IB DP · 考试技巧

Philosophy 考试技巧

Master the art of 'doing philosophy' with official examiner strategies: learn how to anchor Paper 1 Section A directly to your stimulus, divide description from critical evaluation in Paper 2, avoid the fatal name-dropping trap, and build robust, charitable counter-arguments to secure the top-tier 21–25 markband.

阅读时间 4 分钟更新于: 2026年6月21日

试卷概览

卷数
3
总分
125
考试时间
4小时 45分钟
题型
4
试卷时间分数题数比重题型
Paper 1 (Core & Optional Themes)2小时 30分钟752Stimulus Inquiry, Thematic Essay
Paper 2 (Prescribed Texts)1小时252Prescribed Text Part A (Explanatory), Prescribed Text Part B (Evaluative)
Paper 31小时 15分钟25
评级
7654321
计算器规定

A calculator is not normally required for this subject.

  • AO1: Knowledge and understanding of philosophical concepts, texts, and issues
  • AO2: Analysis and evaluation of philosophical arguments and positions
  • AO3: Formulation and support of personal philosophical positions

根据历届试题与评分标准整理(2023–2025)。

常见错误

  1. 1high涉及分数: 10Being human (Core theme)

    Treating the Paper 1 Section A stimulus as a mere starting decoration and dropping it after the introduction.

    如何避免: Integrate explicit, sustained references to specific conceptual or visual details of the stimulus throughout the entire body of the essay to anchor your thesis.
  2. 2high涉及分数: 6John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Prescribed text)

    Writing a purely descriptive, biographical summary of a philosopher in Paper 2 Part B instead of critical evaluation.

    如何避免: Dedicate Part A strictly to explanation and quarantine all critical evaluation, debate of assumptions, and counterarguments inside Part B.
  3. 3medium涉及分数: 4Ethics (Optional themes)

    Using everyday, colloquial definitions of key terms (like 'autonomy' or 'authenticity') instead of philosophically robust parameters.

    如何避免: Establish precise conceptual boundaries and definitions of all major terms early in your introduction (e.g., distinguishing Mill's self-regarding actions from selfishness).
  4. 4high涉及分数: 5Being human (Core theme)

    Presenting weak, easily dismissed 'strawman' counter-arguments instead of representing opposing perspectives with full intellectual charity.

    如何避免: Construct robust alternative viewpoints and evaluate their genuine strengths and limitations before showing how your core thesis resolves the tension.
  5. 5low涉及分数: 15John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Prescribed text)

    Selecting mismatched sub-parts in Paper 2 (e.g., answering Q7a and Q9b) which results in a rubric violation.

    如何避免: Ensure you answer both parts (a) and (b) of the exact same numbered question for your chosen prescribed text.

将技巧化为佳绩

thinka 把你的弱项转化为针对性练习,即时批改并提供应试反馈。聪明地复习,事半功倍。

练习真实试题,AI 即时批改,马上指出错在哪。

免费开始练习