ons, and self-corrections in television debates) with the formal, Latinate lexicon and parenthesized complexity of professional journalism.

In Paper 2 (H070/02), directed writing (Section A, 24 marks) rewards students who can seamlessly modulate their register. To achieve top marks, a candidate must write a cohesive, engaging blog that discusses male-centred language using a style accessible to a well-educated, non-specialist audience. This means integrating theories like Lakoff or Tannen naturally, without relying on dense, unexplained academic jargon. Section B (36 marks) requires rigorous application of power and gender frameworks to specific texts, rewarding precise labeling of legalese and gendered semantic fields.

Common Examiner Pitfalls

The 'Shopping List' Approach: Listing syntactic patterns and rhetorical devices without showing how they construct meaning or respond to the text's audience and purpose.
Weak Comparative Structure: Treating Paper 1's comparative texts as isolated entities rather than crafting integrated, paragraph-by-paragraph contrasts of their modes, styles, and pragmatics.
Register Modulation Failures: Writing H070/02's blog in either an overly formal academic style or an overly informal, ungrounded conversational tone.

Preparation Strategy & Prediction

To maximize your study ROI, prioritize mastering grammatical classification. Don't just point out 'vocabulary'; classify word groups as Latinate noun phrases, anaphoric references, or conditional clauses. Looking ahead, while Power and Gender are staples of Paper 2, topics like Language and Technology (digital evolution) and Language and Age (teen idiolects vs elderly speech) are highly overdue. Ensure you are comfortable applying modern sociolinguistic frameworks to both spontaneous digital data and traditional spoken transcripts.

Charts

Marks by chapter

See where the marks were concentrated so revision time goes to the highest-value topics.

Question type mix

Compare the mark share of each paper section and question type.

Linguistic Analysis Essay24 marks · 1 questions
Comparative Essay36 marks · 1 questions
Directed Writing24 marks · 1 questions
Contextual Analysis Essay36 marks · 2 questions

Mark accessibility

Estimate which marks were basic, mid-level, or high-difficulty.

75%within easy or medium reach

easy: 30 marksmedium: 60 markshard: 30 marks

Difficulty trend

Compare difficulty across recent years.

Command word frequency

Spot common command words so answers match the expected response style.

Skill weighting

Shows the skill mix this paper tested most heavily.

Study ROI

Bigger bubbles recur more often; higher bubbles carry more marks, helping you rank revision priorities.

Language Features in Context (H070/01 Sec A)

24 marks · Difficulty 2.5 · recurrence 100%

Topical Language Writing (H070/02 Sec A)

24 marks · Difficulty 3 · recurrence 100%

Comparing and Contrasting Texts (H070/01 Sec B)

36 marks · Difficulty 3.5 · recurrence 100%

Language in Context: Power / Gender (H070/02 Sec B)

36 marks · Difficulty 3.7 · recurrence 100%

Time vs marks

Compare marks with suggested time allocation to plan exam pacing.

marksmins

Next-year prediction

Topics worth watching next year, with the reason shown directly below each bar.

Language and Technology (Digital Communication)85%

While social media and online forums are often utilized as database sources, a dedicated structural focus on the evolution of digital communication (such as CMC, netspeak, and texting language) remains highly relevant and is overdue for direct focus.

Language and Age75%

Language and Age has not been featured as a prominent context in recent sessions compared to Power and Gender, making it a high-probability focus for Section B of H070/02.

Regional Accent and Dialect Variation70%

With debates around regional representation growing, texts focusing on dialectal bias and accent prestige vs Standard English are highly likely.

Cumulative marks ladder

The line is your running mark total question by question; dashed lines are the estimated grade cut-offs. See which question the line crosses your target grade at, so you know how far you must answer cleanly and which questions decide a band.

Topic-year heatmap

Compare topic weight by year to spot recurring and returning areas.

Jun 2022

Jun 2023

Language Features in Context (H070/01 Sec A)

Comparing and Contrasting Texts (H070/01 Sec B)

Topical Language Writing (H070/02 Sec A)

Language in Context: Power / Gender (H070/02 Sec B)

Examiner insights

Official report

Common pitfalls

Writing a generic analysis of language levels without explicitly linking linguistic features to the text's context, purpose, or audience (crucial for AO3).
Failing to modulate the register in H070/02 Question 1, resulting in either overly dry academic prose dense with unglossed linguistic jargon, or an overly casual blog lacking theoretical grounding.
Forgetting to compare and contrast features systematically in H070/01 Section B, leading to separate summaries of Text B and Text C instead of integrated comparative paragraphs.
Neglecting the multimodal elements and graphological features (such as bold fonts, hyperlinks, parenthetical sub-headings, and illustrative photographs) that shape reader reception.

Misconceptions

Believing that spoken transcripts (like Text B in H070/01) are completely chaotic and uncooperative; overlapping speech can often represent active collaboration and support rather than conflict.
Assuming that a quality newspaper like The Guardian is entirely objective or left-wing, when close analysis can reveal subtle appeals to consumer self-interest or bourgeois assumptions.
Thinking that female speech features (like hedging, intensifiers, or emotional self-disclosure) always indicate weakness; they can be consciously deployed to project warmth, build solidarity, or emphasize team ethos.

Where marks are lost

Failing to identify the subtle tension between the writer's identity (e.g., a corporate lawyer writing about employee restrictions) and the newspaper's general democratic demographic.
Omitting precise terminology for grammatical structures, such as labeling relative clauses, anaphoric references, or conditional structures as simple 'sentences'.
In directed writing, failing to construct a cohesive blog structure with an engaging title, hook, and structured paragraphing suited to a non-specialist audience.

Know what the examiners want — now go get those marks

Thinka is an AI practice app used by 100,000+ DSE students to drill questions and get instant feedback on every answer. You already know the high-frequency topics and where marks are lost — now practice those specifically on Thinka and turn this analysis into actual marks.

Start Practising Free See pricing

Know what's tested? Drill those topics on Thinka — AI questions, instant marking.

Start Practising Free