Cambridge IAL · 試験対策
History (9489) 試験対策
Uncover expert insights, examiner secrets, and step-by-step structural strategies to achieve top levels in Cambridge International AS & A Level History (9489). This package covers Paper 1 source analysis, Paper 2 and 4 thematic essays, and Paper 3 historiographical mastery.
試験の概要
| 試験 | 時間 | 配点 | 問題数 | 配点比率 | 出題形式 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 Document Question | 1時間 15分 | 40 | — | — | — |
| Paper 2 Outline Study | 1時間 45分 | 60 | — | — | — |
| Paper 3 Interpretations | 1時間 15分 | 40 | — | — | — |
| Paper 4 Depth Study | 1時間 45分 | 60 | — | — | — |
A calculator is not normally required for this subject.
- AO1: Recall, select and deploy historical knowledge appropriately and effectively. (40%)
- AO2: Demonstrate an understanding of the past through explanation, analysis and a substantiated judgement of key concepts: causation, consequence, continuity, change and significance within an historical context. (40%)
- AO3: Analyse, evaluate and use a range of source material as evidence. (10%)
- AO4: Analyse and evaluate how aspects of the past have been interpreted and represented (historian perspectives). (10%)
過去問と採点基準にもとづいて作成(2023–2025)。
よくあるミス
- 1high影響する配点: 15Source Comparison
Writing sequential, isolated summaries of Source A and Source B in Paper 1 Part (a) instead of running a synthesized parallel contrast.
回避方法: Structure your answer from the start around key comparative parameters. Use direct comparative language and explicitly explain the differences by evaluating their contrasting provenance or contexts. - 2high影響する配点: 40Extract Interpretation
Treating the Paper 3 interpretations extract as a standard comprehension exercise or writing a general historical essay on the topic rather than identifying the historian's central thesis.
回避方法: Focus explicitly on identifying the overall school of thought or approach in your introduction, and trace how the extract's specific arguments and sub-messages systematically build toward that thesis. - 3medium影響する配点: 30Chronological Discipline
Chronological slippage, such as introducing events outside the explicitly set years of the essay prompt (e.g., using 1930s examples to discuss a 1920s prompt).
回避方法: Highlight the date parameters in the prompt during your planning phase. Keep a strict timeline checklist in your mind to avoid using irrelevant material that won't earn credit. - 4high影響する配点: 25Source Evaluation
Deploying generic, rote evaluation in source analysis (e.g., dismissing a source as simply 'biased' or 'unreliable' because it is a speech or letter) without checking if the specific claims are supported by context.
回避方法: Evaluate the source's provenance, purpose, and audience in direct relation to the specific question asked. Use your contextual knowledge to explain how the author's background shapes their perspective and utility. - 5high影響する配点: 30Thematic Essay Writing
Producing purely narrative, chronological accounts in Paper 2 and Paper 4 essays rather than structuring the response around explicit assessment criteria.
回避方法: Establish clear, measurable criteria in your introduction (e.g. defining what 'success' or 'effectiveness' means for a specific policy) and structure body paragraphs strictly around analytical factors rather than a timeline.
本番形式の問題を解いて、AIが即座に採点とフィードバック。
無料で問題を解いてみる