An evidence-based exam tips package and data audit for Pearson Edexcel GCE A Level Geography (9GE0), incorporating an exhaustive analysis of Paper 1, Paper 2, and Paper 3 structures, quantitative skills (Spearman's Rank, mean, and median calculations), and common candidate misconceptions.
読了時間 4 分更新日: 2026年6月21日
試験の概要
試験数
3
満点
280
制限時間
6時間 45分
出題形式
4
試験
時間
配点
問題数
配点比率
出題形式
Paper 1: Physical Geography
2時間 15分
105
13
35%
Calculation / Skills, Short Explanation, Extended Essay (Assess), Explanation with Resource, Structured Explanation, Evaluative Essay (Evaluate), Explanation with Resource (Section C), Short Explanation (Section C), Structured Explanation (Section C), Extended Essay (Assess) (Section C), Evaluative Essay (Evaluate) (Section C)
Paper 2: Human Geography
2時間 15分
105
16
35%
Short Explanation, Extended Essay (Assess), Explanation with Resource, Structured Explanation, Evaluative Essay (Evaluate), Calculation / Skills, Short Explanation (Section C), Structured Explanation (Section C), Evaluative Essay (Evaluate) (Section C)
A scientific or graphical calculator that meets JCQ regulations may be used (some GCSE Mathematics and Science papers are non-calculator). Graphical calculators must be set to exam mode; you must clear any stored programs, notes or data before the exam, and the calculator must not be able to retrieve stored text or formulae.
AO1: AO1: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of places, environments, concepts, processes, interactions and change, at a variety of scales. (34%)
AO2: AO2: Apply knowledge and understanding in different contexts to analyse, interpret and evaluate geographical information and issues. (40%)
AO3: AO3: Use a variety of relevant quantitative, qualitative and fieldwork skills to: investigate geographical questions and issues, interpret, analyse and evaluate data and resources, and construct substantiated judgements. (26%)
過去問と採点基準にもとづいて作成（2022–2024）。
電卓プログラム
Graph: zeros, intersections & turning points
Graphical calculator / GDC (exam mode)
目的: Plot a function to read its roots (zeros), points of intersection, and maxima/minima.
使う場面: Checking solutions, sketching, or solving where an analytic method is hard.
手順
Graph the function(s) and use the built-in zero, intersect and maximum/minimum tools.
試験での注意: Allowed under JCQ rules, but you must still show your method — an unsupported calculator answer earns no method marks. Clear all stored programs, notes and data (graphical calculators in exam mode) before the exam.
Numerical equation solver
Graphical calculator / GDC (exam mode)
目的: Solve an equation or find a variable numerically when an algebraic route is long or implicit.
使う場面: Iterative or implicit equations, or to confirm an algebraic solution.
手順
Use the equation/zero solver, entering the equation and a sensible starting estimate.
試験での注意: Allowed under JCQ rules, but you must still show your method — an unsupported calculator answer earns no method marks. Clear all stored programs, notes and data (graphical calculators in exam mode) before the exam.
Numerical integration & differentiation
Graphical calculator / GDC (exam mode)
目的: Evaluate a definite integral \(\int_a^b f(x)\,dx\) or a gradient \(f'(x)\) at a point.
使う場面: Checking calculus answers, or where only a numerical value is needed.
手順
Use the GDC's numeric integral / derivative function with the limits or the point.
試験での注意: Allowed under JCQ rules, but you must still show your method — an unsupported calculator answer earns no method marks. Clear all stored programs, notes and data (graphical calculators in exam mode) before the exam.
Statistics & probability distributions
Graphical calculator / GDC (exam mode)
目的: 1-var/2-var statistics, linear regression, and cumulative binomial / normal / Poisson probabilities without tables.
使う場面: Statistics questions and hypothesis tests.
手順
Enter data in the statistics editor, or use the distribution menu (binomial cdf, normal cdf, …).
試験での注意: Allowed under JCQ rules, but you must still show your method — an unsupported calculator answer earns no method marks. Clear all stored programs, notes and data (graphical calculators in exam mode) before the exam.
よくあるミス
1high影響する配点: 2Tectonic Processes and Hazards
Failing to write down the complete formula and intermediate working steps when calculating the Spearman's Rank correlation coefficient, leading to a loss of simple working marks.
回避方法: Write out the complete formula, substitution steps, and sum of differences (\(\sum d^2\)) explicitly in the answer spaces provided. Never write only the final numeric answer.
2medium影響する配点: 8The Carbon Cycle and Energy Security
Confusing the biological fast-carbon-pump processes in the ocean (such as photosynthesis by phytoplankton and marine biota) with slow-geological-pump chemical and physical storage cycles.
回避方法: Distinguish between the biological pump (photosynthesis, organic decay, and biological marine sinking of organic carbon) and geological processes like chemical weathering, deep ocean sedimentation, and metamorphic outgassing.
3high影響する配点: 8Players
Underutilizing visual stimulus and specific numerical evidence from the Resource Booklets in Paper 3 (Synoptic Investigation) analysis questions, which caps answers at lower grade boundaries.
回避方法: Exhaustively analyze all booklet resources, explicitly cross-reference specific data points (e.g. GDP, HDI ranking, net migration rates, and forest cover statistics), and integrate them with synoptic knowledge.
4medium影響する配点: 1Health, Human Rights and Intervention
Incorrect statistical rounding, such as rounding Spearman's Rank coefficients to one decimal place instead of exactly two decimal places as explicitly requested in the prompt.
回避方法: Always check the formatting instructions of calculation questions. If the prompt specifies two decimal places, write your answer as such (e.g., 0.57 or 0.63).
5high影響する配点: 20Coastal Landscapes and Change
Providing descriptive case study reports rather than evaluative essay answers structured around clear success criteria in 20-mark evaluation questions.
回避方法: Structure your essay with comparative thematic paragraphs that analyze different viewpoints (e.g., hard vs. soft management, short-term vs. long-term consequences) and explicitly weigh them against success criteria before making a final judgment.