History 試験対策

よくあるミス

1. 1high影響する配点: 4Paper 1 source comparison techniques

   Treating Paper 1 Question 3 (Compare and Contrast) as two separate, sequential source summaries rather than an integrated comparative analysis.

   回避方法: Structure the response thematically using direct comparative linking words (such as 'similarly', 'conversely', 'whereas') to run point-by-point comparative paragraphs.
2. 2high影響する配点: 15World History Topics selection

   Choosing two case study countries from the same geographical region in Paper 2 essays when the prompt explicitly mandates selecting different regions.

   回避方法: Carefully check the geographical regions of your planned case studies (Americas, Europe, Asia/Oceania, Africa/Middle East) and ensure they are distinct before selecting your prompt.
3. 3high影響する配点: 8Essay structure and argument

   Writing purely narrative or chronological 'storytelling' accounts in Paper 2 essays instead of maintaining an analytical, conceptually-driven thematic argument.

   回避方法: Structure your body paragraphs around thematic arguments (social, political, economic, or ideological) rather than a chronological timeline of events, and explicitly link each paragraph back to the central prompt.
4. 4medium影響する配点: 2Source Evaluation (OPCVL)

   Failing to address both value and limitations explicitly with reference to origin, purpose, and content in Paper 1 Question 2 (OPCVL), or applying formulaic generalizations.

   回避方法: Explicitly reference all three elements (origin, purpose, and content) to construct contextual values and limitations tied directly to the specified historical investigation.
5. 5high影響する配点: 5Paper 1 synthesis essay

   Failing to integrate both source-based evidence and candidate's own historical knowledge in the final 9-mark Paper 1 synthesis question (Question 4).

   回避方法: Plan body paragraphs around thematic points, supporting each point explicitly with both a citation/quote from the provided sources and detailed, named external facts from memory.