Welcome to the Guide: Presenting Findings and Referencing Sources
Hello! Welcome to one of the most vital stages of your AQA A Level English Language (7702) Non-Exam Assessment (NEA). You have formulated your research question, collected your linguistic data, and started spotting fascinating patterns. Now comes the exciting part: turning your raw discoveries into a polished, professional, academic investigation report!
This chapter focuses on presenting your findings clearly and referencing academic sources accurately within your Language Investigation (Component 7702/C: Language in Action). Don't worry if formatting data and academic referencing feel daunting at first—we will break down the entire process step-by-step.
1. The NEA at a Glance
Before diving into formatting, let's keep the big picture and official rules in mind:
• Overall NEA Weighting: The entire NEA component is worth 100 marks, making up 20% of your total A Level grade.
• Total NEA Word Limit: 3,500 words across the entire component.
• Language Investigation Word Limit: 2,000 words.
• What is Excluded from the 2,000-Word Count? Your primary data corpus, tables of figures/data, transcripts, in-text referencing citations, bibliography, and appendices do not count toward your 2,000 words!
Analogy time: Think of your 2,000 words as valuable real estate. Every single word in the main body should be used for linguistic analysis, evaluation, and conceptual discussion—not wasted on long blocks of raw, unanalysed data.
2. The Academic Report Structure
The AQA 7702 specification expects your investigation to follow an organised academic report format. Here is how your project should be structured from start to finish:
1. Introduction / Aims: Outline your clear research question(s), testable hypothesis, specific linguistic focus (e.g. grammar, discourse, phonology), and theoretical rationale.
2. Methodology: Detail your data collection methods, sampling criteria, total corpus size, tools used, transcription keys, and any ethical considerations.
3. Presentation of Findings and Analysis: Present your findings visually (graphs, tables, extracts) alongside deep linguistic analysis across language levels (lexis, semantics, grammar, phonology, pragmatics, discourse).
4. Evaluation and Conclusion: Answer your initial research question, evaluate the limitations of your methodology, discuss unexpected anomalies, and explain broader linguistic implications.
5. Bibliography / References: An alphabetical, standard academic list of all secondary research, books, theories, and articles you cited.
6. Appendices: Your complete raw primary data, full clean transcripts (with keys), and frequency/coding sheets.
3. Meeting the Assessment Objectives (AOs)
Everything you present in your findings and referencing directly targets three core Assessment Objectives:
• AO1 (Linguistic Methods, Terminology & Academic Writing): Assesses your use of accurate linguistic terminology (e.g. modal auxiliary verb rather than just verb), well-structured analysis across language levels, and a coherent academic register.
• AO2 (Concepts and Theories): Assesses how well you integrate, evaluate, and apply academic theories, models, and secondary sources to explain your findings.
• AO3 (Contextual Factors and Meanings): Assesses how you evaluate the influence of social, cultural, and situational contexts on the language produced and received.
4. Presenting Data and Visual Findings Effectively
Presenting data is not just about making nice-looking charts; it is about providing clear linguistic evidence for your reader.
Visual Integration Rules
• Number and Label Everything: Always label your figures clearly (e.g. Table 1: Frequency of Deictic Markers or Figure 2: Percentage of Modal Verbs by Gender).
• Integrate, Never Isolate: Never drop a chart or table into your report without discussing it! An examiner should never have to guess why a graph is there. Always refer directly to it in your text (e.g. "As illustrated in Figure 2, the frequency of epistemic modal verbs increases by \(45\%\)...").
• Keep Quotes Short and Focused: In your main analysis, embed short, high-impact quotes or phrases directly into sentences. Leave full, uncut articles or scripts in the Appendices.
Transcribing Spoken Data
If your investigation involves spoken language, you must transcribe your data accurately using recognised conventions such as Jefferson-style or standard adapted transcription notation:
• Micropause: (.) — a pause of less than half a second.
• Timed Pause: (2.0) — a pause measured in seconds.
• Overlapping Speech: // — indicates the exact point where two speakers talk simultaneously.
• Emphatic Stress: underlining or bold text to show raised volume or emphasis.
• Phonetic Transcription (IPA): Use standard International Phonetic Alphabet symbols when analysing specific regional accents or phonological variations.
Quick Review: A chart without analysis is like evidence in a courtroom that no one explains. Always guide the examiner through the numbers and explain the linguistic meaning behind them!
5. Academic Referencing and In-Text Citations
Referencing is essential to show that you have engaged with wider reading (AO2). In the AQA 7702 investigation, standard author-date styles like the Harvard System are expected.
A. In-Text Citations
Whenever you mention a theory, definition, or concept from a linguist, cite the author's surname and the year of publication in brackets:
• Example 1 (General concept): Research suggests that conversational dominance is linked to contextual power rather than biological gender (Cameron, 2007).
• Example 2 (Direct quotation or specific model): Crystal (2018: 45) argues that digital communication creates dynamic, hybrid linguistic registers.
B. The Final Bibliography
At the end of your investigation, provide an alphabetical list (by author surname) of every source you referenced. A complete reference entry must include:
• Author Surname and Initial(s)
• Year of Publication in parentheses ( )
• Title of Book (in italics) OR "Title of Article" (in quotation marks) and Journal Name
• Publisher and Place of Publication (or URL and access date for online corpora and websites)
Bibliography Examples:
• Book: Crystal, D. (2018) Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Journal Article: Cameron, D. (2007) "Language, Gender, and Power", Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(2), pp. 115-130.
6. Common Pitfalls to Avoid
Learn from past mistakes highlighted in AQA examiner reports:
• Data Dumping: Gathering a huge corpus (e.g. \(50\) podcast episodes) that you cannot possibly analyse within 2,000 words. Keep your corpus focused so you can conduct deep, forensic linguistic analysis.
• Standalone Charts: Inserting visual graphs without explicitly explaining the linguistic patterns in your text.
• Feature Spotting: Labelling word classes (e.g. "Here is an adjective") without linking them to meaning, your research question, theory (AO2), or context (AO3).
• Incomplete Referencing: Dropping theorist names into the text without dates or leaving sources off your final bibliography.
• Over-reliance on Secondary Data: Writing essays full of what other linguists did instead of focusing primarily on analysing your own primary corpus.
Summary & Key Takeaways
✓ Keep your investigation to the 2,000-word limit; use tables, appendices, and short in-text quotes strategically to save word count.
✓ Follow the 6-part academic structure: Introduction \(\rightarrow\) Methodology \(\rightarrow\) Findings/Analysis \(\rightarrow\) Evaluation/Conclusion \(\rightarrow\) Bibliography \(\rightarrow\) Appendices.
✓ Always number, title, and explicitly interpret your tables and figures within the analysis narrative.
✓ Use standard author-date referencing (e.g. Crystal, 2018) and build a complete, alphabetical Bibliography at the end.
✓ Connect every linguistic feature you identify directly to theories (AO2) and contexts (AO3).