Cambridge IAS-Level · 試験対策

History (9489) 試験対策

Master the Cambridge International AS Level History (9489) syllabus by developing dual-source comparison skills, eliminating generic 'stock' source evaluations, and strictly adhering to chronological question boundaries. Learn to write analytical, multi-causal explanations in Paper 2 rather than falling into the narrative trap, ensuring balanced arguments for high-tier evaluative marks.

読了時間 4 分更新日: 2026年6月21日

試験の概要

試験数
2
満点
100
制限時間
3時間
出題形式
4
試験時間配点問題数配点比率出題形式
Paper 11時間 15分40240%P1 Part (a) Comparative Source Analysis, P1 Part (b) Synthesised Source Essay
Paper 21時間 45分60460%P2 Part (a) Causal Explanation, P2 Part (b) Evaluative Essay
評価段階
ABCDEU
電卓の規定

A calculator is not normally required for this subject.

  • AO1: AO1: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the historical period, its themes, and its key concepts.
  • AO2: AO2: Analyze, explain, and evaluate historical explanations and arguments.
  • AO3: AO3: Analyze and evaluate historical sources, extracting evidence and assessing provenance.

過去問と採点基準にもとづいて作成(2023–2025)。

よくあるミス

  1. 1high影響する配点: 8Paper 1 Document Question (Source Evaluation)

    Engaging in 'stock evaluation' of sources—identifying bias purely by the general type of document (e.g. stating a source is biased because it is a cartoon, letter, or speech) without linking it to the specific historical context and purpose.

    回避方法: Evaluate the specific historical purpose, audience, and context of the source. Explain how the author's background, professional standing, or hidden motives (provenance) shape the testimony in relation to the question.
  2. 2high影響する配点: 6Paper 1 Part (a) Source Comparison

    Writing sequential, separate summaries of Source A and Source B in Paper 1 Part (a) instead of directly comparing and contrasting their content point-by-point.

    回避方法: Structure the response around direct 'like-for-like' comparisons of shared details immediately from the first paragraph, utilizing specific quotes to demonstrate both similarities and differences.
  3. 3high影響する配点: 4Paper 2 Part (a) Causal Explanation

    Falling into the 'narrative trap' in Paper 2 Part (a) causal questions by writing a chronological description of 'how' events happened rather than strictly focusing on 'why' they happened.

    回避方法: Group your essay around distinct analytical causal factors and clearly explain the dynamic, interconnected reasons why the event occurred.
  4. 4high影響する配点: 8Paper 2 Part (b) Evaluative Essay

    Constructing one-sided arguments in Paper 2 Part (b) essays, which limits the candidate's score to a maximum of Level 3.

    回避方法: Ensure you develop a balanced argument that explores both sides of the debate, backed up with precise evidence, before reaching a sustained, criteria-driven conclusion.
  5. 5medium影響する配点: 10Paper 2 Outline Study (Chronological Relevance)

    Writing outside the chronological boundary of the question (e.g., writing about the 1905 Russian Revolution or Stolypin's land reforms for a 1914–1917 Russian question).

    回避方法: Strictly analyze the dates given in the prompt, planning your response to include only relevant details that fall within that specified timeframe.
  6. 6medium影響する配点: 5Paper 1 Time Management

    Attempting Paper 1 Part (b) before Part (a), which disrupts the candidate's cognitive transition into the source packet and mismanages exam time.

    回避方法: Always answer Part (a) first to establish a clear point-by-point understanding of the sources before moving on to the synthesised essay in Part (b).

コツを高得点につなげよう

thinka は弱点を的確な演習に変え、即時採点と試験形式のフィードバックを提供します。より賢く、より短時間で。

本番形式の問題を解いて、AIが即座に採点とフィードバック。

無料で問題を解いてみる