AP · thinka 原創模擬試題

2023 AP AP Environmental Science 模擬試題連答案詳解

Thinka May 2023 AP-Style Mock — AP Environmental Science

30 70 分鐘2023
An original Thinka practice paper modelled on the structure and difficulty of the May 2023 AP AP Environmental Science paper. Not affiliated with or reproduced from AP.

部分 II: Free-Response

Answer all 3 questions. Each question is worth 10 points. Recommended time is approximately 22-23 minutes per question. Show all work and steps for calculations.
3 題目 · 30
題目 1 · Design an Investigation
10
Researchers studied the effectiveness of different riparian buffer zone restoration methods along a river bordering agricultural fields in the Midwestern United States. Three distinct 100-meter riparian zones were established and monitored over a 15-year period:

- Zone 1 (Natural Regeneration): The streamside bank was left unmanaged, allowing native and non-native pioneer plants to colonize naturally without intervention.
- Zone 2 (Engineered Agroforestry): The streamside bank was graded, amended with compost, and actively planted with a multi-layered strip of deep-rooted native hardwood trees, shrubs, and perennial prairie grasses.
- Zone 3 (Control / No Buffer): Traditional agricultural farming was maintained with row crops planted directly up to the stream edge.

Researchers recorded the mean nitrate (\(\text{NO}_3^-\)) concentration in shallow groundwater entering the stream from each zone over time. The results are shown in the table below.

### Mean Nitrate Concentration in Shallow Groundwater (mg/L)
| Years After Establishment | Zone 1: Natural Regeneration (mg/L) | Zone 2: Engineered Agroforestry (mg/L) | Zone 3: No Buffer / Control (mg/L) |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| Year 1 | 28.5 | 27.8 | 29.1 |
| Year 5 | 21.0 | 12.4 | 28.9 |
| Year 10 | 14.2 | 6.1 | 29.5 |
| Year 15 | 8.5 | 3.2 | 30.0 |

(a) Based on the data in the table, identify the mean nitrate concentration in groundwater entering the stream in Zone 2 ten years after establishment.

(b) Based on the data in the table, describe the relationship between the age of the buffer zone and the mean nitrate concentration in groundwater for Zone 1.

(c) Researchers hypothesized that active planting of mixed woody and perennial vegetation (engineered agroforestry) reduces nitrate concentrations entering waterways more rapidly than passive natural regeneration. Using the data in the table, make a claim that supports or refutes this hypothesis.

(d) Describe one ecosystem service, other than water filtration/nutrient uptake, provided by riparian buffer zones.

(e) Explain how the rate of nitrate removal by plant uptake in the riparian buffers would be altered during winter in a temperate deciduous forest biome compared to the summer months.

---

To evaluate how soil compaction from farm equipment influences surface runoff and soil erosion, students set up a field simulation. They marked three identical \(2\text{ m} \times 2\text{ m}\) plots on a uniform 5% slope with the same loam soil type:

- Plot A (High Compaction): Driven over repeatedly with heavy tractor tires.
- Plot B (Moderate Compaction): Compacted only by human foot traffic.
- Plot C (Uncompacted): Tilled and loosened, with no machinery or foot traffic.

Each plot received 60 liters of water evenly sprinkled over a 30-minute period. Runoff water from the downslope edge of each plot was captured in collection buckets, and the total volume of runoff and total suspended solids (TSS) were measured.

(f) Identify the scientific question for the students' investigation.

(g) Identify the independent variable in the experiment.

(h) Explain how the results of the experiment would likely be altered if all three plots were planted with a dense cover crop of clover prior to testing.

---

Runoff from agricultural lands can severely impact nearby aquatic ecosystems.

(i) Describe one ecological impact on aquatic organisms that can result from increased turbidity caused by agricultural soil erosion.

(j) Describe one agricultural management practice, other than establishing riparian buffers, that farmers can use to reduce soil erosion and nutrient runoff into nearby waterways.
查看答案詳解

解題

Part (a)
From the table, at Year 10, Zone 2 (Engineered Agroforestry) has a mean nitrate concentration of \(6.1\text{ mg/L}\).

Part (b)
There is an inverse (negative) relationship between the age of the natural regeneration buffer zone and nitrate concentration: as time progresses from Year 1 to Year 15, the nitrate concentration steadily declines from \(28.5\text{ mg/L}\) down to \(8.5\text{ mg/L}\).

Part (c)
The claim supports the hypothesis. By Year 5, Zone 2 lowered nitrate levels to \(12.4\text{ mg/L}\) compared to \(21.0\text{ mg/L}\) in Zone 1. By Year 15, Zone 2 achieved a level of \(3.2\text{ mg/L}\), which is less than half of Zone 1's \(8.5\text{ mg/L}\), showing that active engineered agroforestry accelerates nutrient reduction compared to natural succession alone.

Part (d)
Riparian buffer zones provide numerous ecosystem services beyond water filtration:
- Supporting/Habitat: Provide wildlife habitat, nesting sites, and migratory corridors.
- Regulating: Tree roots stabilize stream banks, reducing channel erosion; canopy shade lowers water temperatures, maintaining higher dissolved oxygen levels.
- Cultural: Aesthetic value and recreational fishing/birdwatching.

Part (e)
In a temperate deciduous forest biome, deciduous plants shed their leaves and enter a state of dormancy during winter. In this dormant state, transpiration and active nutrient uptake by root systems cease or drop significantly compared to peak growing conditions in summer, thereby reducing the rate of nitrate removal from groundwater.

Part (f)
A correctly phrased scientific question relates the independent variable (degree of soil compaction) to the dependent variable (runoff volume or sediment/TSS collected). For example: "How does the level of soil compaction affect the amount of surface runoff produced during precipitation?"

Part (g)
The independent variable is the level of soil compaction (or the treatment method applied to the soil plots: high, moderate, or uncompacted).

Part (h)
Growing a dense cover crop would reduce both the total volume of runoff and the amount of suspended sediment (TSS) collected. Plant foliage intercepts falling raindrops to minimize soil detachment, and extensive root networks improve soil structure and macroporosity, facilitating greater infiltration of water into the soil column.

Part (i)
Elevated turbidity reduces sunlight penetration through the water column, which decreases photosynthetic rates of submerged aquatic plants and phytoplankton. Additionally, suspended sediment particles can clog the gills of fish and aquatic invertebrates, reducing respiration efficiency, or settle out and smother benthic fish spawning beds/gravel habitats.

Part (j)
Practices include:
- No-till or conservation tillage: Leaves crop residue on soil surface, protecting against wind/water erosion and preserving root channels for infiltration.
- Contour plowing: Plowing perpendicular to the slope to create ridges that slow runoff water and prevent channel formation.
- Terracing: Creating stepped flat platforms on steep slopes to reduce runoff velocity.
- Cover cropping: Planting crops like rye or clover during fallow periods to maintain soil cover and bind soil particles.

評分準則

Question 1: Design an Investigation (10 points total)

(a) 1 point
- Accept \(6.1\text{ mg/L}\) (or \(6.1\)).

(b) 1 point
Accept one of the following:
- As the age of the buffer increases, the mean nitrate concentration decreases.
- There is an inverse/negative relationship between buffer age and nitrate concentration.

(c) 1 point
- State that the hypothesis is supported AND cite relevant data comparing Zone 2 to Zone 1 over time (e.g., Zone 2 reached \(12.4\text{ mg/L}\) at Year 5 vs. \(21.0\text{ mg/L}\) in Zone 1 / Zone 2 reached \(3.2\text{ mg/L}\) at Year 15 compared to \(8.5\text{ mg/L}\) in Zone 1).

(d) 1 point
Accept one of the following:
- Provides wildlife habitat / nesting sites / migratory corridors.
- Stabilizes river banks / prevents bank erosion with root systems.
- Shading from tree canopy cools stream temperatures / increases dissolved oxygen capacity.
- Flood control / attenuates floodwaters.
- Recreational / aesthetic opportunities.

(e) 1 point
Accept one of the following:
- Nitrate uptake would decrease/be slower in winter because deciduous plants drop their leaves/enter dormancy, resulting in reduced metabolic activity/transpiration/nutrient absorption compared to summer.
- Nitrate uptake is lower in winter because freezing/colder temperatures slow down microbial denitrification and root metabolic rates.

(f) 1 point
Accept a testable scientific question connecting compaction to runoff/erosion, such as:
- Does soil compaction affect the volume/amount of surface runoff?
- How does the level of soil compaction affect sediment erosion/total suspended solids in runoff?

(g) 1 point
Accept one of the following:
- The level/degree of soil compaction.
- Plot treatment type (high compaction vs. moderate vs. uncompacted).

(h) 1 point
Accept an explanation connecting cover crops to reduced runoff/increased infiltration:
- Runoff volume (and/or sediment) would decrease because plant roots loosen soil/create channels that increase water infiltration.
- Plant roots hold soil in place and foliage slows runoff water, reducing erosion and runoff volume.

(i) 1 point
Accept one of the following:
- Reduces sunlight penetration, decreasing photosynthesis in submerged aquatic vegetation/algae.
- Suspended sediment clogs fish/invertebrate gills, impairing respiration.
- Settling sediment smothers fish eggs/benthic macroinvertebrate spawning habitats.
- Increases water temperature (darker particles absorb heat), decreasing dissolved oxygen.

(j) 1 point
Accept one of the following:
- No-till agriculture / conservation tillage.
- Contour plowing / planting along topographic contours.
- Terracing on slopes.
- Planting cover crops during the off-season.
- Crop rotation / strip cropping / intercropping.
- Precision fertilizer application / split fertilizer application.
題目 2 · free-response
10
The lionfish (Pterois volitans) is an invasive predatory marine fish native to the Indo-Pacific that was introduced into Atlantic and Caribbean coastal waters in the late twentieth century. Lionfish possess venomous dorsal spines, have virtually no natural predators in their introduced range, and mature rapidly, with a single female producing over two million eggs annually. Lionfish consume large quantities of juvenile native reef fish and crustaceans.

The following is an example of a simplified coral reef food chain in the Caribbean:

$$\text{Microalgae/Turf Algae} \longrightarrow \text{Herbivorous Fish (Parrotfish)} \longrightarrow \text{Native Carnivore (Nassau Grouper)} \longrightarrow \text{Apex Predator (Reef Shark)}$$

(a) Based on the information provided, identify one life-history characteristic of lionfish that makes them an effective invasive species.

(b) Describe how the feeding behavior of lionfish directly alters the population size of herbivorous reef fish, such as parrotfish.

(c) Stoplight parrotfish graze heavily on turf algae that compete with corals for light and substrate. Explain how an increase in lionfish numbers can indirectly lead to a reduction in coral reef health.

(d) Coral reefs provide crucial ecosystem services to coastal human communities. Describe one provisioning or cultural ecosystem service provided by coral reefs that is threatened by lionfish proliferation.

(e) Propose a realistic management strategy to reduce the population and spread of invasive lionfish in coastal reef systems.

(f) Justify the solution proposed in part (e) by providing an additional ecological or economic advantage.

(g) Based on the simplified food chain, identify the trophic level of the parrotfish.

(h) Describe the change in energy flow through the trophic levels of the reef ecosystem if lionfish outcompete and displace native primary and secondary consumers.

(i) Many Caribbean coastal waters have historically suffered from the overexploitation of large predatory fish by local fishing fleets in open-access waters. Describe how overfishing in these open-access marine areas exemplifies the tragedy of the commons.

(j) One strategy to help restore depleted marine fisheries is establishing Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) or no-take marine reserves. Describe one potential economic or social disadvantage of establishing an MPA for local coastal communities.
查看答案詳解

解題

(a) Identification: Acceptable responses include: high fecundity / high reproductive output (producing up to two million eggs annually); rapid growth/maturation rate; possession of venomous spines that deter native predators; broad generalist diet.

(b) Description: Lionfish prey heavily on juvenile herbivorous fish (e.g., parrotfish), which reduces the number of juveniles that survive to adulthood, ultimately causing a decline in the overall herbivorous fish population.

(c) Explanation: When lionfish consume herbivorous parrotfish, fewer grazers are present to consume turf algae. As a result, algal populations grow rapidly and overgrow/smother the coral polyps, outcompeting them for sunlight and settlement space, leading to coral degradation or death.

(d) Description: Acceptable ecosystem services include:
- Provisioning: Harvesting of native fish/crustaceans for food or commercial sale.
- Cultural: Ecotourism, recreational scuba diving, snorkeling, or aesthetic value that generates local revenue.

(e) Proposed Solution: Acceptable realistic strategies include:
- Organizing targeted spearfishing/culling tournaments (derbies) targeting lionfish.
- Developing and marketing lionfish as a food source in restaurants/seafood markets.
- Training and incentivizing commercial and recreational divers to harvest lionfish.
- Developing lionfish-specific traps that minimize native fish bycatch.

(f) Justification: Acceptable additional benefits (linked to part e) include:
- Provides an alternative source of income or food for local fishers and restaurants.
- Reduces predation pressure on other commercially or ecologically valuable native species.
- Promotes ecotourism and conservation awareness through community derbies.

(g) Identification: Primary consumer (or second trophic level / herbivore).

(h) Description: Because lionfish consume intermediate prey and divert energy away from the native food chain, less energy is transferred up to native higher-trophic-level predators (such as Nassau groupers and reef sharks), leading to smaller biomass/populations of apex predators.

(i) Description: Open-access marine areas represent a shared, unregulated common-pool resource where individual commercial fishers harvest as many fish as possible to maximize personal short-term profit. Without regulation, this cumulative harvest exceeds sustainable yield, ultimately depleting the common fish population to the detriment of all users.

(j) Description: Acceptable disadvantages include:
- Short-term loss of fishing grounds leading to decreased income or food security for local artisanal fishers.
- Costs associated with patrolling, monitoring, and enforcing no-take regulations.
- Potential overcrowding/overfishing in non-protected adjacent waters due to displacement of fishing effort.

評分準則

Question 2: Analyze an Environmental Problem and Propose a Solution (10 points total)

- Part (a): 1 point
- 1 point for correctly identifying a life-history trait of lionfish (e.g., high fecundity / produces millions of eggs per year, rapid maturation, lack of predators due to venomous defenses, generalist diet).

- Part (b): 1 point
- 1 point for describing that lionfish predation on juvenile parrotfish decreases recruitment, directly shrinking the parrotfish population.

- Part (c): 1 point
- 1 point for explaining that reduced herbivory allows algae to proliferate and overgrow/smother coral polyps, blocking sunlight needed for photosynthesis/calcification.

- Part (d): 1 point
- 1 point for describing a valid provisioning service (food/commercial fish harvest) OR cultural service (ecotourism/snorkeling/diving revenue) harmed by reef degradation.

- Part (e): 1 point
- 1 point for proposing a realistic management strategy to control lionfish (spearfishing derbies, commercial seafood harvesting/culinary promotion, lionfish-specific trapping).

- Part (f): 1 point
- 1 point for justifying the proposal with an additional ecological or economic advantage (economic revenue from seafood sales/derby tourism, recovery of native prey populations).

- Part (g): 1 point
- 1 point for identifying parrotfish as the primary consumer (or second trophic level / herbivore).

- Part (h): 1 point
- 1 point for describing that energy is diverted away from native apex predators / less energy reaches higher trophic levels.

- Part (i): 1 point
- 1 point for describing how unregulated access to a shared resource incentivizes individuals to maximize personal yield, resulting in the depletion/collapse of the common stock.

- Part (j): 1 point
- 1 point for describing a valid social/economic disadvantage (immediate loss of livelihood/catch for local fishers, displacement of fishing pressure to surrounding waters, high enforcement/patrol costs).
題目 3 · free-response
10
Coal-fired power plants have historically supplied a large share of the world's electricity. However, the extraction, combustion, and waste disposal associated with coal energy production cause significant environmental concerns. Many communities are considering transitioning part of their electrical generation to renewable alternatives, such as utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) solar installations.

(a) Describe one negative ecological impact on aquatic ecosystems associated with the disposal of coal combustion residuals (coal ash) in unlined storage ponds.

(b) Identify an atmospheric pollutant, other than carbon dioxide, released during the combustion of coal.

(c) Propose a realistic solution at the facility level to reduce sulfur dioxide (\(\text{SO}_2\)) emissions from an existing coal-fired power plant.

(d) Justify the solution proposed in part (c) by describing an additional benefit of this solution, other than the reduction of sulfur dioxide.

An existing coal-fired power plant generates \(4.2 \times 10^9\text{ kWh}\) of electricity per year. Burning coal in this facility releases \(0.95\text{ kg}\) of \(\text{CO}_2\) into the atmosphere for every \(\text{kWh}\) of electricity produced.

(e) Calculate the mass of \(\text{CO}_2\), in kilograms, released annually by this coal-fired power plant. Show your work.

(f) The regional utility company plans to construct a utility-scale solar PV facility to replace a portion of the coal plant's generation. Each photovoltaic panel produces an average of \(400\text{ kWh}\) of electricity per year. Calculate the number of solar panels needed to generate \(1.2 \times 10^8\text{ kWh}\) of electricity in one year. Show your work.

(g) Each solar panel requires \(2.5\text{ m}^2\) of land area for installation. One hectare (\(\text{ha}\)) is equal to \(10,000\text{ m}^2\). Calculate the total land area, in hectares, required to install the \(300,000\) solar panels calculated in part (f). Show your work.
查看答案詳解

解題

(a) Coal ash contains heavy metals such as arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury. When stored in unlined ponds, these toxic substances can leach into nearby waterways or groundwater, leading to bioaccumulation and biomagnification in aquatic food webs or causing direct mortality and reproductive failure in fish and amphibian species.

(b) Atmospheric pollutants from coal combustion include sulfur dioxide (\(\text{SO}_2\)), nitrogen oxides (\(\text{NO}_x\)), particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (\(\text{CO}\)), and toxic heavy metals like mercury (\(\text{Hg}\)).

(c) A viable facility-level solution is the installation of flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) scrubbers (wet or dry limestone scrubbers) on exhaust stacks to capture sulfur dioxide before it is released into the atmosphere.

(d) Installing scrubbers also helps capture fly ash and fine particulate matter, mitigating respiratory illnesses in nearby communities; furthermore, wet limestone scrubbers generate synthetic gypsum, which can be recycled and sold for wallboard (drywall) manufacturing, reducing landfill waste.

(e)
$$\text{Annual } \text{CO}_2 = 4.2 \times 10^9\text{ kWh/year} \times 0.95\text{ kg CO}_2/\text{kWh} = 3.99 \times 10^9\text{ kg CO}_2$$

(f)
$$\text{Number of panels} = \frac{1.2 \times 10^8\text{ kWh}}{400\text{ kWh/panel}} = 300,000\text{ panels (or } 3.0 \times 10^5\text{ panels)}$$

(g)
$$\text{Total Area (m}^2\text{)} = 300,000\text{ panels} \times 2.5\text{ m}^2/\text{panel} = 750,000\text{ m}^2$$
$$\text{Total Area (ha)} = \frac{750,000\text{ m}^2}{10,000\text{ m}^2/\text{ha}} = 75\text{ hectares}$$

評分準則

Part (a): 1 point
Accept one of the following:
- Leaching of toxic heavy metals (such as arsenic, mercury, selenium, or lead) into groundwater/surface water, leading to bioaccumulation/biomagnification in aquatic wildlife.
- Increased turbidity or sedimentation in adjacent water bodies if holding ponds breach, reducing photosynthesis in aquatic plants.
- Lowering/altering pH or chemical contamination that exceeds the physiological tolerance of fish/invertebrates.

Part (b): 1 point
Accept one of the following:
- Sulfur dioxide (SO2)
- Nitrogen oxides (NOx / NO / NO2)
- Particulate matter (PM / PM2.5 / PM10 / fly ash)
- Mercury (Hg)
- Carbon monoxide (CO)

Part (c): 1 point
Accept one of the following:
- Install wet or dry scrubbers / flue-gas desulfurization (FGD) systems in smokestacks.
- Switch from high-sulfur bituminous/lignite coal to low-sulfur anthracite coal.
- Implement coal washing / pre-combustion cleaning to remove sulfur prior to burning.

Part (d): 1 point
Accept one of the following linked to the chosen solution:
- Scrubbers: simultaneously remove particulate matter/fly ash from flue gases, improving ambient air quality; or produce synthetic gypsum that can be sold for commercial drywall manufacturing.
- Low-sulfur coal: higher energy density per unit mass, requiring less total coal extraction.
- Reduces acid deposition (acid rain), protecting downstream forest and aquatic ecosystems.

Part (e): 2 points total
- 1 point for correct setup:
• \(4.2 \times 10^9\text{ kWh} \times 0.95\text{ kg/kWh}\) OR \(4,200,000,000 \times 0.95\)
- 1 point for correct calculation:
• \(3.99 \times 10^9\text{ kg}\) OR \(3,990,000,000\text{ kg}\) (must include correct value/units)

Part (f): 2 points total
- 1 point for correct setup:
• \(\frac{1.2 \times 10^8\text{ kWh}}{400\text{ kWh/panel}}\) OR \(\frac{120,000,000}{400}\)
- 1 point for correct calculation:
• \(300,000\text{ panels}\) OR \(3.0 \times 10^5\text{ panels}\)

Part (g): 2 points total
- 1 point for correct setup:
• \(300,000\text{ panels} \times 2.5\text{ m}^2/\text{panel} \times \frac{1\text{ ha}}{10,000\text{ m}^2}\) OR \(\frac{300,000 \times 2.5}{10,000}\) OR \(\frac{750,000}{10,000}\)
- 1 point for correct calculation:
• \(75\text{ ha}\) OR \(75\text{ hectares}\)

準備好測試自己了嗎?

將這些筆記轉化為考試練習。獲取此課題的無限量AI題目,即時批改及詳細解析。

練習此課題

想知道自己有幾分把握?

thinka 是 DSE 學生用的 AI 練習應用程式,有無限量練習題、即時自動批改和詳細解題步驟。逾 100,000 名學生用它確認自己真的識,而不只是「以為識」。

想練更多類似題型?在 thinka 無限量操練,即時知道答案。

免費開始練習