AQA IAS-Level · Thinka 原創模擬試題

2023 AQA IAS-Level English Language (9670) 模擬試題連答案詳解

Thinka Jan 2023 Cambridge International A Level-Style Mock — English Language (9670)

100 240 分鐘2023
An original Thinka practice paper modelled on the structure and difficulty of the Jan 2023 Cambridge International A Level English Language (9670) paper. Not affiliated with or reproduced from Cambridge.

部分 Unit 1: Language and context

Answer Question 1 from Section A and either Question 2 or Question 3 from Section B. Total marks: 50. Duration: 2 hours.
4 題目 · 100
題目 1 · essay
25
### Text A

**Into the Abyss: The Ultimate Frontier**
*(From a luxury adventure travel company's promotional brochure for deep-sea submersible expeditions)*

Descend into a world very few have ever witnessed. At Triton Expeditions, we offer the ultimate journey to the ocean floor—a realm of absolute stillness and profound mystery. Board our state-of-the-art titanium submersible, the *Aegis*, and watch the sapphire waters of the surface dissolve into the rich indigo of the Twilight Zone. As you slide past 1,000 meters into the midnight zone, the external pressure reaches a crushing eight tons per square inch, yet inside our pressurized sphere, you will lounge in absolute climate-controlled comfort. Peer through our ultra-clear acrylic viewports to witness bioluminescent organisms flickering like galaxies in the cosmic dark. This is not just travel; it is a transformative pilgrimage to the heart of our planet.

***

### Text B

**Under the Weight of Water**
*(From *The Silent Deep*, a memoir by marine biologist Dr. Alistair Vance, describing a scientific descent in the research submersible *Alvin*)*

The transition from the sunlit surface to the bathypelagic zone is an exercise in sensory deprivation and rising tension. As the winch released us, the capsule bobbed like a cork before plunging into the swell. The cabin, a cramped six-foot sphere of cold steel, immediately hummed with the mechanical vitals of our life-support system—a steady, rhythmic hiss of oxygen and the low whine of scrubbers. At 500 meters, the last vestige of solar red vanished, leaving only a deep, cold blue that rapidly decayed into pitch-black. We sat knees-to-knees, surrounded by a maze of dials, copper pipes, and glowing cathode-ray screens. Every creak of the hull under the tightening grip of the ocean pressure sounded like a pistol shot, a stark reminder that only a few inches of alloy separated us from instant, obliterating physical ruin. Yet, as the pilot switched on the external searchlights, the abyss bloomed with life: fragile, gossamer siphonophores drifted past, their delicate architectures defying the unimaginable weight above.

***

**Question**

Analyze and compare how the writers of Text A and Text B use language to present their experiences of deep-sea descent and exploration.

In your answer, you should:
* analyze the language choices and techniques used in both texts
* compare how the texts represent the deep-sea environment and the experience of descending into it
* consider the influence of the context, audience, and purpose on the language of both texts.
查看答案詳解

解題

### Overview of Comparison

Both texts explore the transition from the surface of the ocean to the deep sea, but they represent this journey in vastly different ways due to their contrasting genres, purposes, and target audiences.

* **Text A** is a luxury promotional brochure aiming to persuade wealthy consumers to purchase an expensive adventure. It represents the descent as a serene, magical, and elite 'pilgrimage' of 'absolute comfort,' downplaying physical danger in favor of awe and wonder.
* **Text B** is an autobiographical memoir aiming to share an authentic, high-stakes scientific endeavor with a general readership. It represents the descent as a tense, claustrophobic, and physically taxing 'exercise in sensory deprivation' and high risk, emphasizing the mechanical realities and the genuine danger of the abyss.

### Detailed Analysis

#### Lexis and Imagery
* **Text A** uses highly romanticized, grand adjectives ('ultimate', 'absolute', 'profound', 'transformative') to construct an elite experience. Colour imagery undergoes a smooth, aesthetic transition from 'sapphire' to 'rich indigo' to 'cosmic dark,' suggesting a beautiful spectacle. The deep sea is framed using cosmic and spiritual metaphors: bioluminescent organisms flicker like 'galaxies' and the trip is a 'pilgrimage.' This elevates the destination to a sacred, pristine state.
* **Text B** utilizes starker, more realistic, and sensory-depriving lexis. The transition of light is described as a 'decay' into 'pitch-black,' a word with more negative, ominous connotations than Text A's 'cosmic dark.' The environment is described through physical discomfort ('cramped,' 'cold steel,' 'knees-to-knees') and auditory imagery ('steady, rhythmic hiss,' 'low whine,' 'creak of the hull... sounded like a pistol shot'). This emphasizes the vulnerability of humans in this extreme environment.

#### Grammar and Syntax
* **Text A** relies heavily on direct address ('you', 'your') and active imperatives ('Descend', 'Board', 'Peer') to position the reader as an active participant in this luxury experience. The syntax is smooth and balanced, with coordinated clauses ('watch the sapphire waters... and watch...', 'yet inside... you will lounge') that reflect the effortless ease and 'absolute comfort' promised to the client.
* **Text B** utilizes first-person plural pronouns ('us', 'we') to recount a shared, collective professional experience. The syntax is more complex and fragmented, mimicking the psychological and physical tension. For instance, the main clause is often delayed or interrupted by prepositional and adverbial phrases ('As the winch released us, the capsule bobbed...', 'Every creak of the hull under the tightening grip of the ocean pressure sounded like...'), mirroring the slow, deliberate, and high-stakes nature of the descent.

#### Representation of Technology and Danger
* In **Text A**, technology is an invisible, protective luxury. The 'state-of-the-art titanium submersible' and 'pressurized sphere' completely insulate the traveler, allowing them to 'lounge' in 'climate-controlled comfort.' The immense physical danger of the ocean ('crushing eight tons per square inch') is mentioned only to highlight the triumph of the technology, serving as a thrill factor rather than a genuine threat.
* In **Text B**, technology is hyper-visible, fragile, and mechanical. The vessel is a 'cramped six-foot sphere' filled with a 'maze of dials, copper pipes.' Rather than luxury, it provides 'life-support.' The extreme ocean pressure is actively hostile ('tightening grip of the ocean pressure') and the threat of 'instant, obliterating physical ruin' is highly immediate, showing a deep respect for the destructive power of nature.

評分準則

### Marking Scheme

This question is assessed against **AO1** (10 marks) and **AO2** (15 marks).

#### AO1: Apply appropriate methods of language analysis, using associated terminology and coherent written expression.
* **Level 5 (9-10 marks):** Excellent, systematic application of linguistic methods (e.g., word classes, syntax, cohesion, pragmatics). Highly precise use of terminology. Writing is fluent, structured, and academically sophisticated.
* **Level 4 (7-8 marks):** Clear and consistent application of linguistic methods. Good range of accurate terminology. Structured and coherent expression.
* **Level 3 (5-6 marks):** Some systematic language analysis with relevant terminology used. Generally clear expression, though some areas may lack analytical focus.
* **Level 2 (3-4 marks):** Descriptive rather than analytical approach. Limited or inconsistent terminology. Structure may be disjointed.
* **Level 1 (1-2 marks):** Very basic or generalized comments on language with little to no terminology. Difficult to follow.

#### AO2: Demonstrate critical understanding of concepts and issues relevant to language use.
* **Level 5 (13-15 marks):** Perceptive, deeply conceptualized comparison of how contextual factors (audience, purpose, genre) shape the language of both texts. Sophisticated understanding of representation and register.
* **Level 4 (10-12 marks):** Clear, purposeful comparison of the texts, highlighting how audience, purpose, and genre influence language choices. Sound understanding of representation.
* **Level 3 (7-9 marks):** Explains some connections between context and language. Comparison is developed but may focus more on one text than the other or rely on superficial points.
* **Level 2 (4-6 marks):** Basic awareness of context (e.g., stating who the texts are for). Comparison is descriptive, pointing out simple differences/similarities in content rather than linguistic style.
* **Level 1 (1-3 marks):** Minimal focus on context or comparison. General summary of the texts' contents with little grasp of how language creates meaning.
題目 2 · essay
25
Placeholder
查看答案詳解

解題

Placeholder

評分準則

Placeholder
題目 3 · Directed Writing
25
A local heritage site or community space in your area is facing redevelopment to build a modern commercial complex. Write the text of a speech you will deliver at a local council meeting, arguing either for the preservation of the heritage site or in favor of the new development. In your speech, you should: (1) consider the cultural, historical, or economic impact of the decision; (2) employ persuasive language techniques to engage the local council and community members; (3) structure your argument logically to reach a clear conclusion. You should write about 350-450 words.
查看答案詳解

解題

Model Response: [Speech Title: Preservation of the Old Foundry] Respected members of the local council, esteemed neighbors, and fellow residents of our town. I stand before you today not merely to oppose a development project, but to protect the very soul of our community: the Old Foundry. For over a century, this iconic red-brick landmark has stood as a proud testament to our town’s rich industrial heritage. Demolishing it to make way for yet another generic, steel-and-glass commercial complex would be an act of cultural vandalism. Proponents of the new retail hub claim it will bring economic prosperity. However, we must ask ourselves: at what cost? True prosperity is not measured solely in retail transactions and parking spaces, but in the preservation of our collective memory and identity. The Old Foundry is not just an empty building; it is a monument to the generations of local families who worked its furnaces and built the foundations of our modern town. Instead of demolition, we should look to successful restoration projects elsewhere, transforming the Foundry into a vibrant cultural center, artisanal marketplace, and green public space. This approach would preserve our history while simultaneously stimulating the local economy by attracting tourism and supporting independent businesses. We have a rare opportunity to bridge our past and our future. Let us not choose the short-sighted path of destruction. I urge the council to reject the demolition proposal and work with us to revitalize the Old Foundry as a proud beacon of our community’s resilience and creativity. Thank you.

評分準則

Marking Scheme: This task is worth 25 marks and assesses AO3 (Demonstrate expertise and creativity in the use of English to communicate in a relatively wide range of forms and contexts). Marks are awarded across five levels of achievement: Level 5 (21-25 marks): Demonstrates sophisticated control of form, register, and tone. Rhetorical devices (such as triadic structures, emotive language, and rhetorical questions) are integrated seamlessly. Structure is highly cohesive and arguments are highly persuasive. Vocabulary is rich and precise. Level 4 (16-20 marks): Clear and purposeful control. Adapts tone and style effectively to a council speech. Structure is logical and arguments are well-developed. Expression is varied and clear. Level 3 (11-15 marks): Competent response with a clear sense of purpose. Some appropriate use of persuasive devices. Arguments are coherent, though some may lack development. Register is generally consistent. Level 2 (6-10 marks): Simple arguments with limited persuasive power. Basic awareness of form and audience. Tone may fluctuate or be overly informal. Frequent expression and grammatical errors. Level 1 (1-5 marks): Minimal response. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the speech form, audience, or purpose. Highly fragmented structure.
題目 4 · Directed Writing
25
A local heritage site or community space in your area is facing redevelopment to build a modern commercial complex. Write the text of a speech you will deliver at a local council meeting, arguing either for the preservation of the heritage site or in favor of the new development. In your speech, you should: (1) consider the cultural, historical, or economic impact of the decision; (2) employ persuasive language techniques to engage the local council and community members; (3) structure your argument logically to reach a clear conclusion. You should write about 350-450 words.
查看答案詳解

解題

Model Response: [Speech Title: Preservation of the Old Foundry] Respected members of the local council, esteemed neighbors, and fellow residents of our town. I stand before you today not merely to oppose a development project, but to protect the very soul of our community: the Old Foundry. For over a century, this iconic red-brick landmark has stood as a proud testament to our town’s rich industrial heritage. Demolishing it to make way for yet another generic, steel-and-glass commercial complex would be an act of cultural vandalism. Proponents of the new retail hub claim it will bring economic prosperity. However, we must ask ourselves: at what cost? True prosperity is not measured solely in retail transactions and parking spaces, but in the preservation of our collective memory and identity. The Old Foundry is not just an empty building; it is a monument to the generations of local families who worked its furnaces and built the foundations of our modern town. Instead of demolition, we should look to successful restoration projects elsewhere, transforming the Foundry into a vibrant cultural center, artisanal marketplace, and green public space. This approach would preserve our history while simultaneously stimulating the local economy by attracting tourism and supporting independent businesses. We have a rare opportunity to bridge our past and our future. Let us not choose the short-sighted path of destruction. I urge the council to reject the demolition proposal and work with us to revitalize the Old Foundry as a proud beacon of our community’s resilience and creativity. Thank you.

評分準則

Marking Scheme: This task is worth 25 marks and assesses AO3. Level 5 (21-25 marks): Demonstrates sophisticated control of form, register, and tone. Rhetorical devices (such as triadic structures, emotive language, and rhetorical questions) are integrated seamlessly. Structure is highly cohesive and arguments are highly persuasive. Vocabulary is rich and precise. Level 4 (16-20 marks): Clear and purposeful control. Adapts tone and style effectively to a council speech. Structure is logical and arguments are well-developed. Expression is varied and clear. Level 3 (11-15 marks): Competent response with a clear sense of purpose. Some appropriate use of persuasive devices. Arguments are coherent, though some may lack development. Register is generally consistent. Level 2 (6-10 marks): Simple arguments with limited persuasive power. Basic awareness of form and audience. Tone may fluctuate or be overly informal. Frequent expression and grammatical errors. Level 1 (1-5 marks): Minimal response. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the speech form, audience, or purpose. Highly fragmented structure.

部分 Unit 2: Language and society

Answer Question 1 from Section A and Question 2 from Section B. Total marks: 50. Duration: 2 hours.
2 題目 · 50
題目 1 · textual_analysis
25
Analyze how the writer of the text below uses language to construct their social identity and present the lifestyle of the eco-living community. Text A: 'So, you want to escape the concrete grind and join the soil-dwellers? Let's be real: transition-life isn't all sun-dappled permaculture and strumming acoustic guitars by the compost heap. It is hard, muddy graft. When we first broke ground here at GreenSpire, we were absolute greenhorns—pardon the pun. We made every rookie error in the permie handbook. But that is the beauty of the intentional community: you do not fail alone. You co-learn, you co-build, and you compost your mistakes. Now, our micro-grid is humming, the forest garden is yielding, and we are practically off-grid-certified. If you are ready to ditch the consumerist hamster wheel and get your fingernails permanently dirty, the gate is open. Just remember to leave your ego—and your single-use plastics—at the threshold.'
查看答案詳解

解題

In analyzing Text A, students should explore how language is used to construct a collective social identity (the in-group) and contrast it with mainstream society (the out-group). Key areas of analysis include: 1. Lexis and Semantics: The use of colloquial compound nouns ('concrete grind', 'soil-dwellers') creates a clear dichotomy between urban life and rural eco-living. Jargon and neologisms associated with the subculture ('permaculture', 'permie', 'intentional community', 'micro-grid') establish the writer's authenticity and status within the group. Metaphors like the 'consumerist hamster wheel' position mainstream life as repetitive and futile, while 'compost your mistakes' repurposes ecological terminology to express a philosophical outlook of resilience. 2. Grammar and Syntax: The use of the first-person plural pronouns ('we', 'our') constructs a strong, unified collective identity, emphasizing collaboration. The shift to second-person pronouns ('you', 'your') directly addresses potential recruits, creating an inclusive tone but maintaining a gatekeeper position. Syntactic parallelism ('You co-learn, you co-build, and you compost...') emphasizes collective effort and shared experiences. 3. Pragmatics and Discourse: The writer uses conversational hedges, self-deprecation ('absolute greenhorns'), and wordplay ('pardon the pun') to project an approachable, honest persona. This avoids sounding overly preachy while establishing authority through lived experience.

評分準則

AO1 (10 marks): Assess the candidate's ability to apply systematic linguistic frameworks and terminology. Level 5 (9-10 marks): Assured and systematic application of linguistic terminology (e.g., dynamic verbs, jargon, parallel syntax, collective pronouns). Clear, coherent, and highly accurate analysis of Text A. Level 4 (7-8 marks): Clear and consistent application of linguistic terminology. Structured analysis showing a good understanding of linguistic patterns. Level 3 (5-6 marks): Some application of terminology, with occasional inaccuracies. Standard essay structure with descriptive focus. Level 1-2 (1-4 marks): Limited or generalized comments without systematic terminology. AO2 (15 marks): Demonstrate critical understanding of concepts and issues related to language and social groups. Level 5 (13-15 marks): Perceptive and insightful analysis of how language constructs social identity, values of the eco-community, and the in-group/out-group boundaries. Evaluates concepts of group identity, community practices, and linguistic gatekeeping. Level 4 (10-12 marks): Secure analysis of how language is used to represent the social group and its values. Good understanding of social identity theory or related concepts. Level 3 (7-9 marks): Explicit explanation of how the text shows the community's lifestyle, with some link to social group concepts. Level 1-2 (1-6 marks): Simple descriptive comments about the lifestyle or the writer, with little or no conceptual connection to social identity.
題目 2 · Sociolinguistic Essay
25
Discuss the view that slang and informal language are used primarily to establish solidarity within a social group, rather than to exclude those outside of it.
查看答案詳解

解題

An effective essay should explore the tension between the dual functions of slang: fostering solidarity within a group (in-group loyalty) and establishing boundaries that keep others out (out-group exclusion). Arguments for Solidarity: 1. In-group Identity: Slang serves as an emblem of shared values and experiences. Refer to Penelope Eckert's study of Detroit high schoolers (Jocks and Burnouts) where linguistic features (like vowel shifts or slang) signal group alignment and shared social practices. 2. Covert Prestige: William Labov's concept of covert prestige explains how non-standard forms are valued within peer groups to show loyalty, rather than to intentionally mock or exclude authority. 3. Communities of Practice (Lave and Wenger): Language is developed through mutual engagement in shared activities; slang naturally evolves as a shorthand of shared meaning. 4. Giles's Accommodation Theory: Convergence is used to reduce social distance and foster closeness within the peer group. Arguments for Exclusion: 1. Boundary Marking: Slang can act as a gatekeeping mechanism. Those who do not understand or use the slang correctly are identified as outsiders (out-group). 2. Divergence: According to Giles, speakers may use distinct slang to emphasize social distance from dominant groups (e.g., youth diverging from adults, or marginalized groups from mainstream society). 3. Antilanguages (Halliday): Slang and sociolects can function as antilanguages used by subcultures to resist or exclude the dominant culture. Linguistic Analysis: Students should refer to specific lexical processes (e.g., neologisms, semantic shifts, compounding, clipping) and grammatical structures that characterize slang.

評分準則

AO1 (10 marks): Apply appropriate methods of language analysis, using associated terminology and coherent written expression. Level 5 (9-10 marks): Sophisticated, application of linguistic methods and terminology is consistently accurate and highly effective; coherent, well-structured argument. Level 4 (7-8 marks): Clear and systematic application of linguistic methods and terminology; structured and logical argument. Level 3 (5-6 marks): Competent application of terminology; essay has a clear direction but may lack consistent depth. Level 2 (3-4 marks): Limited or inconsistent use of linguistic terminology; descriptive rather than analytical. Level 1 (1-2 marks): Minimal terminology; unstructured response. AO3 (15 marks): Demonstrate analysis and evaluation of the influence of contextual factors (or sociolinguistic concepts/theories) on language use and variation. Level 5 (13-15 marks): Insightful and detailed evaluation of the influence of contextual factors, social groups, and sociolinguistic theories on language variation. Highly perceptive synthesis. Level 4 (10-12 marks): Effective evaluation of how social factors and theories explain language use; good range of sociolinguistic concepts integrated. Level 3 (7-9 marks): Sound understanding of social context and some relevant concepts/theories, though analysis may be more generalized. Level 2 (4-6 marks): Basic awareness of social context, tending toward anecdotal examples rather than sociolinguistic theory. Level 1 (1-3 marks): Very limited awareness of context; descriptive or irrelevant.

想知道自己有幾分把握?

Thinka 是 DSE 學生用的 AI 練習應用程式,有無限量練習題、即時自動批改和詳細解題步驟。逾 100,000 名學生用它確認自己真的識,而不只是「以為識」。

想練更多類似題型?在 Thinka 無限量操練,即時知道答案。

免費開始練習