Read the following excerpt from 'Shuo Yuan' and answer the question.
Duke Ping of Jin asked Shi Kuang, 'I am seventy years old and wish to study, but I fear it is already too late.' Shi Kuang replied, 'Why not light a candle?' Duke Ping said, 'How can a minister joke with his ruler?'
What does Duke Ping's remark, 'How can a minister joke with his ruler', reflect about his mindset at that moment?
- A.Feeling insecure about his advanced age, believing Shi Kuang was mocking his incompetence.
- B.Misunderstanding Shi Kuang's metaphor of 'lighting a candle', thinking Shi Kuang was joking or teasing him.
- C.Testing Shi Kuang's loyalty to see if he dared to offer direct advice.
- D.Opposing ministers reading at night, viewing it as a neglect of duty.
Worked solution
Duke Ping expressed his desire to study but feared it was too late due to his age. Shi Kuang suggested 'lighting a candle'. Duke Ping interpreted this literally as lighting a lamp at night, and found it to be an absurd joke given the seriousness of the topic. He thus rebuked Shi Kuang for joking with his sovereign. This reflects that he misunderstood Shi Kuang's metaphor and thought he was teasing him. Therefore, the answer is B.
Marking scheme
Select the correct answer B to obtain 2 marks; other options receive 0 marks.
Following the previous excerpt, Shi Kuang explained: 'To love learning in old age is like the brightness of a lit candle. How does the brightness of a lit candle compare to walking in the dark?'
Which of the following best translates the meaning of '炳燭之明,孰與昧行乎' in the context?
- A.How does walking with the illumination of a lit candle compare to groping forward in the dark?
- B.Is a faint candlelight not more dangerous than running alone on a pitch-black road?
- C.Since you hold a bright candle in your hand, why must you still walk blindly in the dark?
- D.Although lighting a candle brings brightness, who can guarantee not getting lost in the dark?
Worked solution
'孰與' is a fixed classical Chinese structure for comparison, meaning 'compared with..., which is...'. '昧行' means walking in the dark. The entire sentence means: 'How does the brightness of a lit candle compare to walking in the dark?' Shi Kuang uses this to show that although learning in old age has limited light (like a candle), it is far better than not learning and groping in ignorance (walking in the dark). Thus, the answer is A.
Marking scheme
Select the correct answer A to obtain 2 marks; other options receive 0 marks.
Read the following excerpt from a modern prose piece:
'The dim, yellowish street lamp at the entrance of the alley is like a tired night watchman, swaying its faint light in the wind and rain, attempting to detain every hurried homecomer with its warm orange glow.'
Which of the following analyses of the writing techniques and effects in this passage is the most accurate?
- A.It employs personification and simile to vividly portray the warmth and spiritual solace the street lamp brings to homecomers in the cold night rain.
- B.It employs metonymy and contrast to highlight the tragic plight faced by marginalized urban groups on a stormy night.
- C.It employs pun and parallelism to criticize the cold, hurried attitude of modern city dwellers who lack neighborly warmth.
- D.It employs symbolism and hyperbole to imply that the homecomers have developed an inescapable attachment to the clamorous outer world.
Worked solution
The passage compares the 'street lamp' to 'a tired night watchman' (using 'like' as a simile) and endows it with human actions and emotions such as being 'tired' and 'attempting to detain... with warm orange glow' (personification). The 'warm orange glow' of the lamp swaying in the 'wind and rain' offers comfort to the 'hurried homecomers', representing warmth and solace. Thus, the answer is A.
Marking scheme
Select the correct answer A to obtain 2 marks; other options receive 0 marks.
Read the following classical excerpt and answer the question.
'When King Zhao of Chu lost his kingdom, the sheep-butcher Yue fled. When the King regained his kingdom, he prepared to reward his followers, including Yue. Yue said, "Your Majesty lost the kingdom, which was not my fault, so I did not choose to die for it. Your Majesty regained the kingdom, which was not my achievement, so I do not seek a reward for it." The King said, "Force it upon him!" Yue said, "When Your Majesty lost the kingdom, I lost my butcher shop. When Your Majesty regained the kingdom, I regained my shop. My livelihood has already been restored, so what reward is there to receive?"'
Which moral doctrine of Mencius in 'Fish I Want' is best exemplified by Yue's refusal of the reward?
- A.The 'mind of shame and dislike' in refusing 'food handed out in contempt', preserving dignity and integrity even in poverty.
- B.Not losing one's original mind to material desires, valuing righteousness (righteousness) over unearned material gains (life/benefits).
- C.A gentleman should treat others with 'benevolence', preserving the rites of ruler-minister relationships and social order during chaotic times.
- D.'Previously would rather die than accept, now accepts for the beauty of mansions', pointing out that people easily lose their original mind in wealth.
Worked solution
Yue believed that 'Your Majesty lost the kingdom, which was not my fault... Your Majesty regained the kingdom, which was not my achievement', and resolutely refused to receive rewards without merit. He valued personal virtue and righteousness over unearned rewards. This aligns with Mencius's advocacy in 'Fish I Want' to value righteousness over benefit, and not to lose one's 'original mind' due to material temptations (such as huge salaries of ten thousand zhong). Yue upheld his principles and was unmoved by unjustified gains. Therefore, the answer is B.
Marking scheme
Select the correct answer B to obtain 2 marks; other options receive 0 marks.
A modern essayist describes their experience climbing Lion Rock in Hong Kong:
'When I finally stood on the peak of this nameless hill, looking down at the dense reinforced concrete forest below, the wild wind blew away the chest tightness accumulated for days. At that moment, I was no longer a busy gear in the city, but merged with the mountain, the wind, and the drifting clouds, forgetting time and forgetting my own existence.'
Which state of mind or relationship between self and nature described by Liu Zongyuan in 'First Visit to West Mountain' is most similar to the author's state of mind in this passage?
- A.'It was then that my travels truly began' — the awakening and reflection on past travels where one merely lingered in common landscapes.
- B.'The mind becomes concentrated, the body released, secretly uniting with all things' — the state of 'selflessness' where self and nature merge, forgetting physical constraints and worldly sorrows.
- C.'The soils of several prefectures lay beneath my seat' — the magnanimous and heroic spirit of looking down from a high position.
- D.'Pouring wine to the brim, falling into drunken stupor' — drowning sorrows in wine, escaping political reality in a semi-conscious state.
Worked solution
The modern essayist describes 'I was no longer a busy gear in the city, but merged with the mountain, the wind, and the drifting clouds, forgetting time and forgetting my own existence'. This is an aesthetic experience of forgetting oneself and merging with nature. This is completely consistent with Liu Zongyuan's feeling of 'The mind becomes concentrated, the body released, secretly uniting with all things' after climbing the peak of West Mountain (meaning the spirit is concentrated, the physical form is liberated, and one unconsciously merges with the universe, reaching the ultimate state of self-transcendence). Thus, the answer is B.
Marking scheme
Select the correct answer B to obtain 2 marks; other options receive 0 marks.
Question 6 · Table Completion
4 marksBased on Text 1 and Text 2, the two authors have different reflections on the disappearance of 'old city streets'. Complete the following contrast table: (i) Focus of Text 1: [ ] (2 marks); Emotional attitude of Text 1: Nostalgic and reluctant. (ii) Focus of Text 2: The inevitability of urban development; Emotional attitude of Text 2: [ ] (2 marks).
Answer
(i) 關注人與人之間的溫情、鄰里情誼的流失 / The loss of interpersonal warmth and neighborhood relationships. (ii) 抱持豁達、樂觀的面對態度,期盼城市新生的希望 / An open-minded and optimistic attitude, looking forward to the renewal of the city.
Worked solution
(i) The author of Text 1 focuses on the emotional level, pointing out that the demolition of old streets leads to the disappearance of deep neighborhood warmth and shared memories. Thus, answers related to the loss of warmth or community are correct. (ii) The author of Text 2 holds a more rational historical perspective, believing the loss of the old is an opportunity for urban renewal. The attitude is open-minded, so positive, open, or optimistic attitudes are correct.
Marking scheme
(i) Award 2 marks for mentioning 'the loss of interpersonal warmth/neighborhood relationships'; award 1 mark for merely mentioning 'demolition of old buildings'; 0 marks for irrelevant or incorrect answers. (ii) Award 2 marks for 'open-minded/optimistic/hopeful for renewal'; award 1 mark for 'reluctant acceptance'; 0 marks for irrelevant answers.
Question 7 · Contrast Tracking
4 marksAccording to Text 3 (Classical Prose), Duke Jing and Yanzi contrast in their thinking and actions when dealing with the drought. Complete the following contrast table: (i) Duke Jing's reaction/action: [ ] (2 marks); Duke Jing's character traits: Superstitious, anxious, lacking pragmatic foresight. (ii) Yanzi's reaction/action: Believes deities are useless, advocates opening granaries and helping citizens; Yanzi's character traits: [ ] (2 marks).
Answer
(i) 迷信神明,企圖通過祭祀山神及河神來求雨以解決旱災 / Superstitious belief in deities, attempting to pray for rain by sacrificing to mountain and river gods. (ii) 理性務實、愛民如子(或具備治國智慧)/ Rational, pragmatic, and caring for the people (or possessing political wisdom).
Worked solution
(i) When facing natural disasters, Duke Jing failed to propose substantive social relief measures, instead superstitiously attempting to sacrifice to inanimate natural spirits (mountains, rivers), reflecting his anxiety and ignorance. (ii) Yanzi opposed the wasteful sacrifices and proposed concrete relief plans, demonstrating people-oriented rationality and governance wisdom.
Marking scheme
(i) Award 2 marks for 'sacrificing to mountain and river deities to pray for rain'; award 1 mark for merely 'praying to gods'; 0 marks for irrelevant answers. (ii) Award 2 marks for 'rational, pragmatic, and loving/caring for the people'; award 1 mark for 'smart/kind'; 0 marks for irrelevant answers.
Question 8 · Short Answer / Value Explanation
3 marksIn the first unseen modern prose, the author spends significant length describing the "chipped ceramic bowl." Analyze how the author uses this object to project his nostalgia and affection for his grandfather.
Answer
The chipped ceramic bowl serves as a vessel of warm family memories, a symbol of the regret of his grandfather's passing, and a token of emotional inheritance.
Worked solution
1. The chipped bowl carries the warm memories of the grandfather and the author dining together, establishing a concrete link to the past. 2. The 'chip' symbolizes the imperfections of life and the irreversible regret of his grandfather's departure. 3. The author's continued preservation and use of this bowl symbolises his emotional attachment and the continuation of his grandfather's spirit of simplicity in his own life.
Marking scheme
Award marks based on the following three levels of explanation (maximum 3 marks):
- Mentioning that the bowl represents memories of dining with his grandfather (1 mark);
- Explaining the symbolic meaning of the 'chip' (loss/regret of passing) (1 mark);
- Explaining the author's act of preservation/use as emotional inheritance and deep longing (1 mark).
Question 9 · Short Answer / Value Explanation
3 marksIn the second unseen modern prose, the protagonist gives up the bustling city life and chooses to return to his hometown to plant trees. What kind of life value does this choice reflect? Explain with reference to the text.
Answer
This choice reflects a value system that prioritizes inner peace, spiritual fulfillment, and harmony with nature over material wealth and social status.
Worked solution
1. It reflects a pursuit of spiritual peace and simplicity over material wealth, as he leaves the highly competitive city. 2. It demonstrates a belief in harmony with nature, finding purpose in nurturing trees and witnessing the slow, organic growth of life. 3. It shows a definition of self-worth based on long-term ecological contribution rather than immediate financial gain or urban social status.
Marking scheme
Award marks based on the depth of explanation (maximum 3 marks):
- Clearly state the core value (e.g., pursuing inner peace / rejecting materialism) (1 mark);
- Connect the value to the action of returning to the hometown (1 mark);
- Connect the value to the action of planting trees / nurturing nature (1 mark).
Question 10 · Short Answer / Value Explanation
3 marksAccording to the unseen classical prose, why did Master Meng refuse the money presented by the local governor? Explain with reference to his words and actions.
Answer
Master Meng refused the money because he believed in maintaining his moral integrity, avoiding unmerited wealth, and keeping his reputation unsullied.
Worked solution
1. Master Meng believed that accepting money without performing any service or duty is unjust ('unearned wealth'), which violates his moral principles. 2. He valued his clean reputation and integrity over material wealth, fearing that accepting the governor's gift would make him look greedy. 3. His resolute refusal and plain living demonstrate his commitment to self-cultivation and remaining untainted by worldly temptations.
Marking scheme
Award marks based on the following criteria (maximum 3 marks):
- Identifying the moral principle of 'no reward without merit' / avoiding unearned wealth (1 mark);
- Explaining his concern for preserving his reputation and integrity (1 mark);
- Discussing his attitude of prioritizing righteousness/moral self-discipline over material temptation (1 mark).
Question 11 · Short Answer / Value Explanation
3 marksSynthesizing the first and second unseen modern prose pieces, what common attitude do the "grandfather" in Text 1 and the "protagonist" in Text 2 demonstrate when facing the impact of modernization? Explain.
Answer
Both characters demonstrate a resilient attitude of "holding fast to one's original beliefs and refusing to blindly conform to modern utilitarianism."
Worked solution
1. Both share the common attitude of 'holding fast to their original beliefs and resisting modern utilitarianism.' 2. In Text 1, the grandfather insists on the traditional, slow craft of mending porcelain despite the cheapness and convenience of mass-produced modern plastic wares. 3. In Text 2, the protagonist willingly abandons a fast-paced, high-paying corporate life in the city to restore nature in his hometown. Both prioritize intrinsic spiritual and cultural values over modern efficiency and material gains.
Marking scheme
Award marks based on the following three components (maximum 3 marks):
- Generalizing the common attitude (e.g., preserving inner values/resisting modern conformity) (1 mark);
- Explaining how the grandfather in Text 1 embodies this attitude (insisting on old craft over mass production) (1 mark);
- Explaining how the protagonist in Text 2 embodies this attitude (abandoning urban career for organic growth) (1 mark).
Question 12 · essay
4 marksIn Modern Prose (1), the author states that "only by guarding the backyard of one's soul amidst the clamor of fame and fortune can one maintain the dignity of character." How does this resonate with Mencius's concept of "not losing one's original mind" (不失其本心) in "Fish I Want"? Analyze with reference to both texts.
Answer
Both emphasize that when facing material temptations, one must hold onto their inner moral bottom line and authentic self. Guarding the backyard of one's soul in Prose (1) means maintaining inner peace and personal dignity free from worldly utility; while Mencius's "not losing one's original mind" means adhering to the innate sense of shame and choosing righteousness over life, rather than accepting things against propriety for high offices and rich emoluments. Both prioritize the purity of spiritual values over external fame and wealth.
Worked solution
1. Explain the meaning of "guarding the backyard of one's soul" in Prose (1): keeping one's true self and independent dignity in a materialistic and clamorous world (1 mark).
2. Explain Mencius's "not losing one's original mind" in "Fish I Want": adhering to one's innate sense of shame, benevolence, and righteousness, without being swayed by wealth or life-and-death situations (1 mark).
3. Analyze the commonality: Both advocate that when facing external temptations (fame, fortune, material wealth), one must prioritize inner spiritual integrity and dignity (1 mark); both refuse to let external material gains distort or enslave the self, demonstrating an insistence on spiritual autonomy and moral agency (1 mark).
Marking scheme
- Accurately analyze Prose (1)'s "guarding the backyard of one's soul" (1 mark).
- Accurately analyze Mencius's "not losing one's original mind" (1 mark).
- Explain the commonalities between the two (refusing to be enslaved by fame/wealth, maintaining inner dignity) (2 marks).
- Note: If candidate only lists the content of the two texts without comparative analysis, a maximum of 2 marks will be awarded.
Question 13 · essay
4 marksIn Classical Prose (3), during the "tassel-breaking banquet," King Zhuang of Chu ordered all officials to break off their tassels and refused to investigate who harassed his consort. From the perspective of "Junzi" (exemplary person) in The Analects, how does King Zhuang's action demonstrate the character of a Junzi? Analyze with reference to the text and Confucian thoughts.
Answer
King Zhuang's actions embody the Junzi qualities of "magnanimity toward others" and "helping others to realize what is good." He empathized with his subordinate's drunken mistake and refrained from punishing a meritorious officer for private grievances or love. This not only demonstrated the self-restraint of a Junzi, but also won the loyalty of his subjects, showing how benevolence wins the multitude.
Worked solution
1. Point out the Junzi trait of "magnanimity/benevolence": A Junzi is forgiving, empathetic, and seeks to help others improve (1 mark).
2. Analyze King Zhuang's behavior: During the banquet, when a subordinate committed a drunken faux pas (harassing his consort), King Zhuang did not rage but ordered everyone to break their tassels, saving the subordinate's face and life (1 mark).
3. Relate to the Confucian concept of "Junzi": This embodies the spirit of "The Junzi helps others to realize what is good" or "Do not do to others what you would not have them do to you" in The Analects. King Zhuang restrained his personal anger and showed empathy, winning others over by virtue (2 marks).
Marking scheme
- Propose the traits of a Junzi (e.g., magnanimity, benevolence, self-restraint) (1 mark).
- Combine with the specific plot in Classical Prose (3) where King Zhuang forgave the subordinate at the "tassel-breaking banquet" (1 mark).
- Discuss how this action aligns with the Confucian ideals of a Junzi, such as "helping others realize what is good," "self-restraint," or "winning the multitude through magnanimity" (2 marks).
- Deductions may be made for poor phrasing or misunderstandings.
Question 14 · essay
4 marksModern Prose (1) advocates that "leaving blank spaces in life amidst busyness is the only way to reclaim the subjectivity of life," whereas Ah Keung, the protagonist in Modern Prose (2), believes that "to live is to run non-stop; pausing is a waste of life." Which life attitude do you agree with more? Discuss with reference to daily life.
Answer
I agree more with the attitude of "leaving blank spaces." In today's fast-paced society, people often run blindly like Ah Keung, losing their true selves. Leaving blank spaces is not laziness, but a way to settle the soul, see directions clearly, and recharge. For instance, appropriate rest and solitude outside of academic study allow us to go further and live with greater purpose.
Worked solution
Candidates can choose either side, provided they support their view with solid arguments, referencing both texts and daily life.
If agreeing with "leaving blank spaces":
- Explain why "blank spaces" are important for life's subjectivity: Pausing allows reflection on the meaning of life rather than being enslaved by external goals (1 mark).
- Contrast with the drawback of "running non-stop": Blindly running drains the soul, leading to emptiness (1 mark).
- Connect with daily life: e.g., in academic life, studying without pausing for reflection leads to low efficiency; leaving blank spaces fosters creativity and allows one to appreciate life's beauty (2 marks).
If agreeing with "running non-stop":
- Explain why "running" manifests life's value: Life is limited, and only through active striving can one realize oneself and make the most of youth (1 mark).
- Contrast with the negative aspect of "blank spaces": Too much blank space may degenerate into escapism or passivity (1 mark).
- Connect with daily life: e.g., young people should make every effort in their studies and careers while they are energetic; overcoming obstacles and achieving goals brings a sense of fulfillment and social recognition (2 marks).
Marking scheme
- Clearly state the stance (agreeing with "blank spaces" or "running non-stop") (0 marks, but serves as the basis of the essay).
- Combine with Prose (1) or (2) to reasonably explain the positive significance of the chosen attitude (1 mark).
- Comparatively analyze the limitations of the alternative attitude (1 mark).
- Integrate with daily life to concretely demonstrate the feasibility and value of the chosen attitude (2 marks).
- Candidates who only elaborate on one aspect without comparison or daily-life connection will receive a maximum of 2 marks.
Question 15 · essay
4 marksIn Modern Prose (2), the father quietly gives up his painting dream for his family and willingly works as an ordinary blue-collar worker; in Classical Prose (3), the minister Ji Liang speaks out frankly to the king despite personal danger during a national crisis. Both demonstrate a spirit of "responsibility-bearing." Which kind of responsibility do you find more commendable? Discuss your view.
Answer
I find the father's "quiet sacrifice" more commendable. Admonishing the king is risky but carries heroic glory and historical acclaim; conversely, the father's sacrifice is silent, repetitive, and anonymous. He faces the pain of shattered dreams and daily burdens without seeking reward or fame. This thorough self-sacrifice out of love in mundane life requires far greater inner strength and enduring resilience.
Worked solution
If arguing that "the father's quiet sacrifice" is more commendable:
- Analyze the traits of the father's responsibility: long-term, routine, silent, and anonymous (1 mark).
- Contrast with Ji Liang's responsibility: Although dangerous, it carries heroic weight, which often wins moral satisfaction and historical acclaim (1 mark).
- Argue why it is commendable: Erasing one's dream day after day and embracing mediocrity for the family requires a deeper love and immense psychological resilience, without any expectation of public reward (2 marks).
If arguing that "Ji Liang's frank admonition" is more commendable:
- Analyze the traits of Ji Liang's responsibility: facing absolute power and the test of life and death, requiring immense courage and wisdom (1 mark).
- Contrast with the father's responsibility: It falls within the private domain of family duty, which, despite sacrifice, rarely involves immediate threats to life (1 mark).
- Argue why it is commendable: Under autocratic rule, frank admonitions could bring ruin to one's entire family. Ji Liang cast aside personal and family survival for the state and people, demonstrating a grand righteousness and courage that transcends the small self (2 marks).
Marking scheme
- Clearly state the stance (1 mark).
- Accurately analyze the nature and differences between the two types of "responsibility" based on both texts (1 mark).
- Thoroughly argue why the chosen stance is "more commendable" (e.g., in terms of the cost of sacrifice, motivation, impact) (2 marks).
- Deductions may be made for insufficient comparison or straying from the topic.
Question 16 · essay
4 marksIn Modern Prose (1), the author laments that "people are often bound by labels bestowed by society (such as positions, fame, social status), thereby losing their true selves." What is the philosophical connection between this and Zhuangzi's advocacy of "no-self, no-merit, no-fame" (無己、無功、無名) in Carefree Journey? Elaborate with reference to both texts.
Answer
The two closely align philosophically, as both believe that external fame and societal labels are shackles that bind the soul, and only by discarding these can one achieve spiritual freedom. Prose (1) points out how social labels alienate the self; Zhuangzi's "no-self, no-merit, no-fame" acts as the perfect remedy. It advocates not clinging to subjective prejudices (no-self), not pursuing worldly achievements (no-merit), and not seeking social reputation (no-fame), thereby achieving the ultimate state of "carefree ease."
Worked solution
1. Explain the core view of Prose (1): Social labels, fame, and fortune are external constraints that distort the soul and cause the loss of subjectivity in order to conform to societal expectations (1 mark).
2. Explain the philosophy of "no-self, no-merit, no-fame" in Zhuangzi's Carefree Journey: "No-self" means discarding selfish biases; "No-merit" means not pursuing worldly achievements; "No-fame" means not seeking illusionary social reputation (1 mark).
3. Elaborate on the philosophical connection: The "constraint of labels" in Prose (1) is precisely the "merit" and "fame" that Zhuangzi seeks to dismantle. Both oppose "the mind being enslaved by external things" and advocate returning to the authenticity of life to achieve spiritual transcendence and liberation (2 marks).
Marking scheme
- Explain Prose (1)'s view on how social labels restrict the self (1 mark).
- Accurately explain the meaning of Zhuangzi's "no-self, no-merit, no-fame" (1 mark).
- Deeply discuss the inner philosophical connection between the two regarding "opposing the mind's enslavement by external things" and "pursuing spiritual freedom and the true self" (2 marks).
- If candidate only introduces the two texts side-by-side without explaining the "inner connection," a maximum of 2 marks will be awarded.
Question 17 · essay
4 marksIn Classical Prose (3), during a crisis, Zi Lu insisted that "a Junzi dies with his cap on" (君子死,冠不免). He was killed by enemy soldiers while tying his cap tassel. Some criticize Zi Lu as "foolishly clinging to rituals," while others praise him for "resolutely defending his dignity with righteous courage." Based on the Confucian views on "Ritual" (禮) and "Righteousness" (義), which evaluation do you agree with? Analyze your stance.
Answer
I agree with "resolutely defending his dignity with righteous courage." From a Confucian perspective, "Ritual" is the manifestation of inner dignity and moral order. At the verge of death, Zi Lu chose to tie his tassel to practice "Ritual" with his life, prioritizing moral dignity over physical life. This embodies Confucius's ideal of "sacrificing life for benevolence and righteousness," demonstrating an ultimate adherence to faith rather than foolishness.
Worked solution
If agreeing with "resolutely defending his dignity with righteous courage" (positive evaluation):
- Explain the deep Confucian meaning of "Ritual": Ritual is the defense for personal dignity. Zi Lu's action of straightening his cap was a refusal to submit to chaos and humiliation, maintaining the final decency of a Junzi (1 mark).
- Connect with the value of "Righteousness": Confucianism advocates prioritizing righteousness. When life conflicts with moral dignity, one should sacrifice life for righteousness, exhibiting a noble spirit of refusing to live in disgrace (1 mark).
- Conclusion: This is the ultimate practice of faith and moral values, possessing the beauty of a tragic hero (2 marks).
If agreeing with "foolishly clinging to rituals" (negative evaluation):
- Explain the Confucian concept of "flexibility/expediency" (權變): Although Confucianism values ritual, it also stresses adaptability. In life-and-death situations, one should preserve life to serve the state later, rather than dying for a cap (1 mark).
- Connect with the reasonable application of "Righteousness": Righteousness means appropriateness. In war, preserving one's life to accomplish greater tasks is the grand righteousness; dying merely to tie a tassel represents petty courage (1 mark).
- Conclusion: Zi Lu failed to distinguish between the essential and the trivial, prioritizing external ritual forms over life, showing a lack of adaptability (2 marks).
Marking scheme
- Clearly state the stance (0 marks, but serves as the basis of the essay).
- Accurately apply Confucian philosophical concepts of "Ritual" and "Righteousness" (such as "sacrificing life for righteousness," "dying to achieve benevolence," or the Confucian view of "expediency/flexibility") (2 marks).
- Make a reasonable analysis in relation to Zi Lu's specific situation facing death (2 marks).
- If the discussion is superficial or fails to closely connect with Confucian thought, a maximum of 2 marks will be awarded.