題目 1 · Visual stimulus & technical analysis (Structural frame, occupancy, joints, stability, 10-mark QWC evaluation)
26 分Fig. 1 (described below, in place of a photograph) shows a large single-storey warehouse building with a wide, clear-span roof supported on a series of large steel arch-shaped frames, each frame spanning the full width of the building without any internal support columns. The frames are spaced at regular intervals along the length of the building and are braced together by horizontal steel purlins and diagonal steel bracing members.
(a) Name the structural form shown in Fig. 1. (2)
(b) State one other building type, other than a warehouse, that commonly uses this structural form. (2)
(c) Explain two methods used to join the steel members of this structural form together. (4)
(d) Explain two ways that structural stability is provided for this type of structure. (4)
(e) Compare this structural form with a cellular structural form, stating one similarity and one difference. (4)
(f) Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using this structural form (portal frame) rather than a rectangular framed structural form, for a building such as this warehouse. Quality of written communication will be assessed in your answer. (10)
(a) Name the structural form shown in Fig. 1. (2)
(b) State one other building type, other than a warehouse, that commonly uses this structural form. (2)
(c) Explain two methods used to join the steel members of this structural form together. (4)
(d) Explain two ways that structural stability is provided for this type of structure. (4)
(e) Compare this structural form with a cellular structural form, stating one similarity and one difference. (4)
(f) Evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of using this structural form (portal frame) rather than a rectangular framed structural form, for a building such as this warehouse. Quality of written communication will be assessed in your answer. (10)
查看答案詳解收起答案詳解
解題
(a) The description — large steel arch-shaped frames spanning the full width without internal columns, spaced at intervals and braced by purlins and diagonal bracing — is characteristic of a portal frame, one of the structural forms in the specification (alongside cellular, rectangular framed concrete/steel, and modern timber framed). (b) Portal frames are widely used for other large, single-storey buildings requiring wide, unobstructed floor space, such as sports halls/leisure centres, aircraft hangars, supermarkets or large retail sheds, and agricultural buildings such as barns. (c) The steel members of a portal frame are commonly joined using bolted connections, where steel end plates welded to the ends of members are bolted together through pre-drilled holes at the main joints (such as the eaves, where the column meets the rafter, and the apex/ridge, where the two rafters meet), allowing strong, rigid connections that can be assembled on site; alternatively, members can be joined using welded connections, where sections are welded together, typically during fabrication in a factory/workshop before the frame is transported to site for erection. (d) Structural stability in a portal frame is provided partly by the frame's own rigid (moment-resisting) joints between the columns and rafters, which allow the frame to resist lateral (sideways) loads, such as wind, without needing separate internal bracing within each frame; stability along the length of the building (in the longitudinal direction) is provided by diagonal bracing members fitted between adjacent frames, working together with the roof purlins and wall cladding rails, which transfer wind and other lateral loads safely down to the ground via the bracing and foundations. (e) Both a cellular structure and a portal framed structure rely on a structural frame (a skeleton of load-bearing members, such as columns and beams) to carry the building's loads down to its foundations, rather than relying on the walls themselves to bear the load; both therefore need adequately designed foundations to transfer these loads safely into the ground. The key difference is in how internal space is organised: a cellular structure is built up from a grid of more closely and regularly spaced supporting walls or columns, naturally dividing the building into smaller cells/rooms, which suits buildings that need many separate internal spaces (such as offices, schools or hospitals); a portal frame, by contrast, achieves a single wide clear span with no internal columns at all, which suits buildings that need one large, open, unobstructed floor area (such as a warehouse or sports hall). (f) A strong evaluative answer explains that using a portal frame for this warehouse offers real advantages: it provides a wide clear span with no internal columns, maximising the flexibility and usability of the internal floor space for storage, manufacturing or similar large-scale activities where columns would be a major obstruction; portal frames are also typically fabricated off-site and can be erected relatively quickly and efficiently on site compared with some other structural forms, which can reduce construction time and cost for large single-storey buildings. However, a balanced answer should also note the disadvantages: portal frames are generally not well suited to multi-storey buildings, being most efficient for single-storey, wide-span applications; the large clear spans can require deep or heavy frame members, and reduced headroom can occur near the eaves compared with alternative designs; and portal frames may require more specialist structural design and fabrication expertise, with the frame being comparatively less straightforward to later alter or subdivide with internal walls than some other forms. By comparison, a rectangular framed structure (concrete or steel) is generally better suited to multi-storey construction using a repeated regular grid of columns and beams, but this comes at the cost of needing internal columns at regular intervals, which would obstruct the wide-open floor space this particular warehouse needs. On balance, for a single-storey building explicitly requiring a large clear span, such as this warehouse, the portal frame's advantages are likely to outweigh its drawbacks, whereas a rectangular frame would be the more appropriate choice if the building instead needed multiple storeys or smaller, more divided spaces. Final answer: (a) portal frame; (b) e.g. sports hall, aircraft hangar, retail shed, agricultural building; (c) bolted and/or welded connections; (d) rigid frame joints plus diagonal bracing (with purlins/cladding rails) for longitudinal stability; (e) both use a structural frame and need foundations, but cellular uses closely spaced supports for many small spaces while portal frame gives one wide clear span; (f) portal frame suits this warehouse well (wide clear span, efficient erection) but is less suited to multi-storey use and requires specialist design, compared with a rectangular frame's better multi-storey suitability but reduced clear span.
評分準則
(a) 2 marks for correctly naming 'portal frame'. (b) 2 marks for any one valid other building type using this structural form. (c) 2 marks per correctly explained joining method (bolted; welded), up to 2 methods. Max 4. (d) 2 marks per correctly explained stability method (rigid frame joints; diagonal/wind bracing with purlins/cladding rails), up to 2 methods. Max 4. (e) 2 marks for a valid, correct similarity; 2 marks for a valid, correct difference. Max 4. (f) Levels of response, assessing quality of written communication. Level 1 (1-3 marks): basic, one-sided or generic points with limited technical vocabulary. Level 2 (4-7 marks): satisfactory coverage of both advantages and disadvantages, competent technical terms, coherent organisation. Level 3 (8-10 marks): comprehensive, balanced evaluation covering span/flexibility, erection/fabrication, suitability for building height, and a clear comparison with a rectangular framed alternative, with excellent technical vocabulary and structure; 4 of the total marks awarded for quality of written communication. Max 10. Overall max 26.