CCEA A-Level · 試験対策
History 4010 試験対策
A2 History drops candidates who lapse into narrative rather than argument, examiner reports say so on nearly every script. See exactly how the two A2 papers are timed and marked, and how to structure both for the top level.
試験の概要
| 試験 | 時間 | 配点 | 問題数 | 配点比率 | 出題形式 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2 1: Change Over Time | 1時間 15分 | 40 | 1 | 20% | Synoptic thematic essay (AO1) |
| A2 2: Historical Investigations and Interpretations | 2時間 30分 | 80 | 4 | 40% | Primary source utility evaluation (AO2), Two-source synthesis essay (AO1/AO2), Historiographical interpretations evaluation (AO3), Depth essay (AO1) |
No calculator is needed for either A2 History paper. Both units are entirely written response, with no numerical or statistical content.
- AO1: AO1: demonstrate, organise and communicate knowledge and understanding to analyse and evaluate key features, making substantiated judgements and exploring cause, consequence, change, continuity, similarity, difference and significance (58%)
- AO2: AO2: analyse and evaluate appropriate source material, primary and/or contemporary to the period, in its historical context (19%)
- AO3: AO3: analyse and evaluate, in relation to historical context, different ways in which aspects of the past have been interpreted (23%)
過去問と採点基準にもとづいて作成(2022–2025)。
よくあるミス
- 1high影響する配点: 8A2 1 synoptic essay
Writing the A2 1 synoptic essay around one decade or sub-period instead of the whole specified century.
回避方法: Organise the essay by theme or factor, and show how each one plays out at different points across the whole period, not chronologically by decade. - 2high影響する配点: 5Source evaluation, A2 2 Q1(a)
Evaluating a primary source's utility with a stock phrase, such as calling it biased because it is an eyewitness account, without linking that to what the source can and cannot show.
回避方法: Name the author, date, and audience, then say specifically what that combination allows the source to reveal, and what it cannot. - 3high影響する配点: 6Interpretations, A2 2 Q2
Summarising Interpretation A and Interpretation B one after the other in A2 2 Question 2 without directly comparing them.
回避方法: Write a paragraph testing each interpretation against your own knowledge, then a final paragraph that states which is more convincing and why, engaging with both together. - 4medium影響する配点: 4Source synthesis, A2 2 Q1(b)
Treating the two source extracts in A2 2 Question 1(b) in isolation, without weaving in independent contextual knowledge.
回避方法: Use both sources together in the same paragraph and add at least one fact from outside the sources to support or challenge what they say. - 5medium影響する配点: 4A2 1 synoptic essay
Asserting a trend of change or continuity in the A2 1 essay without specific supporting evidence.
回避方法: Every claim about change needs a named event, date, or figure attached to it. An unsupported claim reads as an assertion, not an argument. - 6medium影響する配点: 3Interpretations, A2 2 Q2
Assuming full marks in the interpretations question requires declaring one historian entirely right and dismissing the other.
回避方法: Acknowledge what the weaker interpretation still gets right before explaining why the other is, on balance, more convincing. - 7medium影響する配点: 5Time management
Running out of time on the final question of A2 2 after over-writing the earlier source questions.
回避方法: Both A2 papers run at just under two minutes a mark. Time each question against that figure rather than writing until you feel finished.
本番形式の問題を解いて、AIが即座に採点とフィードバック。
無料で問題を解いてみる