题目 1 · structured-essay
25 分1 (a) Study the following list of terms associated with population studies. 'Emigration' 'Immigration' 'Internal migration' 'Net migration' (i) Define the term 'emigration'. [1] (ii) Identify two pull factors that attract rural migrants to major cities in LEDCs. [2] (iii) Describe three ways in which rural-to-urban migration can benefit the economy of the receiving city. [3] (iv) Describe the difficulties migrants from rural areas may face when they first arrive in a major city in an LEDC. [4] (b) (i) Explain how the age and gender structure of migrants typically differs from the non-migrant population in a rural area of origin. [3] (ii) Explain how rapid out-migration can lead to negative consequences for the source region (the area from which people migrate). [5] (c) For a named country you have studied, explain the causes of a major international migration flow. [7]
查看答案详解收起答案详解
解题
1(a)(i) Emigration is the movement of people out of a country to live in another country permanently. 1(a)(ii) Pull factors: More job opportunities with higher wages; Better educational facilities/schools; Superior healthcare/modern hospitals. 1(a)(iii) Benefits to destination city: Expands the labour force with young, motivated workers; Drives local businesses and services by increasing demand; Migrants pay taxes which funds urban infrastructure. 1(a)(iv) Difficulties: Lack of affordable housing leads to living in informal settlements/slums; High competition for jobs can result in unemployment or low-paying informal work; Language barriers or cultural differences leading to social isolation; Poor access to clean water, electricity, and sanitation. 1(b)(i) Migrants are typically young adults (aged 15 to 35), leading to an overrepresentation of working-age groups compared to the aging population left behind. They are also often predominantly male in certain regions, leaving more females in the source area. 1(b)(ii) Consequences for source area: 'Brain drain' as skilled and educated workers leave; Loss of the active, working-age population leaves an aging, dependent population; Decline in local food production/agriculture due to lack of labour; Closure of local businesses and schools due to a declining population; However, positive remittances can be sent back. 1(c) Case study: Migration from Mexico to the USA. Causes: Push factors include high levels of poverty in rural Mexican states like Chiapas, lack of formal employment opportunities, low wages (averaging 5 dollars/day), and agricultural instability due to drought. Pull factors include the prospect of higher wages in the US (agriculture, construction), family reunification (established diasporas in California/Texas), and better social services (education, healthcare).
评分标准
1(a)(i) 1 mark for correct definition (movement of people leaving a country to settle elsewhere). 1(a)(ii) 2 @ 1 mark for pull factors (e.g., higher paid jobs, better schooling, medical care). 1(a)(iii) 3 @ 1 mark for economic benefits (e.g., provides a larger market, increases tax revenues, fills low-skilled labour shortages). 1(a)(iv) 4 @ 1 mark for rural migrant difficulties (e.g., building squatter huts, lack of clean piped water, discrimination, high cost of living). 1(b)(i) 3 @ 1 mark for explaining differences (e.g., higher proportion of males, younger age profile (15-35), lowers the average age of urban areas). 1(b)(ii) 5 @ 1 mark (or development) for negative impacts on source area (e.g., decline in birth rate due to fewer young couples [1], lack of innovation/development [1], underuse of local resources [1]). Max 4 if no development. 1(c) Case Study Levels Marking: Level 1 (1-3 marks): Simple statements explaining causes of migration (e.g., lack of jobs, poverty, better wages). Level 2 (4-6 marks): Developed statements with specific details of causes (e.g., low agricultural yields due to climate variation in rural states [4], sending remittances to improve housing [5]). Level 3 (7 marks): Developed statements with clear place-specific detail (naming specific source/destination states like Zacatecas and California, or citing precise wage disparities).