解題
A high-scoring answer discusses both sources/functions and evaluates several alternative fluids with balanced detail.
Sources: fluid in the diet comes not only from directly drinking water, but also from other beverages (such as milk, tea, coffee, fruit juice and soft drinks) and from the water content of foods themselves, particularly fruit, vegetables and soups, which can contribute a meaningful proportion of total daily fluid intake.
Functions: water performs several essential functions, including regulating body temperature (through sweating), acting as the main component of blood plasma to transport nutrients, oxygen and waste products around the body, lubricating joints and tissues, and providing the medium for the body's many chemical reactions.
Evaluating other fluids: milk provides fluid alongside valuable nutrients such as protein, calcium and B vitamins, making it a nutritionally valuable fluid choice, particularly for children and older adults. Fruit juice provides fluid alongside vitamin C and some other micronutrients from the fruit; however, because juicing breaks down the fruit's cell structure, the sugars in fruit juice are classed as non-milk extrinsic sugars (NMES), meaning fruit juice can also contribute significantly to sugar intake if consumed in excess, and is generally recommended to be limited to a small portion per day. Tea and coffee provide fluid and contain antioxidant compounds, but also contain caffeine, which has a mild diuretic effect (increasing urine output), meaning it may be slightly less effective at contributing to hydration than an equivalent volume of plain water, particularly if consumed in large amounts. Soft/carbonated drinks, particularly those with added sugar, provide fluid but comparatively little nutritional benefit, and can contribute excess NMES and empty calories to the diet.
A thorough response concludes that, while a wide variety of fluids can contribute usefully to hydration and can each offer specific nutritional advantages, water itself remains the most straightforward, calorie-free way to meet fluid needs, and the nutritional value of alternative fluids should be weighed against any drawbacks such as added sugar or caffeine content.
評分準則
Levels of Response (12 marks total, AS1 Section B 4-band grid).
Basic [0]-[3]: Limited response; may mention only water itself or one alternative fluid with little development; weak specialist vocabulary.
Adequate [4]-[6]: Some sources and functions of water described; at least one alternative fluid evaluated with basic detail; underdeveloped overall.
Competent [7]-[9]: Clear description of sources and functions of water; sound evaluation of two or more alternative fluids (e.g. milk, fruit juice, tea/coffee), with both benefits and drawbacks considered; good specialist vocabulary.
Highly competent [10]-[12]: Comprehensive, well-developed discussion of sources and functions of water; thorough, balanced evaluation of multiple alternative fluids with accurate, specific nutritional detail (e.g. NMES in fruit juice, diuretic effect of caffeine); excellent specialist vocabulary; clear, coherent, well-organised response throughout.