Pearson Edexcel International A Level · Law (YLA1)

Consumer Rights Act 2015: implied terms and remedies:練習問題

その場で採点される選択問題 5 問と、解説つきの記述問題 5 問。すべて「Consumer Rights Act 2015: implied terms and remedies」からの出題です。

10 問25 無料・登録不要
問 1
1

In the application of legal principles regarding the tort of negligence, which of the following must a claimant prove first to establish liability?

問 2
1

When applying the Theft Act 1968, Section 3, which of the following actions most accurately constitutes an appropriation of property?

問 3
1

Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, if a consumer discovers a fault in a digital television 20 days after purchase, what is the application of legal principles regarding their primary 'short-term' remedy?

問 4
1

Under the Defamation Act 2013, which of the following represents a successful application of the honest opinion defense?

問 5
1

In the application of legal principles under the Defamation Act 2013, what must a claimant prove regarding the impact of a statement for it to be actionable?

問 6
2

In the application of legal principles, identify the two elements that must be proven to establish the actus reus of a criminal offence involving causation.

まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。

問 7
5

Analyze how judges apply the legal principle of vicarious liability to determine an employer’s responsibility for torts committed by an employee.

まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。

問 8
3

Within the application of legal principles of contract law, what is the effect of a 'condition' being breached compared to a 'warranty'?

まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。

問 9
4

When considering the application of legal principles in the context of criminal liability, evaluate the importance of the two components of a crime.

(a) Define actus reus and mens rea, providing an example for each using the Theft Act 1968.
(b) Explain the principle of causation and how it is applied to establish liability in a criminal case.

まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。

問 10
6

The operation of judicial precedent relies on a structured court hierarchy and specific elements within a judgment.

(a) Define ratio decidendi and obiter dicta, explaining which part creates a binding precedent.
(b) Discuss the significance of the 1966 House of Lords Practice Statement in allowing the court to depart from its own previous decisions.

まず自分で答えを書いてから、解説と照らし合わせましょう。

※ thinkaのコンテンツはAIにより生成されているため、内容が正確でない場合があります。補助教材としてご使用いただき、公式の教材と合わせてご確認ください。

模範解答は見ました。次はあなたの答案を採点します。

このページは良い答案の形を示せますが、あなたの答案に何が足りないかは教えられません。thinka は実際の採点基準に沿って記述答案を約 15 秒で採点します。

同じような問題をもっと解きたい?このトピックの新しい問題を、解きながら採点。

練習を始める