**(b)** Describe two advantages of using biological control methods rather than chemical pesticides on a crop. [2.78]
**(c)** Suggest why a farmer might choose an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach instead of relying solely on chemical control. [2]
查看答案詳解收起答案詳解
解題
**(b)** Two key advantages of biological control over chemical methods are:
1. **Target Specificity:** Biological control agents (such as ladybirds or parasitic wasps) typically target only the specific pest species, sparing non-target organisms like bees, beneficial soil microbes, and local wildlife.
2. **No Chemical Residues:** Since no synthetic chemicals are applied, there are no toxic residues left on harvested crops, which makes the food safer for consumption and avoids environmental contamination.
**(c)** Relying solely on chemicals can lead to rapid development of pesticide resistance in insect populations, secondary pest outbreaks due to the destruction of natural predators, and high recurrent input costs. An IPM approach combines cultural, physical, biological, and target-specific chemical tactics to manage pests sustainably below an economic threshold, preserving the environment and reducing input costs.
評分準則
- Definition: Pesticide is absorbed by the plant's leaves/roots/tissue [1]
- Translocation: Chemical is transported through the vascular system (xylem/phloem) to all parts of the plant [1]
- Action: Sucking pests ingest the toxic sap/chemical while feeding, leading to death [1]
**(b)** Up to 2.78 marks:
- Any two advantages described (1.39 marks each):
- High specificity / does not kill beneficial insects or non-target wildlife [1.39]
- No chemical residues on crops, making them safer for consumers [1.39]
- Pests do not easily develop resistance to predators/pathogens [1.39]
- Self-sustaining once established, lowering long-term labor and input costs [1.39]
**(c)** Up to 2 marks:
- Any two reasons suggested (1 mark each):
- Minimizes development of chemical resistance in pests [1]
- Reduces negative impacts on soil fertility, water systems, and local ecosystems [1]
- More economically sustainable/cost-effective in the long run [1]
- Decreases farm worker exposure to toxic chemicals [1]