IB DP · 試験対策

Philosophy 試験対策

Master the art of 'doing philosophy' with official examiner strategies: learn how to anchor Paper 1 Section A directly to your stimulus, divide description from critical evaluation in Paper 2, avoid the fatal name-dropping trap, and build robust, charitable counter-arguments to secure the top-tier 21–25 markband.

読了時間 4 分更新日: 2026年6月21日

試験の概要

試験数
3
満点
125
制限時間
4時間 45分
出題形式
4
試験時間配点問題数配点比率出題形式
Paper 1 (Core & Optional Themes)2時間 30分752Stimulus Inquiry, Thematic Essay
Paper 2 (Prescribed Texts)1時間252Prescribed Text Part A (Explanatory), Prescribed Text Part B (Evaluative)
Paper 31時間 15分25
評価段階
7654321
電卓の規定

A calculator is not normally required for this subject.

  • AO1: Knowledge and understanding of philosophical concepts, texts, and issues
  • AO2: Analysis and evaluation of philosophical arguments and positions
  • AO3: Formulation and support of personal philosophical positions

過去問と採点基準にもとづいて作成(2023–2025)。

よくあるミス

  1. 1high影響する配点: 10Being human (Core theme)

    Treating the Paper 1 Section A stimulus as a mere starting decoration and dropping it after the introduction.

    回避方法: Integrate explicit, sustained references to specific conceptual or visual details of the stimulus throughout the entire body of the essay to anchor your thesis.
  2. 2high影響する配点: 6John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Prescribed text)

    Writing a purely descriptive, biographical summary of a philosopher in Paper 2 Part B instead of critical evaluation.

    回避方法: Dedicate Part A strictly to explanation and quarantine all critical evaluation, debate of assumptions, and counterarguments inside Part B.
  3. 3medium影響する配点: 4Ethics (Optional themes)

    Using everyday, colloquial definitions of key terms (like 'autonomy' or 'authenticity') instead of philosophically robust parameters.

    回避方法: Establish precise conceptual boundaries and definitions of all major terms early in your introduction (e.g., distinguishing Mill's self-regarding actions from selfishness).
  4. 4high影響する配点: 5Being human (Core theme)

    Presenting weak, easily dismissed 'strawman' counter-arguments instead of representing opposing perspectives with full intellectual charity.

    回避方法: Construct robust alternative viewpoints and evaluate their genuine strengths and limitations before showing how your core thesis resolves the tension.
  5. 5low影響する配点: 15John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Prescribed text)

    Selecting mismatched sub-parts in Paper 2 (e.g., answering Q7a and Q9b) which results in a rubric violation.

    回避方法: Ensure you answer both parts (a) and (b) of the exact same numbered question for your chosen prescribed text.

コツを高得点につなげよう

thinka は弱点を的確な演習に変え、即時採点と試験形式のフィードバックを提供します。より賢く、より短時間で。

本番形式の問題を解いて、AIが即座に採点とフィードバック。

無料で問題を解いてみる