Religious Studies 4610 試験対策

よくあるミス

1. 1high影響する配点: 8Synoptic assessment, Section B

   Writing Question 4 part (a) using only the current unit's content, with no explicit, developed reference to a second unit of study.

   回避方法: Pick your second unit before you start Section A. Build one full paragraph of genuine comparison into part (a), not a passing mention.
2. 2high影響する配点: 10AO2 evaluative essays

   Producing a descriptive, narrative account in a 30-mark part (b) question instead of a sustained critical evaluation.

   回避方法: Structure part (b) around a thesis and a genuine counter-argument, then a judgement. Retelling what a scholar said is not the same as assessing whether their argument holds up.
3. 3high影響する配点: 4Scholarly evidence

   Naming a scholar without explaining their specific thesis or contribution to the debate.

   回避方法: State what the named scholar actually argued in one sentence before you use their name to support or challenge a point.
4. 4medium影響する配点: 6Synoptic assessment, Section B

   Treating other aspects of human experience in Question 4 part (b) as an abstract theoretical point instead of a specific, concrete example.

   回避方法: Use a named, real example, historical, legal, or contemporary, and connect it directly to the theme, not a generalised hypothetical.
5. 5medium影響する配点: 6Time management

   Spending too long on the 20-mark part (a) questions and running out of time on the heavier 30-mark part (b) essays.

   回避方法: Time each part separately: about 16 minutes for a 20-mark part (a), about 24 minutes for a 30-mark part (b).
6. 6medium影響する配点: 5Balanced evaluation

   Presenting a one-sided, polemical argument in a 30-mark essay with no strong counter-argument.

   回避方法: Write the strongest version of the opposing case you can before you argue against it. A weak counter-argument is easy for an examiner to spot.
7. 7medium影響する配点: 5Synoptic assessment

   Assuming that mentioning a second unit anywhere in Question 4 part (a) satisfies the synoptic requirement.

   回避方法: The mark scheme wants sustained exemplification from the second unit, not a name-check. Give it as much development as your primary unit gets.
8. 8low影響する配点: 3AO2 evaluation

   Believing that agreeing with the stimulus statement counts against you, or that disagreeing is always the safer AO2 choice.

   回避方法: Agree or disagree freely. What is credited is a balanced critique that shows you tested the alternative reading before settling on your position.