IB DP · 試験対策
Philosophy 試験対策
Master the art of 'doing philosophy' with official examiner strategies: learn how to anchor Paper 1 Section A directly to your stimulus, divide description from critical evaluation in Paper 2, avoid the fatal name-dropping trap, and build robust, charitable counter-arguments to secure the top-tier 21–25 markband.
試験の概要
| 試験 | 時間 | 配点 | 問題数 | 配点比率 | 出題形式 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paper 1 (Core & Optional Themes) | 2時間 30分 | 75 | 2 | — | Stimulus Inquiry, Thematic Essay |
| Paper 2 (Prescribed Texts) | 1時間 | 25 | 2 | — | Prescribed Text Part A (Explanatory), Prescribed Text Part B (Evaluative) |
| Paper 3 | 1時間 15分 | 25 | — | — | — |
A calculator is not normally required for this subject.
- AO1: Knowledge and understanding of philosophical concepts, texts, and issues
- AO2: Analysis and evaluation of philosophical arguments and positions
- AO3: Formulation and support of personal philosophical positions
過去問と採点基準にもとづいて作成(2023–2025)。
よくあるミス
- 1high影響する配点: 10Being human (Core theme)
Treating the Paper 1 Section A stimulus as a mere starting decoration and dropping it after the introduction.
回避方法: Integrate explicit, sustained references to specific conceptual or visual details of the stimulus throughout the entire body of the essay to anchor your thesis. - 2high影響する配点: 6John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Prescribed text)
Writing a purely descriptive, biographical summary of a philosopher in Paper 2 Part B instead of critical evaluation.
回避方法: Dedicate Part A strictly to explanation and quarantine all critical evaluation, debate of assumptions, and counterarguments inside Part B. - 3medium影響する配点: 4Ethics (Optional themes)
Using everyday, colloquial definitions of key terms (like 'autonomy' or 'authenticity') instead of philosophically robust parameters.
回避方法: Establish precise conceptual boundaries and definitions of all major terms early in your introduction (e.g., distinguishing Mill's self-regarding actions from selfishness). - 4high影響する配点: 5Being human (Core theme)
Presenting weak, easily dismissed 'strawman' counter-arguments instead of representing opposing perspectives with full intellectual charity.
回避方法: Construct robust alternative viewpoints and evaluate their genuine strengths and limitations before showing how your core thesis resolves the tension. - 5low影響する配点: 15John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Prescribed text)
Selecting mismatched sub-parts in Paper 2 (e.g., answering Q7a and Q9b) which results in a rubric violation.
回避方法: Ensure you answer both parts (a) and (b) of the exact same numbered question for your chosen prescribed text.
本番形式の問題を解いて、AIが即座に採点とフィードバック。
無料で問題を解いてみる