Question 1 · short_answer
10 marksThe table below shows information about global earthquakes recorded over a one-year period. Richter Magnitude: Minor (3.0 - 3.9), Average global frequency per year: 49000, Average damage: Rarely felt but recorded. Richter Magnitude: Moderate (5.0 - 5.9), Average global frequency per year: 800, Average damage: Significant damage to poorly built structures. Richter Magnitude: Major (7.0 - 7.9), Average global frequency per year: 18, Average damage: Serious damage over large areas. Richter Magnitude: Great (8.0 or higher), Average global frequency per year: 1, Average damage: Severe destruction across several hundred kilometres. (a) Describe the relationship shown in the table between Richter magnitude and the average global frequency per year. [2] (b) State two ways scientists can monitor a volcano to predict an eruption. [2] (c) Explain why the destructive effects of an earthquake of magnitude 6.5 might be much greater in a developing country (LEDC) than in a developed country (MEDC). [4] (d) Suggest why some people continue to live near active volcanoes. [2]
Show answer & marking schemeHide answer & marking scheme
Worked solution
(a) As the Richter magnitude increases, the average global frequency per year decreases. For example, Minor earthquakes (3.0-3.9) occur 49,000 times a year while Great earthquakes (8.0+) occur only once a year. (b) Monitoring seismic activity (using seismometers to detect mini-shocks) and measuring gas emissions (using spectrometers to detect changes in sulfur dioxide). (c) LEDCs often have poorer building infrastructure which collapses more easily. They may lack emergency services, early warning systems, and resources for quick rescue operations. High population densities in urban slums also increase casualties. (d) Volcanic soils are highly fertile and excellent for agriculture, geothermal energy can be harnessed, and tourism provides jobs.
Marking scheme
(a) [2 marks] 1 mark for stating that frequency decreases as magnitude increases. 1 mark for using comparative data from the table to support the statement. (b) [2 marks] 1 mark for each valid volcano monitoring method (e.g., gas analysis, seismology, ground deformation/tiltmeters, satellite thermal imaging). Max 2 marks. (c) [4 marks] Award up to 4 marks for explaining: low-quality building construction/lack of earthquake-proof designs [1], lack of emergency preparedness/rescue equipment [1], higher population density in vulnerable areas [1], limited medical facilities and financial resources for recovery [1]. (d) [2 marks] Award 1 mark for each valid reason (e.g., fertile volcanic ash for farming, geothermal energy, tourism industry, poverty/inability to move, mineral mining). Max 2.