第 1 题
1 分In the Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans) study, what was the primary difference in the operationalisation of the 'ill' victim versus the 'drunk' victim?
Cambridge International AS Level · Psychology (9990)
Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans)：练习题
5 道选择题即时批改，另有 5 道文字题附完整解题步骤，全部围绕「Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans)」。
10 道题目29 分免费，无需注册
第 2 题
1 分In the study by Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans), which of the following describes the role of the two female observers?
第 3 题
1 分Piliavin et al. found that helping behavior did not decrease as the number of bystanders increased. Which of the following best explains why the diffusion of responsibility effect was not observed in this field experiment?
第 4 题
1 分In the study by Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans), which of the following is a correct description of the victims used in the experiment?
第 5 题
1 分Regarding the results of the Piliavin et al. study, what was the observed relationship between the number of bystanders and the speed of helping?
第 6 题
3 分Identify two quantitative measures of the dependent variable that were recorded by the observers while the victim was collapsed on the floor.
先自己写一遍答案，再对照解题步骤。
第 7 题
5 分Explain why the use of qualitative data, such as the recorded comments of female passengers, was necessary to supplement the quantitative findings in this study.
先自己写一遍答案，再对照解题步骤。
第 8 题
4 分Explain one reason why the study by Piliavin et al. is categorized as a field experiment rather than a naturalistic observation.
先自己写一遍答案，再对照解题步骤。
第 9 题
5 分Piliavin et al. conducted a field experiment to investigate bystander behavior on a New York subway.
(a) Describe the standardized behavior of the 'victim' during the trials. [2]
(b) Explain one way in which the study attempted to control for the variable of 'diffusion of responsibility'. [2]
(c) Identify one qualitative finding recorded by the observers during the study. [1]
先自己写一遍答案，再对照解题步骤。
第 10 题
7 分The study by Piliavin et al. (subway Samaritans) utilized a field experiment to observe bystander intervention.
(a) Identify two of the four independent variables manipulated in this study. [2]
(b) Explain one strength and one weakness of using a field experiment to investigate bystander apathy in this study. [2]
(c) Based on the findings regarding the 'ill' and 'drunk' conditions, describe how the cost-reward model explains the differences in the speed of helping. Refer to specific results in your answer. [3]
先自己写一遍答案，再对照解题步骤。
* thinka提供的内容由AI生成，可能并非总是准确或最新。请将其用作辅助资源，并与官方材料进行核实。
想多做几道同类题目？立即开始练习这个课题，边做边批改。
立即练习