題目 1 · Extended Response
30 分You recently completed a two-week internship at a local company as part of your school's work experience program. You want to share your experience—including the valuable professional skills you learned, the challenges you faced in adapting to a professional workplace environment, and your advice for future interns—with your school community.
Write a text in which you reflect on this experience and provide guidance to your peers.
Choose the most appropriate text type from the options below:
- Blog post
- Formal letter
- Proposal
Write between 250 and 400 words. Adopt the appropriate text type, register, and tone.
Write a text in which you reflect on this experience and provide guidance to your peers.
Choose the most appropriate text type from the options below:
- Blog post
- Formal letter
- Proposal
Write between 250 and 400 words. Adopt the appropriate text type, register, and tone.
查看答案詳解收起答案詳解
解題
### Model Response Outline (Blog Post)
**Title:** Stepping into the Professional World: My Two-Week Internship Journey
**Introduction:**
- Engage the audience (fellow students) with an inviting opening about the transition from the classroom to the corporate office.
- State the purpose: sharing experiences from a recent two-week internship.
**Body Paragraph 1: Skills and Highlights:**
- Describe the tasks performed during the internship.
- Detail specific skills developed (e.g., time management, communication, digital collaboration tools).
**Body Paragraph 2: Challenges Faced:**
- Discuss the transition challenges (e.g., navigating workplace hierarchy, maintaining focus during long working hours, adapting to professional dress codes).
**Body Paragraph 3: Tips and Advice for Peers:**
- Provide concrete tips for future student interns (e.g., ask questions, be punctual, show initiative).
**Conclusion:**
- Summarize the value of work experience programs.
- Invite readers to leave comments or ask questions below the post.
---
### Conceptual Understanding & Text Type Conventions (Blog Post):
- **Format:** Catchy title, author name or username, date (optional), clear paragraphing, bullet points for readability, invitation for comments at the end.
- **Tone/Register:** Semi-formal or informal, warm, reflective, and encouraging.
- **Perspective:** First-person ('I', 'we').
**Title:** Stepping into the Professional World: My Two-Week Internship Journey
**Introduction:**
- Engage the audience (fellow students) with an inviting opening about the transition from the classroom to the corporate office.
- State the purpose: sharing experiences from a recent two-week internship.
**Body Paragraph 1: Skills and Highlights:**
- Describe the tasks performed during the internship.
- Detail specific skills developed (e.g., time management, communication, digital collaboration tools).
**Body Paragraph 2: Challenges Faced:**
- Discuss the transition challenges (e.g., navigating workplace hierarchy, maintaining focus during long working hours, adapting to professional dress codes).
**Body Paragraph 3: Tips and Advice for Peers:**
- Provide concrete tips for future student interns (e.g., ask questions, be punctual, show initiative).
**Conclusion:**
- Summarize the value of work experience programs.
- Invite readers to leave comments or ask questions below the post.
---
### Conceptual Understanding & Text Type Conventions (Blog Post):
- **Format:** Catchy title, author name or username, date (optional), clear paragraphing, bullet points for readability, invitation for comments at the end.
- **Tone/Register:** Semi-formal or informal, warm, reflective, and encouraging.
- **Perspective:** First-person ('I', 'we').
評分準則
Students are assessed against three criteria:
### Criterion A: Language (12 Marks)
- **9–12 marks:** Command of the language is highly effective. Vocabulary is appropriate and varied. Grammar is accurate with a wide range of complex structures.
- **5–8 marks:** Command of the language is generally effective. Vocabulary is appropriate to the task. Some complex structures are attempted successfully; errors do not impede communication.
- **1–4 marks:** Command of the language is limited. Vocabulary is basic. Grammatical errors are frequent and occasionally impede meaning.
### Criterion B: Message (12 Marks)
- **9–12 marks:** All key aspects of the task are fully developed (skills learned, challenges faced, and advice to peers). Information is organized logically with smooth transitions.
- **5–8 marks:** Most aspects of the task are addressed, though some may be developed more than others. The structure is generally logical with simple transition words.
- **1–4 marks:** The response misses key elements of the prompt or lacks development. Ideas are disorganized or repetitive.
### Criterion C: Conceptual Understanding (6 Marks)
- **5–6 marks:** The chosen text type (Blog post) is highly appropriate. The register and tone are consistently fitting for a peer audience. The blog post formatting (title, intro, reader interaction) is fully evident.
- **3–4 marks:** The text type is suitable, but there are minor inconsistencies in register or missing conventions of a blog post (e.g., missing a clear heading or interactive closing).
- **1–2 marks:** The text type selected is inappropriate (e.g., a formal letter or proposal is written instead), or the tone is completely unsuited to the intended audience.
### Criterion A: Language (12 Marks)
- **9–12 marks:** Command of the language is highly effective. Vocabulary is appropriate and varied. Grammar is accurate with a wide range of complex structures.
- **5–8 marks:** Command of the language is generally effective. Vocabulary is appropriate to the task. Some complex structures are attempted successfully; errors do not impede communication.
- **1–4 marks:** Command of the language is limited. Vocabulary is basic. Grammatical errors are frequent and occasionally impede meaning.
### Criterion B: Message (12 Marks)
- **9–12 marks:** All key aspects of the task are fully developed (skills learned, challenges faced, and advice to peers). Information is organized logically with smooth transitions.
- **5–8 marks:** Most aspects of the task are addressed, though some may be developed more than others. The structure is generally logical with simple transition words.
- **1–4 marks:** The response misses key elements of the prompt or lacks development. Ideas are disorganized or repetitive.
### Criterion C: Conceptual Understanding (6 Marks)
- **5–6 marks:** The chosen text type (Blog post) is highly appropriate. The register and tone are consistently fitting for a peer audience. The blog post formatting (title, intro, reader interaction) is fully evident.
- **3–4 marks:** The text type is suitable, but there are minor inconsistencies in register or missing conventions of a blog post (e.g., missing a clear heading or interactive closing).
- **1–2 marks:** The text type selected is inappropriate (e.g., a formal letter or proposal is written instead), or the tone is completely unsuited to the intended audience.