CCEA A-Level · 試験対策

Government and Politics 4830 試験対策

A2 Government and Politics is won on two essays worth 65 of the 175 marks. This page sets out the paper structure, the source-use rule that caps whole levels, and the comparative balance examiners keep marking down.

読了時間 4 分更新日: 2026年9月3日

試験の概要

試験数
2
満点
175
制限時間
3時間 45分
出題形式
12
試験時間配点問題数配点比率出題形式
A2 1: Comparative Government2時間 15分100658%Short definition / concept with example, Structured source explanation (two ways), Medium institutional explanation, Extended source-based evaluative essay, Comparative identification and explanation (two differences), Extended comparative essay (choice of 2)
A2 2: Political Power and Political Ideas1時間 30分75542%Short definition / text phrase with example, Structured source explanation (two features or claims), Extended analytical source explanation, Short definition / concept with example, Extended evaluative theory or ideology essay (choice of 2)
評価段階
A*ABCDEU
電卓の規定

This is a non-calculator subject. Neither A2 1 nor A2 2 requires or permits a calculator; bring only pens, pencils and the other equipment CCEA and JCQ allow into the exam room.

  • AO1: AO1: demonstrate knowledge and understanding of political institutions, processes, concepts, theories and debates (43%)
  • AO2: AO2: analyse and evaluate political information, arguments and theories, and identify parallels, connections, similarities and differences between the political systems studied (36%)
  • AO3: AO3: construct and communicate coherent arguments, using a range of appropriate political vocabulary (21%)

過去問と採点基準にもとづいて作成(2022–2025)。

理解度をチェックしませんか?

このノートの内容を試験形式で演習。AIが生成する無制限の問題で、即座に採点・解説を受けられます。

このトピックを演習

よくあるミス

  1. 1high影響する配点: 5Source-based analysis

    Ignoring the printed source in the questions that require it, A2 1 Questions 2 and 4 and A2 2 Questions 2 and 3, and answering from memory instead.

    回避方法: Name what the source says before adding your own knowledge, so the reference is visible in the answer itself, not just in your head.
  2. 2high影響する配点: 6Comparative Government (Section B)

    Writing an unbalanced comparative essay: detailed paragraphs on the UK system and only surface comments on the chosen counterpart.

    回避方法: Plan the essay as paired points from the start, one UK feature set directly against its US or Irish counterpart, rather than two separate mini-essays.
  3. 3high影響する配点: 6Political Power and Political Ideas

    Writing a one-sided theory or ideology essay with no exploration of the competing position.

    回避方法: Set out the opposing theoretical position explicitly and weigh it against your main argument before your concluding sentence.
  4. 4medium影響する配点: 3Comparative executive power

    Claiming the UK Prime Minister is simply stronger than the US President, without accounting for party rebellion, cabinet constraints or unified versus divided government.

    回避方法: State the conditions under which each executive is strong or weak instead of giving a fixed ranking between the two systems.
  5. 5medium影響する配点: 3Theories of Political Power / Ideologies

    Treating ideologies or theories of power as a single block, rather than distinguishing their internal strands.

    回避方法: Name the strand you mean: Classical Liberalism against Modern Liberalism, or Marxist class-based control against Elite Theory's organisational model.
  6. 6medium影響する配点: 5Structured explanation questions

    Giving only one mechanism or reason when a question asks you to identify and explain two.

    回避方法: Number your two points as you write them, so it is obvious to the examiner and to you that both are present.
  7. 7medium影響する配点: 2Short definition questions

    Skipping the definition and jumping straight to the example in a 5-mark definitional question.

    回避方法: State the definition in your first sentence, then attach the example as a second, separate sentence.
  8. 8low影響する配点: 3Theories of Political Power

    Describing a theory of power without naming the theorist behind it.

    回避方法: Attach a name to the position you are using, Michels or Mosca for elite theory, Dahl for pluralism, rather than describing the theory in the abstract.

コツを高得点につなげよう

thinka は弱点を的確な演習に変え、即時採点と試験形式のフィードバックを提供します。より賢く、より短時間で。

本番形式の問題を解いて、AIが即座に採点とフィードバック。

無料で問題を解いてみる