問 1
1 点What is the general rule regarding discharge of a contract through performance as established in the case of Cutter v Powell (1795)?
Cambridge OCR A Level · Law - H418
Discharge：練習問題
その場で採点される選択問題 5 問と、解説つきの記述問題 5 問。すべて「Discharge」からの出題です。
10 問24 点無料・登録不要
問 2
1 点When an anticipatory breach occurs, what choice does the innocent party have according to the principle in Hochster v De La Tour (1853)?
問 3
1 点Following the frustration of a contract, how are financial adjustments handled under the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943?
問 4
1 点In contract law, which of the following best describes the doctrine of frustration?
問 5
1 点Which of the following scenarios would likely allow a party to claim payment under the doctrine of substantial performance?
問 6
2 点Define the doctrine of substantial performance and explain its impact on a party's obligation to pay the contract price.
まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。
問 7
4 点Explain the limits to frustration by describing how self-induced frustration and foreseeability prevent a contract from being discharged.
まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。
問 8
6 点Evaluate the financial consequences of a frustrated contract under the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943, specifically regarding Section 1(2) and the court’s discretion to award expenses.
まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。
問 9
3 点A contract between a venue owner and a theatre company is rendered impossible to perform because the theatre is destroyed by an accidental fire two days before the opening night.
Part (a): Identify the legal doctrine that applies to this situation.
Part (b): Briefly explain the financial consequences for any money paid in advance, according to section 1(2) of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943.
まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。
問 10
4 点On May 1st, Arjan enters into a contract to employ Beatrice as a tour guide starting July 1st. On June 1st, Arjan tells Beatrice that he no longer requires her services and will not honor the contract.
Part (a): Explain the nature of anticipatory breach in this scenario.
Part (b): Identify and explain the two choices available to Beatrice (the innocent party) regarding when she can bring a claim for damages, as established in Hochster v De La Tour.
まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。
※ thinkaのコンテンツはAIにより生成されているため、内容が正確でない場合があります。補助教材としてご使用いただき、公式の教材と合わせてご確認ください。
模範解答は見ました。次はあなたの答案を採点します。
このページは良い答案の形を示せますが、あなたの答案に何が足りないかは教えられません。thinka は実際の採点基準に沿って記述答案を約 15 秒で採点します。
同じような問題をもっと解きたい？このトピックの新しい問題を、解きながら採点。
練習を始める