IB DP · 考试技巧

History 考试技巧

Evidence-based exam tips and strategies for IB Diploma Programme History Paper 1 and Paper 2, focusing on precise time management, command word interpretation, structural outlines, and avoiding regional traps.

阅读时间 4 分钟更新于: 2026年6月21日

试卷概览

卷数
3
总分
99
考试时间
5小时
题型
5
试卷时间分数题数比重题型
Paper 1: Source-based (Prescribed Subjects)1小时24
Paper 2: World History Topics1小时 30分钟30
Paper 3: HL Depth Studies (one regional option)2小时 30分钟45
评级
7654321
计算器规定

A calculator is not normally required for this subject.

  • AO1: AO1: Knowledge and understanding
  • AO2: AO2: Application and analysis
  • AO3: AO3: Synthesis and evaluation
  • AO4: AO4: Use and application of historical skills

根据历届试题与评分标准整理(2023–2025)。

常见错误

  1. 1high涉及分数: 4Paper 1 source comparison techniques

    Treating Paper 1 Question 3 (Compare and Contrast) as two separate, sequential source summaries rather than an integrated comparative analysis.

    如何避免: Structure the response thematically using direct comparative linking words (such as 'similarly', 'conversely', 'whereas') to run point-by-point comparative paragraphs.
  2. 2high涉及分数: 15World History Topics selection

    Choosing two case study countries from the same geographical region in Paper 2 essays when the prompt explicitly mandates selecting different regions.

    如何避免: Carefully check the geographical regions of your planned case studies (Americas, Europe, Asia/Oceania, Africa/Middle East) and ensure they are distinct before selecting your prompt.
  3. 3high涉及分数: 8Essay structure and argument

    Writing purely narrative or chronological 'storytelling' accounts in Paper 2 essays instead of maintaining an analytical, conceptually-driven thematic argument.

    如何避免: Structure your body paragraphs around thematic arguments (social, political, economic, or ideological) rather than a chronological timeline of events, and explicitly link each paragraph back to the central prompt.
  4. 4medium涉及分数: 2Source Evaluation (OPCVL)

    Failing to address both value and limitations explicitly with reference to origin, purpose, and content in Paper 1 Question 2 (OPCVL), or applying formulaic generalizations.

    如何避免: Explicitly reference all three elements (origin, purpose, and content) to construct contextual values and limitations tied directly to the specified historical investigation.
  5. 5high涉及分数: 5Paper 1 synthesis essay

    Failing to integrate both source-based evidence and candidate's own historical knowledge in the final 9-mark Paper 1 synthesis question (Question 4).

    如何避免: Plan body paragraphs around thematic points, supporting each point explicitly with both a citation/quote from the provided sources and detailed, named external facts from memory.

将技巧化为佳绩

thinka 把你的弱项转化为针对性练习,即时批改并提供应试反馈。聪明地复习,事半功倍。

练习真实试题,AI 即时批改,马上指出错在哪。

免费开始练习