Cambridge IAS-Level · 試験対策
Sociology (9699) 試験対策
Master the rigorous requirements of Cambridge International AS Level Sociology (9699) with this expert-curated exam guide. Learn how to construct high-scoring answers, avoid the deadly 'juxtaposition trap' in your essays, manage your time effectively, and deploy advanced sociological vocabulary with precision across both papers.
試験の概要
| 試験 | 時間 | 配点 | 問題数 | 配点比率 | 出題形式 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 Socialisation, Identity and Methods of Research | 1時間 30分 | 60 | 4 | 50% | Describe (Short Answer), Explain (Medium Answer), Explain View / Argument (Structured), Evaluate Essay |
| Paper 2 The Family | 1時間 30分 | 60 | 4 | 50% | Describe (Short Answer), Explain (Medium Answer), Explain View / Argument (Structured), Evaluate Essay |
A calculator is not normally required for this subject.
- AO1: AO1: Knowledge and Understanding (40%)
- AO2: AO2: Interpretation and Application (30%)
- AO3: AO3: Analysis and Evaluation (30%)
過去問と採点基準にもとづいて作成(2023–2025)。
よくあるミス
- 1high影響する配点: 10Key debates, concepts and perspectives
Relying on simple juxtaposition of theoretical perspectives (e.g., writing a Marxist paragraph followed immediately by a Functionalist paragraph) without explicitly evaluating the prompt.
回避方法: Directly compare theories within the same paragraph. Use evaluative connective language ('However, this functionalist view is heavily critiqued by Marxists who argue...') and end each paragraph with an analytical link back to the specific question prompt. - 2high影響する配点: 6Methods of research
Conflating reliability (the ability to replicate research and obtain consistent findings) with validity (the extent to which research depicts true, deep, and accurate social reality).
回避方法: Memorize and apply distinct definitions. Link quantitative methods (e.g., structured questionnaires) to reliability and qualitative methods (e.g., unstructured interviews) to validity, and never treat them as interchangeable synonyms. - 3high影響する配点: 4Methods of research
Underdeveloping explanations in 6-mark (Q2b/Q3b) and 8-mark (Q2a) questions by merely stating a point rather than explaining why it serves as a strength, limitation, or counter-argument.
回避方法: Structure your answers explicitly: identify the point, explain how it operates theoretically/practically, back it up with sociological material (theories/studies), and state exactly *why* or *how* this constitutes a strength or limitation. - 4medium影響する配点: 6Theories of the family and social change
Assuming that stepfamilies or reconstituted families represent a structurally non-nuclear family structure, when they actually function as nuclear structures.
回避方法: Recognize in family diversity debates that reconstituted families structurally replicate the nuclear model (consisting of two adults and dependent co-resident children) even though they represent a change in the life cycle. - 5medium影響する配点: 2Socialisation and the creation of social identity
Defining key terms in Question 1 using tautologies (e.g., defining 'positive social sanctions' as 'positive ways of being social').
回避方法: Provide a precise sociological definition (e.g., rewards used to encourage compliance with social norms) followed by a clear, non-tautological example (e.g., a school certificate or a promotion at work).
本番形式の問題を解いて、AIが即座に採点とフィードバック。
無料で問題を解いてみる